You are on page 1of 7

Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.

2008; 37: 372–378


doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.021, available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com

Research Paper

Expression of vascular S. E. S. Faustino1, D. T. Oliveira1,


S. Nonogaki2, G. Landman3,
A. L. Carvalho4, L. P. Kowalski4

endothelial growth factor-C


1
Department of Stomatology, Area of
Pathology, Bauru School of Dentistry -
University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil; 2Adolfo
Lutz Institute, Pathology Division, São Paulo,

does not predict occult lymph- Brazil; 3Department of Pathology, A. C.


Camargo Cancer Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil;
4
Department of Head and Neck Surgery and

node metastasis in early oral Otorhinolaryngology, A. C. Camargo Cancer


Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil

squamous cell carcinoma


S. E. S. Faustino, D. T. Oliveira, S. Nonogaki, G. Landman, A. L. Carvalho, L. P.
Kowalski: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C does not predict occult
lymph-node metastasis in early oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oral
Maxillofac. Surg. 2008; 37: 372–378. # 2007 International Association of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Abstract. Strong vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) expression has been
correlated to occurrence of lymph-node metastases in patients with oral squamous
cell carcinoma (OSCC). The incidence of occult lymph-node metastasis remains a
decisive factor in the prognosis of patients with early OSCC. The aim of this study
was to evaluate VEGF-C expression as a predictor of occult lymph-node metastasis
in OSCC. Eighty-seven patients with primary OSCC arising in the tongue or floor of
mouth, clinically T1N0M0 or T2N0M0, with (pN+) and without (pN0) occult
lymph-node metastases were analyzed for VEGF-C expression by malignant cells.
Occult lymph-node metastases (pN+) were detected in 22% of the 64 patients who
were submitted to elective neck dissection. No statistically significant difference
was found between OSCC with and without occult lymph-node metastasis in
regard to VEGF-C immunoexpression by malignant cells and clinicopathologic
features. Independently of VEGF-C expression, lymph-node metastasis (pN+) was
Keywords: VEGF-C; oral squamous cell carci-
the most significant prognostic factor for overall survival of patients with OSCC noma; occult metastasis.
(p = 0.030). These findings indicate that isolated VEGF-C expression by malignant
cells is not of predictive value for occult lymph-node metastasis in the early stages Accepted for publication 26 November 2007
of OSCC. Available online 4 March 2008

Tumor invasion and metastasis is a critical as angiogenic/lymphangiogenic factors and patient prognosis has been extensively
event of human cancer frequently asso- that facilitate tumor progression and studied in various types of human tumor,
ciated with a fatal outcome. It has been metastasis9,15,23,29,30,43. including OSCC2,4,19,22,24,28,37,42. Evi-
speculated that the VEGF family, particu- The role of VEGF-C in angiogenesis/ dence is emerging to correlate the pre-
larly VEGF-C and VEGF-D, may function lymphangiogenesis, disease progression sence of VEGF-C expression in tumor

0901-5027/040372 + 07 $30.00/0 # 2007 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
VEGF-C expression and occult lymph-node metastasis in oral cancer 373

