Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GROUP E
MEMBERS: Nagtalon, Aquino, Mangahas, Nablo, Narona, Onate, Sinson
Criteria for Rating Mode of Rating 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Excellent Rating
Content expectations were Content expectations were Content expectations were
Content expectations were
partially met as evidenced generally met as evidenced beyond met as evidenced by
Breadth/Depth of not met as evidenced by the
Content Covered
Group
poor extraction of contents
by the fair extraction of
contents from identified
by the sufficient extraction the excellent extraction of
of contents from identified contents from identified
4
from identified sources
sources sources sources
Members spoke unclear Members occasionally used Members minimally used Members used clear language
Articulation Group language reflected in choice unclear language reflected unclear language reflected
of words, etc. in choice of words, etc. in choice of words, etc.
as reflected in choice of
words, etc.
4
Relevance of the topic was Relevance of the topic was
Relevance of the topic was Relevance of the topic was
Practicality Group
unclear
evident but lacked
elaboration
sufficiently expounded
well-established and
contextualized
4
Members appeared
Members appeared lousy Members appeared Members had flawless
coordinated but were
Teamwork and and uncoordinated to coordinated and had execution of assigned roles
Cooperation
Group
facilitate the session or
evidently depending on
cues from particular
minimal consultation from leading to smooth transition 4
present during the session colleagues and flow of the session
members
Members poorly managed Members went below or Members had flawless time
Members generally
time by delivering a exceeded above the time management as evidenced by
Time Management Group
presentation that is too short significantly to affect the
managed the time within
expectations
starting on time and ending 4
or too long other presenters’ time within time
Job well done! Creativity at its best indeed! Appreciate seeing the diverse methods employed! Keep
it up! All the best! Please refer to the session proceedings for the discussion. TRANSMUTED SCORE/GRADE EQUIVALENT 96.1538461538