You are on page 1of 20

1

2
3
4
5
6 Supplementary materials
7
8 Appendix 1
9
10
Data envelopment analysis – applications and evaluating criteria
11
12
Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
13 Braglia and Petroni (2000) Bottling machines and packaging Outputs – Profitability; Quality; Delivery compliance.
14 lines manufacturing Inputs – Management capabilities; Production facilities and capacity;
15 Technological capabilities; Financial position; Experience;
16 Geographical location.
17
18 Liu et al. (2000) Agricultural and construction Outputs – Supply variety; Quality.
19 equipment manufacturing Inputs – Price index; Delivery performance; Distance.
20
21 Forker and Mendez (2001) Electronic components Output – Acceptable parts per million.
22 manufacturing Inputs – Role of management leadership and quality policy; Role of
23
24 the quality department; Training; Product/service design; Supplier
25 quality management; Process management; Quality data and reporting;
26 Employee relations.
27
28 Narasimhan et al. (2001) Telecommunications industry Outputs – Quality; Price; Delivery; Cost reduction performance; Other.
29 Inputs – Quality management practices and systems; Documentation
30 and self-audit; Process/manufacturing capability; Management of the
31 firm; Design and development capabilities; Cost reduction capability;
32
33 Supplier performance assessment.
34 Talluri and Baker (2002) Supply chain management Outputs – Number of shipments to arrive on time; Number of bills
35
36 received from the supplier without errors; Service quality experience;
37 Service quality credence.
38 Inputs – Total cost of shipments; Number of shipments per month.
39
40 Talluri and Sarkis (2002) Supply chain management Outputs – Number of shipments to arrive on time; Number of bills
41 received from the supplier without errors; Service quality experience;
42 Service quality credence.
43 Inputs – Total cost of shipments; Number of shipments per month.
44
45
46
26
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Talluri and Narasimhan (2004) Telecommunications industry Outputs – Quality; Price; Delivery; Cost reduction performance; Other.
7
8 Inputs – Quality management practices and systems; Documentation
9 and self-audit; Process/manufacturing capability; Management of the
10 firm; Design and development capabilities; Cost reduction capability;
11 Supplier performance assessment.
12
13 Garfamy (2006) Manufacturing – supplier Output – A unit of product.
14 evaluation and management Inputs – Manufacturing cost; Quality cost; Input technology; After
15
accounting sales service cost; Price.
16
17 Ross et al. (2006) Communications industry Outputs – Percentage of order acknowledgements with a promise ship
18 date within 24 hrs of PO issue; Percentage of suppliers shipping
19
20 notices received at buyer within 24 hrs of ship date; Percentage of
21 orders shipped to buyer on or before the original promised ship date;
22 Percentage of orders shipped on or before final ship date; Percentage of
23 orders delivered by the due date; Percentage of products/items not
24
25
rejected upon inspection.
26 Inputs – Dollar value of contracted; Dollar value of performance
27 incentives associated with contracted items; Purchase order stability;
28 Buyer’s forecast accuracy; Buyer’s comprehensiveness of forecast.
29
30 Saen (2006) Nuclear power industry Outputs – Electricity capacity; Amount of know-how transfer.
31 Input – Cost.
32
33 Seydel (2006) Consumer products Outputs – Price; Quality; Lead time; Quantity; Delivery; Technology;
34 manufacturing Service.
35
36 Talluri et al. (2006) Pharmaceutical industry Outputs – Quality; Delivery.
37 Input – Price.
38
39 Saen (2007a) Supply chain management Outputs – Number of bills received from the supplier without errors.
40 Input – Total cost of shipments; Supplier reputation.
41
42 Wu et al. (2007) Aviation electronics Outputs – Revenue; Satisfaction.
43 manufacturing Input – Cost; Judgment.
44
45
46
27
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 2
7
8 Mathematical programming – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Approach Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 Linear programming Talluri and Narasimhan Pharmaceutical industry Price; Quality; Delivery.
