You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/340590744

Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid DNS assay for the reducing sugars:
Interference of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural

Article  in  International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · April 2020


DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045

CITATIONS READS

14 1,549

5 authors, including:

Narendra Naik Deshavath Gourab Mukherjee


University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
26 PUBLICATIONS   272 CITATIONS    14 PUBLICATIONS   154 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Vaibhav Goud Veeranki Venkata Dasu


Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
173 PUBLICATIONS   6,400 CITATIONS    110 PUBLICATIONS   1,661 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass Under Subcrtical Water Treatment View project

Dissolution of Biomass in Ionic Liquids View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Narendra Naik Deshavath on 06 August 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


BIOMAC-15254; No of Pages 6
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156 (2020) xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijbiomac

Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing


sugars: Interference of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural
Narendra Naik Deshavath a, Gourab Mukherjee b, Vaibhav V. Goud a,c,
Venkata Dasu Veeranki a,d,⁎, Chivukula V. Sastri a,b,⁎⁎
a
Centre for the Environment, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India
b
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India
c
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India
d
Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Transformation of renewable biomass into value-added chemicals and biofuels has evolved to be a vital field of
Received 28 February 2020 research in recent years. Accurate estimation of reducing sugars post pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
Received in revised form 21 March 2020 has been very inconsistent. For a few decades, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay has been widely employed
Accepted 3 April 2020
for the estimation of reducing sugars derived from pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. This assay tests for
Available online 11 April 2020
the presence of free carbonyl group (C=O), the so-called reducing sugars. This involves the oxidation of the al-
Keywords:
dehyde functional group present to the corresponding acid while DNS is simultaneously reduced to 3-amino-
Lignocellulosic biomass 5-nitrosalicylic acid under alkaline conditions. However, the presence of other active carbonyl groups can poten-
Pretreatment tially also react with DNS leading to incorrect yields of reducing sugars. Therefore, a detailed study has been car-
Reducing sugars ried out to evaluate the influence of active carbonyl compounds like furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-
Furans HMF) in the overall estimation of reducing sugars (glucose, xylose and arabinose) by DNS assay. In addition to
DNS assay this, reducing sugars estimation in the presence of furans were also investigated, it reveals that reducing sugars
HPLC estimation was found to be 68% higher than actual sugars. Therefore, current findings strongly indicate that the
employment of DNS assay for quantifying the reducing sugars in the presence of furans is not appropriate.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

1. Introduction concentration [7]. Therefore, phenol-free DNS reagent has been imple-
mented to correctly estimate the reducing sugars [7–9]. DNS method es-
Different colorimetric methods have been well established for the pecially designed for the quantification of single reducing sugar, have
estimation of reducing sugars that includes DNS [1] and Nelson – also been adopted for quantifying the mixture of reducing sugars (pen-
Somogyi [2,3]. Among them, DNS assay has been the most widely tose, hexose and oligosaccharides) which are the common products of
used method for reducing sugars estimation, which is easy to perform lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis [5,6,10].
and rapidly quantifies a greater number of samples in a shorter period Although, DNS method is not suitable for quantifying the mixture of
of time. But, the major problem that impede the DNS assay is its inaccu- sugars but it is still being used for the total reducing sugars estimation
racy, where the different reducing sugars yield dissimilar colour intensi- [9,11]. Since a few decades, DNS assay has been the most widely used
ties [4,5]. In 1986, Deschatelets and Ernest reported that DNS assay is method for the quantification of reducing sugars derived from lignocel-
not suitable for quantifying single sugar in the presence of other mix- lulosic biomass pretreatment [12–19]. In general, the basic structure of
ture of sugars [6]. Moreover, the presence of unwanted impurities lignocellulosic biomass constitutes cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin
such as phenol in DNS reagent preparation increases the colour inten- [20]. Hemicellulose and cellulose are the polymeric carbohydrates;
sity of a sample which leads to overestimation of reducing sugars upon hydrolysis, hemicellulose yields pentose sugars (xylose and arab-
inose) and cellulose yields glucose [21,22]. Whereas, lignin is a complex
aromatic heteropolymer usually found as a hydrophobic matrix around
⁎ Correspondence to: V. Dasu, Department of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian the polysaccharide components of plant cell walls [23,24]. Its three-
Institute of Technology Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India.
⁎⁎ Correspondence to: C. V. Sastri, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of
dimensional structure provides decay-resistance, which thereby re-
Technology Guwahati, 781039, Assam, India. stricts the dilute acid hydrolysis (generally known as dilute acid
E-mail addresses: veeranki@iitg.ac.in (V.D. Veeranki), sastricv@iitg.ac.in (C.V. Sastri). pretreatment) process of the polymeric carbohydrates. It is mainly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
0141-8130/© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Please cite this article as: N.N. Deshavath, G. Mukherjee, V.V. Goud, et al., Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing
sugars: Interference of furf..., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
2 N.N. Deshavath et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156 (2020) xxx