cells with an increased likelihood of radiotherapy), and clinical follow up (local section were digitally captured with a cam-
lymph-node metastases, and consequently recurrence, regional recurrence and death). era (Axiocam MR3, Zeiss, Jena, Germany)
to suggest it as a prognostic indicator in A formalin-fixed 3-mm section of tumor attached to a light microscope (Axioskop2
oral cancer11,16,17,20,21,25,33,35,36,41,44. tissue was taken from the pathology Plus, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and recorded
It is well established that positive patho- archive for hematoxylin & eosin (HE) by a computer program system (Axiovision
logic neck nodes (pN+) have the most staining and immunohistochemistry ana- 4.5, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Immunostain-
decisive influence on prognosis in patients lyses of occult lymph-node metastasis and ing results of VEGF-C expressed by malig-
with OSCC13. The incidence of occult VEGF-C expression. The histopathologi- nant cells were evaluated by two
lymph-node metastasis (pN+) in patients cal malignancy grading of the OSCC was investigators without prior knowledge of
with OSCC, clinical stages I and II, ran- established by an experienced pathologist the tumor’s histopathologic features and
ging from 23.1% to 45%1,7,26,31, continues according to BRYNE et al.6 (1989), without the patient’s clinical status. A combined
to be one of the strongest arguments indi- knowledge of the clinical data. The pre- score for VEGF-C expression was based
cating elective neck dissection of these sence of vascular embolization, and peri- on: (a) intensity of the immunostaining
tumors. There are also a high percentage neural, muscular and salivary gland (0 = negative; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate;
of patients who do not have metastasis in infiltrations in the OSCC were reviewed 3 = strong; 4 = very strong) and (b) percen-
the pathological exam (pN0), and in such in the HE stained tumor sections. tage of positive cells (0 = 0% positive cells;
cases the undesirable cosmetic and func- 1 = <25% positive cells; 2 = 25–50% posi-
tional effects of neck dissection ideally tive cells; 3 = 50–75% positive cells;
VEGF-C immunoexpression in OSCC
should be avoided1. Determining whether 4 = >75% positive cells), as described pre-
or not elective neck dissection will be The 87 specimens of OSCC previously viously by SOINI et al.40. The final immu-
beneficial to the patient continues to be fixed in 10% buffered formalin and nostaining score was determined by the
an important clinical dilemma. embedded in paraffin were cut into 3- sum of (a) + (b) ranged from 0 to maxi-
Detection of better markers to identify mm-thick sections for the standard strep- mally 8. A final score with value greater
patients with biologically aggressive tavidin-biotin–peroxidase complex than 6 was considered as strong VEGF-C
tumors and/or poor prognoses would pro- method (StreptABComplex/HRP, Duet expression.
vide a much-needed opportunity to target Mouse/Rabbit, Dako ref K0492, Glostrup,
patients at risk of development of metas- Denmark). After antigen retrieval using
tasis24, contributing to the proper selection 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, in a pressure Statistical analysis
of patients for elective neck dissection1. cooker for 4 min, endogenous peroxidase
All statistical analyses were performed
Hence, there is an urgent need to identify activity was blocked by incubation in 3%
using SPSS statistical software version
characteristics of the primary tumor that H2O2 for 20 min. The sections were incu-
10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Asso-