12 (2003)
13
14 Linear programming Talluri and Narasimhan Telecommunications Quality; Price; Delivery; Cost reduction performance;
15 (2005) industry Other; Quality management practices and systems;
16 Documentation and self-audit; Process/manufacturing
17
18
capability; Management of the firm; Design and
19 development capabilities; Cost reduction capability;
20 Supplier performance assessment.
21
22 Linear programming Ng (2008) Agricultural and Supply variety; Quality; Distance; Delivery; Price.
23 construction equipment
24 manufacturing
25
26 Binary integer linear Talluri (2002) Pharmaceutical industry Price; Quality; Delivery.
27 programming
28
29 Mixed integer linear Hong et al. (2005) Agriculture industry Delivery; Quality; Price; Quantity.
30 programming
31
32 Mixed integer nonlinear Ghodsypour and O’Brien Hypothetical case Price; Ordering cost; Perfect rate; On-time delivery;
33 programming (2001) Capacity.
34
35 Goal programming Karpak et al. (2001) Hydraulic gear pump Product cost; Quality of castings purchased; Delivery
36 manufacturing reliability of castings purchased
37
38 Multi-objective Narasimhan et al. (2006) Personal computer Direct cost; Indirect-coordination cost; Quality;
39 programming manufacturing Delivery reliability; Complexity of supply arrangement.
40
41 Multi-objective Wadhwa and Ravindran Hypothetical case Price; Lead time; Rejects.
42 programming (2007)
43
44
45
46
28
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 3
7
8 Analytic hierarchy process – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 Akarte et al. (2001) Automobile castings Maximum casting size; Minimum section thickness; Casting
12 complexity; Software aid; Pattern making; Sand preparation; Molding;
13 Core making; Melting and pouring; Heat treatment; Machining;
14
15 Dimensional tolerance; Surface roughness; Testing facilities; Quality
16 certification; Quality awards; Total casting cost; Sample delivery time.
17
18
Muralidharan et al. (2002) Bicycles manufacturing Quality; Delivery; Price; Technical capability; Financial position; Past
19 performance attitude; Facility; Flexibility; Service.
20
21
Chan (2003) Manufacturing Cost; Quality; Design capability; Manufacturing capability; Technical
22 capability; Technological capability; Performance history;
23 Management capability; Degree of cooperation; Financial
24 performance; Degree of closeness.
25
26 Chan and Chan (2004) Semiconductor assembly Cost; Delivery; Flexibility; Innovation; Quality; Service.
27 equipment manufacturing industry
28
29 Liu and Hai (2005) Furniture industry Quality; Responsiveness; Discipline; Delivery; Financial;
30 Management; Technical capability; Facility.
31
32 Chan et al. (2007) Airline industry Cost; Satisfaction of supplier; Quality; Assurance of supplier;
33 Proactive in measuring supply chain / own suppliers; E-business
34 initiatives; CI program / six sigma program / TQM program, etc.;
35
36
Research and development; Organizational culture and strategic issue;
37 Compatibility; Perceived risk; Financial issues; Technological issues;
38 Safety, environmental, and education issues.
39
40 Hou and Su (2007) Printer manufacturing Quality; Cost; Technology; Production capability; R&D; Delivery &
41 Location; Performance & Service.
42
43
44
45
46
29
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 4
7
8 Case-based reasoning – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 Choy and Lee (2002) Consumer products Delivery; Shipment quality; Product price; Manufacturing capability;
12 manufacturing Customer service; Management commitment, Product development;
13 Process improvement; Quality planning; Quality assurance supply;
14
15 Quality assurance production; Inspection and experimentation; Quality
16 staff; Organizational culture; Achievement of sales and marketing
17 objectives.
18
19 Choy et al. (2002) Consumer products Compliance with due date; Compliance with quality; Rejection in
20 manufacturing incoming quality; Rejection in production line; Rejection from
21 customers; Price; Inquiry response time; Quality staff; Product
22 development time; Product variety; Product line.
23
24 Choy and Lee (2003) Consumer products Delivery; Shipment quality; Product price; Manufacturing capability;
25 manufacturing Customer service; Product innovation; Product development time;
26
27 Number of quality staff; Culture innovation; Financial status.
28 Choy et al. (2003a) Consumer products Delivery; Shipment quality; Product price; Customer service; Quality;
29
30 manufacturing Development; Organizational culture.
31 Choy et al. (2003b) Consumer products Same as Choy et al. (2002)
32
33
manufacturing
34 Choy et al. (2004a) Consumer products Same as Choy et al. (2002)
35
36
manufacturing
37 Choy et al. (2005) Consumer products Price; Delivery; Quality; Innovation level; Level of technology;
38
39
manufacturing Culture; Commercial awareness; Production flexibility; Ease of
40 communication; Current reputation.
