Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHANGE
OBJECTIVES
A. Discussion
- How many different ways of organising or structuring a company can you think of?
Think about departments, products and markets.
- If you work for a company or organisation, how would you describe the company structure?
Rosin Ingle hears how efficient management structures are vital for success
The need for a solid structure within all business entities is “absolutely
fundamental”, according to Ms Angela Tripoli, a lecturerinBusinessAdministration at
University College Dublin. “Organizational structure concerns who reports to whom in the
company and how different elements are grouped together. A new company cannot go
5 forward without this and established companies must ensure their structure reflects their
target markets, goals and available technology.”
Depending on their size and needs there are several organizational structures
companies can choose from. Increasingly though, in the constantly evolving business
environment, “many firms are opting for a kind of hybrid of all of them.”
10 The most recognisable set up is called the functional structure where a fairly
traditional chain of command (incorporating senior management, middle management
and junior management) is put in place. The main benefit of this system is clear lines of
communication from top to bottom but it is generally accepted that it can also be a
bureaucratic set up which does not favour speedy decision-making.
15 More and more companies are organising themselves along product lines where
companies have separate divisions according to the product that is being worked on. “In this
case the focus is always on the product and how it can be improved.”
The matrix structure first evolved during a project developed by NASA when they
25 needed to pool together different skills from a variety of functional areas. Essentially the
matrix structure organises a business into project teams, led by project leaders, to carry
out certain objectives. Training is vitally important here in order to avoid conflict between
the various members of the teams.
During the 1980s a wave of restructuring went through industry around the globe.
30 This process, known as delayering, saw a change in the traditional hierarchical structures
with layers of middle management being so removed. This development was driven by
new technology and by the need to reduce costs. The overall result was organisations that
were less bureaucratic.
The delayering process has run its course now. Among the trends that currently
35 influence how a company organises itself is the move towards centralisation and
outsourcing. Restructuring hasevolved along with a more “customercentric” approach
that can be seen to good effect in the banks. They now categorise their customers and their
complex borrowing needs into groups instead of along rigid product lines.
Another development can be seen in larger companies, which are giving their
40 employees more freedom to innovate in order to maintain a competitive edge.
50 It works, said MsMaclauchlan, because everyone who works in the unit is “incredibly
empowered”. “Without a huge bureaucratic infrastructure people can react a lot more
quickly to any challenges and work towards the company's objectives.”
I. Read the text about the different ways in which companies are organised and answer
these questions.
1. Four main kinds of organisational structure are described in the article. What are they?
4. What were the reasons for delayering and what were the results?
II. Match these definitions with the four organisational structures described in the text.
2. A structure rather like the army, where each person has their place in a fixed hierachy.
III. These words and expressions are used in the text to describe different aspects of
organisational structure. Which are positive and which are negative?
1. product a. teams
2. target b. objectives
3. borrowing c. lines
4. project d. units
5. delayering e. company
6. country f. process
7. business g. markets
8. software h. needs
9. company i. managers
Use an appropriate phrase from Exercise A to complete each sentence.
A. Discussion
- Every organisation has its own distinctive culture, and this can vary enormously from
company to company. To an outsider, corporate culture differences are usually reflected
in external symbols or characteristics, such as advertising and design. Other
characteristics of corporate culture are only observable by when you get inside the
company as an employee or a supplier, such as the kind of dress worn by staff or the use
of first names. Try to think of some other characteristics of corporate culture based on
companies that you know.
- Think of some large supermarket groups you know. What kind of image do they project
to their customers, e.g. friendly, giving best value?
B. Reading
You could not hope to find a neater fit; said the commentators when Wal-Mart, the world's
biggest retailer, agreed a £6.7bn takeover deal with Asda, the UK's number three supermarket
5 group.
It had long been known that the team which was brought in to rescue Asda from collapse in
the mid-1980s had deliberately set out to copy virtually every aspect of the giant US discount
group that could be replicated in the UK.
So Asda stores have 'colleagues', is not employees. They have people in the parking lots to
10 help drivers to park. They have old-age pensioners wearing colourful name badges, standing
at the door to say hello and ask customers if they need help. In the Leeds headquarters no one
has an individual office, not even the chairman. Finally, store staff get actively involved in
promoting individual product lines, and are rewarded when their efforts lead to tangible sales
improvements.
15 Most of these ideas came straight from Bentonville, Arkansas, home to one of the world's most
unusual retailers. For Wal-Mart's corporate culture has become a legend in retailing.
The company's employees chant the Wal-Mart cheer before store meetings. They benefit from
a share ownership scheme which is one of the most widespread in the industry. Top executives
share rooms when on business trips, and pay for their coffee and tea from vending machines
20 like the lowliest sales assistant.
Given, the similarities, there are few who really believe putting Asda into the Wal-Mart
network will result in anything but success. But, says Asda's Chief Executive, Allan Leighton,
this is no reason to be complacent. Fairing to bring together corporate cultures, even those as
similar as Asda's and Wal-Mart's, could lead to the downfall of the most logical mergers.
25 'When acquiring or merging with a business, getting the cultures to fit is fundamentally
important,' he says. Half-way houses, where compromises are made, never work, he believes,
and nor does imposing one culture on another. 'A company calling their colleagues colleagues
and treating them like staff is not the answer,' he says.
The key to getting the deal to work culturally rests on a few fundamental issues, he believes.
30 The first and most important is terminology, he says. 'Businesses have their own language.
You have to get everyone aligned so that when someone uses a word it means the same thing
to everyone.'
