You are on page 1of 4

FEEDBACK FORM

High Impact Practice Implementation Rubric: Collaborative Planning Teams


Collaborative Planning Teams Feedback
Not Glows/Evidence Next Steps
Concept Emerging Operational Exemplary
Evident

Leadership is somewhat Work with team to set norms for each meeting
clearly established, but norms they give more structure, establish leadership, and
Tea have not been set. guide discussion.
1 x
m
Lead
ershi
p
and Teachers meet but it is not Design a more organized and structured approach
Faci consistent planned in advance. and schedule to collaborative planning.
litati 2 x
on

Identify learning gaps and teaching practice and


They discussed what learning make sure to incorporate specific standards in the
Refl gaps they were anticipating discussions
1 x
ectiv this year and what they have
e done to minimize these gaps.
Teac
hing
Prac Continue to discuss common issues and share
They did not discuss how they ways they have or plan to address these in the
tices
2 x will remedy their common classroom in a preventative manner.
misconceptions.

There was no reflection upon Teachers bring upcoming standard and work to
3 deconstruct the language.
x specific standards.
Collaborative Planning Teams Feedback

Not Exemplar
Concept Emerging Operational
Evident y Glows/Evidence Next Steps

The GSE are embedded in the More collaborative standard deconstruction.


1 x curriculum maps for each class
taught.

The GSE are embedded in the More collaboration, even amongst teachers who
2 x pacing guides they have teach different courses.
submitted for each course.

The teachers have worked to Continue to unpack GSE as a collaborative team.


3 x design learning targets, but it
was not collaborative.

I saw no action plans being Work to develop action plans in order to be


4 x constructed. proactive.

They are aligned to the GSE, Collaborate more with other teachers teaching the
but not all were developed same subject and even subjects that are
collaboratively. horizontally aligned. (math and ela)
1 x

Some of the components are Collaborate more in the construction of the lesson
embedded. plans with teachers of different subjects to gain
more perspective on lesson planning ideas.
2 x
Collaborative Planning Teams Feedback

Not Glows/Evidence Next Steps


Concept Emerging Operational Exemplary
Evident

Asse They have submitted Work to develop more common assessments,


ssme summative assessments for especially formative assessments and share
nt 1 x progress monitoring, but they the data.
and are not all common.
Evid
ence
of Teachers do share their Work to develop ways to differentiate
Stud summative data, but rarely are lessons to account for weaknesses in student
ent 2 x they discussing how they are understanding of specific standards.
Lear adjusting their instruction.
ning
They do analyze assessment Discuss more way to adjust instruction based
3 x data, but instruction is not on data from assessments aligned with
always adjusted. standards.

4 x Again, data is analyzed, but Discuss more way to adjust instruction based
instruction is not always on data from assessments aligned with
adjusted. standards.

Remediation is not always Go over methods of differentiation they does


5 x implemented because of staff not require multiple teachers in a classroom
constraints. because of staff constraints.

Teachers provide feedback Remind to link feedback to standard.


6 x often, but it is not linked to
specific standards.

You might also like