41
42
43
44
45
46
30
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 5
7
8 Analytic network process – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 Sarkis and Talluri (2002) High technology metal-based Culture; Technology; Relationship; Cost; Quality; Time; Flexibility.
12 manufacturing
13
14 Bayazit (2006) Hypothetical case Flexibility; On-time delivery; Price; Delivery lead-time; Quality;
15
16
Market share; Personnel capability; Process capability; Top
17 management capability; Financial capability.
18
Gencer and Gürpinar (2007) Electronic industry Facility location; Number of working years; References; Service
19
20 capability; Communication capability; Organization structure; Number
21 of personnel; Education status of the personnel; The last term profit;
22 Exporting status; Appropriateness of the materials price to the market
23 price; Machine capacity and capability; Manufacturing technology;
24
25
Facilities manufacturing capacity; Technical capability; Manufacturing
26 planning capability; Handling and packaging capability;
27 Appropriateness of the quantity; Appropriateness of the delivery date;
28 Appropriateness of the packaging standards; The period of procuring
29 materials; Quality system certificate of the supplier; Quality manual;
30
31 Documentation control; Archive of quality records; Usage of worth
32 instructions; Process control capability; Product identification;
33 Receiving inspection; Calibration control; Non-conforming material
34 control system; Corrective and preventive action system; Audit
35
36
mechanism; Training
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
31
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 6
7
8 Fuzzy set theory – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 Chen et al. (2006) High-technology manufacturing Profitability of supplier; Relationship closeness; Technological
12 capacity; Conformance quality; Conflict resolution.
13
14 Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006) Hypothetical case Price; Quality; Delivery lead time; Attitude; Quality systems in
15 operation at the supplier’s place; Financial capability of the supplier;
16 Production facilities and capacity; Management and organization;
17
18
Technological capability; Breadth of product line; Supplier’s
19 proximity; Existence of IT standards; Labor problems at the supplier’s
20 place; Reputation.
21
22 Florez-Lopez (2007) Hypothetical case Cost reduction effort; Delivery delays; Price; Reliability; Commit to
23 quality; Responsiveness; Commit to improvement; Delivery mistakes;
24 Fluctuation on costs; Order mistakes; Outgoing quality; Timely
25 communication; Customer service; Technical assistance.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
32
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 7
7
8 Simple multi-attribute rating technique – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 Barla (2003) Glass manufacturing industry Reliability of subcontractor; Capability of subcontractor; Quality
12 organization; Geographical condition; Financial condition; Service;
13 Price.
14
15 Huang and Keskar (2007) PC manufacturing industry Reliability; Responsiveness; Flexibility; Cost and financial; Assets and
16 infrastructure; Safety; Environment.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 Appendix 8
24
25 Genetic algorithm – application and evaluating criteria
26
27 Authors Application Evaluating criteria
28 Ding et al. (2005) Textile industry Order-to-delivery lead-time; Ratio of on-time delivery; Inventory
29
position; Resource utilization; Cost.
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
33
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 9
7
8 Integrated AHP approaches – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Approaches Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 AHP-Bi-negotiation Chen and Huang (2007) High-end computer Cash-to-cash cycle time; Inventory days of supply;
12 manufacturing Order quantity; Visitation to supplier facilities;
13 Performance history; Production flexibility; Quality
14
15 performance; Position in the industry and reputation;
16 EDI capability; Organization structure; Price; Logistics
17 cost; Value-added productivity; Supply chain response
18 time; Delivery lead time; Fill rate.
19
20 AHP-DEA Ramanathan (2007) Hypothetical case Manufacturing costs; Quality; Technology; After-sales
21 service.
22
23 AHP-DEA Saen (2007b) Hypothetical case Two unknown inputs and two unknown outputs.
24
25 AHP-DEA Sevkli et al. (2007) TV set manufacturing Shipment quality; Delivery; Cost; Number of
26 employees; Organizational structure; Training; Number
27 of technical staff; Management commitment; Inspection
28 and control; Quality planning; Quality assurance;
29
30 Production capacity; Maintenance; Lead-time; Up to
31 date; Storage; Development; Reputation; Location;
32 Price; Patent; Technical capability; RFID; EDI; Internet.
33
34 AHP-DEA-ANN Ha and Krishnan (2008) Auto parts manufacturing Production facilities; Quality management intention;
35 Quality system outcome; Claims; Quality improvement;
36 Response to claims; On-time delivery; Organizational
37 control; Business plans; Customer communication;
