You are on page 1of 265

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Acasio Vir Lloyd Adolfo
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Point Numerical Weight


Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
√ √
E a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16
Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Vir Lloyd A Acasio PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER

July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020


(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Banzon Arnold Villegas
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS √
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS √
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright √ 1 Civic-minded √ 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Arnold V Banzon PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
√ √ Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cartalaba Noel Teomera
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Traffic Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest √ 1 Responsible √ 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
√ √

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Noel T Cartalaba PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Traffic Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Castro Leonard Ruales
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination √ √ 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
√ √
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Leonard R Castro PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Dacapio Jr Remillo Patindol
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management√ & Submission of Reports√ 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization √ 1 Initiate positive action
√ 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Remillo P Dacapio Jr PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Dalman Lemuel Reyes
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
DEU Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score
√ √
a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check √ Marks

TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Lemuel R Dalman PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk DEU Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
√ √
PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Dela Cruz Francisco Nalzaro
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING√(NPR) = TWS / 5 √ 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

√ √

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Francisco N Dela Cruz PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Harding Reymundo Tagud
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait
√ Personal Trait

Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
√ √
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE √ RATING (APR) (Please√refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Reymundo T Harding PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Jopista Ronald Familar
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Road Discipline Task Force
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with√and Implementation of √ 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report
√ represent my best judgement.√ [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Ronald F Jopista PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Road Discipline Task Force Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Libertino Randy Orijines
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Traffic Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work √ √ 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III.
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:√ √

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Randy O Libertino PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Traffic Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form) √ √

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Matalang Marjorie Cutler
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Traffic Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16
Personal Trait Personal Trait
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:
√ √
Significant/Critical Incident(s):

√ √
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Marjorie C Matalang PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Traffic Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Melendres Jiovanne Jay Rellon
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright √ 1 Civic-minded √ 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): √ √

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Jiovanne Jay R Melendres PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Montalban Leonard Solis
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority√
√ 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

√ √

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Leonard S Montalban PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Palanas Carlos Macalos
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I. √ √
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
Interpersonal
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

√ √
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Carlos M Palanas PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Asst. Warrant/ Subpoena PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

√ √
POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Palar Clanthor Agac-ac
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged:
√√Conformed: √√ Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Clanthor A Palar PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Opertive Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Paloma Alter Benitez
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Custodial Facility Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest √ 1 Responsible √ 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

√ √
PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Alter B Paloma PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Custodial Facility Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Rollorata Glenn John Ochida
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8
a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20
C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) √
d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation √ 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra √ PMSg Glenn John O Rollorata


√ PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sanchez Jotchie Sala
Police Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Traffic investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment√of target √ 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PMSg Jotchie S Sanchez PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk √ Traffic Investigator Chief of Police

RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT



FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR√MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Amargo Arvin Fabular
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Boat Patrol
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

√ √
PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Arvin F Amargo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Boat Patrol Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 √ √ 1, 2020
July July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Balahay Wendell Cuamag
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Desk Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10

II. Job Knowledge


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just √ 1 Courteous/tactful
√ 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Wendell C Balahay PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Desk Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) √ √
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cortez Donnie Noval
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness√ √ 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Donnie N Cortez PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
√ √
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cosal Rico Calipayan
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12
√ √
a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10
b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Rico C Cosal PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)


I certify that this report was referred √ for review and evaluation.
to the Grievance Committee

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
√Rating Period: January 1 to June
√ 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mabalod Rommel Sumilhig
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Custodial Facility Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Point Numerical Weight
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra √ √


PSMS Rommel S Mabalod PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Custodial Facility Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
√ √
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Matobato Cyrian Matabilas
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1

Loyal to the Organization √
1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Cyrian M Matobato PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
√ √
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mondalo Ruel Castillo
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Station Guard
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
√ √
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Ruel C Mondalo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Station Guard Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
√ √
PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Omaña Rey Nagaliza
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of√job description √ 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Rey N Omaña PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form) √ √


POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020
√ √
1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank
Pagaran Joseph Mundo
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Joseph M Pagaran PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk √ Investigator √ Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)


√ √
POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Peria Ana Fe Torres
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
HR / Law & Order PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Years & 8 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check √ Marks √
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Ana Fe T Peria PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk HR/ Law & Order PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT



FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT √
TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 to June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pedro Edwin Montaña
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions
√ √ 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Edwin M Pedro PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 2A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR POLICE MASTER SERGEANT TO POLICE SENIOR MASTER SERGEANT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating
√ Period: January 1 to June
√ 30, 2020
1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank
Rotimas Arnel Escabillas
Police Senior Master Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol, Team Leader
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of work 5 x 5 = 25
Output b. Timeliness of Work 3 x 5 = 15
I.
(15 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x 5 = 20
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x 4 = 12

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the√organization √
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 4 x 5 = 20
(20 points) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 4 x 5 = 20
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x 4 = 8

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x 4 = 20


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 4 x 5 = 20
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 4 x 4 = 16
P (25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Cost Effectiveness 4 x 5 = 20
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x 4 = 16

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x 4 = 16
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x 4 = 16
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 4 x 4 = 16
I (20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x 4 = 16
E e. Motivation 4 x 4 = 16

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Presrvation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 points) Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 448
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSMS Arnel E Rotimas PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Mobile Patrol, Team Leader Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

√ √
√ √
√ √

√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √

√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √

√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √

√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √

√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Aban Ma Alvelyn Joy Segundo
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
WCPD Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Ma Alvelyn Joy S Aban PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
WCPD Officer WCPD Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Largado Lovinel Solomon
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait
√ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Lovinel S Largado PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Motorcops Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Baldonado Krystel Joy Gumban
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
WCPD Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Krystel Joy G Baldonado PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
WCPD Officer WCPD Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Clemen Stephanie Mae Bangoy
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
WCPD Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Stephanie Mae B Clemen PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
WCPD Officer WCPD Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Calamba Sheena Dee Espera
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Morale & Welfare PNCO/Admin Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing System 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 5 = 10
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 455
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 91
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PARMU from January to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES Pat Sheena Dee E Calamba PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Admin Officer Morale & Welfare PNCO/ Admin Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


De Guzman Xyrus Amponan
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Xyrus A De Guzman PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Diez Rusina Lapinig
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 5 = 10
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 455
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 91
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO Pat Rusina L Diez PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Intel Officer Intel Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mahumot Alfie Guzon
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Alfie G Mahumot PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Magallanes Rey Glenn Abaño
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Rey Glenn A Magallanes PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Polinar Rosemen Ventura
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
WCPD Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Rosemen V Polinar PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


WCPD Officer WCPD Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Manatad Pedrito Amodia
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Pedrito A Manatad PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tan Jr Sabino Vergara
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
OIC Security Escort
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES Pat Sabino V Tan Jr PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer OIC Security Escort Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Vargas Carl Kevin Lim
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR Pat Carl Kevin L Vargas PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Burce Juvy Baniog
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 5 = 10
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 455
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 91
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO PCpl Juvy B Burce PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Intel Officer Intel Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Dinagay Peter Fritz Eramis
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 5 = 10
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 455
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 91
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO Pat Peter Fritz E Dinagay PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Intel Officer Intel Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Catarata ll Alexander Salapare
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PCpl Alexander S Catarata ll PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Navarro Meljoy Daroy
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Operation Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PCpl Meljoy D Navarro PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Operation Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Kuizon Charlotte Jennifer Pagador
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SAIDMC Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 6 months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PCpl Charlotte Jennifer P Kuizon PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer SAIDMC Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Libatan Jayheyniel Maban
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 5 = 10
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 455
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 91
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO PCpl Jayheyniel M Libatan PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Intel Officer Intel Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Endrina Venus Morata
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
FJGAD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PCpl Venus M Endrina PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin/PCAD Officer FJGAD PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tautho Carlo Edwin Iglesias
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 453
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 90.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO PCpl Carlo Edwin I Tautho PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Intel Officer Intel Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Navales Dennis Panutsol
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
PCAD Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PCpl Dennis P Navales PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


