https://www.ukessays.

com/essays/economics/centrally-planned-economies-and-free-market-
economies-economics-essay.php

Centrally Planned Economies

For example, the health care system of the People’s Republic of China, an avowed communist state
is in a state of transition. China’s system of universal health care, is based on central planning has
largely been disbanded and replaced by health insurance programs vary, many of which are funded
by membership dues. Employees of the private sector and independent workers that usually do not
include any public and bear the full cost of health care itself.

Central planning has developed in the Soviet Union after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. Vladimir
Lenin established two economic plans called “War Communism and New Economic Policy. War
Communism, which ran 1918-1920, was trying to remove the pre-production, control, and
confiscation peasant cultures for distribution. The collapse of Communism War has simultaneously
with the establishment of a planning committee called Gosplan. The role of Gosplan, although vague
and undefined, not harmony with the new economic policy was created in 1921. Starting in 1925
Gosplan began publishing economic evaluations each year. These predictions will soon be five, who
began as estimated not bind the economic activities in the future. This fact, however, changed very
little in the first five year plan in 1928 marked the beginning of an economic central planning official
the Soviet Union. Five-Year Plan trying to make a balance between demand and production, but was
too optimistic and based on projected growth is not realistic. The main purpose of central planning
in the United the achievements of Soviet five year plan in which state agencies perform.

Central economic planning as set in the Soviet Union and other communist countries has to depend,
obedience and discipline on the part of individual supporters of the state. This choice is limited
supply of goods and services and makes decisions about jobs, careers and work options

In communist Poland, for example, the role of trade unions has furthered the goal of production
planning commission of the State. Also in this country, wages are not determined by collective
bargaining or market demand, which is due to the central government without a plan in consultation
with the union. Central planning has failed for several reasons, including inefficient allocation of
resources and labor, increasing the transmission of information agents distorted and selfish and
down stairs, not valuation related costs, supply and demand and make inefficient administration of
the different economic.

Central planning, however, is sometimes ruthlessly efficiency at micro level to channel scarce
resources to economic imperative. A typical example of this is a country with an economy of war.
Nylon, for example, is essential for production of even during World War II. Because the supply of
this fabric was limited, the government planned to requisition all ready for production though nylon.
This removes the future supply of all nylon, a product whose sole purpose is cosmetic and therefore
entirely without any military value. This example also illustrates an essential characteristic of central
planning and dependence of the price mechanism. The fact that a certain amount of nylon can be
used to perform thousands of pairs of nylons thousands of dollars in revenue and only one worth
even $25 is not related to the central planning agency.

“Savings certificate” is also a feature of the economy under central planning and are caused in part
by the production of consumer goods marked by poor quality and lack of choice in cases this.
Consumers often resort to overtime, the corruption and black market to meet their needs.
Secondary economy provides the mechanisms needed to meet demand beyond frustrating, while
the goals of central planning by transferring assets necessary for the so-called “unproductive” use.
Black market nylons use the previous example; find ways to satisfy consumer demand, but scarce
resources move production out whether the request of the central government by the economy.
Planning to determine the bid based on the needs and demands of government applications, which
reflected in the asking price, has no effect on the supply line was established by the government.

Analysis of Centrally Planned Economy:

In this system the total direction and development of a nation’s economy is planned and
administered by its government.

Centrally Planned Economy functions through administrative guidelines.

Central Planning is capitalism which is characterized by private sector control of production,

distribution, and consumption.

Central planning is sometimes ruthlessly efficiency at micro level to channel scarce resources to
economic imperative.

Central planning has developed in the Soviet Union after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

Central economic planning as set in the Soviet Union and other communist countries has to depend,
obedience and discipline on the part of individual supporters of the state. This choice is limited
supply of goods and services and makes decisions about jobs, careers and work options.

