Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CAD/CAM
1.CNC
(Kolarevic,2003) 2. (Welch,1994; Turkiyyah, 1997 ; Lee,
2005 ) 3. ( Glymph , 2002; Shelden,2002 ; Schmiedhofer, 2008)
CNC
(LIM,
2006; Lee,2005 ;Turkiyyah ,1997)
( Shelden,2002 ;
Schmiedhofer, 2008 ; Baldassini, 2008)
1.
2. 3.
1: (U,V)
2: U,V
3: sweep NURBS
4: Form Finding Shelden,2002
5:
6:
53
41 24
50%
I
The development of computer technology and new media in architecture has given new
rise to the creativity of designers and lead architecture to new break through in construction. The
making of CAD/CAM free-form structures, can be divided into the making of curved surfaces
and the skeleton. In using curved glass as the skin, methods often used are: 1. CNC for the
making of curved components (Kolarevic, 2003) 2. Triangulating curved faces and then
flattening (Welch, 1994; Turkiyyah, 1997; Lee,2005) 3. Quadrilateral Planar Facets. (Glyph , J.
2002;Shelden, 2002 ;Schmiedhofer,2008) This research paper proposes a new method for
curved-glass construction using a simple and robust geometric method.
Presently, problems encountered while making CAD/CAM surfaces are view in two dimensions:
1. Manufacturing issues: In present manufacturing, each unit is unique and needs to be made
individually. Such complexity leads to problems like mounted expenses and difficulties in
construction. ( LIM , 2006 ;Lee,2005 Turkiyyah ,1997) 2. Aesthetic issues: Triangulating , and
parallelogram framing techniques form shapes out of planar components. This constructs a
non-smooth surface for the exterior causing it lose aesthetic values.
( Shelden,2002 ;Schmiedhofer,2008 ;Baldassini,2008)Therefore, the main problem is: in order
to minimize changing the original design during construction and to construct in a simpler
fashion, how do we maximize the amount of repeated components but at the same time keep the
smoothness of the free form design?
According to the problems mentioned above, we review actual cases on curtain glass, and
then demonstrate the geometric method through procedure. At the end process and steps will be
categorized and organized into a framework for free-form glass dividend. Free-form surfaces
mentioned in this paper are to meet the restrictions: 1. free-form surface must be a glass curtain
2. curved surface must be curved in both directions. 3. the surface component is to be a curved
surface which has a constant radius of curvature. The geometric method proposed in this
research, uses a curved surface to meet the original designed shape allowing surface components
to divide surfaces into repeated components. Procedure can organized as below:
Step 1:To use a double dimension (U,Vdimension) degree 2 curve as a control element for
NU RBS.
Step 2:By adjusting the control element we execute form-finding on the “ main 3D model”
for a shape-closure to the original form. The new shape will come close to the
original and thus replace it.
Step 3:Then, divid the curved surface to while conforming these two control elements.
Step 4:Part of the new curved component will grow symmetrically due the the symmetry of
the curved line. Resulting from this symmetric, paired and identical curved
components will be found in the new shape.
The new surface constructed using this method will result in a smooth surface along with a
few repeated curved components. However, this inevitably will slightly change the shape of the
original design. Under ideal circumstances, curved components can be reduced to half the
original design.
II
I
II
III
1. 1
1.1. 1
1.2. 3
1.3. 5
2. 8
2.1. 8
2.2. CAD/CAM 11
2.3. 13
3. 21
3.1. 22
3.1.1 22
3.1.2 FORM F INDING 25
3.1.3 CAD/CAM 28
III
3.2. 32
1 33
2 37
3 UV NURBS 39
4 F ORM FINDING 40
5 41
6 43
3.3. 45
3.3.1 45
3.3.2 CAD/CAM 48
4. 51
4.1. 51
4.2. 52
4.3. 53
5. 55
IV
1.
1.1.