composed of p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and syringyl 100 mL of DNS reagent. Phenol was not used in the preparation of
(S) monomers that are produced from p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl al- DNS reagent which unnecessarily increases the colour intensities of
cohol, and sinapyl alcohol, respectively [24]. This lignin and polysaccha- the measured concentration range of compounds [7–9].
rides remain covalently linked in the wood and non-wood biomass to
form the lignin-carbohydrate complexes (LCCs) [25]. These LCCs consti- 2.2.2. Preparation of calibration standard curves
tute five types of lignin-carbohydrate bonds, viz. phenyl glycosides A series of calibration standard curves of each and individual reducing
(PG), benzyl ethers (BE), γ-esters (GE), ferulate/coumarate esters (FE/ sugars (glucose, xylose and arabinose) and furans (furfural and 5-HMF)
CE) and hemiacetal/acetal linkages [26]. Therefore, due to the rigid na- are prepared by DNS assay at a concentration range of 0.4–1 mg/mL
ture of lignocellulosic biomass, pretreatment should be carried out at (Table 1).
highly severe conditions such as high temperature and pressure with
dilute acid [27–33] or superheated water (hydrothermal pretreatment) 2.2.3. Preparation of hydrolysates to examine the furans effect on reducing
[18,33,34] which make biomass amenable for enzymatic hydrolysis sugar estimation
[35–37]. During these types of pretreatment processes, lignocellulosic A synthetic hydrolysate was prepared which consists of reducing
biomass-derived reducing sugars have been decomposed to form furans sugars (glucose, xylose and arabinose, all together 0.3–1.8 mg/mL)
such as furfural (a dehydration product of xylose and arabinose) and 5- and furans (furfural and 5-HMF, together 0.2–1.2 mg/mL) at concentra-
hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) (a dehydration product of glucose) tion range of 0.5–3 mg/mL (Table 2) and are quantified by DNS assay.
[28,38]. Xylose, arabinose, glucose, furfural and 5-HMF are leading prod- Furthermore, to evaluate the effect and interference of furans in the
ucts of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment process [31,38,39]. All of DNS assay, a furan free reducing sugars mixture medium (consists of
these compounds have a common free carbonyl group. DNS is prone glucose, xylose and arabinose, all together at a concentration range of
to reduction to the corresponding 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid thereby 0.3–1.8 mg/mL, listed in Table 2) have been prepared and are quantified
oxidising its carbonyl centre to carboxylic acid [1]. Thus, it is indeed a by DNS assay and the results are compared with that of the synthetic
redox reaction involving a colour change from yellow to brick red. How- hydrolysate for the clear observation of overestimated results of reduc-
ever, the origin of the colour change is the reduced form of DNS, irre- ing sugars in the presence of furans.
spective of the source of the carbonyl group. Therefore, we predict Finally, pre-hydrolysate was prepared by conducting the pretreat-
that during the estimation of reducing sugars by DNS method, decom- ment of sorghum biomass with 1% sulfuric acid at 121 °C for 120 min,
position products of the reducing sugars such as furfural and 5-HMF with 5% (w/v) solid loading. The pretreatment derived hydrolysate (de-
may also interfere to show higher colour intensity than actual sugars noted as pre-hydrolysate) containing total reducing sugars concentra-
concentration. tion was determined by DNS assay and the concentration of each and
It is necessary to provide the technical and experimental reasons to individual reducing sugar such as glucose, xylose, arabinose and furans
avoid inaccurate methodologies in the field of scientific research. There- such as furfural, 5-HMF are quantified by high performance liquid chro-
fore, in the present study, the error of estimation (standard deviation) matography (HPLC) for the comprehensive comparison between DNS
between three individual reducing sugars such as glucose, xylose and assay and HPLC analysis. The amount of reducing sugars released per
arabinose has been investigated through plotting the calibration stan- gram of sorghum biomass has been calculated by the following equa-
dard curve by DNS assay. To avoid inaccuracies in the estimation, the re- tions (Eqs. (1) and (2)).
activity of furfural and 5-HMF towards DNS have also been considered.
Moreover, the estimation of reducing sugars mixture has been per- Sugars ðmg=mLÞ
formed using DNS assay to evaluate the percentage of error against ¼ Concentration dectected by DNS assay=HPLC analysis  DF ð1Þ
the calibration plot of single reducing sugar alone. Furthermore, a syn-
 