might predict nodal metastasis36, improv- bated overnight at 4 8C with the primary
ciations between VEGF-C expression and
ing the patient’s survival10,11. In this antibody VEGF-C (C-20) (Santa Cruz
the variables studied were verified accord-
study, isolated VEGF-C expression by Biotechnology, sc-1881, Santa Cruz,
ing to Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact
malignant cells as a predictor of occult CA, USA), dilution 1:100, in phosphate-
test. P values less than 0.05 were consid-
lymph-node metastasis was investigated buffered saline with bovine serum albu-
ered statistically significant. The survival
in early stages of OSCC located in the min solution to block a non-specific reac-
probabilities (overall and disease-free sur-
tongue and floor of mouth. tion. Then, the tumor sections were
vivals) were estimated using the Kaplan–
incubated with second antibody biotiny-
Meier method and to compare survival
lated anti-goat Ig made in rabbit (Vector
curves the log-rank test was used. The
Patients and Methods BA-5000, Burlingame, CA, USA) diluted
follow-up period was the time between
in phosphate-buffered saline 1:500, for
Patient and tumor samples surgery date and the death or last patient
30 min, at 37 8C. The antigen–antibody
information date.
This study was based on the analysis of 87 reaction was detected using streptavidin-
patients (68 males and 19 females) who biotin-based detection kit StreptABCom-
underwent surgical treatment for primary plex/HRP Duet, mouse/rabbit (Dako A/S, Results
OSCC from 1968 to 2001, at the Head and K0492, Denmark) and visualized using
Clinical features
Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology 3.3’diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride
Department of the A.C. Camargo Cancer (DAB/SIGMA, ref D-5637, St. Louis, The analysis of 87 patients with OSCC
Hospital, Brazil. The inclusion criteria MO, USA). Sections were counterstained revealed a white male predominance with
were: (1) primary OSCC located in the with Harris hematoxylin before being frequently tobacco (83%) and/or alcohol
tongue or floor of mouth, clinical stages I dehydrated and cover slipped. Human pla- (76%) consumption. The patients’ ages
(T1N0M0) and II (T2N0M0), confirmed by centa was used as positive control. Normal ranged from 35 to 89 years (mean 59.36
biopsy; (2) patients who did not undergo oral mucosa from the surgical margins was years 10.91 standard deviation [SD]).
radiotherapy, chemotherapy or other treat- used as internal control. For a negative The tumor was located in the tongue
ment prior to surgery; (3) patients without control, the primary antibody was omitted (69% of cases) and floor of the mouth
other simultaneous primary tumors; (4) during the immunohistochemical staining. (31% of cases). On the basis of the Union
tumor tissue available for microscopic ana- Quantitative computer-assisted analysis Internationale Contre le Cancer38,39 criteria
lysis. Clinical data of the patients were of 30 invasive tumor front fields (X400 of oral cavity carcinomas, a total of 28 cases
obtained from the medical records and magnification: 93,992.05 mm2/field) in (32%) were at clinical stage I (T1N0M0)
included gender, age, ethnic group (white each tumor sample was performed to eval- and 59 (68%) clinical stage II (T2N0M0).
or not white), tobacco and alcohol con- uate the cytoplasmic immunoreactivity of All 87 patients underwent surgical treat-
sumption, tumor location, TNM stage38,39, VEGF-C expressed by malignant cells. The ment of primary tumor resection and 64 of
treatment (surgery, postoperative adjuvant images of the invasive tumor front in each them were submitted to elective neck dis-
374 Faustino et al.