CAD/CAM
(fabrication) CAD/CAM
(Mitchell, 1998)CAD/CAM
tectonics
(Gao, 2004; Liu and Lim, 2008 )
CAD/CAM
1
(Kolarevic , 2003 LIM,2006 Lee,2005; Turkiyyah,
1997 ;Schmiedhofer;2008)
CAD/CAM
monocoque construction
CNC milling
CNC
milling
smooth
Gehry Conde Nast
Bernhard Franken 1999 BMW
( 1-1)
2007 BMW
( 1-2)
2
Catia (Glymph, 2002 ; Shelden,
2003)
( Schmiedhofer,2008; Pottmann et al,2006; Baldassini,2008 ;)
2007
Norman Foster
1-3 (Schiftner, 2007)
1-2 1-3
1-1 CNC milling
1.2.
(Lynn, 1995)
CNC
3
1-1 ( Shelden,2003 ; Schmiedhofer, 2008 ; Baldassini, 2008)
1-1
CNC
G0
( )
G1 G2
1-4
4
1-4 A G0 B G1 G2
1.3.
CAD/CAM
CAM
1.1
Ruled Surface
1.2
5
1 2 3
CAD/CAM
1.3
2007
(continuity)
2.1
2.3
6
2.4
3.1
(G2 )
3.2
7
2.
2.1.
2.1.1 -
( Zevi , 1981;
, 2006) Schon 1992
1900 Estereo
Estatica Utzon
(Million, 1994
8
(Kolarevic,
2003; , 2006)
CAD/CAM
2.1.2 -
1900 2000
( , 2006 )
2D
1950
9
1957John Utzon Sydney Opera House( 2-2)
Utzon
CAD/CAM
CAD/CAM
2D
CAD/CAM
CAD/CAM (Kolarevic, 2001; Mitchell, 2004; , 2001; 2005;
2007.)
( , 2003)
CAD/CAM
10
Catia CAD/CAM GT ghery tecnolige
NOX Frankert UN studio Zaha
CAD/CAM
2.2. CAD/CAM
2.2.1 CAD/CAM
1950 SAGE
(plot) 70
1. Mesh ” ” ” ”
2. 3D
3. ”(non-uniform rational B-spline, NURBS) CAD
CATIA
4. (Solid modeling) I-DEAS Unigraphic
UniSolids (CAD CAD-History) (Chris and Jimmie, 1993)
11
2. RP (Rapid Prototyping, RP) (Layered Manufacturing,
LM) 1.Concept Modeling
2.Rapid Prototyping
3. 3D scanner:
CAD (Luca and Nardin ,2002) (Seely, 2004;Friedman, 2002)
2.2.2 CAD/CAM
(Shell)
(Sapaun ,2005)
2-4 1957 John
Utzon ( 2-2)
2006
2-5
(monocoque construction)
(Lynn,1995)
monocoque construction
Monocoque Mono coque
12
(Shelden2002; 2005, Griffith2008)
2-6 2-7
2000
Jennifer ,Seely, Kolarevic 2003
2006 CAD/CAM
Gehry Franken
1. 2. 3.
4. ( 3-1) (Mitchell, 1998; Lindsey, 2001;
Kocaturk 2001; Kolarevic, 2003; Dritsas, 2004; Lee, 2005 ;Lim,2007)
2.3.
(Glymph,2002 ;
Shelden,2003) CAM
1.CNC Kolarevic, 2002 2.
13
CAM
CAD 1.
;
2.