thetic hydrolysate has been prepared with respect to the lignocellulosic Eq:1  Total Volume of prehydrolysate
Sugars ðmg=g Þ ¼ ð2Þ
biomass pretreatment to investigate the feasibility of using DNS assay Initial weight of biomass
for quantifying the reducing sugars in the presence of furfural and 5-
HMF. Finally, to validate the proposed hypothesis, a thermo-chemical Moreover, bioethanol potential of reducing sugars derived from di-
pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass has been carried out by using lute acid pretreatment process has been calculated through the follow-
dilute sulfuric acid as a catalytic agent and the hydrolysate was analysed ing equations (Eqs. (3), (4) and (5)).
by HPLC (to evaluate the concentration of each and individual reducing
sugars and furans) as well as DNS assay for the comprehensive compar- C6H12O6→2C2H5OH þ 2CO2 ð3Þ
ison of reducing sugars concentration.
0:51 kg ethanol
TEY ðkg=tonÞ ¼ CS ðkg=tonÞ  ð4Þ
2. Materials and methods kg sugar

2.1. Chemicals TEY


V ðL=tonÞ ¼ ð5Þ
ρ
D-(+)-xylose (99%), L-(+)-arabinose (99%), D-(+)-glucose anhy-
drous (≥99.5%), 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (≥99%) and furfural (99%) where, Cs is the concentration of sugars (C6 or C5) present in the ligno-
3,5-dinitrosalicyclic acid (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, cellulosic biomass, 0.51 (gp/gs) is theoretical ethanol yield TEY constant,
Bangalore (India). Sodium potassium tartrate (99.98%) and Sulfuric ρ is the ethanol density (0.789 kg/L at 20 °C).
acid (98%) were purchased from Merck, Pvt., Ltd., India.
2.2.4. Reducing sugar estimation procedure
2.2. DNS assay DNS assay was carried out by placing the 1 mL of standard or test
sample in a 25 mL test tube and then 3 mL of DNS reagent was added.
2.2.1. 3, 5-Dinitrosalicyclic acid reagent preparation
The following method was followed for the preparation of 3,5- Table 1
dinitrosalicylic acid. [1] 1.6 g NaOH was added to 75 mL of distilled List of reducing sugars and furans for making of four-pointed calibration curve.
water under continuous stirring and then 3, 5-Dinitrosalicyclic acid Components Glucose Xylose Arabinose Furfural 5-HMF
was added to it. Finally, 3 g of Sodium potassium tartrate was added
Concentration range (mg/mL) 0.4–1 0.4–1 0.4–1 0.4–1 0.4–1
and the remaining volume was filled with distilled water to make

Please cite this article as: N.N. Deshavath, G. Mukherjee, V.V. Goud, et al., Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing
sugars: Interference of furf..., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
N.N. Deshavath et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156 (2020) xxx 3

Table 2
Composition of synthetic hydrolysate and mixture of reducing sugars.

S. No Reducing sugars (A) (mg/mL) Furans (B) (mg/mL) Mixture of reducing sugars (mg/mL) Synthetic hydrolysate (mg/mL)

Xylose Glucose Arabinose Furfural 5-HMF (A) (A + B)

1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5


2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 1
3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 2
4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.8 3

