Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assume that you are the new CEO of a major corporation in Bahrain that has five major
product lines each run as separate corporations. You discover that if you invested the
company’s financial resources outside of the firm that it could earn a 15% rate of return on
the investment. You tell all the presidents of each of these subsidiary companies that in
order for them to remain with the company that their return on capital must equal to or
exceed 15% rate of return. Is the advice of the CEO feasible? Use at least two economic
principles in the course to explain why the CEO’s advice is sound. Discuss your answer
fully. Maximum of 700 words.
I feel that the CEO is justified. Since he is getting 15% return that is guaranteed, it is expected
that he is able to generate the same from his investment. I shall explain it with the help of the
Opportunity Cost:
We all make daily decisions, regardless of who we are, rich or poor, or where we come from in
this world. It's worth noting that scarcity and opportunity cost play a role in these decisions,
which range from simple ones like what to eat for breakfast, lunch, and supper to more
sophisticated ones like earning o certain amount on our investments and also how to manage our
portfolio. These decisions are often based on the principle of sacrifice (Ansar, A., B. Flyvbjerg,
A. Budzier and D. Lunn (2016)). It shows that if we are choosing a certain alternative, what
would be value of the sacrifice that we are making to use that alternative. In this case, the CEO is
already receiving 15% for his investment from an alternate investment. Therefore he has to now
choose between investing in that alternative or keep running the firm. Since he is getting 15% he
is interested to receive at least 15% on his investment in the company which is very much
realistic. He is foregoing 15% and therefore is expecting his managers of sub decisions to get
him at least 15%. The expense of swapping one product or action for another is known as the
opportunity cost. This notion allows people to assess the benefits and drawbacks of various
decisions. It indicates that humans are required to recognize accessible options, weigh the
benefits and drawbacks of each option, and finally choose the optimal option (Buckley, T., S.
Nicholas, and M. Brown (2017)). That decision symbolizes the opportunity cost; you have to
lose one side in order to win the other. Therefore the CEO is justified according to this economic
principle.
Marginal Principle:
The marginal principle aids in economic decision-making and determining how a change in one
variable affects another. As a result, it is easier to compare the marginal benefit and marginal
cost. The marginal principle states that in order to maximize profits it is necessary that units are
produced which have lower marginal costs (Easterly, W. (2003)). As a result, the managerial
control variable should be increased to the point where marginal benefit equals marginal cost in
order to maximize overall benefits. The marginal cost rises as the degree of activity rises,
The firm will profit from that unit if the marginal revenue (the increased revenue from selling an
additional unit) is greater than the marginal cost (the additional cost of selling an additional unit).
If the marginal cost is less than the marginal revenue, on the other hand, the firm should produce
less (Ekanayake, E.M. and A. Mukherjee (2010)). When the marginal cost and income are
identical, the profit maximizing level is reached. The price is then established so that the amount
maximize profit from one unit more than the other and therefore would be able to get the desired
rate of 15% or more. However, if it goes for investment in the other company, it shall not have
that much control on the operations and therefore the CEO can guide and monitor the costs to
make sure that he gets at least 15% return from each department.
References
1. Ansar, A., B. Flyvbjerg, A. Budzier and D. Lunn (2016), does infrastructure investment lead
2. Buckley, T., S. Nicholas, and M. Brown (2017), China 2017 Review: World’s Second-
Biggest Economy Continues to Drive Global Trends in Energy Investment, Institute for
3. Easterly, W. (2003), “IMF, and World Bank Structural Adjustment Programs and Poverty”,
4. Ekanayake, E.M. and A. Mukherjee (2010), “Trade Blocs and the Gravity Model: A Study of
25(4), December.
Question 2
Fossil fuels (oil, coal, and natural gas) are our most traditional source for power
generation. These days, alternative energy sources, often touted for their environmental
friendliness and even as potential sources of economic growth by our elected officials, have
opportunity costs associated with them. In view of this, compare between the values of the
current tradeoffs made by switching to alternative energy sources to the potential future
environmental benefits from using less polluting sources of energy in the country. Do you
believe that Bahrain should switch to greater usage of alternative energy? Maximum of 800
words.
