The document summarizes a short story called "Lost Spring" by Anees Jung. It discusses the grinding poverty faced by rag-pickers who scour garbage dumps for items to sell so they can afford food. It also describes the situation of bangle makers in Firozabad who, despite their difficult and unsafe work producing beautiful bangles, can barely afford one meal a day due to exploitation by authorities and being trapped in a cycle of poverty. While the bangles symbolize beauty and joy for others, the makers live and die in squalor. The document answers questions about why garbage is like gold to rag-pickers, how one bangle maker differed from others, who the author blames for the
The document summarizes a short story called "Lost Spring" by Anees Jung. It discusses the grinding poverty faced by rag-pickers who scour garbage dumps for items to sell so they can afford food. It also describes the situation of bangle makers in Firozabad who, despite their difficult and unsafe work producing beautiful bangles, can barely afford one meal a day due to exploitation by authorities and being trapped in a cycle of poverty. While the bangles symbolize beauty and joy for others, the makers live and die in squalor. The document answers questions about why garbage is like gold to rag-pickers, how one bangle maker differed from others, who the author blames for the
The document summarizes a short story called "Lost Spring" by Anees Jung. It discusses the grinding poverty faced by rag-pickers who scour garbage dumps for items to sell so they can afford food. It also describes the situation of bangle makers in Firozabad who, despite their difficult and unsafe work producing beautiful bangles, can barely afford one meal a day due to exploitation by authorities and being trapped in a cycle of poverty. While the bangles symbolize beauty and joy for others, the makers live and die in squalor. The document answers questions about why garbage is like gold to rag-pickers, how one bangle maker differed from others, who the author blames for the
a) Garbage to them is gold; why does the author say so about the rag-pickers? Seemapuri is a place where rag pickers live without identities and have no basic amenities, yet they are happy here because they get food by hunting and scouring through garbage and selling usable items for cash, occasionally finding some coins or currency notes, which would make them immensely happy. Therefore, Garbage is gold to them, because it provides items which can further be used to buy food and is a means of survival. b) How is Mukesh different from the other bangle makers of Firozabad? Mukesh, who hailed from the city of Dhaka, was different from other bangle makers of Firozabad because he had the courage and willpower to break free from the traditional occupation of bangle making and chase his dreams. He wanted to be a motor mechanic and someday drive cars because he was fascinated and inspired when he saw fast vehicles hurtling down the streets of Firozabad. c) Whom does Anees Jung blame for the sorry plight of the bangle makers? Anees Jung blames the middlemen, the policemen, the lawmakers, the bureaucrats and the politicians for the sorry plight of the bangle makers. They conspire against and exploit the poor bangle makers by preventing them to form a co-operative society. The families of Firozabad are caught in a web of poverty, burdened by the stigma of the caste in which they are born and are ostracized because of the vicious circle of entrapment in the bangle making industry. d) Would you agree that promises made to poor children are rarely kept? Why do you think this happens in the incidents narrated in the text? Yes, I agree that promises made to poor children are rarely kept. People say things in a light manner, never knowing how seriously the one wracked with poverty might take it. They make promises to spread temporary happiness, fleeting hope and false assurance. It makes the person feel powerful in that moment, ensures self-satisfaction and fuels one’s ego. The author made an empty promise to Sahib by encouraging them to study and attend school, nonchalantly saying that she would build a school for them. Sometime later, when Sahib asks her about the promised school, the author realizes how shallow and meaningless her promise was and felt embarrassed.
Long Answer Questions
a) 'Lost Spring' explains the grinding poverty and traditions that condemn thousands of people to a life of abject poverty. Do you agree? Why/Why not? I agree. Lost spring is a grave tale of grinding poverty and the toxic traditions to which thousands of people have succumbed. It speaks wisely about how some poor people are happy despite their miserable condition and standards of living, and how some are utterly hopeless and devoid of optimism and joy. The story revolves around the pitiful circumstances of families who moved to India in search of better opportunities and are forced to live as rag pickers for survival, and families born in poverty who have been forced to live in slums and toil in unsanitary and unsafe environments for survival. The first part of the story tells the writer’s impression about the life of rag pickers who have migrated from Dhaka, Bangladesh, but now have settled in the Seemapuri area of Delhi. They must hunt for usable items in heaps of garbage so that they can further sell them for money to buy food. The second part of the story tells us about the desolation and despair of the bangle makers in the town of Firozabad. The stark reality of these families is despite their back-breaking work, they can barely afford to scrape by, having even one square meal a day. They are victims of exploitation by corrupt authoritative figures, and they are stuck in a vicious repetitive cycle. b) The bangle makers of Firozabad make beautiful bangles and make everyone happy but they live and die in squalor. Elaborate. The above statement throws into sharp contrast the situation of the bangle makers of Firozabad against that of what they make to earn a livelihood. While the bangles symbolise beauty, grace and delight, the makers live ugly lives where exploitation is the norm, and the families of bangle- makers have surrendered to the corrupt system which is meant to protect them. They are victims of a society that is designed for equality and justice, and they are instead subjected to social stigma, ostracism and alienation. The bangles represent auspicious new beginnings for the lucky Indian bride, while each bangle is being carefully crafted by the nimble fingers of children with lightless eyes. The sheer disparity between the sanctity that the bangles depict and the polluted environment in which they are created speaks volumes of irony.