The reaction mixture was heated in boiling water for 5 min. The absor- tested was b1.5%. However, for the most practical purposes, this error
bance spectra of the test samples were measured at 540 nm using 2 mm margin should be considerable and acceptable for the monitoring of re-
path length quartz cuvettes in the UV–vis spectrophotometer (Agilent, ducing sugars. Based on these results, DNS assay was also examined for
Carry 100, USA). Blank test was performed in 1 mL of distilled water in- the mixture of reducing sugars (the furans free reducing sugar medium)
stead of the test sample. and the results were quite in acceptable error range (b1.5%) with corre-
spondence to standard calibration curves of each and individual reduc-
2.3. High performance liquid chromatography ing sugars (Fig. 2).
Apart from the reducing sugars, we found out that furfural and 5-
High performance liquid chromatography was used for the quantifi- HMF also reacted separately with 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid to yield differ-
cation of individual sugars and furans present in the synthetic hydroly- ent colour intensities. This encouraged us to investigate the feasibility of
sate and pre-hydrolysate. The calibration standards for individual DNS assay for a mixture of reducing sugars in the presence of furans and
sugars and furans (concertation range are listed in Table 1) were thus quantify the exact estimation of sugars. A synthetic hydrolysate
made by plotting their area under the curve against concentrations. medium was prepared corresponding to the subcritical water or dilute
The HPLC separation system was equipped with a refractive index (RI) acid pretreatment at high temperature and pressure. The dehydration
detector (355 Varian), solvent delivery system (210 Varian) and a com- of lignocellulosic biomass derived reducing sugars to form furans is a
puter software-based integration system (Varian, The Netherlands). Re- common phenomenon in the pretreatment process conducted at high
ducing sugars such as glucose, xylose, arabinose and furans like 5- temperature and pressure with dilute acid or water (at subcritical
hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), furfural were analysed by using state) [41]. However, in enzymatic pretreatment process no formation
MetaCarb-87H carbohydrate column (300 × 6.5 mm, particle size of furans is observed. [18,28,31,34,37] In the commercial prospective,
8 μm) at 60 °C. 0.013 N sulfuric acid was used as a mobile phase for dilute acid pretreatment is well established process and relatively
the elution of compounds with 0.5 mL/min flow rate. cheaper than enzymatic pretreatment [42]. Based on the aforemen-
tioned literature, synthetic hydrolysate medium was prepared contain-
3. Result and discussion ing a mixture of reducing sugars and furans (Table 2). The concentration
ranges of reducing sugars (glucose, xylose and arabinose, all together
The basic principle of DNS assay includes the reduction of one of the 0.3–1.8 mg/mL) used in this synthetic hydrolysate medium is similar
nitro groups in 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid to 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid to that of the aforementioned mixture of reducing sugars medium (a
and subsequent oxidation of the aldehyde groups in substrates to car- furan- free reducing sugars medium) (Table 2). Since the concentration
boxylic acids. [1] However, with employment of different sugars, the of the reducing sugars in both the synthetic mediums were kept con-
production of 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid is not uniform [4] and stant for absorption spectroscopy, the corresponding absorbance for
hence different sugars yield dissimilar colour intensities [5], which sug- the two mediums were expected to be similar. However, enhancement
gests that the chemistry of the test demands a detailed scrutiny. Since of colour intensity was observed in the furan containing synthetic hy-
the lignocellulosic materials are heterogeneous in nature, consequently drolysate medium (Fig. 2). As evident from the concentration against
different types of reducing sugar formation can occur during the process absorbance plot in Fig. 2, DNS assay for the furan containing synthetic
of pretreatment [28]. Reducing sugar decomposition products such as hydrolysate gives higher absorbance values at a definite concentration
furfuraldehyde (furfural) and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfuraldehyde (5- and that the absorbance increases with increasing concentration. There-
HMF) are also formed as by-products during the pretreatment process fore, this surge in absorbance in the furans containing synthetic hydro-
depending upon the reaction temperature, pressure and type of catalyst lysate can be attributed to the reaction of furfural and 5-HMF with 3,5-
used for hydrolysis [14,27,28,35,40]. Xylose, arabinose, glucose (reduc- dinitrosalicylic acid. As such, almost 68% enhancement in absorbance
ing sugars), cellobiose, xylobiose (disaccharides), acetic acid, gluconic
acid (organic acids), furfural and 5-HMF (reducing sugars decomposi-
tion products) are the general pretreatment products of lignocellulosic
material [28,38]. Apart from the above listed disaccharides and organic
acids, aldehyde is found to be a common functional group present in the
reducing sugars as well as furans. Being reducing in nature, DNS could
also oxidize the aldehyde group in furfural and 5-HMF along with that
in the reducing sugars. Therefore, to discriminate the effect of DNS on
the sugars and the by-products, we performed a thorough analysis. A
typical set of calibration standard curves of glucose, xylose, arabinose,
furfural and 5-HMF were made by using the DNS method (Fig. 1).
As expected, dissimilar colour intensities were observed when DNS
reagent were reacted with different reducing sugars and furans. It is
understood that aldehyde groups of reducing sugars and furans are
oxidized to carboxyl groups, simultaneously 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid re-
duces to 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid under alkaline conditions and ex-
hibits different colour intensities. The highest error of estimation Fig. 1. Absorbance against concentration plot for various aldehyde containing compounds
(standard deviation) obtained from all the reducing sugars components in DNS assay. All the absorbance values were recorded at 540 nm at room temperature.