PCAD Officer PCAD Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Alejo Edgardo Cagang
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Station Guard
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Edgardo C Alejo PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Station Guard Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Almedora Carlou Olaivar
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Carlou O Almedora PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Llorca Manuel Capuno
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
OIC Security Escort
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PCpl Manuel C Llorca PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer OIC Security Escort Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Hadjula Elsir Tabar
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Fixed Checkpoint/Chokepoint PNCO (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PCpl Elsir T Hadjula PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Fixed Checkpoint/Chokepoint PODP Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Capurihan Brian Achacoso
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PCpl Brian A Capurihan PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Bahinting Jonar Cantones
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Jonar C Bahinting PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Costan Rhyan Basa
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
OIC Security Escort
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PCpl Rhyan B Costan PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer OIC Security Escort Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cañada Jade Tocmo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Finger Print / E-Warrant
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 8 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Jade T Cañada PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Finger Print / E-Warrant Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cañete Llewelyn John Cejas
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years & 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Llewelyn John C Cañete PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Awitin Jay R Basig
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Fixed Checkpoint/Chokepoint PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PCpl Jay R B Awitin PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Fixed Checkpoint/Chokepoint PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Catalino Kerrneil Rosaroso
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Kerrneil R Catalino PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Dizon Maria Arlene Balante
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
COP Security Escort
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Maria Arlene B Dizon PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Admin Officer COP Security Escort Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Florentino Reynaldo Luna
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Reynaldo L Florentino PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Garzon Mark Suico
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Mark S Garzon PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ibag Kerk Neil Monreal
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative / Special Investigator for Drug Cases
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Years & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 5 = 15
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 5 = 15
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 453
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 90.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO PSSg Kerk Neil M Ibag PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Intel Officer Intel Operative/Special Investigator for Drug Cases Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Juan Ryan Balogo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Ryan B Juan PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Law-ay Edwin Tapa
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Supply PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 13 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Edwin T Law-ay PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer Supply PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Legarda Jerry Matoran
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:
Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Jerry M Legarda PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Llemit Aris Cagadas
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 5 = 15
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 5 = 15
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 453
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 90.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO PSSg Aris C Llemit PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Intel Officer Intel PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Luceñara Rodjie Llanera
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Rodjie L Luceñara PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Marilao Rubelyn Cañazares
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
On Public Safety Junior Leadership Course (PSJLC)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 3 = 9
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 3 = 9
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 5 = 20

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Rubelyn C Marilao PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer PSJLC Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mende ll Cesar Lindong
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 5 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Cesar L Mende ll PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Merquita Randy Boncales
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
On Public Safety Junior Leadership Course (PSJLC)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Randy B Merquita PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer PSJLC Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Merto Jhonle Ochavo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal
III.
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Jhonle O Merto PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Navarro Merlyn Ponpon
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
WCPD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

√ √
Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Merlyn P Navarro PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


CESPO/Chief Clerk WCPD PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Buhat Virgilio Jr Samones
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Virgilio Jr S Buhat PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cortado Jr Arturo Bagnol
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative/Special Investigator for Drug Cases
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 5 = 15
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 5 = 15
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 453
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 90.6
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT BENJIE C SOLTEO PSSg Arturo B Cortado Jr PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Intel Officer Intel Operative/Special Investigator for Drug Cases Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Panganoron Mike Cane Redoloza
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Operation Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Mike Cane R Panganoron PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Operation Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Parcon Melven Ocao
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PCPT ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Melven O Parcon PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pasion Ruel Pia
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
On Public Safety Junior Leadership Course (PSJLC)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 3 = 9
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 3 = 9
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 5 = 20

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Ranked No.1 Regional Level re Unit Performance Evaluation Rating (UPER) - PIU from February to April 2021.

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Ruel P Pasion PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer PSJLC Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Peralta Jr Gil Orcajada
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Gil O Peralta Jr PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Perea Renan Manalo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Renan M Perea PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Piñez Jhuvan Secusana
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 8 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
Work
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Jhuvan S Piñez PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Piñez Maria Fe Demabildo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
FJGAD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 10 Years & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25
a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12
C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT FRANCISCO S CASLIB PSSg Maria Fe D Piñez PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


PCAD Officer FJGAD PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ricohermoso Norielyn Sagocio
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SANTINIG In-charge
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Years & 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √ √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT FRANCISCO S CASLIB PSSg Norielyn S Ricohermoso PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


PCAD Officer SANTINIG In-charge Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pongo Ian Ali
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Ian A Pongo PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Patenio Ermel Merquita
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
On Public Safety Junior Leadership Course (PSJLC)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Ermel M Patenio PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer PSJLC Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Separa Roque Rubinos
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10

