This document analyzes the five forces model for a company called Nutrilight Food Co. It discusses strategies for each of the five competitive forces: 1) Rivalry among existing competitors can be addressed by differentiating products and increasing scale. 2) Threat of new entry can be reduced by innovating new products and achieving economies of scale. 3) Bargaining power of suppliers can be managed by diversifying suppliers and experimenting with alternative materials. 4) Bargaining power of buyers can be limited by broadening the customer base and developing new products. 5) Threat of substitute products can be minimized by focusing on customer service rather than just products and increasing customer switching costs.
This document analyzes the five forces model for a company called Nutrilight Food Co. It discusses strategies for each of the five competitive forces: 1) Rivalry among existing competitors can be addressed by differentiating products and increasing scale. 2) Threat of new entry can be reduced by innovating new products and achieving economies of scale. 3) Bargaining power of suppliers can be managed by diversifying suppliers and experimenting with alternative materials. 4) Bargaining power of buyers can be limited by broadening the customer base and developing new products. 5) Threat of substitute products can be minimized by focusing on customer service rather than just products and increasing customer switching costs.
This document analyzes the five forces model for a company called Nutrilight Food Co. It discusses strategies for each of the five competitive forces: 1) Rivalry among existing competitors can be addressed by differentiating products and increasing scale. 2) Threat of new entry can be reduced by innovating new products and achieving economies of scale. 3) Bargaining power of suppliers can be managed by diversifying suppliers and experimenting with alternative materials. 4) Bargaining power of buyers can be limited by broadening the customer base and developing new products. 5) Threat of substitute products can be minimized by focusing on customer service rather than just products and increasing customer switching costs.
COMPETITORS - By building a sustainable differentiation - By building scale it will be able to compete more effectively. - Collaborating with competitors to increase the market size rather than just competing for small market. THREAT OF NEW ENTRY BARGAINING POWER OF - By innovating new products and services. New SUPPLIERS products not only brings new customers to the fold but also give old customer a reason to buy - By building efficient supply chain with multiple Nutrilight Food Co.’s products. suppliers. - By achieving economies of scale, it is possible to - By experimenting with product designs using reduce the fixed cost per unit. different materials so that if the prices go up of one raw material then company can shift to - Building capacity and investing in research and another. development New entrants are less likely to enter a dynamic business when established firms like Nutrilight Food Co. define the standards on a regular basis. It greatly narrows the window of spectacular earnings for new enterprises, discouraging new entrants into the market.
BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS THREAT OF SUBSTITUTE
- By establishing a broad consumer base. This will be advantageous in two ways. It will lower buyers' negotiating power and give a chance PRODUCTS for the corporation to simplify its sales and production processes. - By being service oriented rather than just - By developing new products. Customers frequently seek discounts product oriented. and offers on existing items, therefore if Nutrilight Food Co. - Understanding the consumer's basic need continues to develop new products, it may limit buyers' negotiating rather than what the customer is purchasing. power. - By increasing the switching cost for the - New products will also reduce the defection of existing customers of customers. Nutrilight food Co. to its competitors.