Fig. 1. Weak cytoplasmic immunostaining for VEGF-C in OSCC (A and B). Strong cytoplasmic immunostaining for VEGF-C in OSCC (C
and D).

section (54 patients: ipsilateral neck elective neck dissection presented positive 272.1 months (mean 82.2  63.1 SD). At
dissection; 9 patients: bilateral neck dis- lymph nodes confirmed by histopatholo- the end of the follow-up period, 33
section). Only 19 patients received post- gical analysis (pN+) at the moment of patients (38%) were alive and disease free,
operative adjuvant radiotherapy. primary tumor resection. 19 patients (22%) had died of recurrence
During clinical follow up, local and (local, regional or distant), 28 patients
regional recurrences were observed in (32%) had died from cause other than
Immunostaining for VEGF-C expressed
15 (17%) and 14 (16%) patients respec- tumor, and 7 (8%) were considered lost
by malignant cells
tively, and three patients (3.4%) devel- to follow up because they reached a clin-
oped both. Two patients with OSCC Immunohistochemical analysis showed ical outcome in less than 5 years.
developed distant metastases (one within strong cytoplasmic immunostaining for Details concerning 5-year and 10-year
lung and the other liver). VEGF-C in 66 (75.9%) of the 87 tumors overall and disease-free survival rates are
Microscopically, most of the OSCC and weak immunostaining in 21 (24%) summarized in Table 3. VEGF-C expres-
cases analysed were well to moderately (Fig. 1). Some of the inflammatory cells sion by malignant cells was not a signifi-
differentiated, showing solid cords of neo- infiltrating the tumors, especially macro- cant prognostic factor for patients with
plastic cells as pattern of invasion. Most of phages, were found to stain strongly for OSCC.
the tumors presented intense keratiniza- VEGF-C. Excluding VEGF-C expression, the
tion, discrete nuclear polymorphism, few No statistically significant correlations neck lymph-nodal status influenced the
mitotic figures per high-power field (X400 were found regarding clinicopathologic overall survival rates of the 64 patients
magnification) and intense-to-moderate parameters (including gender, ethnic submitted to elective neck dissection
lymphocytic infiltration. group, age, tobacco, alcohol, tumor site, (Fig. 2 and Table 4). The 5-year and 10-
According to histopathological malig- T stage, local recurrence, regional recur- year overall survival rates were, respec-
nant grading described by BRYNE et al.6, 69 rence, lymphatic or blood embolization, tively, 67% and 58% (pN0 group),
OSCCs (79%) were classified as more perineural, muscular and salivary gland whereas for the 14 patients with occult
differentiated tumors (5–12 points) and infiltrations) and the VEGF-C expression lymph-node metastasis they were 50% and
18 (21%) as less differentiated tumors by malignant cells of the OSCC (Table 1). 29% (pN+ group) (p = 0.030), as summar-
(13–20 points). Surgical margins were There was no statistical correlation ized in Table 4.
negative in 84 patients (97%), but three between VEGF-C expression and occult
patients (3.4%) had positive surgical mar- lymph-node metastases as well as histo-
Discussion
gins (a surgical margin was classified as pathological malignancy grading in the
positive when there was OSCC or OSCC invasive front of the tumors (Table 2). Although the metastatic dissemination of
in situ at the margin). Fourteen patients The clinical follow up for the 87 tumor cells to regional lymph nodes is a
(22%) among the 64 patients submitted to patients with OSCC ranged from 5.4 to common feature of OSCC arising in the
VEGF-C expression and occult lymph-node metastasis in oral cancer 375

