Vinod Sah has filed a petition for bail as he claims to be innocent of the charges against him under sections 406, 419, 420, 506, and 353/34 of the IPC. He states that the prosecution's story is false and that he has been in custody since September 8, 2021. He alleges that the FIR was filed against him due to a dispute with Sumitra Devi, Kishori Devi, and Rinku Devi that has since been resolved. Vinod Sah asserts that local individuals are willing to act as sureties and that he has no prior criminal record.
Vinod Sah has filed a petition for bail as he claims to be innocent of the charges against him under sections 406, 419, 420, 506, and 353/34 of the IPC. He states that the prosecution's story is false and that he has been in custody since September 8, 2021. He alleges that the FIR was filed against him due to a dispute with Sumitra Devi, Kishori Devi, and Rinku Devi that has since been resolved. Vinod Sah asserts that local individuals are willing to act as sureties and that he has no prior criminal record.
Vinod Sah has filed a petition for bail as he claims to be innocent of the charges against him under sections 406, 419, 420, 506, and 353/34 of the IPC. He states that the prosecution's story is false and that he has been in custody since September 8, 2021. He alleges that the FIR was filed against him due to a dispute with Sumitra Devi, Kishori Devi, and Rinku Devi that has since been resolved. Vinod Sah asserts that local individuals are willing to act as sureties and that he has no prior criminal record.
of accused petitioner named as Vinod Sah, S/o – Ramji Sah, R/o Village – Basaitha, P.S. – Saraiya, Distt – Muzaffarpur most respectfully. Sheweth :- 1. That the above said petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. 2. That no any regular bail petition on the behalf of above said petitioner has been filed in Honorable High Court, Patna. 3. That the regular bail petition was rejected to A.C.J.M. – 4 th west, Muzaffarpur on dated – 23/09/2021. 4. That the prosecution story against the accused petitioner is wrong and false. 5. That the above said petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 6. That the petitioner is under custody since dated 08/09/2021. 7. That the allegation was imposed by Sumitra Devi, Kishori Devi and Rinku Devi and on their application F.I.R. was instituted against the accused person and further they compromised with the accused. 8. That good relationship has been restored between both the parties. 9. That due to the party politics the petitioner is implicated in this false case. 10. That the local bailers are ready to stand as sureties against petitioner. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your honour may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail for which your petitioner shall ever pray.