Please cite this article as: N.N. Deshavath, G. Mukherjee, V.V. Goud, et al., Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing
sugars: Interference of furf..., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
4 N.N. Deshavath et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156 (2020) xxx

78.1 kg or 99 L/ton (based on Eq. (5)) has been taking place by


employing the DNS assay for the quantification of reducing sugars de-
rived from pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Hence, wrong inter-
pretation of ethanol yield significantly hampers the techno-economic
viability of a bio-refinery process.
Since past few decades, DNS assay is the most widely used method
to monitor the production of reducing sugars from pretreatment of lig-
nocellulosic biomass. However, the interference of furfural and 5-HMF
in the said process remained unnoticed. Mechanism of the formation
of furfural and 5-HMF from pentose (xylose and/or arabinose) and hex-
ose (glucose and/or fructose) sugars includes dehydration of the reduc-
ing sugars with subsequent loss of three water molecules [43]. It is a
known fact that the decomposition of pentose and hexose sugars were
initiated when the pretreatment reaction has been conducted in a pres-
surized batch reactor at elevated temperatures by using different types
Fig. 2. Absorbance against concentration plot for synthetic hydrolysate (blue line) and of catalysts [27–29,34,38]. Generally, pretreatment of lignocellulosic
mixture of sugars (red line), keeping sugar concentration constant. All the absorbance
biomass are conducted by either hydrothermal process (where water
values were recorded at 540 nm at room temperature.
act as a catalyst at subcritical sate) [18,33,34,44] or thermochemical
process (where dilute mineral acids act as a catalyst) [27–29,31,40] for
was observed in the quantification of reducing sugars in the presence of significant hydrolysis of polymeric carbohydrates. The temperature
furans. Thus, a detailed analysis of the two synthetic hydrolysate media range for hydrothermal pretreatment and dilute acid pretreatment
infers an overestimation in the quantification of reducing sugars by DNS would be 160 °C–220 °C and 121 °C–160 °C, respectively with corre-
assay in the presence of furans. Henceforth, it is suggested that employ- spondence to the reaction pressure [18,27–29,31,33,34,40]. Therefore,
ment of DNS assay results in imprecise estimation of reducing sugars significant amount of furan formation is expected to occur when the lig-
present in the pre-hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass. Precise nocellulosic biomass pretreatment is conducted at these elevated tem-
sugar estimation is more important for the prediction of bioethanol peratures. On the other hand, degradation of sugars does not occur
yield for the development of a specific bio-refinery process. upon the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass conducted with bio-
For instance, sorghum biomass pretreatment (at 121 °C, 120 min logical enzymes, which are generally performed in the temperature
with 1% sulfuric acid strength) derived pre-hydrolysate containing re- range of 25 °C to 80 °C (thermo-stable enzymes). However, a recent
ducing sugars were quantified by both DNS assay and HPLC analysis. study conducted by Teixeira et al. 2012, suggested that the measure-
For the better reflection of results, SI (standard international) units of ment of cellulase and xylanase activities by using DNS method show in-
reducing sugars in-terms of mg/mL (mg of reducing sugars per mL of correct (overestimated) results which can be due to the interference of
pre-hydrolysate) is converted into mg/g (mg of reducing sugars per enzymes that contain amino acids such as cysteine, tyrosine, histidine
gram of biomass) by the aforementioned equations Eqs. (1) and (2). Ac- and hydroxylproline [7].
cording to the DNS assay, per gram of sorghum biomass produces Therefore, employment of DNS assay for monitoring the reducing
434.3 mg of reducing sugars which is equivalent to 434.3 kg/ ton of sor- sugars derived from the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass at high
ghum biomass. Whereas, the actual reducing release (analysed by temperature (121 °C - 160 °C and 160 °C– 220 °C for dilute acid pretreat-
HPLC) was found to be 281 mg/g (sum of glucose (45.2 mg), xylose ment and hydrothermal pretreatment, respectively) is not that reliable
(219.7 mg) and arabinose (16.1 mg)) or 281 kg/ton of sorghum bio- and feasible. Indeed, the data obtained from DNS assay was directly cor-
mass. Based on the stoichiometric equation (Eq. (3)), the maximum roborated with HPLC analysis of the synthetic hydrolysate. It was ob-
theoretical yield (gp/gs) of ethanol per gram of substrate (C6 or C5 served that upon separation of the individual components in HPLC,
sugar) is 0.51 g. Therefore, according to the Eq. (4), 281 kg of reducing the concentration of sugar remained intact in both mediums (mixture
sugar (detected by HPLC) can be converted into 143.3 kg of ethanol, of reducing sugars and synthetic hydrolysate shown in Table 2), and
whereas 434.3 kg of reducing sugar (detected by DNS assay) can be con- that furans (furfural and 5-HMF) have no significant impact on increas-
verted into 221.4 kg of ethanol. Therefore, a misinterpretation of about ing the reducing sugar concentration during the HPLC analysis (see

Fig. 3. HPLC chromatogram of synthetic hydrolysate.

