Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Cost reduction in building is the primary objective in almost all the developing countries.
To achieve this objective, there are intensive efforts being made in the effective
utilization of wastes and byproducts, particularly from mining and mineral industries,
with a view to conservation of primary raw materials, viz, clay, limestone, energy (coal,
oil) and water, in almost all building materials industries. This paper presents a brief
account of the Indian experience in the utilization of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and
byproduct gypsum, red mud and mine tailings of iron, zinc, copper and gold ores
beneficiation in the development of cements, concrete products, calcium silicate bricks
and cellular concrete.
1.0 Introduction :
Until about middle of the nineteenth century, apart from stone and mud, burnt-clay
bricks, tiles natural pozzolana, gypsum and lime were the chief building materials all
over the world. The real breakthrough came in the invention of portland and cement, in
1824 A.D., by Vanderburg in Germany and cellular concrete in 1925, by Axel Erikson, in
Sweden. Since then the face of building materials has undergone a remarkable change.
The technological developments, plant and machinery, automation, requirements of
energy and trained manpower, have all run a parallel race.
Incidentally, it is only in the context of the most versatile applications of cement
and concrete that there are innovations, through extensive R&D and industrial processes,
related to the utilization of slag, pulverised fuel ashes, mine tailings and many other
wastes and byproducts. But the history of all these developments in hardly 150 years old.
India established its first cement plant in 1904 in Porebander (Gujarat) the cellular
concrete plant, in 1948, in New Delhi, thus not far behind the first plants in the U.K.,
Germany and Sweden. Even the first steel plant in India was established, in 1870, by
Bengal Iron Works Co. Kulti (West Bengal) and a complete integrated steel plant, in
1907 by Tata Irom and Steel Works at Jamshedpur (Jharkhand) (The U.S.A. established
the first steel plant in 1860, at Sanjus, Mass). The U.S.A., started using fly ash in cement
around 1938, in India, in 1950, in mass concrete by Rihand dam and Bokaro (Jharkhand)
was completed. It was in early fifties that the Central Building Research Institute,
Roorkee (Uttaranchal) India, began studies on the characteristics of black and red clays
and variability of fly ashes. The CBRI also established the suitability of granulated blast
furnace slag, from TISCO, for slag cement. Later, in 1964, the CBRI, with the financial
assistance from HUDCO, established four demonstration plants for the manufacture of
clay fly ash burnt bricks. Side. The Central Fuel Research Institute, Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
and the CBRI took two patents in 1972, on the manufacturing technologies, for the
production of fly ash sand lime bricks, by both normal pressure steam and high pressure
(autoclaved) curing pressures. Thus, in spite of not lacking in R & D and initiatives, the
situations about the initialization of fly ash and other byproducts are far from anything
but satisfactory though notwithstanding the country taking pride in surplus production in
bricks, cement and steel.
Borogypsum
Group I materials have been characterized by properties like soundness, strength, shape,
abrasion resistance and gradation and they all find one or the other uses in building
materials. Group II materials are used to a limited scale because they require some
processing. Some of them did not quite satisfy the unhindered utilization or confirm to
the Indian standard specifications. Group III materials have been investigated quite
thoroughly but there are no standard specifications yet for their proposed uses.
Additionally, some of group III materials need further beneficiation to get them free from
either toxic or undesrable constitutents like P2O5, SO3, and alkalies.
Table-2 : presents a list of the mineral and mining wastes, in 5 groups, which are now
being extensively utilized as principal or secondary raw materials as substituted or
supplement with resultant savings in clays, limestone, coal and water.
4.1 Concrete block masonry units and saving of limestone & energy :
Table-4 gives a simple calculation about the effective use of limestone in various
walling units of equivalent strength It shows that not only clays are saved, but there is
lesser limestone consumption as compared to the old fashioned lime-based block. Cement
based (with fly ash) calcium silicate bricks or pre-cast concrete should be preferred. This
is the main reason that the concrete block/brick, slag fly ash lime-gypsum bricks
industries have multiplied and led to introduction of various government directives to use
fly ash in all kinds of bricks blocks and ready-mix concrete and obtain tax concessions if
a minimum 25% fly ash in used in a product.
Table-4 gives two typical mix proportion of concretes, using high fly ash and/or
ground granulated blast furnace slag with effective saving of cement (limestone), water,
and energy.