Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRADING CRITERIA
1 1. Does not or rarely attends coordination meetings
2. Hard to reach or contact and has a lot of excuses
3. Does not participate or submits outputs that’s less than the expected quality
4. Outputs require multiple revisions, but he/she doesn’t revise
5. Does not make it on time
2 1. Attends coordination meetings, but is not consistent
2. Can be reached and contacted most of the time, but rarely responds
3. Submits average quality outputs
4. Does revisions as advised
5. Sometimes late
3 1. Consistently attends coordination meetings
2. Communication lines are always open and responds right away
3. Submits good quality outputs
4. Outputs submitted doesn’t require revisions but attends to comments and suggestions
for improvement.
5. Always on-time
4 1. Asks for coordination meetings and consistently attends it
2. Initiates communication and quick to respond
3. Submits above and beyond expected quality outputs
4. Keeps on improving every output he/she takes part on
5. Ahead of time, always there, even irritating and annoying at times
F&S SECTION 2: PRELIM PEER GRADING
GROUP ___4______