38
39 Internal audit; Data administration.
40 AHP-GP Çebi and Bayraktar (2003) Food manufacturing Lead time; Supply lots; Flexibility; Delivery conditions;
41
42 Capacity; Involvement; Improvement effort; Problem
43 solving; Reputation; Financial strength; Management;
44 Communication; Past experience; Sales representative.
45
46
34
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 AHP-GP Wang et al. (2004) Automobile manufacturing Delivery reliability; Flexibility and responsiveness;
7
8 Cost; Assets.
9 AHP-GP Wang et al. (2005) Automobile manufacturing Same as Wang et al. (2004)
10
11 AHP-GP Perçin (2006) Automobile manufacturing Manufacturing facilities/capabilities; Conformance
12 quality; Flexibility; Delivery reliability; Technical
13
14
capability; Continuous improvement programs;
15 Technical information sharing; Technological
16 compatibility; Product innovation capabilities;
17 Suppliers’ organizational structure; Reputation and
18 position in industry; Financial strength; Management
19
20 skills; Performance history; Geographical location;
21 Long-term relationship; Response to complaints;
22 Communication systems; Warranty support; Repair and
23 maintenance service.
24
25 AHP-GP Kull and Talluri (2008) Precision turned steel Delivery risk; cost risk; quality risk; flexibility risk;
26 products manufacturing confidence risk.
27
28 AHP-GP Mendoza et al. (2008) Hypothetical case Flexibility; Quality; Price; Service; Delivery.
29
30 AHP-grey relational Yang and Chen (2006) Laptop computer Quality; Finance; Customer service; Production
31 analysis manufacturing capacity; Design & technical capability; IT system;
32 Turnover; Cost; Delivery; Distance.
33
34 AHP-mixed integer Mendoza and Ventura Hypothetical case Flexibility; Quality; Price; Service; Delivery.
35 nonlinear programming (2008)
36
37 AHP-multi-objective Xia and Wu (2007) Hypothetical case Price; Technical level; Defects; Reliability; On-time
38 programming delivery; Supply capacity; Repair turnaround time;
39 Warranty period.
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
35
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 10 Integrated fuzzy approaches – applications and evaluating criteria
7
8 Approaches Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
9 Fuzzy-AHP Kahraman et al. (2003) White good manufacturing Financial; Management; Quality systems; Handling;
10 Use in manufacturing; Other business consideration;
11
12
End use; Follow up; Customer support; Customer
13 satisfiers; Professionalism.
14
15
Fuzzy-AHP Chan and Kumar (2007) Manufacturing Cost; Quality; Service performance; Supplier’s profile;
16 Risk factor.
17
Fuzzy-AHP-cluster Bottani and Rizzi (2008) Beverage manufacturing Economical value; Number of orders per year; Waiting
18
19 analysis time.
20 Fuzzy-GA Jain et al. (2004) Automobile part Part rejection rate; Delivery performance; Residual
21
22 manufacturing stress; Surface finish.
23 Fuzzy-multi-objective Amid et al. (2006) Hypothetical case Cost; Quality; Service level (or on-time delivery).
24
25 programming
26 Fuzzy-multi-objective Amid et al. (2008) Hypothetical case Cost; Net rejections; Net late deliveries.
27
28 programming
29 Fuzzy-QFD Bevilacqua et al. (2006) Clutch couplings Experience of the sector; Capacity for innovation to
30
31
manufacturing follow up the customer’s evolution in terms of changes
32 in its strategy and market; Quality system certification;
33 Flexibility of response to the customer’s requests;
34 Financial stability; Ability to manage orders on-line
35 (EDI-system); Geographical position.
36
37 Fuzzy-SMART Kwong et al. (2002) Electrical appliances Product quality; Product construction; Product safety;
38 manufacturing Quality system; Engineering; Product and planning
39
40 control; Research and development.
41 Fuzzy-SMART Chou and Chang (2008) IT hardware Cost; Quality; Delivery; Organizational culture and
42
43 manufacturing strategy; Technical capacity.
44
45
46
36
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 11
7
8 Other approaches – applications and evaluating criteria
9
10 Approaches Authors Applications Evaluating criteria
11 ANN-CBR Choy et al. (2003c) Consumer products Compliance with due date; Compliance with quality;
12 manufacturing Rejection in incoming quality; Rejection in production
13 line; Quality system and implementation; Price;
14
15 Response time; Technical competence; Product
16 development time; Product innovation; Cultural
17 innovation.
