Comment by:

Katahira & Engineers International Package Chainage: CH 38+620 - CH 39+073 Reply by: Sheet
MG Through PK-A
Comment Management Sheet A Structure: Via-Duct KEI 1
Consortium

Client’s original comment KEI's reply to the original comment

No Remarks
Date: October 13th 2018 : Letter No. 4846 Date: November 12th 2018

Recheck the vertical soil pressure, surcharge Back wall project out from the abutment stem is not considered for soil
1 calculations. Check and confirm the back-wall stem vertical pressure and the effect is revisited and attached under item 02.
extended outward from the abutment stem area is not
considered in the soil pressure surcharge calculations.

Recheck sliding stability and check for the use of Revised sliding stability calculations are attached.
shear key.
2

Provide the relevant geo technical recommendation

3 Attached.
and detail calculations.

The footing base shall be rested on firm rock with the Agreed.
.
4 consent of the Engineer.

5 Parapet on wing wall details are not provided.
Check the requirement of the service ducts provided
6 in the layout.
Design of parapet wall on wing walls are submitted by the report no.CEP-
2/PK-A/ST/BR/TYP/001/R00
Service ducts are shown for as the parapet wall section is shown.

Hydrology- Proposed toe drain details to be provided

7. in the layout. Shown in the GA drawing.

Service ducts to be provided as per the requirement.

8. Two nos. of service ducts ae required and shown.
Provide the sectional elevation view of the abutment
9. Shown.
with the reference bore hole showing the rock profile.
End of Comment