Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN V
BSC (HONS) ARCHITECTURE
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN
TAYLOR’S UNIVERSITY
August 2021
Introduction
Klang is a place full of memories and layers of history. Its community and its
culture define the value of Klang, yet time is constantly moving forward. With
technology introduced and people of new generation creating the gap, there are also
some initiatives taken to help Klang to preserve its existing traditions. For instance,
painted mural arts around town or setting up a backpacker hotel to attract visitors
Klang is a decaying town with the new generation leaving and the old generation
maintaining its reflecting in the local community as the food culture and small
businesses are one of the few charms left that has been maintained and people
needs them because it has already been imbued in part of their lives. Therefore, the
crowd would only linger around town to pick up their daily necessities, some
cultural meaning is lost. The site which I have chosen is comparatively merrier than
site B. Site A is a sweet spot for a community center and it is because the site is
located in 2 major contact points, the KTM station and the famous Chong Kok.
Building a community center near these landmarks will attract crowd towards the
site.
The elements of legibility such as social dimension by Jan Gehl suggested that
there are three types of activities in the current social situation such as necessary
activities, optional activities and social activities. The necessary activities in Site A
here includes staffs working in the shop houses and the KTM station. The optional
activities are customers buying goods in the shop houses or eating food in the
1
coffee shops surrounding the site. An example of social activities would be
interaction between customers and waitresses, taxi drivers or staffs. These activities
Site A have poor quality outdoor areas and it is because of the bare minimum
activities taken place. People rush home when they have completed their essential
tasks. Jan Gehl have also mentioned that ‘When the quality of outdoor area is good,
optional activity occur increased its frequency.’ In this case, there are less social
Zoning in Klang splits function and causes displacement that sometimes could not
useless gathering space because people do not gather in that specific area anymore.
Thus, the position taking should emphasis on the social groups and sequences of
2
Narrative of the end-user experience
Every architecture should prioritize visual permeability as it should inform the user
that the community centre is available and welcoming for everyone. The multi-
noticeable by cars from Jalan Stesen with façade replica of the site. Moreover,
pedestrian walking from Chong Kok Kopitiam to the community centre will
experience a pristine landscape of trees and plants acting as shades and also a place
for social interacting since there are not much noticeable landscape on site.
To tell a better story of Klang, the linear circulation of the community centre should
help people understand the culture and history of Klang with the front of the
building connecting to the back alley. With that, it will ensure the safety of back
alley as people will walk through there as shortcut and peek into the community
centre. While trying to understand and appreciate a piece of art, providing a lounge
area in one of the blocks around the gallery will encourage communication whether
it is between a connoisseur of art, a history enthusiast or the 3 local who have been
around for some time. It increases the social activities desirable for a community
centre.
As might be expected, the community centre must be in the best interests of the
locals with its necessary activities and potential activities. Hence for the
programme, a mini library and collaborative workshop could educate the locals or
become a pastime. The mini library will be the space where young generation
arouse aspiration from their heart since there are students present in the area. With
3
the library and multipurpose classrooms, it is possible to create job opportunities
around the area and bring back the young generation back to the town. The
of the locals and instil new interests, creates topic of conversation allowing social
different drawbacks. The pantry will also aid in providing a “take a break” space
for the people in the community centre. Apart from that, more communal activities
provided will foster positivity among the community allowing them to learn and
town with rich history and showcase the initiatives taken to revive the town. The
shop houses’ design element such as the courtyard are incorporated in the
community center as an open space cut through corridor to remind visitors of the
traditional Nanyang architecture. The allocated cut through space will give the
to the back alley and it is ventilated. At the same time, it creates variation in terms
of building form and induce curiosity for spatial experience of a segregated town.
Conclusion
To put it briefly, the design creates new environment with old elements and it is a
designer’s role to bring back its cultural meaning since opportunities are provided
to reshape the urban centre. A community centre being the talk of the town
4
increases contact form among people. Minimal investment has to be made in order
to maintain the public space and the community’s willingness to participate in the
organized events. On account of that, event halls are set up for hosting indoor social
events. I hope that the community centre will enhance the charm of this town and
restore its cultural meaning by inviting more crowd. It should be a spot where both
locals and non-locals could enjoy, learn, play and interacting with the others.
References
Gehl, J., & Koch, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island
Press.