18
19 ANN-CBR Choy et al. (2004b) Consumer products Compliance with due date; Compliance with quality;
20 manufacturing Rejection in incoming quality; Rejection in production
21 line; Rejection from customers; Parts price; Response
22 time; ISO quality system installed; Product development
23
24 time; Use of the Internet and database; VMI readiness.
25 ANN-GA Lau et al. (2006) Hypothetical case Delivery efficiency; Reliability of quality;
26
27 Responsiveness to the market trend; Competitiveness of
28 cost.
29
30 ANP-multi-objective Demirtas and Üstün Refrigerator Low defect rate; Process capability; On-time delivery;
31 programming (2008) manufacturing Process flexibility; Response to changes; Support to
32 design process; Consistency; Mutual trust and ease of
33 communication; Unit cost; Break in line; Measurement
34
and assessment; Order delays; Customer complaints;
35
36 Inability to meet further requirements.
37 ANP-GP Demirtas and Üstün Refrigerator Same as Demirtas and Üstün (2008)
38
39 (2009) manufacturing
40 DEA-multi-objective Weber et al. (2000) Manufacturing Price; Delivery; Quality.
41
42 programming
43 DEA-multi-objective Talluri et al. (2008) Pharmaceutical industry Price; Quality; Delivery.
44
45
46
37
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 programming
7
8 DEA-SMART Seydel (2005) Consumer products Quality; Price; Lead time; Quantity; Service; Delivery;
9 manufacturing Technology.
10
11 GA-multi-objective Liao and Rittscher (2007) Hypothetical case Cost; Quality; Delivery; Flexibility.
12 programming
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
38
47
48
49
Appendix 12
1
2 Summary of individual approaches
3
4 Approaches No. of articles Authors
5 DEA 14 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Liu et al. (2000);
6 Forker and Mendez (2001); Narasimhan et al.
7
8
(2001); Talluri and Baker (2002); Talluri and
9 Sarkis (2002); Talluri and Narasimhan
10 (2004); Garfamy (2006); Ross et al. (2006);
11 Saen (2006); Seydel (2006); Talluri et al.
12 (2006); Saen (2007a); Wu et al. (2007)
13
14 Mathematical 9 Ghodsypour and O’Brien (2001); Karpak et
15 programming al. (2001); Talluri (2002); Talluri and
16
17
Narasimhan (2003); Hong et al. (2005);
18 Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Narasimhan
19 et al. (2006); Wadhwa and Ravindran (2007);
20 Ng (2008).
21
22 AHP 7 Akarte et al. (2001); Muralidharan et al.
23 (2002); Chan (2003); Chan and Chan (2004);
24 Liu and Hai (2005); Chan et al. (2007); Hou
25
26 and Su (2007)
27 CBR 7 Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et al. (2002);
28
29 Choy and Lee (2003); Choy et al. (2003a);
30 Choy et al. (2003b); Choy et al. (2004a);
31 Choy et al. (2005)
32
33 ANP 3 Sarkis and Talluri (2002); Bayazit (2006);
34 Gencer and Gürpinar (2007)
35
36 Fuzzy set theory 3 Chen et al. (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra
37 (2006); Florez-Lopez (2007)
38
39 SMART 2 Barla (2003); Huang and Keskar (2007)
40 GA 1 Ding et al. (2005)
41
42 Total 46
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62 39
63
64
65
Appendix 13
1
2 Summary of integrated approaches
3
4 Approaches No. of articles Authors
5 AHP-GP 6 Çebi and Bayraktar (2003); Wang et al.
6 (2004); Wang et al. (2005); Perçin (2006);
7
8
Kull and Talluri (2008); Mendoza et al.
