This document provides a rubric for evaluating writing with ratings from 1 to 5. A rating of 5 is for an excellent paper that is clear, focused, and supported with relevant details. It has strong organization that enhances the central theme. The writing has a smooth flow and varied sentence structure. Conventions are used effectively. A rating of 1 is for an unacceptable paper that has no clear purpose and requires inferences from sparse details.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating writing with ratings from 1 to 5. A rating of 5 is for an excellent paper that is clear, focused, and supported with relevant details. It has strong organization that enhances the central theme. The writing has a smooth flow and varied sentence structure. Conventions are used effectively. A rating of 1 is for an unacceptable paper that has no clear purpose and requires inferences from sparse details.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating writing with ratings from 1 to 5. A rating of 5 is for an excellent paper that is clear, focused, and supported with relevant details. It has strong organization that enhances the central theme. The writing has a smooth flow and varied sentence structure. Conventions are used effectively. A rating of 1 is for an unacceptable paper that has no clear purpose and requires inferences from sparse details.
focused. It holds the reader's attention. Relevant Ideas details and quotes enrich the central theme.
The organization enhances
and showcases the central idea or theme. The order, structure of information is Organization compelling and moves the reader through the text.
The writing has an easy
flow, rhythm, and cadence. Sentences are well built, with strong and varied structure that invites Sentence Fluency expressive oral reading.
The writer demonstrates a
good grasp of standard writing conventions (e.g., spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, usage, paragraphing) and Conventions uses conventions effectively to enhance readability. The form and presentation of the text enhances the ability for the reader to understand and connect Presentation with the message. It is pleasing to the eye. 4 / VERY GOOD 3 / AVERAGE This paper is mostly The writer is beginning to focused, and has some define the topic, even though good details and quotes. development is still basic or general.
Paper (and paragraphs) The organizational structure is
are mostly organized, in strong enough to move the order, and makes sense reader through the text without to the reader. too much confusion.
The writing mostly flows, The text hums along with a
and usually invites oral steady beat, but tends to be reading. more businesslike than musical, more mechanical than fluid.
The write understands The writer shows reasonable
good writing conventions control over a limited range of and usually uses them standard writing conventions. correctly. Paper is easily Conventions are sometimes read and errors are rare; handled well and enhance minor touch-ups would readability; at other times, get this piece ready to errors are distracting and publish. impair readability. The format only has a The writer's message is few mistakes and is understandable in this format. generally easy to read and pleasing to the eye. 2 / NEEDS 1 / UNACCEPTABLE IMPROVEMENT Topic is not well- As yet, the paper has no clear sense of defined and/or there purpose or central theme. To extract are too many topics. meaning from the text, the reader must make inferences based on sketchy or missing details.
Sentences within The writing lacks a clear sense of
paragraphs make direction. Ideas, details, or events seem sense, but the order of strung together in a loose or random paragraphs does not. fashion; there is no identifiable internal structure.
The text seems choppy The reader has to practice quite a bit in and is not easy to read order to give this paper a fair interpretive orally. reading.
The writer seems to Errors in spelling, punctuation,
have made little effort capitalization, usage, and grammar and/or to use conventions: paragraphing repeatedly distract the spelling, punctuation, reader and make the text difficult to read. capitalization, usage, grammar and/or paragraphing have multiple errors. The writer's message The reader receives a garbled message is only understandable due to problems relating to the occasionally, and presentation of the text, and is not typed. paper is messily written.