Table 1. Correlation between clinicopathologic parameters and VEGF-C expression in OSCC has gained importance in recent years as
VEGF-C expression an adjuvant tool, in order to understand the
P mechanism of metastatic spread via lym-
Weak Strong phatic vessels.
Variable Category N % N % Most of the patients with OSCC sub-
mitted to elective neck dissection in our
Gender Male 16 76 52 79 0.802
Female 5 24 14 21 series showed strong cytoplasmic immu-
Ethnic group White 20 95 60 91 0.525 nostaining for VEGF-C, including pN0 and
Not white 1 5 6 9 those with occult lymph node metastasis
Age 59 years 10 48 35 53 0.666 (pN+), as shown in Fig. 1. These results
>59 years 11 52 31 47 confirm the observation that tumor cells of
*
Tobacco Yes 17 85 55 90 0.524 OSCC, in the early stage of development,
No 3 15 6 10 express VEGF-C11,16,17,20,21,25,33,35,36,41,44,
Alcohol* Yes 16 80 50 82 0.844 which may elevate the risk of precocious
No 4 20 11 18 nodal metastasis.
Tumor site Tongue 16 76 44 67 0.411
Floor of mouth 5 24 22 33
VEGF-C expression of OSCC located
T stage T1 10 48 18 27 0.082 in the tongue and floor of mouth was not
T2 11 52 48 73 influenced by other clinicopathological
Local recurrence Yes 2 10 13 20 0.282 parameters (gender, ethnic group, age,
No 19 90 53 80 tobacco and alcohol consumption, tumor
Regional recurrence Yes 4 19 10 15 0.672 site, T stage, local recurrence, regional
No 17 81 56 85 recurrence, lymphatic or blood emboliza-
Lymphatic embolization Yes 5 24 20 30 0.567 tion, perineural, muscular and salivary
No 16 76 46 70 gland infiltration) as described in
Blood embolization Yes 2 10 10 15 0.515
Table 1. In contrast to the results of KISHI-
No 19 90 56 85 11 16 33
MOTO et al. , LI et al. , SEDIVY et al. ,
Perineural infiltration Yes 12 57 32 49 0.489 35 36
No 9 43 34 51 SHINTANI et al. , SIRIWARDENA et al. and
Muscular infiltration Yes 18 86 53 80 0.577 TANIGAKI et al.41, the present results do not
No 3 14 13 20 show a statistically significant association
Salivary gland infiltration Yes 5 24 24 36 0.288 between lymph-node metastasis and
No 16 76 42 64 VEGF-C expression by malignant cells
TOTAL 21 100 66 100 of the OSCC (clinical stage I and II).
*
Excluding patients with lost records. These authors did not investigate, as in
the present study, the occult lymph-node
tongue and floor of mouth, it is not clear sels9,15,23,29,30,43, but little is known about metastasis from OSCC, and most of them
whether the tumor utilizes existing lym- the role of tumor lymphangiogenesis in analyzed tumors at both early and
phatic channels or whether dissemination metastasis. VEGF-C overexpression advanced clinical stages (from I to IV).
requires the formation of new lymphatic seems to induce new lymphatic and blood Occult lymph-node metastases (pN+)
vessels (lymphangiogenesis)4,8,18,27,32,34. vessels in the vicinity of the primary can- were detected in 22% of the 64 patients
In the last decade, VEGF-C and VEGF- cer14,33. In this context, the correlation who were submitted to elective neck dis-
D were identified as lymphangiogenic between VEGF-C and lymphatic vessel section in this series. This percentage is
growth factors and ligands to the receptor density in human OSCC, evaluated by close to those reported by AMARAL et al.1
VEGFR-3 present in the lymphatic ves- immunohistochemical parameters25,33,36, (23%) and OKAMOTO et al.26 (24%), but