9 (2008)
10
AHP-DEA 3 Ramanathan (2007); Saen (2007b); Sevkli et
11
12 al. (2007)
13 ANN-CBR 2 Choy et al. (2003c); Choy et al. (2004b)
14
15 DEA-multi-objective 2 Weber et al. (2000); Talluri et al. (2008)
16 programming
17
18 Fuzzy-AHP 2 Kahraman et al. (2003); Chan and Kumar
19 (2007)
20
21 Fuzzy-multi-objective 2 Amid et al. (2006); Amid et al. (2008)
22 programming
23
24 Fuzzy-SMART 2 Kwong et al. (2002); Chou and Chang (2008)
25
26 AHP-Bi-negotiation 1 Chen and Huang (2007)
27
28 AHP-DEA-ANN 1 Ha and Krishnan (2008)
29 AHP-grey relational 1 Yang and Chen (2006)
30
31
analysis
32 AHP-mixed integer 1 Mendoza and Ventura (2008)
33
34
nonlinear
35 programming
36
AHP-multi-objective 1 Xia and Wu (2007)
37
38 programming
39 Fuzzy-AHP-cluster 1 Bottani and Rizzi (2008)
40
41 analysis
42 Fuzzy-GA 1 Jain et al. (2004)
43
44 Fuzzy-QFD 1 Bevilacqua et al. (2006)
45
46 ANN-GA 1 Lau et al. (2006)
47
48 ANP-multi-objective 1 Demirtas and Üstün (2008)
49 programming
50
51 ANP-GP 1 Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
52 DEA-SMART 1 Seydel (2005)
53
54 GA-multi-objective 1 Liao and Rittscher (2007)
55 programming
56
57 Total 32
58
59
60
61
62 40
63
64
65
1
2
3
4
5
6 Appendix 14
7
8 Summary of evaluating criteria
9
10 Criteria No. of articles Authors
11 Quality 68 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Liu et al. (2000); Weber et al. (2000); Akarte et al. (2001); Forker and
12 Mendez (2001); Ghodsypour and O’Brien (2001); Karpak et al. (2001); Narasimhan et al. (2001);
13 Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et al. (2002a); Kwong et al. (2002); Muralidharan et al. (2002); Sarkis
14
15 and Talluri (2002); Talluri (2002); Talluri and Baker (2002); Talluri and Sarkis (2002); Barla (2003);
16 Chan (2003); Choy and Lee (2003); Choy et al. (2003a); Choy et al. (2003b); Choy et al. (2003c);
17 Kahraman et al. (2003); Talluri and Narasimhan (2003); Chan and Chan (2004); Choy et al. (2004a);
18 Choy et al. (2004b); Jain et al. (2004); Talluri and Narasimhan (2004); Choy et al. (2005); Hong et
19
al. (2005); Liu and Hai (2005); Seydel (2005); Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Amid et al. (2006);
20
21 Bayazit (2006); Bevilacqua et al. (2006); Chen et al. (2006); Garfamy (2006); Lau et al. (2006);
22 Narasimhan et al. (2006); Perçin (2006); Ross et al. (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Seydel
23 (2006); Talluri et al. (2006); Yang and Chen (2006); Chan and Kumar (2007); Chan et al. (2007);
24 Chen and Huang (2007); Chou and Chang (2007); Florez-Lopez (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar
25
26
(2007); Hou and Su (2007); Liao and Rittscher (2007); Ramanathan (2007); Saen (2007a); Sevkli et
27 al. (2007); Wadhwa and Ravindran (2007); Xia and Wu (2007); Amid et al. (2008); Demirtas and
28 Üstün (2008); Ha and Krishnan (2008); Mendoza and Ventura (2008); Mendoza et al. (2008); Ng
29 (2008); Talluri et al. (2008); Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
30
31 Delivery 64 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Liu et al. (2000); Weber et al. (2000); Akarte et al. (2001); Ghodsypour
32 and O’Brien (2001); Karpak et al. (2001); Narasimhan et al. (2001); Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et
33 al. (2002); Muralidharan et al. (2002); Sarkis and Talluri (2002); Talluri (2002); Talluri and Baker
34
35 (2002); Talluri and Sarkis (2002); Barla (2003); Çebi and Bayraktar (2003); Chan (2003); Choy and
36 Lee (2003); Choy et al. (2003a); Choy et al. (2003b); Choy et al. (2003c); Talluri and Narasimhan
37 (2003); Chan and Chan (2004); Choy et al. (2004a); Choy et al. (2004b); Jain et al. (2004); Talluri
38 and Narasimhan (2004); Wang et al. (2004); Choy et al. (2005); Ding et al. (2005); Hong et al.
39
(2005); Liu and Hai (2005); Seydel (2005); Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Wang et al. (2005);
40
41 Amid et al. (2006); Bayazit (2006); Bevilacqua et al. (2006); Lau et al. (2006); Narasimhan et al.
42 (2006); Perçin (2006); Ross et al. (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Seydel (2006); Talluri et al.
