Katahira & Engineers International Package Chainage: CH 43+770 – 46+053 Comments By: Reply by KEI Sheet 1

Comments Management Sheet A Structures: Piers Foundation Layout & details P19 – MG Through PK-A Consortium
P21

The Engineer’s original comment KEI’s reply to the original comment The Engineer’s follow-up comment KEI’s follow-up reply
No
Date: 18th September 2018 (4561) Date: 20th September 2018 Date: Date:
Top reinforcement (bar #3) for the base footing was
Agreed. Corrected accordingly. Relevant updated pages are
optimized by your design subcontractor as per the
1 attached with this submission.
discussions held on 30th August 2018, which shall be
Revised accordingly.
incoporated accordingly.
Agreed. The difference in shrinkage strain is only 0.000021.
Anyway, updated the design and relevant pages are attached
2 Check shrinkage calculations parameters utilized (eg. Kj.)
with this submission.
Revised accordingly.
Select optimum footing base level as per the actual site
3 Agreed as noted.
conditions.

4 Agreed as noted.

Proposed toe drain arrangement at the required locations at

either side of the viaduct considering the ground
5 topographical condition is shown in the GA drawings. Updated
GA will be submitted in due course.
Revised accordingly.

Removed from the drawing.

6
Revised accordingly.

Included in drawings.
7
Revised accordingly.

Included in drawings.
8
Revised accordingly.
 Katahira & Engineers International Package Chainage: CH 43+770 – 46+053 Comments By: Reply by KEI Sheet 2
Comments Management Sheet A Structures: Piers Foundation Layout & details P19 – MG Through PK-A Consortium
P21

Included in drawings.
9
Revised accordingly.
 Katahira & Engineers International Package Chainage: CH 43+770 – 46+053 Comments By: Reply by KEI Sheet 3
Comments Management Sheet A Structures: Piers Foundation Layout & details P19 – MG Through PK-A Consortium
P21

The Engineer’s original comment KEI’s reply to the original comment The Engineer’s follow-up comment KEI’s follow-up reply
No
Date: 20th August 2018 (4279) Date: 20th September 2018 Date: Date:
1

Included in drawings.
Revised accordingly.

2 Proposed toe drain arrangement at the required locations at

either side of the viaduct considering the ground
topographical condition is shown in the GA drawings. Updated
GA will be submitted in due course.
Revised accordingly.
3

Camber is considered when calculating levels.

No revision is required.

4
Camber is considered when calculating levels.
No revision is required.

Checked and Ok.

No revision is required.

No tie beam.
No revision is required.

No tie beam.
No revision is required.

End of Comments