Please cite this article as: N.N. Deshavath, G. Mukherjee, V.V. Goud, et al., Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing
sugars: Interference of furf..., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
N.N. Deshavath et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156 (2020) xxx 5

Fig. 3). As such, DNS assay for reducing sugar analysis is in general not a [15] A. Karemore, R. Sen, Downstream processing of microalgal feedstock for lipid and
carbohydrate in a biorefinery concept: a holistic approach for biofuel applications,
true reflection for furan containing samples. A comparison of DNS assay RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 29486–29496, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA01477A.
with HPLC analysis is imperative of the fact that the DNS assay leads to [16] R. Potumarthi, R.R. Baadhe, A. Jetty, Mixing of acid and base pretreated corncobs for
an inaccurate estimation of reducing sugars derived from pretreatment improved production of reducing sugars and reduction in water use during neutral-
ization, Bioresour. Technol. 119 (2012) 99–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.
of lignocellulosic biomass conducted at elevated temperatures. 2012.05.103.
[17] I. Pancha, K. Chokshi, R. Maurya, S. Bhattacharya, P. Bachani, S. Mishra, Comparative
evaluation of chemical and enzymatic saccharification of mixotrophically grown de-
4. Conclusion oiled microalgal biomass for reducing sugar production, Bioresour. Technol. 204
(2016) 9–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.078.
[18] J. Liang, X. Chen, L. Wang, X. Wei, H. Wang, S. Lu, Y. Li, Subcritical carbon dioxide-
Overall, the current study reveals the limitation involved with the water hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse pith for reducing sugars production,
DNS assay, in which 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid is seen to react with the un- Bioresour. Technol. 228 (2017) 147–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.
12.080.
wanted by-products (in the form of furans) along with the reducing [19] H.A. Villa-Vélez, H.A. Váquiro, J. Telis-Romero, The effect of power-ultrasound on the
sugars. This leads to incorrect estimation of sugars due to a parallel reac- pretreatment of acidified aqueous solutions of banana flower-stalk: Structural,
tion going on inside the reaction medium. In particular, the presence of chemical and statistical analysis, Ind. Crops Prod. 66 (2015) 52–61, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.022.
furfural and 5-HMF in the synthetic hydrolysate enhances the reduction
[20] J.B. Sluiter, R.O. Ruiz, C.J. Scarlata, A.D. Sluiter, D.W. Templeton, Compositional anal-
of DNS to 3-amino-5-nitrosalicylic acid. This leads to magnified absorp- ysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 1. Review and description of methods, J. Agric.
tion values in the visible spectrum. Thus, to infer, we establish that the Food Chem. 58 (2010) 9043–9053, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf1008023.
estimation of reducing sugars by DNS assay is not a reliable method in [21] C. Huang, W. Lin, C. Lai, X. Li, Y. Jin, Q. Yong, Coupling the post-extraction process to
remove residual lignin and alter the recalcitrant structures for improving the enzy-
the presence of furfural and 5-HMF. matic digestibility of acid-pretreated bamboo residues, Bioresour. Technol. 285
(2019) 121355, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2019.121355.
Acknowledgement [22] W. Lin, D. Chen, Q. Yong, C. Huang, S. Huang, Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of
acid-pretreated bamboo residues using amphiphilic surfactant derived from
dehydroabietic acid, Bioresour. Technol. 293 (2019) 122055, https://doi.org/10.
We would like to thank Central Instrumentation Facility (CIF) IIT 1016/J.BIORTECH.2019.122055.
Guwahati for providing instrumentation facilities. This research was fi- [23] C. Huang, J. He, R. Narron, Y. Wang, Q. Yong, Characterization of Kraft lignin fractions
obtained by sequential ultrafiltration and their potential application as a biobased
nancially supported (Grant No: IITG/EVC-61.16/127/2017-18) by component in blends with polyethylene, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017)
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India. 11770–11779, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03415.
[24] R. Whetten, R. Sederoffavb, Lignin Biosynthesis, American Society of Plant Physiolo-
gists, 1995.
Credit author statement [25] H. Dong, L. Zheng, P. Yu, Q. Jiang, Y. Wu, C. Huang, B. Yin, Characterization and appli-
cation of lignin–carbohydrate complexes from lignocellulosic materials as antioxi-
Narendra Naik Deshavath: Conceptualization, Methodology, Inves- dants for scavenging in vitro and in vivo reactive oxygen species, ACS Sustain.
Chem. Eng. 8 (2019) 256–266, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05290.
tigation, Writing- Original draft preparation. Gourab Mukherjee: For-
[26] N. Giummarella, Y. Pu, A.J. Ragauskas, M. Lawoko, A critical review on the analysis of
mal analysis, Writing- Original draft preparation. Vaibhav V. Goud: lignin carbohydrate bonds, Green Chem. 21 (2019) 1573–1595, https://doi.org/10.
Visualization, Investigation. V. Venkata Dasu & Chivukula V. Sastri: Su- 1039/c8gc03606c.
pervision, Validation, Writing- Reviewing and Editing. [27] T. Vancov, S. McIntosh, Mild acid pretreatment and enzyme saccharification of Sor-
ghum bicolor straw, Appl. Energy 92 (2012) 421–428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apenergy.2011.11.053.
References [28] N.N. Deshavath, M. Mohan, V.D. Veeranki, V.V. Goud, S.R. Pinnamaneni, T. Benarjee,
Dilute acid pretreatment of sorghum biomass to maximize the hemicellulose hydro-
[1] G.L. Miller, Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar, lysis with minimized levels of fermentative inhibitors for bioethanol production, 3