43 (2006); Yang and Chen (2006); Chen and Huang (2007); Florez-Lopez (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar
44 (2007); Hou and Su (2007); Liao and Rittscher (2007); Sevkli et al. (2007); Wadhwa and Ravindran
45
46
41
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 (2007); Xia and Wu (2007); Amid et al. (2008); Bottani and Rizzi (2008); Chou and Chang (2008);
7 Demirtas and Üstün (2008); Ha and Krishnan (2008); Mendoza and Ventura (2008); Mendoza et al.
8 (2008); Ng (2008); Talluri et al. (2008); Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
9
10 Price/Cost 63 Liu et al. (2000); Weber et al. (2000); Akarte et al. (2001); Ghodsypour and O’Brien (2001); Karpak
11 et al. (2001); Narasimhan et al. (2001); Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et al. (2002); Muralidharan et al.
12
13
(2002); Sarkis and Talluri (2002); Talluri (2002); Talluri and Baker (2002); Talluri and Sarkis
14 (2002); Barla (2003); Chan (2003); Choy and Lee (2003); Choy et al. (2003a); Choy et al. (2003b);
15 Choy et al. (2003c); Talluri and Narasimhan (2003); Chan and Chan (2004); Choy et al. (2004a);
16 Choy et al. (2004b); Talluri and Narasimhan (2004); Wang et al. (2004); Choy et al. (2005); Ding et
17 al. (2005); Hong et al. (2005); Seydel (2005); Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Wang et al. (2005);
18
19 Amid et al. (2006); Bayazit (2006); Garfamy (2006); Lau et al. (2006); Narasimhan et al. (2006);
20 Ross et al. (2006); Saen (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Seydel (2006); Talluri et al. (2006);
21 Yang and Chen (2006); Chan and Kumar (2007); Chan et al. (2007); Chen and Huang (2007);
22 Florez-Lopez (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Hou and Su (2007); Liao and Rittscher (2007);
23 Ramanathan (2007); Saen (2007a); Sevkli et al. (2007); Wadhwa and Ravindran (2007); Wu et al.
24
25 (2007); Xia and Wu (2007); Amid et al. (2008); Chou and Chang (2008); Demirtas and Üstün
26 (2008); Mendoza and Ventura (2008); Mendoza et al. (2008); Ng (2008); Talluri et al. (2008);
27 Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
28
29 Manufacturing 39 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Liu et al. (2000); Akarte et al. (2001); Ghodsypour and O’Brien (2001);
30 capability Narasimhan et al. (2001); Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et al. (2002); Muralidharan et al. (2002);
31 Talluri and Sarkis (2002); Barla (2003); Çebi and Bayraktar (2003); Chan (2003); Choy and Lee
32
33
(2003); Choy et al. (2003b); Choy et al. (2004a); Jain et al. (2004); Talluri and Narasimhan (2004);
34 Hong et al. (2005); Liu and Hai (2005); Seydel (2005); Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Bayazit
35 (2006); Perçin (2006); Ross et al. (2006); Saen (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Seydel (2006);
36 Yang and Chen (2006); Chen and Huang (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Hou and Su (2007);
37 Sevkli et al. (2007); Xia and Wu (2007); Bottani and Rizzi (2008); Chou and Chang (2008);
38
39 Demirtas and Üstün (2008); Ha and Krishnan (2008); Ng (2008); Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
40 Service 35 Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et al. (2002); Muralidharan et al. (2002); Barla (2003); Çebi and
41
42
Bayraktar (2003); Choy and Lee (2003); Choy et al. (2003a); Choy et al. (2003b); Choy et al.
