Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2020 Mitigation and Monitoring
2020 Mitigation and Monitoring
MONITORING
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
▪ Mitigation and some examples
▪ Monitoring and EMoP, EMP
▪ EIA Audit
▪ EIS Writing
Damage to riparian
features
• use of natural materials for
bank protection and
stabilization eg. use of
vegetational fingers and bank
side trees
Increased sediment
loads and turbidity
• select appropriate
equipment and timing
Impacts of dams
and reservoirs
• adjust size and
location
• minimize height and
slope of
embankment, plant
with trees
Pollution Control Association of the Philippines, Inc.- National 9
SOME TYPICAL MITIGATION RELATING
TO WATER IMPACT ISSUES
Chemical pollution
• use of oil traps, siltation
traps/ponds/lagoons
Water depletion by
abstraction
• minimize water use, eg.
metering and installation
of water efficient
equipment and appliances
Increased runoff
• efficient pipe drainage and
sewer systems
Increased sewage
• increased capacity or
sewage treatment level
• Habitat loss
• Introduced species
• Pollution
• Population growth
• Over consumption
SOME TYPICAL
MITIGATION RELATING
TO FLORA AND FAUNA
• Minimize storage of
construction materials and
apply appropriate storage,
handling and management of
soils
• Minimize waste and employ
pollution prevention measures
• Minimize damage to vegetation
and soils
Baseline data
NOTES: LC – Land Component; AC – Air Component; TDB – to be determined prior to start of construction; N/A – not applicable; EQPL values: Limit → 90% of the standard; Alert
→ 75% of Limit; Action → 90% of Limit; (a) Final values for limits, action, and alert levels will be determined from monitoring data; Units: ug/ncm for ambient air and mg/li water
quality parameters; (b) Included in construction costs; (c) Sampling method: 24h High Volume Sampler; Analytical method: Gravimetric USEPA 40 CFR, Part 50, Appendix B; (d)
Sampling method: 24-hr Gas Bubbler; Analytical method: Pararosaniline Method; (e) Sampling method: 24-hr Gas Bubbler; Analytical method: Griess-Saltzman or
Chemiluminescence Method; (f) ID pollutant source (construction activity or equipment); (g) Implement appropriate corrective action at identified pollutant source; (h)
Temporary stoppage or replacement of identified construction activity or equipment
- Unloading, loading, Surface water pollution (WC) BTEX-Benzene (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 0.34 0.38 0.45 (e) (f) (g)
storage of substances
Surface water pollution (WC) BTEX-Ethyl benzene (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 5.06 5.74 6.75 (e) (f) (g)
and mixtures
- Daily operations Surface water pollution (WC) BTEX-Toluene (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
13.50 15.30 18
Surface water pollution (WC) BTEX-Xylenes (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 10.13 11.48 13.5 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Chloride (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 303.75 344.25 405 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Chromium (Cr6) (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 0.01 0.02 0.018 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) COD (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 67.50 76.50 90 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 0.03 0.03 0.036 (e) (f) (g)
Copper (dissolved)
Surface water pollution (WC) Cyanide (Free) (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 80,000 (e) (f) (g)
0.14 0.15 0.18
Surface water pollution (WC) Fluoride (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 1.35 1.53 1.8 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Iron (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 5.06 5.74 6.75 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Lead (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 0.07 0.08 0.09 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Nickel (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 0.68 0.77 0.9 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Nitrate as NO3-N (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 9.45 10.71 12.6 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Oil and Grease (b) Quarterly (c) PCO 3.38 3.83 4.5 (e) (f) (g)
Surface water pollution (WC) Phenol & Phenolic (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
0.34 0.38 0.45
Substances
Surface water pollution (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
Phosphate 0.68 0.77 0.9
(WC)
Surface water pollution Temperature (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
2.03 2.30 2.7
(WC)
Surface water pollution Total Suspended Solids (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
67.50 76.50 90
(WC)
Surface water pollution Trichloroethylene (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
6.08 6.89 8.1
(WC)
Surface water pollution Zinc (b) Quarterly (c) PCO (e) (f) (g)
2.70 3.06 3.6
(WC)
Manufacturing of paint Ambient air pollution (AC) TSP (h) Annually 4 points PCO 155 186 207 (e) (f) (g)
(Work Environment
Ambient air pollution (AC) SO2 (i) Annually 4 points PCO 50,000 122 146 162 (e) (f) (g)
Measurement and
Personal Sampling) Ambient air pollution (AC) NO2 (j) Annually 4 points PCO 101 122 135 (e) (f) (g)
Workplace (AC) Volatile Organic DOLE Annually TBD SO (e) (f) (g)
371 445 495
Compound
Workplace (AC) Dust DOLE Annually TBD SO 10 13 15 (e) (f) (g)
Workplace (AC) Ventilation Rate DOLE Annually TBD SO 3.9 5.0 5.56 (e) (f) (g)
Workplace (AC) Xylene DOLE Annually TBD SO 75,000 304 391 435 (e) (f) (g)
Workplace (AC) Benzene DOLE Annually TBD SO 56 72 80 (e) (f) (g)
Workplace (AC) Toluene DOLE Annually TBD SO 262 337 375 (e) (f) (g)
Workplace (AC) Ethylbenzene DOLE Annually TBD SO 304 391 435 (e) (f) (g)
Land pollution Disposal of hazardous TSD EMB As TBD PCO
and non-hazardous
Pollution Control Association of the Philippines, Inc.- National required 500,000
waste
OPERATION PHASE
Sampling & measurement Plan EQPL Management Scheme
EQPL range (a) Management measure
Key environmental aspects per Potential impacts per Estimated ALERT ACTION LIMIT ALERT ACTION LIMIT
Parameter to be monitored Lead person
Project phase environmental sector Method Frequency Location annual cost
NOTES: WC – Water Component; (a) Final values for limits, action, and alert levels will be determined from monitoring data; Units: mg/li water quality parameters; effluent standards based on
Class C water body. Soil values based on Dutch Intervention Values in mg/kg; (b) EMB Approved Methods of Analysis for Water and Wastewater (EMB Memorandum Circular #012 Series of
2016); (c) Effluent outfall; (d) Included in operation costs; (e) Identify pollutant source; conduct additional sampling; (f) Detailed assessment of operations; determine cause of elevated
concentrations; identify and prepare to implement corrective action options; (g) Implement corrective action; h) Sampling method: 24h High Volume Sampler; Analytical method: Gravimetric
USEPA 40 CFR, Part 50, Appendix B; (i) Sampling method: 24-hr Gas Bubbler; Analytical method: Pararosaniline Method; (j) Sampling method: 24-hr Gas Bubbler; Analytical method: Griess-
Saltzman or Chemiluminescence Method;
• Must be transparent
Impact Assessment
Pollution Control Association of the Philippines, Inc.- National 44
EIS INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING
INFORMATION