Anal. Chem. 31 (3) (1959) 426–428. Biotech. 7 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0752-3.
[2] J. Hospital, Method nelson for medical, J. Biol. Chem. 03 (1944) 375–380. [29] L. Chen, R. Chen, S. Fu, FeCl 3 pretreatment of three lignocellulosic biomass for eth-
[3] B.Y. Michael, By Michael Determination *, 1951 19–24. anol production, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3 (2015) 1794–1800, https://doi.org/10.
[4] F. Hostettler, E. Borel, H. Deuel, Über die Reduktion der 3,5 Dinitrosalicylsure durch 1021/acssuschemeng.5b00377.
Zucker, Helv. Chim. Acta 34 (1951) 2132–2139, https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca. [30] K.A. Ghazali, S.F. Salleh, T.M.I. Riayatsyah, H.B. Aditiya, T.M.I. Mahlia, The effect of di-
19510340655. lute acid pre-treatment process in bioethanol production from durian (Durio
[5] A. Bell, D.J. Manners, Anne Palmer, Observations on the Reduction of Alkaline 3 : 5- zibethinus) seeds waste, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 32 (2016) https://doi.
Dinitro- salicylate by Certain Carbohydrates, 1951 3760–3763. org/10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012058.
[6] L. Deschatelets, E.K.C. Yu, A simple pentose assay for biomass conversion stud- [31] P. Lenihan, A. Orozco, E. O’Neill, M.N.M. Ahmad, D.W. Rooney, G.M. Walker, Dilute
ies, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24 (1986) 379–385, https://doi.org/10.1007/ acid hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass, Chem. Eng. J. 156 (2010) 395–403,
BF00294594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.061.
[7] R.S.S. Teixeira, A.S.A. Da Silva, V.S. Ferreira-Leitão, E.P. Da Silva Bon, Amino acids in- [32] S.Y. Yoon, S.H. Han, S.J. Shin, The effect of hemicelluloses and lignin on acid hydro-
terference on the quantification of reducing sugars by the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid lysis of cellulose, Energy. 77 (2014) 19–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.
assay mislead carbohydrase activity measurements, Carbohydr. Res. 363 (2012) 01.104.
33–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2012.09.024. [33] P. Kumar, D.M. Barrett, M.J. Delwiche, P. Stroeve, Methods for pretreatment of ligno-
[8] I.P. Wood, A. Elliston, P. Ryden, I. Bancroft, I.N. Roberts, K.W. Waldron, Rapid quan- cellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production, Ind. Eng. Chem.
tification of reducing sugars in biomass hydrolysates: improving the speed and pre- Res. 48 (2009) 3713–3729, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801542g.
cision of the dinitrosalicylic acid assay, Biomass Bioenergy 44 (2012) 117–121, [34] M. Mohan, T. Banerjee, V.V. Goud, Hydrolysis of bamboo biomass by subcritical
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.003. water treatment, Bioresour. Technol. 191 (2015) 244–252, https://doi.org/10.
[9] A.A.N. Saqib, P.J. Whitney, Differential behaviour of the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) 1016/j.biortech.2015.05.010.
reagent towards mono- and di-saccharide sugars, Biomass Bioenergy 35 (2011) [35] A.L. Scholl, D. Menegol, A.P. Pitarelo, R.C. Fontana, A.Z. Filho, L.P. Ramos, A.J.P. Dillon,
4748–4750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.013. M. Camassola, Ethanol production from sugars obtained during enzymatic hydroly-
[10] W. Rice, H. Roe, A Photometric of Free Method Pentoses for the Determination in sis of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum.) pretreated by steam explo-
Animal Tissues, (n.d.). sion, Bioresour. Technol. 192 (2015) 228–237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.
[11] D.B. Rivers, S.J. Gracheck, L.C. Woodford, G.H. Emert, Limitations of the DNS assay for 2015.05.065.
reducing sugars from saccharified lignocellulosics, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26 (1984) [36] M.A. Amezcua-allieri, T.S. Durán, J. Aburto, Study of Chemical and Enzymatic Hydro-
800–802, https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260260727. lysis of Cellulosic Material to Obtain Fermentable Sugars, 2017, 2017.
[12] A. Kumar, L.K. Singh, S. Ghosh, Bioconversion of lignocellulosic fraction of water- [37] M. Idrees, A. Adnan, S.A. Bokhari, F.A. Qureshi, Production of fermentable sugars by
hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hemicellulose acid hydrolysate to ethanol by Pichia combined chemo-enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic material for bioethanol produc-
stipitis, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009) 3293–3297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tion, Brazilian J. Chem. Eng. 31 (2014) 355–363, https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.
biortech.2009.02.023. 20140312s00002415.
[13] R. Kataria, R. Ruhal, R. Babu, S. Ghosh, Saccharification of alkali treated biomass of [38] N.N. Deshavath, V.V. Dasu, V.V. Goud, P.S. Rao, Development of dilute sulfuric acid
Kans grass contributes higher sugar in contrast to acid treated biomass, Chem. pretreatment method for the enhancement of xylose fermentability, Biocatal.
Eng. J. 230 (2013) 36–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.045. Agric. Biotechnol. 11 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.07.012.
[14] C.-W. Jiang, X. Zhong, Z.-H. Luo, An improved kinetic model for cellulose hydrolysis [39] X. Liu, N. Ai, H. Zhang, M. Lu, D. Ji, F. Yu, J. Ji, Quantification of glucose, xylose, arab-
to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using the solid SO42−/Ti-MCM-41 catalyst, RSC Adv. 4 inose, furfural, and HMF in corncob hydrolysate by HPLC-PDA-ELSD, Carbohydr. Res.
(2014) 15216, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra00167b. 353 (2012) 111–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2012.03.029.