Table 2. Correlation between histopathological malignancy grading, neck lymph-nodal status and VEGF-C expression in OSCC
VEGF-C
P
Weak Strong TOTAL
Variable Category N % N % N %
Malignancy grading Less differentiated 3 17 15 83 18 100 0.406
More differentiated 18 26 51 74 69 100
Neck lymph-nodal status* pN+ (ONM) 2 14 12 86 14 100 0.876
pN0 8 16 42 84 50 100
ONM = occult lymph node metastasis.
*
Excluding patients not submitted to elective neck dissection.

Table 3. Five-year and 10-year survival rates of the 87 patients with OSCC according to VEGF-C expression
Overall survival (%) Disease-free survival (%)
Variable Category P P
5-year 10-year 5-year 10-year
VEGF-C Weak 63 53 0.682 65 65 0.975
Strong 62 46 66 66
376 Faustino et al.

Table 4. Five-year and 10-year overall survival rates of the 64 patients with OSCC submitted to as a prognostic factor in OSCC, these
elective neck dissection results suggest that the isolated immu-
Overall survival (%) noexpression of VEGF-C in malignant
Variable Category P cells does not directly influence the clin-
5-year 10-year
ical outcome and prognosis of patients
Neck lymph-nodal status pN+ (ONM) 50 29 0.030 with early OSCC of tongue and floor of
pN0 67 58 mouth. In spite of this, further studies
ONM = occult lymph-node metastasis. should be performed with regard to
VEGF-C, microvessel density and the
lower than those of RUSSOLO et al.31 (34%) nancy grading and VEGF-C expression occurrence of regional lymph-node metas-
and BYERS et al.7 (45%) in patients with (Table 2). Bryne’s grading system6 was tases because, in the future, understanding
OSCC. used, in which the morphological features the influence of lymphangiogenic growth
The immunostaining of VEGF-C in are determined from the most invasive factors and tumour immunomodulation
OSCC is a histopathological parameter that front of the tumors. The invasive tumor may yield an array of new therapies to
has been evaluated for others11,17,33,35,41 front consists of the most aggressive cells, limit the metastatic spread of oral cancer.
but generally few microscopic fields were which have the ability to invade surround-
analyzed and frequently the extension of ing tissue structures, including vessels,
the examined area and field magnification and thereby metastasize. The characteris- Acknowledgments. The authors thank
were not specified. The present study tics of the invasive tumor front are of FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa
involved an objective and reproducible major significance for the prognosis of do Estado de São Paulo, grant #2005/
evaluation of VEGF-C expression in malig- oral cancer3,5. 04577-4) and CAPES (Coordenação de
nant cells of OSCC using a computer sys- VEGF-C expression in the malignant Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nı́vel
tem that permitted capture of the tumor area cells did not influence the likelihood of Superior) for supporting this study.
to be analyzed by investigators. Thirty overall and disease-free survival for the
invasive front tumor fields were evaluated patients with OSCC located in the tongue
(X400 magnification) in each sample; with- and floor of the mouth (Table 3). The only References
out doubt, a representative area of the most prognostic factor that reached statistical
invasive region of the OSCC. Use of this significance and influenced cumulative 1. Amaral TMP, Freire ARS, Carvalho
objective methodology minimizing the overall survival rates was the occurrence AL, Pinto CAL, Kowalski LP. Predic-
subjectivity and facilitates comparison of of occult lymph-node metastasis (pN+), as tive factors of occult metastasis and prog-
nosis of clinical stages I and II squamous
the results with those of future studies, an showed in Table 4 and Fig. 2. These results cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of
essential step for establishment of the real reinforce previous findings that, in the early the mouth. Oral Oncol 2004: 40: 780–
influence of VEGF-C expression by malig- stages of OSCC, the prediction of occult 786.
nant cells on the clinical and biological lymph-node metastasis is, at present, indis- 2. Arinaga M, Noguchi T, Takeno S,
behavior of the OSCC. pensable for improvement in the probabil- Chujo M, Miura T, Uchida Y. Clinical
According to the histopathological ity of survival1,7,10,11,12,31. The pursuit of significance of vascular endothelial
malignancy grading, most (79%) of the predictive factors should be increased to growth factor C and vascular endothelial
87 OSCC cases were classified as well-to- reduce the morbidity of elective neck dis- growth factor receptor 3 in patients with
moderately differentiated (more differen- section in patients who do not have metas- nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer
2003: 97: 457–464.
tiated tumors), a finding consistent with tasis in the pathological exam (pN0).
3. Bànkfalvi A, Piffkò J. Prognostic and
other published studies11,35,41. There was In conclusion, although VEGF-C predictive factors in oral cancer: the role
no statistical correlation between malig- expression has been occasionally regarded of invasive tumor front. J Oral Path Med
2000: 29: 291–298.
4. Beasley NJP, Prevo R, Banerji S,
Leek RD, Moore J, van Trappen P,
Cox G, Harris AL, Jackson DG. Intra-
tumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymph
node metastasis in head and neck cancer.
Cancer Res 2002: 62: 1315–1320.
5. Bryne M, Boysen M, Alfsen CG, Abe-
ler VM, Sudbo J, Nesland JM, Kris-
tensen GB, Piffko J, Bankfalvi A. The
invasive front of carcinomas. The most
important area for tumour prognosis?
Anticancer Res 1998: 18: 4757–4764.
6. Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R,
Stene T, Bang G, Dabelsteen E.
New malignancy grading is a better prog-
nostic indicator than Broders’ grading in
oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral
Pathol Med 1989: 18: 432–437.
7. Byers RM, El-Naggar AK, Lee YY,
Rao B, Fornage B, Terry NH, Sample
D, Hankins P, Smith TL, Wolf PJ. Can
Fig. 2. Cumulative overall survival probability curves for groups with lymph-node metastasis we detect or predict the presence of
(pN+) and without lymph-node metastasis (pN0). occult nodal metastases in patients with
VEGF-C expression and occult lymph-node metastasis in oral cancer 377

squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue? long-term follow-up. Mod Pathol 2003: 32. Saharinen P, Tammela T, Karkkai-
Head Neck 1998: 20: 138–144. 16: 309–314. nen MJ, Alitalo K. Lymphatic vascu-
8. Clarijs R, Ruiter DJ, De Wall RM. 20. Nakaya H, Kawashiri S, Tanaka A, lature: development, molecular
Lymphangiogenesis in malignant Noguchi N, Kato K, Hase T, Yama- regulation and role in tumor metastasis
tumours: does it occur? J Pathol 2001: moto E. Influences of angiogenesis and and inflammation. Trends Immunol 2004:
193: 143–146. lymphangiogenesis on cancerous inva- 25: 387–395.
9. Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. The biol- sion in experimentally induced tongue 33. Sedivy R, Beck-Mannagetta J,
ogy of vascular endothelial growth factor. carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2005: 34: Haverkampf C, Battistutti W, Hön-
Endocr Rev 1997: 18: 4–25. 87–92. igschnabl S. Expression of vascular
10. Haddadin KJ, Soutar DS, Oliver RJ, 21. Nakazato T, Shingaki S, Kitamura N, endothelial growth factor-C correlates
Webster MH, Robertson AG, MacDo- Saito C, Kuwano R, Tachibana M. with the lymphatic microvessel density
nald DG. Improved survival for patients Expression level of vascular endothelial and the nodal status in oral squamous cell
with clinically T1/T2, N0 tongue tumors growth factor-C and -A in cultured human cancer. J Oral Pathol Med 2003: 32: 455–
undergoing a prophylactic neck dissec- oral squamous cell carcinoma correlates 460.
tion. Head Neck 1999: 21: 517–525. respectively with lymphatic metastasis 34. Shayan R, Achen MG, Stacker SA.
11. Kishimoto K, Sasaki A, Yoshihama Y, and angiogenesis when transplanted into Lymphatic vessels in cancer metastasis:
Mese H. Expression of vascular endothe- nude mouse oral cavity. Oncol Rep 2006: bridging the gaps. Carcinogenesis 2006:
lial growth factor-C predicts regional 15: 825–830. 27: 1729–1738.
lymph node metastasis in early oral squa- 22. Neuchrist C, Erovic BM, Handisurya 35. Shintani S, Li C, Ishikawa T, Mihara
mous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2003: A, Fischer MB, Steiner GE, Holle- M, Nakashiro K, Hamakawa H.
39: 391–396. mann D, Gedlicka C, Saaristo A, Bur- Expression of vascular endothelial
12. KOWALSKI LP, MAGRIN J, SAB_OIA M, SAN- ian M. Vascular endothelial growth growth factor A, B, C and D in oral
TOS JC, TORLONI H. Squamous cell carci- factor C and vascular endothelial growth squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol
noma of the tongue: a review of 629 factor receptor 3 expression in squamous 2004: 40: 13–20.
patients treated at a single institution. cell carcinomas of the head and neck. 36. Siriwardena BSMS, Kudo Y, Ogawa
South Am J Cancer 1997: 1: 245-254. Head Neck 2003: 25: 464–474. I, Udagama M.N.G.P.K.. Tilakaratne
13. Kowalski LP, Medina JE. Nodal metas- 23. Nicosia RF. What is the role of vascular WM, Takata T. VEGF-C is associated
tases: predictive factors. Otolaryngol Clin endothelial growth factor-related mole- with lymphatic status and invasion in oral
North Am 1998: 31: 621–637. cules in tumor angiogenesis? Am J Pathol cancer. J Clin Pathol 2007: 9 [Epub ahead
14. Krishnan J, Kirkin V, Steffen A, 1998: 153: 11–16. of print]..
Hegen M, Weih D, Tomarev S, Wilt- 24. O-Charoenrat P, Rhys-Evans P, 37. Skobe M, Hawighorst T, Jackson DG,
ing J, Sleeman JP. Differential in vivo Eccles SA. Expression of vascular Prevo R, Janes L, Velasco P, Riccardi
and in vitro expression of vascular endothelial growth factor family mem- L, Alitalo K, Claffey K, Detmar M.
endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C bers in head and neck squamous cell Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis
and VEGF-D in tumors and its relation- carcinoma correlates with lymph node by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer
ship to lymphatic metastasis in immuno- metastasis. Cancer 2001: 92: 556–568. metastasis. Nat Med 2001: 7: 192–
competent rats. Cancer Res 2003: 63: 25. Ohno F, Nakanishi H, Abe A, Seki Y, 198.
713–722. Kinoshita A, Hasegawa Y, Tate- 38. Sobin LH, Fleming ID. TNM classifica-
15. Kukk E, Lymboussaki. Taira S, Kaipa- matsu M, Kurita K. Regional differ- tion of malignant tumors, fifth edition.
