Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evidence That Pathogenic Transglutaminase 2 in Celiac Disease Derives From Enterocytes
Evidence That Pathogenic Transglutaminase 2 in Celiac Disease Derives From Enterocytes
K.G. Jebsen Coeliac Disease Research Centre, University of Oslo, and Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo
University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
(Figure 1A). The estimated amount of TG2 (0.15 pg per cell) Abbreviations used in this paper: CeD, Celiac Disease; TG2, Trans-
was in the same range as what was recently found by mass glutaminase 2.
spectrometry quantification of more than 5000 enterocyte Most current article
proteins in mice, placing TG2 among the 10% most abun- © 2020 by the AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open
dant proteins in small intestinal enterocytes3 (Figure 1B). access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/).
Because the role of TG2 in CeD is linked to its calcium- 0016-5085
dependent enzymatic activity, we next addressed whether https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.018
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University Foundation Juan N Corpas de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en abril 10, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
August 2020 Luminal TG2 and Celiac Disease 789
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
Figure 1. Enterocytes contain catalytically intact TG2, which can facilitate T-cell–B-cell interactions. (A) Representative
Western blot showing detection of TG2 in small intestinal enterocytes. Based on signal intensities, the amount of TG2 was
quantified in 2 different lysate preparations. Column heights represent mean amount of TG2 based on quantification of 2 or 3
different lysate dilutions with error bars indicating standard deviation. (B) Ranking of the expression levels (molecules per cell)
of more than 3600 proteins in mouse jejunum enterocytes based on quantitative mass spectrometry data reported by Arike
et al.3 The overlaid box plot indicates the 10th and 90th percentiles of the protein expression levels. (C) Western blot showing
detection of biotin in enterocyte lysate obtained from TG2 sufficient (Tgm2þ/þ) or TG2 knockout (Tgm2/) mice after incu-
bation with or without a biotinylated 34-mer gluten peptide and calcium to allow TG2-mediated isopeptide-bond formation.
The bands at w70 kDa and w120 kDa present in all lanes represent endogenously biotinylated proteins. (D) T-cell–B-cell
collaboration assay showing release of interleukin (IL)-2 from activated hybridoma T cells specific to the indicated gluten
epitopes after co-culture with A20 lymphoma B cells expressing HLA-DQ2.5 in combination with a TG2-specific or non–TG2-
specific B-cell receptor. Before addition of T cells, the B cells were pulsed with different concentrations of enterocyte lysate in
the presence of 2 mM CaCl2 and 25 mM gluten peptide containing the relevant non-deamidated T-cell epitope. Symbols
represent mean IL-2 concentration with indication of standard deviation based on culture triplicates.
immune system in the same way as microbial and food peptides will be available to B cells in Peyer’s patches. B
antigens. Notably, soluble luminal molecules have direct cells with a TG2-specific receptor will therefore be able to
access to adaptive immune cells through the conduit system bind catalytically active TG2, which can react with gluten
of Peyer’s patches.7 Here, we have shown that mouse small peptides and form enzyme-substrate complexes. Thus,
intestinal enterocytes contain a significant amount of TG2, following receptor-mediated endocytosis, TG2-specific B
which can be catalytically active in the extracellular envi- cells can present deamidated gluten peptides on surface
ronment. Moreover, TG2 expression has been demonstrated MHC-II molecules. We believe that this mechanism allows
in human enterocytes by single-cell transcriptome analysis.8 TG2-specific B cells to serve as important antigen-
Hence, after a gluten-containing meal, both TG2 and gluten presenting cells in CeD, leading to activation of disease-
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University Foundation Juan N Corpas de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en abril 10, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
790 Iversen et al Gastroenterology Vol. 159, No. 2
driving gluten-specific T cells and formation of Received February 17, 2020. Accepted April 8, 2020.
TG2-specific autoantibodies. Hence, luminal TG2 released Correspondence
from shed enterocytes could form the basis for the adaptive Address correspondence to Ludvig M. Sollid, MD, PhD, Department of
Immunology, Oslo University Hospital–Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
immune response in CeD. e-mail: l.m.sollid@medisin.uio.no.
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
Acknowledgments
Supplementary Material We thank Chaitan Khosla for providing polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse TG2
antibody and Gerry Melino for providing TG2 knockout mice.
Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying
this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at CRediT Authorship Contributions
www.gastrojournal.org, and at https://doi.org/10.1053/j. Rasmus Iversen, PhD (Conceptualization: Supporting; Data curation: Lead;
Formal analysis: Equal; Investigation: Supporting; Methodology: Equal;
gastro.2020.04.018. Writing – original draft: Equal). Sunniva F. Amundsen, MSc (Data curation:
Equal; Formal analysis: Equal; Investigation: Lead; Methodology: Equal;
Writing – review & editing: Supporting). Liv Kleppa, PhD (Data curation:
References Supporting; Formal analysis: Supporting; Investigation: Supporting;
Methodology: Supporting; Writing – review & editing: Supporting). M. Fleur
1. du Pre MF, et al. J Exp Med 2020;217:e20190860. du Pré, PhD (Data curation: Supporting; Investigation: Supporting;
2. Mowat AM. Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3:331–341. Methodology: Supporting). Jorunn Stamnaes, PhD (Conceptualization:
Supporting; Data curation: Supporting; Investigation: Supporting;
3. Arike L, et al. Cell Rep 2020;30:1077–1087.e3. Methodology: Supporting; Supervision: Supporting). Ludvig M. Sollid, MD,
4. Williams JM, et al. Vet Pathol 2015;52:445–455. PhD (Conceptualization: Lead; Project administration: Lead; Supervision:
Lead; Writing – original draft: Equal).
5. Blander JM. FEBS J 2016;283:2720–2730.
6. Glaeser H, Drescher S, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; Conflicts of interest
71:131–140. The authors disclose the following: Ludvig M. Sollid has privately or via his
employer been consultant during the two last years for Amagma
7. Chang JE, et al. Nat Immunol 2019;20:1506–1516. Therapeutics, ImmusanT Therapeutics, Intrexon Actobiotics, Bioniz
8. Wang Y, Song W, et al. J Exp Med 2020; Therapeutics, UCB Biopharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck and GSK.
217:e20191130. Funding
This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway (project 255053),
the University of Oslo World-leading research program on human immunology
(WL-IMMUNOLOGY) and the European Research Council (project ERC-2010-
Author names in bold designate shared co-first authorship. Ad-268541).
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en University Foundation Juan N Corpas de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en abril 10, 2021. Para uso
personal exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2021. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.