Glymph,2002;
Shelden2003 ; Schmiedhofer,2008
CNC milling
CNC milling
CNC
RP
CNC
CNC milling
Seely, 2004
1997
CNC milling
( 2-8) (The Walt Disney
Concert Hall, 1992-97) CAM 3D CNC
milling
14
2-11 2000
Frank Gehry Conde Nast Cafeteria CNC milling
2-10
Gehry CNC
Franken, 2003)
2-8 CNC milling 2-9 Walt Disney Concert 2-10 CNC milling
Hall
15
2.3.2
( 2-11) CAD/CAM
3D 2D
NURBS
Subdived( )
(Glymph et al,2002;
Shelden, 2003;Schmiedhofer ,2008)
Welch 1994
1997 Turkiyyah
2-13
CAD
Form Z
Peper kura
( 2-15)
3D 2D ,2005
CAD/CAM
( 2-14)
16
2-13 2-14 2-15 Peper kura
(Welch,1994 ,2007
2000 AleppoZone
Laser cutter
( 2-16) Liu et al ,2002 Lim ,2004 ,2005
Massimiliano Fuksas2004 Milan Trade Fair
( 2-17)2007 BMW
Laser
cutter 2D ( 2-18)
17
2.3.3
CAM
2D
2-19
18
( Schmiedhofer , 2008 )
19
Translation Surface
Catia
( 2-22,2-23)
2-23
2-22 Quadrilateral Planar Facets
20
3.
CAD/CAM
2007 ( ,2005)
CAD/CAM
CAD/CAM 3D
(
3-1)
3-1 ( ,2007 )
21
CAD/CAM
RP
3-2
3-2
3.1.
3.1.1
G1 G2
22
, 26:
. . :
:
3-4
3-3
( 3-3,3-4)
1.
Rule surface
23
2. .
NURBS
G0 :
(G0) ( 3-5a)
G1 :
( )
(G1) G0 ( 3-5b)
G2 :
(G2)
G2 G0 G1 ( 3-5c)
24
G0 ( )
G1
Shelden Shelden
G1
Generatrix directrix surface
( conical
line) ;
( )
( 3-7)
Generatrix
directrix Form Finding
25
3-7 UV : Gene1 ratrix Directrix :
Unite Unite 1’
NURBS
B-spline
Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline NURBS
NURBS
( Degree )
0
1
26
2
Conical Line
conic section
3-11
(generator
line)
F( ) F
L( ) e( ) F
e L 0<e<1 e=1
e>1 ( 3-12) e=0
L e
Form Finding
27
3-11
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/
3-12
3.1.3 CAD/CAM
CAD/CAM
MAYA RHINO 3DsMAX INSIGHT ( 3-13)
CAD/CAM
3-13 CAD/CAM
CAD
CAD/CAM
CAD CAM
CAD/CAM
Rhino
NURBS
B-spline Non-Uniform
Rational B Spline POLYGON NURBS
(Mesh)
NURBS
28
NURBS
NURBS
NURBS
3DMAX
3DMAX NURBS
3DMAX NURBS STL.file
2. Tramsfore Degree
STL.file
29
Edit polygon/Polygon/Flip
( 3-14)
3. RP Shell
Polygon RP
1mm ( 3-15)
Insight
30
4.
STL
Insight
3dsMAx STL Insight
RP
CAM
RP
Insight
3-21
3-20 RP 3-21
31
3.2.