Please cite this article as: N.N. Deshavath, G. Mukherjee, V.V. Goud, et al., Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing
sugars: Interference of furf..., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
6 N.N. Deshavath et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 156 (2020) xxx

[40] K. Miazek, Release of Reducing Sugars from High Yield Energy Crops during Ethanol Fermentation via Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of
Termochemical Pretreatment, 2000. Corn Stover, 2014 81, https://doi.org/10.2172/1129271.
[41] C. Huang, X. Wang, C. Liang, X. Jiang, G. Yang, J. Xu, Q. Yong, A sustainable process for [43] S.R. Kamireddy, J. Li, S. Abbina, M. Berti, M. Tucker, Y. Ji, Converting forage sorghum
procuring biologically active fractions of high-purity xylooligosaccharides and and sunn hemp into biofuels through dilute acid pretreatment, Ind. Crop. Prod. 49
water-soluble lignin from Moso bamboo prehydrolyzate, Biotechnol. Biofuels 12 (2013) 598–609, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.06.018.
(2019) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1527-3. [44] C.-H. Zhou, X. Xia, C.-X. Lin, D.-S. Tong, J. Beltramini, Catalytic conversion of lignocel-
[42] L. Tao, D. Schell, R. Davis, E. Tan, R. Elander, A. Bratis, L. Tao, D. Schell, R. Davis, E. Tan, lulosic biomass to fine chemicals and fuels, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (2011) 5588, https://
R. Elander, A. Bratis, NREL 2012 Achievement of Ethanol Cost Targets: Biochemical doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15124j.

Please cite this article as: N.N. Deshavath, G. Mukherjee, V.V. Goud, et al., Pitfalls in the 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay for the reducing
sugars: Interference of furf..., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.045
View publication stats

You might also like