Central planning has failed for several reasons, including inefficient allocation of resources and labor,
increasing the transmission of information agents distorted and selfish and down stairs, not
valuation related costs, supply and demand and make inefficient administration of the different
economic.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/centrally-planned-economy.asp

Centrally Planned Economy

What is a Centrally Planned Economy?

Understanding Centrally Planned Economies

Most developed nations have mixed economies that combine aspects of central planning with
the free market systems promoted by classical and neoclassical economists. The majority of these
systems skew heavily toward free markets, where governments intervene only to implement
certain trade protections and coordinate certain public services.

Theory of Central Planning

Free market economies run on the assumption that people seek to maximize personal financial
utility and that businesses strive to generate the maximum possible profits. In other words: all
economic participants act in their own best interests, given the consumption, investment, and
production options they face before them. The inherent impulse to succeed consequently assures
that price and quantity equilibrium are met and that utility is maximized.

Problems With Centrally Planned Economies

The centrally planned economic model has its fair share of criticism. For example, some believe
governments are too ill-equipped to efficiently respond to surpluses or shortages. Others believe
that government corruption far exceeds corruption in free market or mixed economies. Finally, there
is a strong sense centrally planned economies are linked to political repression, because consumers
ruled with an iron fist aren't truly free to make their own choices.

Examples of Centrally Planned Economies

Communist and socialist systems are the most noteworthy examples in which governments control
facets of economic production. Central planning is often associated with Marxist-Leninist theory and
with the former Soviet Union, China, Vietnam, and Cuba. While the economic performance of these
states have been mixed, they've generally trailed capitalist countries, in terms of growth.

[Important: While most centrally planned economies have historically been administered in
authoritarian states, participation in such an economic paradigm theoretically can be elective.

https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/central-planning/

Central Planned Economy

Definition – A centrally planned economy is an economy where decisions on what to produce, how
to produce and for whom are taken by the government in a centrally managed bureaucracy.

Central planning is also referred to as a ‘Command economy’ or ‘Communist economy.’

Centrally-Planned-Economy

WIth Central planning, the theory is that the government will take ownership of the means of
production and run the economy in the interest of workers. The theoretical basis of a planned
economy stems from the work of Karl Marx

“To my mind, the so-called ‘socialist society’ is not anything immutable… It’s crucial difference from
the present order consists naturally in production organized on the basis of common ownership by
the nation of all means of production.”

 Karl Marx (Letter to Otto Von Boenigk (1890)

The Soviet Union often announced ‘5-year plans’ where targets for steel production would be
created. In the period 1928-40 and after the Second World War, these Five-year plans were very
successful in terms of expanding the Soviet Union’s industrial production. The Soviet Union achieved
very rapid rates of economic growth. However, by the 1960s, the system was struggling with
corruption, inefficiency and a lack of incentives.

The rapid economic growth of the Stalin years also occurred against a backdrop of political
repression.

Examples of Central Planning

 The Soviet Union 1917-1991 and Soviet Bloc

 China until the late 70s

 Cuba

Features of a Centrally planned economy

 Ownership by government

 Decisions on what to produce, how to produce and how to distribute goods taken at
national bureaucratic level

 Prices usually set by price controls rather than market forces.

 Distribution according to ration books.

 Production could be planned for five or ten years in advance

 Requires more levels of bureaucracy to manage and plan economic decisions

 Scope for inefficiency due to lack of incentive

 Scope for corruption due to power of bureaucrats

 Often required degree of political control and censorship.

Problems of Central Planning Economies

1. Governments are poor at predicting future trends.

2. Lack of incentives when income is guaranteed.

3. Inflexible. Difficult to respond to shortages and surpluses

4. Greater scope for corruption

5. Planned economies often associated with greater political repression

6. People achieve targets for the sake of it, rather than what is needed. There was a joke in the
Soviet Union made by workers “They pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work.” The goal
was often to achieve targets, rather than really meet needs, therefore as much effort went
into massaging figures and reports and producing socially useful goods.

https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Centrally_planned_economy
Centrally planned economy

Advantages

There are very few benefits that stem from a centrally planned economy although there are some
examples where central planning is an effective economic organization.