2007
2010
20 150
AleppoZONE
1-2 28
16
2-3 ( 3-22)
3-22
RHINO 4
1: (U,V
2 U,V
32
3 NURBS
4: Form Finding
6:
1.1
3D
3D
MAYA
MAYA NURBS
RHINO4
MAYA IGES (3D )
(smooth) (optimized) CV
33
CV 3-1 UV
CV 3519 99.14
1/15
( 3-23 ; 3-24) 3-2:
3-1
NURBS NURBS
U: = 3 CV = 153 (0 <= U <= 1) U: =3C
V: = 3 CV = 23 (0 <= V <= 2) V = 10 (0 <= U <= 1)
CV 3519 CV 30
4 4
3-23 3-24
34
3-2 1.1
MAYA Export
IGES
Untrim
CurvatureAnalysis
35
Rebuild
1.2
NURBS
NURBS ( Degree )
(CV) ( Knot )
3-10 UV
NURBS
UV
3-3
3-3 1.2
ExtractIsoCurve
ExtractWireframe
36
Section
conical
surface NURBS surface
Mesh Mesh
NURBS
3.1.2
3-4
RHINO
Trim
3-25-a
37
G1 3-25-b
4 5
3-25-c-d
3-25 : A B C
D
3-4 2
2 ChangeDegree
38
Rebuild Curve
4
PointsOn
Conic
PointsOn
3 UV NURBS
39
3-5 3 UV NURBS
3DsMAX
1Rail-sweep
MAX
NURBS LATHE
1Rail-sweep
1Rail-sweep
Sweep Parallel
4 Form Finding
UV
Form Finding
surface UV
3-28-C
3-6
40
3-6 4 Form Finding
CV
Pull
IGES rhino
DupBorder
Trim
5.1
41
( 3-27) 3-7
3-7 5
Section
3-3
42
5.2
( 3-26)
2 :
( 3-27
3-26 3-27
3-8
( 3-28)
43
3-28
3-8 6
DupBorder
BlendSrf
5-1
Trim 3-3
44
3.3.
3.3.1
sweep
54
( 3-9)
3-9
53 24
19
19
11
45
Zebra
(G2)
3-29
3-30
2003 Shelden
UV
46
NURBS
3-31
3-10
47
3 Degree 2
2
1
Form Finding
3.3.2 CAD/CAM
3 CAM CAD/CAM
3-1
CAM 3d
CAM
CNC
RP ABS 3-32
3-32
3d RP CAM
48
( 3-33)
Bently Micostaion
( 3-37)
3-33 3D
RP 3-3
RP
1 2 3( 3-34
)
RP
1 2
3 RP
1: 3d 1
2:
2 1 4
49
3 7
( 3-34 )
CAD/CAM
CAD/CAM
Form Finding 3D
RP
5
( 3-35)
3-34 RP
3-35
50
4.
CAD/CAM
4.1.
CAD/CAM
CAD/CAM
CNC Milling
3-1
3-2
51
CAD
1 6
1/2
1- 6
50% 3-9
3-30
3-10
CAD/CAM CAD/CAM
Rhino 3ds Max
RP
RP CAD/CAM
3-35
CNC milling
4.2.
52
2003 Dennis R. Shelden
5
2
Pattern
1/2
2
3.1.1
Rule surface
2006 CAD/CAM
4.3.
4 Form
Finding 2 5
3-3
53
CAD/CAM
Rhino MAX
Ruled
surface
54
5.
Chris, M. and Jimmie, B. 1993. CAD/CAM - From principles to practice. UK: Addison-Wesley.
Franken, B. 2003. Real as Data. Architecture in the digital age: Design and Manufacturing. Upenn. Spon
Press. pp.121-138
Friedman, M. (ed). 2002. Gehry Talks: Architecture + Process. New York, NY: Universe Publishing.
Gao, W P (2004) Tectonics? A case study for digital free-form architecture Proceedings of Computer
Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia Yonsei
Glymph, J., Shelden, D., CECCATO, C., MUSSEL, J. AND SCHOBER, H. 2004. A parametric strategy
for free-form glass structures using quadrilateral planar facets. Automation in Construction 13,
187-202.
Griffith, Kenfield; Sass, Larry and Michaud, Dennis 2005,A strategy for complex-curved building
design:Design structure with Bi-lateral contouring as integrally connected ribs
Kocaturk, T., Veltkamp, M. and Tuncer, B. 2003. Exploration of Interrelationships between Digital Design
and Production Processes of Free-Form Complex Surfaces in a Web-Based Database. CAAD FUTUTE.
Tainan, Taiwan. Kluwer Academic. pp. 445-455.
Kolarevic, B. 2001. Digital Fabrication: Manufacturing Architecture in the Information Age. ACADIA 20.
New York: Buffalo. pp. 268-278.
