Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The importance of adolescent literacy factors in developing and then soon establishing
what students should be able to comprehend. “Disciplinary literacy, at its core, is designed as a
method for helping students to understand the language of the full community of the content area
(Reynolds and Rush, 2017, 1). Through the use of disciplinary literacy, educators must create
ways to improve and conquer comprehension towards the specific content area in which they
teach. Disciplinary literacy allows educators to create tasks and skills that tie into comprehension
comprehension, results have and do vary. “One key underlying finding in studies with experts
and novices reading literary texts is the difference between comprehension and interpretation”
(Reynolds and Rush, 2017, 4). Through the use in one study of differentiating and understanding
Comprehension and interpretation are not the only methods towards disciplinary literacy.
Disciplinary literacy allows educators to build stronger understandings of what each and
every one of our students are capable of in the provided content areas. As well as understanding
what the students need to improve upon in the content area in a more complex and detailed
manner. “Expert readers in these studies did more with their readings, and kept pushing for depth
as they read; novice readers, on the other hand, seemed ready to pronounce a meaning quickly,
and move on” (Reynolds and Rush, 2017, 5). Reading is important to all provided content areas
Running Head: English Literacy 3
towards disciplinary literacy. Through each content area, reading is important in terms of
Disciplinary literacy is not always the most accurate. Like any sets of studies, findings
and results will vary. Important actions that educators should establish for themselves includes
conscientiousness and in-depth analyses. It is important for educators to truly question what each
and every one of their students should be able to master withing the provided content area. In
terms of English language arts, educator’s primary goals for their student’s academic goals
within this specific content area mainly comes down to reading and writing. However, like any
discipline within any content area, English as a subject has varied overtime. “The discipline of
English has come under continual revision over the years, with various summits held to
reconsider its status and component activities. The field’s evolution, occasionally at relatively
revolutionary speeds, makes it difficult to define what counts as the province of ELA”
(Smagorinsky, 3, 2015). It is also important for educators to take notice in the fact that English as
a content area for disciplinary literacy will differ but as mentioned before can also be effective
There are standards and guidelines towards providing accurate and effective ways in order for
students to truly succeed within any academic field. “Without understanding how and why
experts read literature in their lives, we cannot expect students to achieve at high levels and
develop a full understanding of the discipline (Rainey and Moje 2012, 85). It is important, in this
Running Head: English Literacy 4
case with English as the subject area, it is important to establish a step-by-step process. The goal
should be for improved comprehension in reading literacy. Of course, this would be overtime.
lessons on poetry, Shakespeare, reading a novel and exploring the novel through analysis and
depth, Along the way educators should continue to accurately and effectively question what each
and every student should need to succeed in the subject area. With English, there are specific
challenges students face. This especially applies to a English being taught in a secondary
education setting.
There are many ways in which teachers can provide beneficial academic support for
students who may and more commonly do struggle with English as an academic discipline.
There have been many effective strategies to support students in English as an academic
discipline. “Recently, scholars have constructed a framework, the READI (reading, evidence,
reading, to guide instructional approaches for teaching literary reasoning and argumentation (Lee
& Goldman, 2015)” (Rainey, 5, 2016). Every student needs support towards English
comprehension. It truly does not matter if they have exceptionalities or not. Each and every
student within a classroom needs support in one way or another. Support for students for English
Running Head: English Literacy 5
as a discipline has been updated and studying in great depth. “With clearer empirical
understandings about the markers of current scholars’ participation in the social and cultural
community of literary studies, the work of Lee, Levine, and others seeking to develop
instructional approaches that support all students’ uptake of literary literacy practices might be
furthered (Rainey, 5, 2016). There are always specific questions that should be and are asked by
teachers and experts themselves. “What are problems that practicing literary scholars grapple
with? Are there inquiry-based practices that seem to rise above specific literary scholars’
theoretical orientations? How might educators use instructional approaches and heuristics with
students to advance goals of literary inquiry and participation?” (Rainey, 5, 2016). Questions that
are proposed and analyzed by teachers and experts themselves, helps to further research and
findings. Once the research and findings based off questions like these are put together, the more
support is found for the students own English comprehension as a complex academic discipline.
described their approaches for teaching students to construct literary puzzles.” (Rainey, 15,
2017). The puzzles as many scholars call it are their specific strategies for utilizing English as a
complex discipline within education. Another effective strategy towards English as a discipline
in which they use is through having students provide claims. “One way that some scholars
described supporting students’ attempts to write original interpretive claims was to encourage
students to use an unfolding essay structure so each essay ended in a different or more
complicated place than it began” (Rainey, 15, 2016). The research similar to a discipline is less
Running Head: English Literacy 6
basic and better as a complex form of studying and finding the answers that are beneficial
The more research and findings are made and establish, the more English as an important
academic subject area can be truly and more accurately understood. Similar to a discipline itself
(as it is defined), the process of English, needs to be understood. How can someone understand
English without following the guidelines of disciplinary learning? The more engaging but also
comprehensible manner of studying and teaching English. There can be the more findings and
better results towards learning for a student can occur within a secondary academic setting. The
well. However, the specific research towards truly understanding English subject matter. This
includes reading, writing, spelling, analyzing Shakespeare, Novel analyses. “Indeed, there is much
yet to learn about disciplinary literacy in the school domain of ELA. Yet, this study offers helpful
language for some literary literacy practices and teaching approaches that could be further explored by
researchers and taken up by teachers and teacher educators committed to forwarding disciplinary literacy
teaching in K–12 classrooms” (Rainey, 18, 2016). English is truly an engaging subject. English as a
subject establishes escapism with understanding. There is a lot of emotion tied into connecting
Rainey, E. C. (2016). Disciplinary literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the social and
Rainey, E., & Mojie, E. B. (2012). Building Insider Knowledge: Teaching Students to Read,
Write, and Think within ELA and across the Disciplines. Nation Council of Teachers of
Reynolds, T., & Rush, L. S. (2017). Experts and Novices Reading Literature: An analysis of
Disciplinary literacy in English language arts. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(3),
199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1299820