Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Since the citric acid is an important member of TCA cycle, its content
in bIood is considered to vary with many diseases (1, 2). For instance,
(i) hematic citric acid generally increases in the case of diabetes (3))
and its relation to lipogenesis was examined (4)) (ii) the relationship be-
tween calcium and citric acid in blood has been examined for bone me-
tabolism, and administration of thyrocarcitonine resulted in decrease of
its level (5), ( 111
“‘) some periodontal diseases were thought to be related
to hypercitricemia (6). For the determination of very small amounts of
the citric acid such as that in blood, a high sensitive, specific and simple
method is required, although several quantitative analyses of citric acid
have been reported (7-14). The Auorometric methods already described
( 15, 16) are highly sensitive but not specific, because aconitic acid and
isocitric acid in blood also react to produce fluorescent substances.
Recently Olthoff et aI. (17) reported that D-penicillamine produced on
heating with citric acid the fluorescent substances I, II, and III ( Chart I ) .
\
I In
CHART 1. Fluorescent substances produced by the reaction of citric acid and D-
penicillamine [reported by Olthoff et al. ( 17) 1.
citric acid and established more sensitive and selective method by using
o-aminothiophenol (o-ATH) .
PH
0 IO 20 30 40 50
HSPO, CONC. (%W/V)
The intense fluorescence was observed when the reaction was pro-
ceeded in acidic phosphate buffer (pH 0.5) as shown in Fig. 1, and the
most intense fluorescence was obtained in 35% phosphoric acid solution
(Fig. 2). o-ATH was favorably soluble in aqueous solutions at this pH.
The fluorescence intensity increased in proportion to the o-ATH concen-
tration up to that of about 15 mg/3 ml of reaction mixture, and it tended
to decrease in concentration over that, hence the amount of o-ATH was
decided to be 15 mg/3 ml (Fig. 3). The fluorescence intensities were de-
termined at various reaction temperatures at the reaction time of 6 hr.
The intensity increased evidently at the reaction temperature about
100°C (Fig. 4). But the reaction temperature in this study was decided
to be 125°C which is the maximum temperature of the sterilizer used. At
this reaction temperature, the fluorescence intensity reached a plateau
OO_1,,,,
O-ATH CONC. img/3ml REACT. MIX.)
after 15 hr (Fig. 5). From the result, reaction time was settled to 15 hr
but shorter time also could be used, if the result is needed in haste.
In the case of blood or plasma samples, the blank values of the reaction
mixtures were increased more or less even after deproteinization. To
avoid this defect, the fluorescent substance was attempted to be extracted
with several organic solvents. Although it could be extracted with n-
butanol, diisopropyl ether, ethylacetate, etc., ethylacetate was used since
it can be separated easily from aqueous layer, moreover the intensity in-
creased about four times as much as that before extraction.
The fluorescence of the ethylacetate solution was stable for 24 hr at
room temperature. Excitation and emission spectra of the extracted so-
lution was shown in Fig. 6, and we choose the excitation wave length at
FIG. 5. Time course of the formation of fluorescence at 125°C. Procedure for the
assay is the same as the legend for Fig. 1, except that the reaction was performed for
3-24 hr in 35% H3P0d.
DETERMINATION OF CITRIC ACID ,i:?J
415 nm, blank value at which was weaker than that at 400 nm, and
emission wave length at 450 nm.
By this method, a linear relationship was obtained between the fluores-
cence intensity and citric acid in concentration ranging from 0.570
mg/dl, but not in higher concentration than that (Fig. 7).
Blood contains various substances, such as organic acids, amino acids,
sugars, in addition to citric acid. These substances listed in Table 1 hardly
make the fluorescences, except aconitic acid. Each trans- and cis-aconitic
acid gave positive error about 9% and 7% of citric acid, but it may not be
concerned because the citric acid predominated over aconitic acid in
blood and serum. The volume of sample blood was changed between
0.01 and 0.2 ml (Table 2). The results indicate that there are remarkable
difference in too small samples (less than 0.02 ml) and too large samples
(more than 0.2 ml). Hence optimum volume of the saple should be 0.05
0.1 ml. The recovery of citric acid added to human blood was between
95 and 112% (Table 3). The precision of this method was 2.51% as the
TABLF: 1
COMPARISON OF RI~:L.ITIVE FLUOKESCI~N~W OIST.IINED IVY THE REACTIOS OF
o-ATH W-ITH V.i~rous COMPOUNDS
-
Compound R.F. Compound R.F.
The relat,ive fluorescence per mole was compared with c.it,ric arid.