nen A, Jeltsch M, Joukov V, Alitalo ence in intratumoral lymphangiogenesis Union Internationale Contre le Cancer
K. VEGF-C receptor binding, and of oral squamous cell carcinomas evalu- and the American Joint Committee on
pattern of expression with VEGFR-3 sug- ated by immunohistochemistry using D2- Cancer. Cancer 1997: 80: 1803–1804.
gests a role in lymphatic vascular devel- 40 and podoplanin antibody: an analysis 39. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM: classi-
opment. Development 1996: 122: 3829– in comparison with angiogenesis. J Oral fication of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New
3837. Pathol Med 2007: 36: 281–289. York: John Wiley & Sons 2002.
16. Li QL, Chen FJ, Zeng ZY, Yang AK, 26. Okamoto M, Nishimine M, Kishi M, 40. Soini Y, Puhakka A, Kahlos K, Säily
Wu QL, Zhang HZ, Hou JH. Expression Kirita T, Sugimura M, Nakamura M, Pääkkö P, Koistinen P, Kinnula V.
and clinical significance of VEGF-C and M, Konishi N. Prediction of delayed Endothelial nitric oxide synthase is
Flt-4 in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. neck metastasis in patients with stage I/ strongly expressed in malignant mesothe-
Ai Zheng 2006: 25: 235–240. II squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. lioma but does not associate with vascular
17. López De Cicco R, Watson JC, Bassi J Oral Pathol Med 2002: 31(4):227–233. density or the expression of VEGF, Flk1
DE, Litwin S, Klein-Szanto1 AJ. 27. Pepper MS. Lymphangiogenesis and or Flt1. Histopathology 2001: 39: 179–
Simultaneous expression of furin and vas- tumor metastasis: myth or reality? Clin 186.
cular endothelial growth factor in human Cancer Res 2001: 7: 462–468. 41. Tanigaki Y, Nagashima Y, Kitamura
oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma pro- 28. Pepper MS, Tille JC, Nisato R, Skobe Y, Matsuda H, Mikami Y, Tsukuda M.
gression. Clin Cancer Res 2004: 10: M. Lymphangiogenesis and tumor metas- The expression of vascular endothelial
4480–4488. tasis. Cell Tissue Res 2003: 314: 167– growth factor –A and –C, and receptors
18. Munoz-Guerra MF, Marazuela EG, 177. 1 and 3: Correlation with lymph node
Martin-Villar E, Quintanilla M, 29. Ribatti D, Nico B, Crivellato E, Roc- metastasis and prognosis in tongue squa-
Gamallo C. Prognostic significance of caro AM, Vacca A. The history of the mous cell carcinoma. Inter J Mol Med
intratumoral lymphangiogenesis in squa- angiogenic switch concept. Leukemia 2004: 14: 389–395.
mous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. A 2007: 21: 44–52. 42. Tsurusaki T, Kanda S, Sakai H, Kane-
study of the early stages. Cancer 2004: 30. Roskoski Jr R. Vascular endothelial take H, Saito Y, Alitalo K, Koji T.
100: 553–560. growth factor (VEGF) signaling in tumor Vascular endothelial growth factor-C
19. Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto progression. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol expression in human prostatic carcinoma
M, Yang Q, Tsukiyama A, Imabun S, 2007: 62: 179–213 Epub 2007 Feb 26.. and its relationship to lymph node
Nakahara M, Nakao K, Nakamura M, 31. Russolo M, Giacomarra V, Papani- metastasis. Br J Cancer 1999: 80: 309–
Mori I, Kakudo K. Clinicopathological kolla L, Tirelli G. Prognostic indica- 313.
significance of vascular endothelial tors of occult metastases in oral cancer. 43. Veikkola T, Karkkainen M, Claes-
growth factor-C in breast carcinoma with Laryngoscope 2002: 112: 1320–1323. son-Welsh L, Alitalo K. Regulation
378 Faustino et al.

of angiogenesis via vascular endothelial oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral 9-75
growth factor receptors. Cancer Res Maxilofac Surg 2007: 65: 475–484. CEP 17012-901
2000: 60: 203–212. Bauru
44. Warburton G, Nikitakis NG, Rober- Address: São Paulo
son P, Marinos NJ, Wu T, Sauk JJ, Ord Denise Tostes Oliveira Brazil
RA, Wahl SM. Histopathological and Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru Tel.: +55 21 14 32358251
lymphangiogenic parameters in relation Área de Patologia Fax: +55 21 14 32234679
to lymph node metastasis in early stage Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla E-mail: d.tostes@fob.usp.br

You might also like