When the government is able to control the allocation of resources, it can easily direct the economic
efforts of the state towards specific goals. For example, in Russia in the early 20th century, Russia
was able to rapidly industrialize from a simple agrarian state into an industrial powerhouse.

In Cuba, the communist government places great emphasis on the healthcare system and as a result
the Cuban healthcare system is one of the best in the world.

An advantage of a centrally planned economy is that the planners or, those who direct the economy,
can direct the economic activities to mitigate harm caused by certain activities or encourage
activities that have positive effects. There are implications to limiting or promoting certain economic
activities but depending on what planners think is best for an economy or country, the strict
planning can produce a positive outcome. [3]

Suppose a central planning committee wanted to minimize or eliminate the negative

externality created by the combustion of fossil fuels and the emissions they release. A centrally
planned economy would be able to direct firms to only construct energy projects that have zero
emissions and to stop using electrical generation methods that produce emissions and pollution.
While this would have very large repercussions for the economy it would be done in order to
eliminate the effects of fossil fuel combustion and to switch to renewable methods. Additionally this
can be used to limit the inefficient use of energy in homes, factories and other areas of an economy.

An example of this is in The Peoples Republic of China where, in 2010, the central government
announced that they would close over 2000 factories that are very energy inefficient. The factories
had been open since the 1950s/60s and as a result their equipment is very energy intensive and
strains the energy resources of China. [8]

Disadvantages

The disadvantages far outweigh the advantages of a centrally planned economy. The main
disadvantage of centrally planned economies is the vast inefficiency that comes from ignoring
natural market forces. Under a planned system the government cannot detect or track the
preferences of consumers in time to shift production, this leads to an inefficient allocation of goods,
also known as the local knowledge problem. This inability to understand what consumers want in
time leads to a less than optimal distribution in the economy.[9]

In a market economy, consumer preferences drive production and production shifts when
preferences do, this leads to an efficient allocation. For example, if a firm makes sugary soda drinks
and the consumers decide they want a healthier option the firm will make an effort to make a
healthier drink in order to keep the business of the consumers.

In market economies, the local knowledge problem is much less of a problem because the
production is autonomous and decentralized. Firms make an effort to understand consumer
preferences in the markets they operate in. Due to the rigid control of a planned economy and the
slow flow of information the market is not allowed to change output levels according to
consumption and as a result changes in output are usually too large or too small leading to unsteady
output levels over time.[10]

Planned economies suppress the incentive for people and firms to maximize their benefit from the
economy and thus suppresses innovation as firms do not need to compete for market share. In a
free market, firms seek to compete as much as possible to capture as much of the market as they
can. Because they can earn more money by competing, firms in a free market have the incentive to
innovate to make a better product for consumers.

Central planning is not synonymous with communism or socialism because central planning is

specifically an economic model. Both socialism and communism use central planning as a way of
achieving other social and political goals, but usually operate as part of a mixed economy.

https://study.com/academy/lesson/centrally-planned-economy-definition-characteristics-
advantages.html#partialRegFormModal

Centrally Planned Economy: Definition, Characteristics & Advantages

Centrally Planned Economy Defined

So what is a centrally planned economy? Well, there are several parts to this definition. They are as
follows:

1. The government makes the economic decisions. This is different from the market
economy that we are familiar with, in which businesses decide what they will produce, not
the government.

2. The government controls all aspects of the economic production. In other words, the
government decides what goods will be produced and how they will be produced.

3. The government decides how resources are distributed and used. For example, if the
government thinks we need more goods in a particular area, they will make that decision,
not the businesses in that area.

4. The government needs to make the decisions. It is assumed that the needs of the people are
not met in a market economy; therefore, in a centrally planned economy, the government
controls decision-making.

5. The government can determine the price of goods and services.