II. Job Knowledge


objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): A) Awarded as Best PPO National Level during 119th Police Service Anniversary Celebration.
B) Outstanding PPO of PRO 11 for the Year 2020 during the 25th Police Community Relations Month. C) Awardee for the Search
of PNP's Best Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Region XI in Celebration of the 25th PCR Month.
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Roque R Separa PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Motorcops Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Villares Albert Semblante
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Custodial Facility Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

II.
a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10
b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): A) Awarded as Best PPO National Level during 119th Police Service Anniversary Celebration.
B) Outstanding PPO of PRO 11 for the Year 2020 during the 25th Police Community Relations Month. C) Awardee for the Search
of PNP's Best Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Region XI in Celebration of the 25th PCR Month.
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Albert S Villares PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Custodial Facility Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sharief Hashouba Bagon
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
PSMU PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Hashouba B Sharief PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Admin Officer PSMU PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Siapo Glenville Dojo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Warrant/Subpoena PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output
I.
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PMAJ ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PSSg Glenville D Siapo PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Investigation Officer Warrant/Subpoena PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Solibio Jovanie Siton
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Admin PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 5 = 15
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 5 = 15
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 5 = 20

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 455
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 91
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) OS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Jovanie S Solibio PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic Officer Traffic Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ybañez Retchel Dayoc
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Point Numerical Weight
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Retchel D Ybañez PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tabile Lindsey Andoyo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Years & 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Lindsey A Tabile PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tabuyan Beverly Jane Gaco
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Human Rights PNCO/Survivor PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Beverly Jane G Tabuyan PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Admin Officer Human Rights/Survivor PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Templa Julius Mar Cagurol
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Operation PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 5 = 10

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 5 = 20

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Julius Mar C Templa PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Operation PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021
1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank
Tenaja Adrian Legarda
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Adrian L Tenaja PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Villanueva Mark Anthony Sagabaen
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Years & 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Mark Anthony S Villanueva PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)


POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Purugganan Mae Ann Jueza
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Operation Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Mae Ann J Purugganan PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Operation Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Bartonico Cherry Dianne Marquez
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Cherry Dianne M Bartonico PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Basco Aldrin Podador
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PCpl Aldrin P Basco PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Arangcon Alexis Ferniz
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Fixed Checkpoint/Chokepoint PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 8 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PCpl Alexis F Arangcon PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Operation Officer Fixed Checkpoint/Chokepoint PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Asumen Neldon Cagas
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Neldon C Asumen PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cuenca Junelle Caesar Sinco
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Junelle Caesar S Cuenca PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Masepequiña James Cruda
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat James C Masepequiña PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mitra Allan Delasalde
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Allan D Mitra PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Oñez Arnel Comidoy
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Arnel C Oñez PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pantua Aljen Ramos
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:
Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Aljen R Pantua PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sumaliday Ricky Encallado
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Ricky E Sumaliday PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sumampong Abil Dapar
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Abil D Sumampong PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Viagedor Jr Vincent Razo
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Vincent R Viagedor Jr PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Villanueva Mark James Hebia
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Mark James H Villanueva PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sorrosa Archie Salmorin
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III.
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT CYRIL REX C BERCILLA PSSg Archie S Sorrosa PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON
Opertaion Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Awitin Jay R Basig
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√

Personal
III.
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PCpl Jay R B Awitin PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cabiles Noriel Lurican
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Custodial Facility Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16
Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Noriel L Cabiles PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Custodial Facility Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


De Guzman Xyrus Amponan
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PAT Xyrus A De Guzman PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pagobo Al Saligumba
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PCpl Al S Pagobo PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ebdao Ebenezer Milagrosa
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Desk Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): A) Awarded as Best PPO National Level during 119th Police Service Anniversary Celebration
B) Outstanding PPO of PRO 11 for the Year 2020 during the 25th Police Community Relation Month. C) Awardee for the Search
of the PNP's Best Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Region XI in Celebration of the 25th PCR Month
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PCpl Ebenezer M Ebdao PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Desk Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Espiña Madeline Singson
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
Interpersonal
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): A) Awarded as Best PPO National Level during 119th Police Service Anniversary Celebration
B) Outstanding PPO of PRO 11 for the Year 2020 during the 25th Police Community Relation Month. C) Awardee for the Search
of the PNP's Best Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Region XI in Celebration of the 25th PCR Month
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PCpl Madeline S Espiña PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Operation Officer Motorcops Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 to December 31 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Maarat Robert Melo
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): A) Awarded as Best PPO National Level during 119th Police Service Anniversary Celebration
B) Outstanding PPO of PRO 11 for the Year 2020 during the 25th Police Community Relation Month. C) Awardee for the Search
of the PNP's Best Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Region XI in Celebration of the 25th PCR Month
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PCPT ANJANETTE P TIRADOR PCpl Robert M Maarat PLTCOL RUTH B DIZON