Several renewable energy sources, including as solar, hydrothermal, geothermal, and wind
power, are currently the primary sources of energy in various states. This is also a positive
attribute for Bahrain since it is sunny through out the year in Bahrain (Basso, L. C. (2019)). The
Sun, which is considerable as a great source of renewable energy is available in abundance. This
makes it susceptible to use it as an alternate energy source.
As a result, alternative energy sources help the economy, citizens in a country, and the
environment, and are rapidly gaining traction as primary energy sources for homes and
companies. Alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydrothermal are pollution-free
and do not contribute to climate change. Wind, solar, and nuclear energy are examples of
renewable energy sources that do not emit carbon or other greenhouse gases (Kalogirou, S.
(2020)). As a result, they have aided in lowering the harmful effects that are caused by the
emission of greenhouse gases that harm the environment in a bad way. (Moriarty, 2020)
Electricity generation from renewable sources of energy provides for two-thirds of the reduction
in greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming, especially when solar, wind,
nuclear atoms, geothermal, and even hydro thermals are used (Kalogirou, 2020). Renewable
energy technologies, on the other hand, are supposed to employ even more people. For example,
the solar business employed around 100,000 people full and part time in production, solar
installation, and sales. In 2009, the hydroelectric power business employed over 250,000 people,
while the geothermal energy industry employed over 5200 people (Moriarty, P., & Honnery,
D. (2020)). Increasing the usage of renewable energy has the potential to generate even more
jobs). In 2009, the Union of Concerned Scientists examined the economic benefits of a 25%
renewable energy standard and found that policies promoting these alternative energy sources
would generate three times as many jobs as fossil-fuel-based electricity, which is expected to
Apart from the jobs that these renewable energy businesses directly produce, their growth and
development also have a positive economic ripple effect (Trifu, Prof. A. (2020)). The renewable
energy supply chain, for example, as well as other unrelated industries, will greatly profit.
Increased business and household earnings, as well as other important economic development
benefits the owners of renewable energy projects pay the local government income and property
taxes, as well as other contributions .The funds raised can be used to support critical public
services, particularly in rural areas where projects are typically located. (Kalogirou, 2020)
Furthermore, these energy sources are limitless and have a large energy supply. Sunny skies,
powerful winds, solar heat, rapid moving water, and plant wastes can all contribute to a
constantly replenished and large energy resource supply on a global scale. Renewable energy
resources of various types have the technical capability and promise to provide all of a country's
electricity needs on a consistent basis unlike fossil fuels, which are unevenly spread over the
globe, the global economy is reliant on a small number of countries that export them. Alternative
energy can greatly reduce reliance, hence improving energy security by ensuring a reliable and
To summarize Bahrain companies should use them as they are numerous, emission-free, have
lower costs associated with equipment repair, and have been shown to promote human health.
They are widely available, thus they are unlikely to be depleted and leave consumers in a bind.
The generation of electricity or power from these many energy sources is "green" and "clean."
People switching to power or electricity generated by these alternative energy sources will
greatly reduce carbon dioxide emissions from conventional energy sources, therefore minimizing
and solving the problem of global warming (Usman, M., Khalid, K., & Mehdi, M. A. (2021).
Alternative energy sources can help to mitigate the consequences of traditional energy sources'
water, air, and soil pollution in a reasonable way. The manufacturing and industrial revolution
have caused significant damage to the globe, necessitating rapid action in order to maintain the
planet sustainable for future generations. As a result, the utilization of alternative energy sources
is the most significant step that can be taken to avert additional environmental damage.
References
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.868631
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy
3. Moriarty, P., & Honnery, D. (2020). What is the global potential for renewable energy?
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.151
The Pursuit of Happiness. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 9–11.
https://doi.org/10.34257/gjmbrbvol20is1pg9
5. Usman, M., Khalid, K., & Mehdi, M. A. (2021). What determines environmental deficit in
Asia? Embossing the role of renewable and non-renewable energy utilization. Renewable