43 (2003c); Kahraman et al. (2003); Chan and Chan (2004); Choy et al. (2004a); Choy et al. (2004b);
44 Wang et al. (2004); Choy et al. (2005); Liu and Hai (2005); Seydel (2005); Wang et al. (2005);
45
46
42
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Perçin (2006); Seydel (2006); Yang and Chen (2006); Chan and Kumar (2007); Chen and Huang
7 (2007); Florez-Lopez (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Hou and Su (2007); Huang and Keskar
8 (2007); Ramanathan (2007); Sevkli et al. (2007); Xia and Wu (2007); Demirtas and Üstün (2008);
9
10
Ha and Krishnan (2008); Mendoza and Ventura (2008); Mendoza et al. (2008); Demirtas and Üstün
11 (2009)
12
13
Management 25 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Forker and Mendez (2001); Narasimhan et al. (2001); Choy and Lee
14 (2002); Sarkis and Talluri (2002); Çebi and Bayraktar (2003); Chan (2003); Choy and Lee (2003);
15 Choy et al. (2003a); Choy et al. (2003c); Kahraman et al. (2003); Talluri and Narasimhan (2004);
16 Choy et al. (2005); Liu and Hai (2005); Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Bayazit (2006); Perçin
17 (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Chan et al. (2007); Chen and Huang (2007); Florez-Lopez
18
19 (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Sevkli et al. (2007); Chou and Chang (2008); Ha and Krishnan
20 (2008)
21
22
Technology 25 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Akarte et al. (2001); Muralidharan et al. (2002); Sarkis and Talluri
23 (2002); Chan (2003); Choy et al. (2003c); Choy et al. (2004b); Choy et al. (2005); Liu and Hai
24 (2005); Seydel (2005); Bevilacqua et al. (2006); Chen et al. (2006); Garfamy (2006); Perçin (2006);
25 Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Seydel (2006); Yang and Chen (2006); Chan et al. (2007); Chen and
26 Huang (2007); Florez-Lopez (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Hou and Su (2007); Ramanathan
27
28 (2007); Sevkli et al. (2007); Xia and Wu (2007)
29 Research and 24 Forker and Mendez (2001); Narasimhan et al. (2001); Choy and Lee (2002); Choy et al. (2002);
30
31 Development Kwong et al. (2002); Chan (2003); Choy and Lee (2003); Choy et al. (2003a); Choy et al. (2003b);
32 Choy et al. (2003c); Chan and Chan (2004); Choy et al. (2004a); Choy et al. (2004b); Talluri and
33 Narasimhan (2004); Choy et al. (2005); Talluri and Narasimhan (2005); Bevilacqua et al. (2006);
34 Perçin (2006); Yang and Chen (2006); Chan et al. (2007); Hou and Su (2007); Sevkli et al. (2007);
35
Demirtas and Üstün (2008); Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
36
37 Finance 23 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Muralidharan et al. (2002); Barla (2003); Çebi and Bayraktar (2003);
38 Chan (2003); Choy and Lee (2003); Kahraman et al. (2003); Wang et al. (2004); Choy et al. (2005);
39
40 Liu and Hai (2005); Wang et al. (2005); Bayazit (2006); Bevilacqua et al. (2006); Chen et al. (2006);
41 Perçin (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Yang and Chen (2006); Chan et al. (2007); Chen and
42 Huang (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Huang and Keskar (2007); Wu et al. (2007); Bottani
43 and Rizzi (2008)
44
45
46
43
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
6 Flexibility 18 Muralidharan et al. (2002); Sarkis and Talluri (2002); Çebi and Bayraktar (2003); Chan and Chan
7
8 (2004); Wang et al. (2004); Choy et al. (2005); Wang et al. (2005); Bayazit (2006); Bevilacqua et al.
9 (2006); Narasimhan et al. (2006); Perçin (2006); Chen and Huang (2007); Huang and Keskar
10 (2007); Liao and Rittscher (2007); Demirtas and Üstün (2008); Mendoza and Ventura (2008);
11 Mendoza et al. (2008); Demirtas and Üstün (2009)
12
13 Reputation 15 Braglia and Petroni (2000); Muralidharan et al. (2002); Çebi and Bayraktar (2003); Chan (2003);
14 Choy et al. (2005); Bevilacqua et al. (2006); Perçin (2006); Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006); Chen and
15
Huang (2007); Chan and Kumar (2007); Chan et al. (2007); Gencer and Gürpinar (2007); Hou and
16
17 Su (2007); Saen (2007a); Sevkli et al. (2007)
18 Relationship 3 Sarkis and Talluri (2002); Chen et al. (2006); Perçin (2006)
19
20 Risk 3 Chan and Kumar (2007); Chan et al. (2007); Kull and Talluri (2008)
21
22 Safety and 3 Kwong et al. (2002); Chan et al. (2007); Huang and Keskar (2007)
23 environment
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
44
47
48
49
Appendix 15
1
2 Distribution of number of journal articles since 2000
3
4 Years No. of articles
5 2000 3
6 2001 5
7
8
2002 8
9 2003 9
10 2004 6
11 2005 7
12 2006 14
13
14 2007 15
15 2008 11
16 Total 78
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62 45
63
64
65

You might also like