Deputy, Chief of Police Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2022
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Budac Cristine Delos Santos
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Survivor PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait
√ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Cristine S Budac PMAJ JOSELITO L TAN JR


Admin Officer Survivor PNCO Officer In-Charge
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ricohermoso Norielyn Sagocio
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SANTINIG In-Charge
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 5 Years & 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait
√ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Norielyn S Ricohermoso PMAJ JOSELITO L TAN JR


Admin Officer SANTINIG In-Charge Officer In-Charge
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Piñez Maria Fe Demabildo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
FJGAD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 10 Years & 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Maria Fe D Piñez PMAJ JOSELITO L TAN JR
Admin Officer FJGAD PNCO Officer In-Charge
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tenaja Adrian Legarda
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Adrian L Tenaja PMAJ JOSELITO L TAN JR


Admin Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Officer In-Charge
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Amor Oliver Rentuza
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Years & 8 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Oliver R Amor PMAJ JOSELITO L TAN JR


Admin Officer Investigator Officer In-Charge
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Lyses Faith Malnegro
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 5 = 15
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 5 = 15
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 5 = 15
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT STEPHEN F CAMPOMANES PSSg Cristine S Budac PMAJ JOSELITO L TAN JR


Admin Officer Survivor PNCO Officer In-Charge
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: January 1 - 18, 2021

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Magoncia Jr Franco Dumali
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Franco D Magoncia Jr PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mamalias Mary Rose Ang
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

√ √
Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Mary Rose A Mamalias PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mangulon Delmer Gapa
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Delmer G Mangulon PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Maraña Jeric Luna
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Jeric L Maraña PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Maruhomadil Rajed Bautista
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Rajed B Maruhomadil PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mingo Jefrey Abay-abay
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Jefrey A Mingo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mocoy Rolan Carmina
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √
√ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Rolan C Mocoy PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Molinos Lex Rodger Cabalonga
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Lex Rodger C Molinos PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Monteza Scarlley Dao
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Scarlley D Monteza PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Moreno Cyriel Jhon Caballero
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III.
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Cyriel Jhon C Moreno PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Oculam Eugene Montero
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16
Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Eugene M Oculam PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Odo Jabe Andagkit
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Jabe A Odo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pacheco Tyrone Jeb Villaray
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
Interpersonal
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Tyrone Jeb V Pacheco PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Panganoron Christine Sabejon
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Christine S Panganoron PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Padilla III Sixto Gomez
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12

Work
C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Sixto G Padilla III PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Patugan Kristine Mae Castro
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Kristine Mae C Patugan PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pardillo Russell Kit Alquizar
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Russell Kit A Pardillo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pepito Joebert Lazan
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24
a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10
b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Joebert L Pepito PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Peralta Francis Oliver Bradley
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Francis Oliver B Peralta PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mingo Jeffrey Abay-abay
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months
Point Numerical Weight
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √√ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Jeffrey A Mingo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mocoy Rolan Carmina
Patrolman
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √
√ Personal Trait √
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Rolan C Mocoy PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Molinos Lex Rodger Cabalonga
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Lex Rodger C Molinos PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Monteza Scarlley Dao
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Beat Patroller (PSFTP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 4 = 24
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 4 = 12

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √ √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 436
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 87.2
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Scarlley D Monteza PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Beat Patroller (PSFTP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cañete Llewelyn John Cejas
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years & 5 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Llewelyn John C Cañete PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Carrillo Kimberly Llanda
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
CPSMU PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Kimberly L Carrillo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk CPSMU PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Catalino Kerrneil Rosaroso
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Kerrneil R Catalino PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Dizon Maria Arlene Balante
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Maria Arlene B Dizon PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Florentino Reynaldo Luna
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Reynaldo L Florentino PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Garzon Mark Suico
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Mark S Garzon PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Asst. Warrant / Subpoena PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ibag Kerk Neil Monreal
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative / Special Investigator for Drug Cases
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

