Goodner AP ENGL LANG & COMP 1

The Awakening Critical Perspectives Peer Evaluation

Peer Evaluation of Critical Perspectives Presentation

Peer Evaluator: ________________________________________________________________

Cameron Chaudhry

Presenters: ____________________________________________________________________
Carter, Herrington, Malone, Martin, Millicks, Price

Topic: ___________________________________________
New Historicist Critical Perspective Date: November
_____________________
15, 2021

Rate each of the following areas as excellent √ +, good √, or needs work √-.
Add Comments to explain your rating and answer the questions below.

AREA RATING COMMENTS

Content (e.g. interest, appropriateness
for audience and assignment, clear focus,
good support and details, identified
sources adequately)
The content was interesting, appropriate
for the audience, they had clear focus,
√+ good support and details, and identified
sources adequately.

Organization (e.g. easy to follow, clear The organization of their presentation

sections [introduction, body, and √+ was easy to follow and had clear sections
conclusion], transitions, coherent) (introduction, body, and conclusion).

Delivery and Overall Communication The delivery and overall communication

(e.g. eye contact, appropriate volume and
rate of speech, clarity of speech,
comprehensibility, posture and body
language, use of media and visual aids,
all members well-prepared)
was good such as the eye contact,
appropriate volume, rate/clarity of
√+ speech, comprehensive, and the posture
and body language was normal.

1) What is one thing that you learned from this presentation?

2) What is one thing the group did well?

They explained all their information, thoughts, details, and evidence thoroughly.

3) What is one suggestion to help them improve future presentations?

To make just a little more eye contact and be more exact towards their
evidence and more explanations for it. Overall, great presentation.

4) Additional Comments: No additional comments.

 Goodner AP ENGL LANG & COMP 2
The Awakening Critical Perspectives Peer Evaluation

Peer Evaluation of Critical Perspectives Presentation

Peer Evaluator: ________________________________________________________________

Cameron Chaudhry

Presenters: ____________________________________________________________________
Guillory, Jacobs, Livaccari, Nobles, Shearin, West

Topic: ___________________________________________
Psychoanalytical Critical Perspective Date: _____________________
November 15, 2021

Rate each of the following areas as excellent √ +, good √, or needs work √-.
Add Comments to explain your rating and answer the questions below.

AREA RATING COMMENTS

Content (e.g. interest, appropriateness

for audience and assignment, clear focus,
√+
good support and details, identified
sources adequately)
The content was interesting, appropriate
for the audience, they had clear focus,
good support and details, and
identified sources adequately.

The organization of their presentation

Organization (e.g. easy to follow, clear was easy to follow and had clear sections
sections [introduction, body, and √+ (introduction, body, and
conclusion], transitions, coherent)
conclusion).

Delivery and Overall Communication The delivery and overall communication

(e.g. eye contact, appropriate volume and
rate of speech, clarity of speech,
comprehensibility, posture and body
language, use of media and visual aids,
all members well-prepared)
was good such as the eye contact,
appropriate volume, rate/clarity of
√+
speech, comprehensive, and the posture
and body language was normal.

1) What is one thing that you learned from this presentation?

2) What is one thing the group did well?

They explained all their information, thoughts, details, and evidence thoroughly.

3) What is one suggestion to help them improve future presentations?

To make just a little more eye contact and be more exact towards their evidence
and more explanations for it. Overall, great presentation.
4) Additional Comments: No additional comments.
 Goodner AP ENGL LANG & COMP 3
The Awakening Critical Perspectives Peer Evaluation

Peer Evaluation of Critical Perspectives Presentation

Peer Evaluator: Cameron

________________________________________________________________
Chaudhry

Presenters: ____________________________________________________________________
Bates, Crenshaw, Leleux, Morrow, Ranson, Tortorello

Topic: Feminist
___________________________________________
Critical Perspective Date: _____________________
November 16, 2021

Rate each of the following areas as excellent √ +, good √, or needs work √-.
Add Comments to explain your rating and answer the questions below.

AREA RATING COMMENTS

Content (e.g. interest, appropriateness The content was interesting, appropriate

for audience and assignment, clear focus, √+ for the audience, they had clear focus,
good support and details, identified good support and details, and
sources adequately) identified sources adequately.

Organization (e.g. easy to follow, clear

The organization of their presentation
sections [introduction, body, and √+ was easy to follow and had clear sections
conclusion], transitions, coherent) (introduction, body, and
conclusion).

Delivery and Overall Communication The delivery and overall communication

(e.g. eye contact, appropriate volume and
rate of speech, clarity of speech,
comprehensibility, posture and body
language, use of media and visual aids,
all members well-prepared)
was good such as the eye contact,
√+ appropriate volume, rate/clarity of
speech, comprehensive, and the posture
and body language was normal.

1) What is one thing that you learned from this presentation?

2) What is one thing the group did well?

They explained all their information, thoughts, details, and evidence thoroughly.

3) What is one suggestion to help them improve future presentations?

To make just a little more eye contact and be more exact towards their evidence
and more explanations for it. Overall, great presentation.
4) Additional Comments: No additional comments.
 Goodner AP ENGL LANG & COMP 4
The Awakening Critical Perspectives Peer Evaluation

Peer Evaluation of Critical Perspectives Presentation

Peer Evaluator: ________________________________________________________________

Presenters: ____________________________________________________________________

Topic: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________________

Rate each of the following areas as excellent √ +, good √, or needs work √-.
Add Comments to explain your rating and answer the questions below.

AREA RATING COMMENTS

Content (e.g. interest, appropriateness

for audience and assignment, clear focus,
good support and details, identified
sources adequately)

Organization (e.g. easy to follow, clear

sections [introduction, body, and
conclusion], transitions, coherent)

Delivery and Overall Communication

(e.g. eye contact, appropriate volume and
rate of speech, clarity of speech,
comprehensibility, posture and body
language, use of media and visual aids,
all members well-prepared)

1) What is one thing that you learned from this presentation?

2) What is one thing the group did well?

3) What is one suggestion to help them improve future presentations?

4) Additional Comments: