All Owners Of Harita Gardens

Should Know & Think About It

#1) Who Collects Corpus Fund
1 of 2
• Corpus fund is collected by the builders and developers in any market
and transfer to the association once the construction is completed. So,
as builder/developer VMRDA collected the Corpus fund and
transferred to VHAA after its formation.

→
#1) Who Collects Corpus Fund
2 of 2

→
So, nothing went wrong in VHAA Case. All the builders/developers does the same.
#2) FALSE CLAIM of Misuse of Corpus Funds by
VHAA
• Initially VMRDA has maintained HG for few months/1 year but, when there were
severe complaints from the residents directly to the VC, VMRDA about security
guards and garderns, VMRDA has withdrawn their support and asked VHAA to
take care of it.
• By that time, very few owners have paid MMC and there was not enough fund in
MMC account to maintain HG. That's when VHAA, in consultation with many
owners, has decided to use ONLY INTEREST generated on Corpus fund to use for
maintenance of HG. Without it, HG residents would have got no power, water,
security, gardeners and lift maintenance till date. IS THIS MEASURE NOT IN THE
INTEREST OF RESIDENTS OF HG? Shall we stop paying above bills?
#3) How Col Kolasani Srinivas was co-opted as Executive
Committee Member? Based on this clause
in the bye-laws
(amendments)
registered with ROS in
the year 2018, Col.
Kolasani Srinivas as co-
opted as a Member in
the EC of VHAA.

If anyone read these

bye-laws would
understand it. And, it is
NOT peculiar to VHAA,
it is standard practice
across RWA's.

The copy of this registered bye-laws are avilable in TG HO group since long time. Please go through.
 #4) Questionning Existence of VHAA

• VHAA is paying bills for Security, Electricity, Water, Gardeners, Lifts &
Repairs of Motors, etc., since the beginning with which the residents
owners and tenants are able to live in HG for many years even when
many owners are not paying MMC.

• It is unfortunate and shame that the same Owners who are enjoying
the above facilities for years without paying MMC are questionning
existence of VHAA & Interest of Corpus fund utilisation.
#5) People United HG v/s People Divided HG
PEOPLE WHO UNITED HG OWNERS PEOPLE WHO DIVIDED HG OWNERS
Coordinated with every owner in all platforms and in Those who conducted meetings behind closed doors
transparent manner without consulting & communicating with anyone.

Brought every owner onto a common understanding and Brought that situation back and divided owners into
made the EGBM happened
Cleared misunderstanding and caused friendship
between all owners
Though there were few loop holes in the system, the
focus was on moving forward and welfare of HG
Removed barriers between all owners and made them
come together for a common cuase, welfare of HG
different groups & became reason for stalling Election
Process
Created misunderstanding and caused disturbances
between all owners
Dug up unnecessary things, Wasted time & Opened
pandora box with government agencies viz., ROS and
lost focus on the given task.
Created barriers between Owners by introducing
Resident owner & Non-Resident owner & First Allottee
and Second Owner, etc.
#6) Claiming misapporpriation of funds by VHAA

• The current EC of VHAA has shifted records of all accounts to

HG weeks ago and invited owners to come and inspect the
records.

• As suggested by few owners, we are also absolutely fine with

any independent Chartered Accountant firm to come and
audit all accounts right from the inception of the association.
We have no problem for that.
#7) Not considering SOP for reference
When many of you did say that SOP is only meant for duties and
responsibilities of Additional office bearers and not for others, we have
accepted it and supported you to go ahead with only those two
(inception bye-laws of 213 & amended bye-laws of 2018) registered
with ROS for conduct of elections.

But, we didn't understand why El.C., has gone for something which is
not mentioned in these two registered bye-laws initially and created
disturbances.
#8) MyGate App Usage
 There was misconception that secret polling feature available on MyGate app can be tampered
with to suit to the Admin's choice but, it is wrong. It is not at all possible.

 We have asked El.C., as well as all owners whoever has doubt to come forward and prove if it can
be tampered.

 Mr. Chaitanya challenged in Telegram HO group but didn't turn up when called him for date and
time to give him FULL Admin rights.

 WE ARE STILL OPEN TO GIVE FULL ADMIN RIGHTS TO ANYONE WHO IS INTERESTED TO TRY AND
PROVE IF IT CAN BE TAMPERED WITH.

 If anyone proves it then we are ready to go for R2V app for our elections.
#9) Court Case
• The petitioners (KSN Reddy & two other owners of HG) have filed a case in the
court in Visakhapatnam against VHAA.

• Unless they withdraw, our election process could become null and void as the
petitioners have involved ROS & VMRDA also in the case.

• ROS has already conveyed to El.C., that he can't accept elections unless the
court case is withdrawn.

• We, along with few other well wishers of HG were having a workable to plan
to resolve the matter with ROS & others but, now we have lost that
opportunity as El.C., has already opened the pandora box at ROS.
#10) Violation of Mandate Given To
Ex-El.C. 1 of 4
Election Committee’s work and proposals are found to be,
•Creating division, hatred and rivalry among the owners by introducing
something that is not there in our bye-laws or ROS Act (e.g. division
between resident owner and non-resident owner terms)

•Misinterpreting sensitive information available in our bye-laws (e.g. If

allottees are mentioned in the bye-laws, misquoting it as First Allottees
and announcing Second buyers are not allowed to contest for EC
positions)
#10) Violation of Mandate Given To Ex-El.C.
2 of 4
•Preparing technical comparison reports with preset and biased mindset
instead of fair and unbiased comparision. This is nothing but misleading all the
710 flat owners of HG (e.g. Report on MyGate v/s R2V platforms)

•Communicating/posting VHAA election related information/notices in other

groups that are exclusive for another registered association.

•Not serious to follow documentation requirements (e.g. It took 10 days and

follow up by many members to give acknowledgment for El.C., appointment
letter)
#10) Violation of Mandate Given To Ex-El.C.
3 of 4
• Misusing and converting the draft documents of VHAA elections as
final documents and submitting to various government organizations
(e.g. Draft-3 of Election Notification conversion to Final Election Notification and
submitting in ROS. It was the job of R.O., to convert it to Final Notification)

• El.C in their first draft mentioned that those doesn't vote, common
services will be stopped for them (This is against law)
#10) Violation of Mandate Given To Ex-El.C.
4 of 4
• Not being able to clarify on membership of VHAA requirement for
considering an owner as eligble/not eligible voter per byelaws and ROS
Act.

• Ignoring/misrepresenting inceptions as well as amended bye-laws that

were registered at ROS
#11) Appointment of new R.O., as per Court
Case
• Mr. Niranjan Patnaik (Retd. Registrar) was appointed and
communicated to you all.
• We will share the details as soon as we receive from him to
take the election process forward.
• Per law, no one can conduct elections for VHAA other than
the existing EC.
• Anyone trying to conduct elections in HG on their own will
divide HG further.