√ √
Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Kerk Neil M Ibag PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative/Special Investigator for Drug Cases Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Juan Ryan Balogo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Ryan B Juan PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Law-ay Edwin Tapa
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Supply PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 11 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Edwin T Law-ay PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Supply PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Legarda Jerry Matoran
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Jerry M Legarda PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Llemit Aris Cagadas
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
Work
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Aris C Llimet PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Luceñara Rodjie Llanera
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x = 0
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Rodjie L Luceñara PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Marilao Rubelyn Cañazares
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years & 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Rubelyn C Marilao PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mende ll Cesar Lindong
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Operative
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 5 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

II.
a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10
b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Cesar L Mende ll PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Operative Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Merquita Randy Boncales
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output
I.
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Randy B Merquita PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Merto Jhonle Ochavo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Point Numerical Weight
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Jhonle O Merto PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Navarro Merlyn Ponpon
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
WCPD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Merlyn P Navarro PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk WCPD PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020
1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank
Ococa Cyrille Alyssa Calamba
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
PLDD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Cyrille Alyssa C Ococa PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
CESPO/Chief Clerk PLDD PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)


POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Panes Delfin Capuso
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Delfin C Panes PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.
Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Panganoron Mike Cane Redoloza
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Mike Cane R Panganoron PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Parcon Melven Ocao
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Melven O Parcon PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pasion Ruel Pia
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 7 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Ruel P Pasion PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Peralta Jr Gil Orcajada
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Years

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:
Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Gil O Peralta Jr PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Perea Renan Manalo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Renan M Perea PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Piñez Jhuvan Secusana
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 1 Month

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Jhuvan S Piñez PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Piñez Maria Fe Demabildo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
FJGAD PNCO
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √

Personal
III.
Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Maria Fe D Piñez PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk FJGAD PNCO Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Ricohermoso Norielyn Sagocio
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SANTINIG In-charge
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Years & 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √ √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Norielyn S Ricohermoso PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk SANTINIG In-charge Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pongo Ian Ali
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Ian A Pongo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Saludares Julius Damiles
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Station Guard
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Julius D Saludares PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Operation Officer Station Guard Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sardoncillo Roland Tulin
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Team Leader, K9 Unit
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Roland T Sardoncillo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Team Leader, K9 Unit Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sebuco Glenn Mark Balahay
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25
a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12
C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Glenn Mark B Sebuco PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Patrol/Traffic Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sharief Hashouba Bagon
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Hashouba B Sharief PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Siapo Glenville Dojo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Investigator
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 1 Year & 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10

II. Job Knowledge


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra PSSg Glenville D Siapo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Investigator Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Solibio Jovanie Siton
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Road Discipline Task Force
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Jovanie S Solibio PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Road Discipline Task Force Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sunico Benedict Suan
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Benedict S Sunico PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tabile Lindsey Andoyo
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years & 5 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Lindsey A Tabile PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020
1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank
Tabuyan Beverly Jane Gaco
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Operation Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Years & 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Beverly Jane G Tabuyan PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Operation Officer Operation Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)


POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Templa Julius Mar Cagurol
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Julius Mar C Templa PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Tenaja Adrian Legarda
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 10 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Adrian L Tenaja PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Villanueva Mark Anthony Sagabaen
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 6 Years & 5 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait √


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Mark Anthony S Villanueva PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Purugganan Mae Ann Jueza
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Operation Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:


PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Mae Ann J Purugganan PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Operation Officer Operation Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Bartonico Cherry Dianne Marquez
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:
Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Cherry Dianne M Bartonico PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Basco Aldrin Podador
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PCpl Aldrin P Basco PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Aranaydo Alvin Migraso
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Alvin M Aranaydo PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Asumen Neldon Cagas
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal
III.
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Neldon C Asumen PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cuenca Junelle Caesar Sinco
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Junelle Caesar S Cuenca PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Masepequiña James Cruda
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat James C Masepequiña PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Mitra Allan Delasalde
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Allan D Mitra PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Oñez Arnel Comidoy
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Arnel C Oñez PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Pantua Aljen Ramos
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25
a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12
C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Aljen R Pantua PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sumaliday Ricky Encallado
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Ricky E Sumaliday PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sumampong Abil Dapar
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10

