Professional Documents
Culture Documents
John Davis (hereinafter “Mr. Davis), by and through Counsel, and moves the Court to enter
an Order extending the Order entered by this Court, and in support would show as follows:
attorneys, their representatives, parties, witnesses, law enforcement officers and court personnel
from discussing or commenting on any aspect of this case with the media. See Judge Wooten’s
2. Mr. Davis asks the Court to extend the order to Mississippi Auditor Shadrack
White, Mississippi Department of Human Services Director Robert Anderson, and their agents
and employees. Both Messrs. White and Anderson are attorneys licensed to practice in the State
of Mississippi. Both Messrs. White and Anderson have intentionally and repeatedly commented
publicly on the allegations surrounding Mr. Davis 1 which threatens Mr. Davis’ right to a fair and
impartial jury. As attorneys both Messrs. White and Anderson should be familiar with the
1
An example of the public comments can be found here: https://www.wlbt.com/2021/10/01/audit-finds-69m-
unallowable-questionable-expenses-money-earmarked-needy-families/
https://www.wtok.com/content/news/Mississippi-auditor-DHS-audit-reveals-millions-wasted-570176951.html
https://www.wlbt.com/2021/10/06/executive-director-mississippi-department-human-services-discusses-findings-
forensic-audit/
https://mississippitoday.org/2021/12/07/mississippi-welfare-agency-subgrantees-demand-letters/
Case: 25CI1:20-cr-00049-AHW Document #: 44 Filed: 12/13/2021 Page 2 of 4
Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.6, Trial Publicity, and 3.8 Special
Responsibilities of a Prosecutor. Mr. White is a State Auditor and takes credit for helping bring
the case to the Hinds County District Attorney’s Office and is therefore both a lawyer under Rule
3.6 and a Prosecutor under Rule 3.8. Bob Anderson is an ex-Federal Prosecutor and current head
of the Mississippi Department of Human Services (MDHS), who has commented on evidence and
procedures at MDHS. Both Mr. Anderson and Mr. White have repeatedly made comments about
Mr. Davis, inferring matters about his guilt, but failing to report instances when the actions taken
by Mr. Davis were approved by MDHS policies. In some instances, Mr. White and Mr. Davis have
made comments about Mr. Davis’s actions when those actions were approved by other people at
MDHS. Mr. Davis and Mr. White have on more than one occasion inferred that Mr. Davis did
*****followed an approval process in the MDHS asks the Court to prohibit Messrs. White and
Anderson as well as their employees and agents from commenting publicly about Mr. Davis.
JOHN DAVIS,
PLAINTIFF
PRESENTED BY:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I, Charles R. (Chuck) Mullins, attorney for Defendant John Davis, do
hereby certify that I have this day electronically filed the above and foregoing Motion to Enforce
the Court’s Order Limiting Pre-Trial Publicity, with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system,
Further, I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to