TABLE 2
I<FFMZT OF S.~MPLING VOI.UMX OF HUMAN BLOOD
From 0.01 lo 0.2 ml of definite hlunan blood samples were determined in every thrice
al~d the repr~,Jl~cihilities were compared.
DETERMINATION OF CITRIC ACID
TABLE 3
I~IGCUV~:RY OF CITRIC ACID ADDED TO HUMAN BLOOD
Different concentration of citric acid was added in blood sample (0.05 ml) and it was
determined by the analytical procedure presented. The recovery was calcnlated after
sttbtra&)n of control value.
quantitative methods for citric acid (Table 5). The levels determined
with the author’s method were slightly high. The reason for this dis-
crepancy is not clear, but it can be assumed that the inhibitors for these
methods are different and affect their precision.
The authors isolated the fluorescent substances from a reaction mixture
according to the procedure presented in Chart 2. The yields, fluorescence
spectra and thin-layer chromatograms showed that the main fluorescent
product is IV, and small amount of by-product V is also produced in the
reaction mixture. IV was yellow needles and sublimated at about 250°C.
TABLE 4
Ib3PRODUCIBILITY OF THE PKESENT ~IE:THoD
1 I. 10
2 1.1:;
3 1,lR
4 1.E
-5 1.19
6 1. l!)
7 1 2
s 1.1s
0 I .I4
10 1.22
TABLE 5
CITRIC ACID LEVELS IN PLASMA AND BLOOD SSMPLES
Present Pentabromoacetone
&Sample Race method method
COOH
\\ ’
+ PO-ATH ’
\
- 6 H,O \
\
\
+ o-ATH
V
CHART 3. Presumablereaction processof citric acid and o-ATH.
11Instruments \lsed are: MS: HITBCHI RMS-4, IR: HITACHI 215, UV: HITACHI EPS-2, N&11{: VARIAX H,4-100.
h Abbreviation: Y: singlet, d: doublet, d-d: donble-doublet, m: multiplet, >I+: molecular ion.
1 Not assigtled because the peaks overlapped.
DETERMINATION OF CITRIC ACID 59
The fluorescent substance formed by the present method was hardly dc-
rived from other acids as shown in Table 1.
The long reaction time (15 hr) required is not practically trouble be-
cause the reaction mixture is only allowed to stand overnight in a steri-
lizer and the reaction time can be shortened if the sensitivity is not
strictly required.
SUMMARY
REFERENCES
1. SPENCER, A. F., AND LOWENSTEIN, J. M., Biochem. I. 103, 342 ( 1967).
2. SAUER, F., ERFLE, J. D., AND BINNS, M. R., Eur. J. Biochem. 1’7, 350 ( 1970).
3. DEVILLIERS, D. C., DIXIT, P. K., JR., AND LAZAROW, A., Metab. C/in. Exp. 15,
458 (1966).
4. GREENBAUM, A. L., GUMAA, K. A., AND MCLEAN, P., FEBS Lett. 13, 5 ( 1971).
5. KOMARKOVA, A., BILYK, I., ZAHOR, Z., AND CZABANOVA, V., Experientia 26, 196
(1970).
6. TSUNEMITSU, A., J. Dent. Res. 42, 783 ( 1963).
7. SAFFRAN, M., AND DENSTEDT, 0. F., J. Biol. Chem. 175, 849 ( 1948 ) .
8. ETTINGER, R. H., GOLDBAU~I, L. R., AND Smm, L. H., .I. Biol. Chem. 199, 531
(1952).
9. DAGLEY, S., in “Method of Enzymatic Analysis,” (H. U. Bergmeyer, Ed.), p. 313.
Academic Press, New York, 1963.
10. CASVIS, D. T., Can. J. Biochem. 43, 1281 ( 1965).
11. KESNER, L., AND MUNTOVYLER, E., Anal. Chem. 38, 1164 (1966).
12. ZAURA, D. S., AND METCOFF, J., Anal. Chem. 41, 1781 (1969).
13. GRUNRAUM, B. W., AND PACE, N., Micro&em. J. 15, 673 (1970).
14. DUMhfEL, R. J., AND KUN, E., J. Chromatog. 54, 130 ( 1971).
15. LEISINGER, E., AND KATZ, S., Anal. Chem. 21, 810 ( 1949).
16. SHOL’TS, K. F., AND NIKOLAEVA, M. I., U.S.S.R. Pat. 295,065 ( cf. CA. 75, 72397f ).
(1971).
17. OLTHOFF, U., H~TTENRAUCH, R., AND MATTHEY, K., Pharmazie 25, 789 (1970)
and Tetrahedron 27, 3447 ( 1971).