II. Job Knowledge


objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Abil D Sumampong PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Viagedor Jr Vincent Razo
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Vincent R Viagedor Jr PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Villanueva Mark James Hebia
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP)
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 9 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR Pat Mark James H Villanueva PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS
Traffic/Patrol Officer Mobile Patrol Crew (PODP) Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Sorrosa Archie Salmorin
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
SWAT Team, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 2 years and 6 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PSSg Archie S Sorrosa PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer SWAT Team, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: July 1 - December 31, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Awitin Jay R Basig
Police Corporal
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Mobile Patrol Crew
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s): A) Awarded as Best PPO National Level during 119th Police Service Anniversary Celebration
B) Outstanding PPO of PRO 11 for the Year 2020 during the 25th Police Community Relation Month. C) Awardee for the Search
of the PNP's Best Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Region XI in Celebration of the 25th PCR Month
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT FRANCISCO S CASLIB PCpl Jay R B Awitin PLTCOL JED G CLAMOR


Patrol/Traffic Officer Mobile Patrol Crew Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2021
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Cabiles Noriel Lurican
Police Staff Sergeant
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Custodial Facility Officer
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 3 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT RENANTE D MATALANG PSSg Noriel L Cabiles PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Operation Officer Custodial Facility Officer Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


De Guzman Xyrus Amponan
Patrolman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Motorcops, Member
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PLT JUANITO E ARELLANO JR PAT Xyrus A De Guzman PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


Patrol/Traffic Officer Motorcops, Member Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)
I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT


FOR PATROLMAN/WOMAN TO POLICE STAFF SERGEANT (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period: April 1-June 30, 2020

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank


Lapinig Rusina Gayola
Patrolwoman
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
Intel Clerk
Tagum City Police Sation
5. Years and Month in Current Position: 4 Months

Point Numerical Weight


PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score

a. Quality of Work 7 x 4 = 28
Output b. Timeliness of Work 6 x 4 = 24
I.
(25 pts) c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x 5 = 30
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x 4 = 24

a. Understanding of job description 2 x 5 = 10


b. Awareness of the vision, mission and 2 x 5 = 10
objectives of the organization
II. Job Knowledge c. Community Oriented Policing Sustem 5 x 4 = 20
(25 pts) d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x 5 = 10
C e. Analytical Ability 2 x 5 = 10
O f. Ability to solve problem/troubleshooting 2 x 5 = 10
R g. Oral and written communication 5 x 5 = 25
E h. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x 5 = 25

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x 4 = 12


C b. Compliance with and Implementation of 3 x 5 = 15
O Work Policies/SOPs
M Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x 4 = 8
P (15 pts) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x 4 = 12
E e. Cost Effectiveness 2 x 4 = 8
T f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x 4 = 8

E
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x 4 = 12
N Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x 4 = 12
C Relationship c. Build linkages and networks 3 x 4 = 12
I (15 pts) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x 5 = 15
E e. Motivation 3 x 5 = 15

S
Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x 4 = 12
Organization b. Preservation of unit interest 3 x 4 = 12
(10 pts) c. Coordination 4 x 4 = 16

Personal Trait √ Personal Trait√


Morally Upright 1 Civic-minded 1
Personal Honest 1 Responsible 1 10.0 x 5 = 50
III. Qualities Well Groomed 1 Disciplined 1
(10 PTS Fair and Just 1 Courteous/tactful 1
Loyal to the Organization 1 Initiate positive action 1
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHT SCORE (TWS) 445
NUMERICAL PERFORMANCE RATING (NPR) = TWS / 5 89
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table) VS
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represent my best judgement. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT recommend this
personnel to be granted [ ] promotion [ ] designation to higher position [ ] relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s):

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

PEMS Antonio Q Zafra Pat Rusina G Lapinig PLTCOL PABLITO G ODIAS


CESPO/Chief Clerk Intel Clerk Chief of Police
RATER RATEE REVIEWER
July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2020
(Date accomplished) (Date accomplished) (Date accomplished)
(IF REFER TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head Grievance Committee

You might also like