Kolarevic, B. 2003a. Architecture in the Digital Age: design and manufacturing. New York: Spon Press.
Kolarevic, B. 2003b. Design fabrication: from digital discourse. Indianapolis, Indiana. U.S.A. Bookmaster,
Inc. pp. 54-55.
Kolarevic, B. 2004. Designing and Manufacturing the material in the Digital Age. ACADIA.
Lim, CK. 2006. A better digital design and construction process using CAD/CAM media.’
Lindsey, 2001 B. Lindsey, Digital Gehry: material resistance digital construction, Birkhauser,
Liu, Y. T. (ed.): 2001, Defining Digital Architecture 2000 FEIDAD Award, Birkhäuser, Berlin.
Liu, Y. T. and Lim,C, K.2008 New tectonics: a preliminary framework involving classic and digital
thinking
Liu, Y.-T. 1996. Understanding of Architecture in the Computer Era. Taipei: Hus.
55
Luca, F. D. and Nardin, M. 2002. Behind the Scene: Avant-garde Techniques in Contemporary Design.
Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhauser.
Million, H. A. 1994. The Renaissance from Brunelleschi to Michaelangelo. New York: Rizzoli.
Mitchell, W. J. and McCullough, M. 1995. Digital Design Media. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mitchell, W. J. Computer-Aided Architectural Design, New York, Wiley, John & Sons. Inc., 1977
Mitchell, W. J.:1998.a, Antitectonics: The Poetics of Virtuality, In. J. Beckmann, (ed), The Virtual
Dimension:Architecture, Representation and Crash Culture, Princeton Architectural Press, New York,
Pp.205-217.
Mitchell, W. J.:1998.b, Articulate Design of Free-Form Structures, In I. Smith, (ed), Artificial Intelligence
in Structural Engineering: Information Technology for Design, Collaboration, Maintenance, and
Monitoring, Springer Verlag, Berlin. Pp.223-234.
Nardini, M.:2003, Avant-garde techniques in contemporary design - New tools or new languages for the
project?,
POTTMANN, H., LIU, Y., WALLNER, J., BOBENKO, A. AND WANG, W. 2007. Geometry of
Multi-layer Freeform Structures for Architecture. ACM Trans. Graphics 26, 3. In Proceedings of
SIGGRAPH 2007.
Ruby, A. 2001. Architecture in the age of digital producibility. DigitalReal--Blobmeister: First Built
Projects. Schmal, P.C.(ed). Basel. Birkhauser. pp. 206-211
Ryder, G., Ion, B., Green, G., Harrison, D. and Wood, B. 2002. Rapid design and manufacture tools in
architecture. Automation in Construction. 11: 279-290.
Smith, A. C. 2004. Architectural model as machine: A new view of models from antiquity to the
presentday. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Steiner, R. 2003. Architecture - An Introductory Reader. The Square, Forest Row: Rudolf Steiner Press.
Sapaun, S.M., 2005, ” Concurrent design and manufacturing process of automotive composite
components”, Assembly Automation, 146-152
SCHIFTNER, A. 2007. Planar Quad Meshes from RelativePrincipal Curvature Lines. Diploma Thesis.
Schon, D. A. and Wiggins, G. 1992. Kinds of seeing and their funtions in designing. Design Studies. 13(2):
135-156.
Seely, J. C. 2004. Digital fabrication in the architectural design process. Master Thesis. MIT.
56
Turkiyyah, G.M ,1997,An accelerated triangulation method for computing the skeletons of free-form solid
models.
Welch, W. and Witkin, A. 1994, Free-Form Shape Design Using Triangulated Surfaces
Zevi, B. 1981. The modern language of architecture: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 2.1.1 p12
, 2001. , ,
. (ed.): 2006,
( ), 2003. , ,
OpenNURBS http://www.opennurbs.org/
Mathworld http://mathworld.wolfram.com/
57