Middle management comes next. 'Initially, everything is done at the top of the organisation,”
he says. “But most of the work is done in the middle.' If middle management is not
35 incentivised, a deal can go horribly wrong. 'It all boils down to people in the end. And what
motivates people? Unless you can demonstrate very quickly that their influence in the
organisation is at least the same if not better than before, then people will get concerned about
it,' he says.
Third comes getting to know each other. Asda and Wal-Mart have spent the last few weeks
40 swapping store managers and IT systems staff. 'We will go out there, look and bring back,'
Leighton says. 'That way we will have ownership of the changes as opposed to having them
pushed on us.'
It will always be hard to determine whether a merger or takeover has failed because the cultures
simply did not fit. But success is more likely to elude those who do not really believe in the
45 cultures they are trying to create. 'This all comes from the heart,' says Leighton. 'You do not
get it from textbook management or instruction. You have to create an environment where
people feel comfortable in expressing themselves in a different way.'
C. Exercises
I. Read the text on the opposite page about the merger of two companies and their
corporate cultures and answer these questions.
4 Which of these statements best summarises the corporate cultures of Asda and Wal-
Mart?
6 Allan Leighton mentions three things needed to get the deal 'to work culturally'. What
are they?
II. Mark these statements T (true) or F (false) according to the information in the text.
Find the part of the text that gives the correct information
6 Allan Leighton is sure the merger of Asda with Wal-Mart will succeed
1 Choose the best explanation of the phrase 'there are few who really believe putting
Asda into the Wal-Mart network will result in anything but success' (line 22)
a) most people think the combination of Asda and Wal-Mart will succeed
2 What does Allan Leighton mean when he says 'it all boils down to people in the
end' (line 35)
Vocabulary tasks
A Synonyms
1 The word 'employees' is used several times in the text. What other word is used
that has a similar meaning? (para 4)
2 The phrase 'to push something on someone' is used in line 97. What similar phrase
is used earlier in the text? (para 6)
B Word search
7 agreement where both sides give up some of what they want (para 6)
C Definitions
work
6 lead to the downfall (line 24) f) a place where cars are put
means
D Collocations
1 IT a) ownership
2 Product b) trip
3 Name c) systems
4 Store d) line
5 Sales e) management
6 Share f) badges
7 Middle g) assistant
8 Business h) manager
3 With the increased emphasis on the customer in retailing, the role of the ………….
is important.
4 The increased use of audio and video conferencing should reduce the number of
………. executives need to make.
6 If people didn't wear ………… at big conferences, you wouldn't know who
anyone was.
8 The role of a ………………..is to motivate and control the sales staff in the shop.
READING 3: MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
A. Discussion
2. What kind of changes have you experienced in the place where you work or study?
Organizational change occurs when a company makes a transition from its current state to some
desired future state. Managing organizational change is the process of planning and
implementing change in organizations in such a way as to minimize employee resistance and
cost to the organization while simultaneously maximizing the effectiveness of the change
effort.
Today's business environment requires companies to undergo changes almost constantly if they
are to remain competitive. Factors such as globalization of markets and rapidly evolving
technology force businesses to respond in order to survive. Such changes may be relatively
minor—as in the case of installing a new software program—or quite major—as in the case of
refocusing an overall marketing strategy, fighting off a hostile takeover, or transforming a
company in the face of persistent foreign competition.
Organizational change initiatives often arise out of problems faced by a company. In some
cases, however, companies change under the impetus of enlightened leaders who first
recognize and then exploit new potentials dormant in the organization or its circumstances.
Some observers, more soberly, label this a "performance gap" which able management is
inspired to close.
But organizational change is also resisted and—in the opinion of its promoters—fails. The
failure may be due to the manner in which change has been visualized, announced, and
implemented or because internal resistance to it builds. Employees, in other words, sabotage
those changes they view as antithetical to their own interests.
AREAS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
Studies of organizational change identify areas of change in order to analyze them. Daniel
Wischnevsky and Fariborz Daman, for example, writing in Journal of Managerial Issues,
single out strategy, structure, and organizational power. Others add technology or the corporate
population ("people"). All of these areas, of course, are related; companies often must institute
changes in all areas when they attempt to make changes in one. The first area, strategic change,
can take place on a large scale—for example, when a company shifts its resources to enter a
new line of business—or on a small scale—for example, when a company makes productivity
improvements in order to reduce costs. There are three basic stages for a company making a
strategic change: 1) realizing that the current strategy is no longer suitable for the company's
situation; 2) establishing a vision for the company's future direction; and 3) implementing the
change and setting up new systems to support it.
People changes can become necessary due to other changes, or sometimes companies simply
seek to change workers' attitudes and behaviors in order to increase their effectiveness or to
stimulate individual or team creativeness. Almost always people changes are the most difficult
and important part of the overall change process. The science of organization development was
created to deal with changing people on the job through techniques such as education and
training, team building, and career planning.
RESISTANCE TO CHANGE
A manager trying to implement a change, no matter how small, should expect to encounter
some resistance from within the organization. Resistance to change is normal; people cling to
habits and to the status quo. To be sure, managerial actions can minimize or arouse resistance.
People must be motivated to shake off old habits. This must take place in stages rather than
abruptly so that "managed change" takes on the character of "natural change." In addition to
normal inertia, organization change introduces anxieties about the future. If the future after the
change comes to be perceived positively, resistance will be less.
Education and communication are therefore key ingredients in minimizing negative reactions.
Employees can be informed about both the nature of the change and the logic behind it before
it takes place through reports, memos, group presentations, or individual discussions. Another
important component of overcoming resistance is inviting employee participation and
involvement in both the design and implementation phases of the change effort. Organized
forms of facilitation and support can be deployed. Managers can ensure that employees will
have the resources to bring the change about; managers can make themselves available to
provide explanations and to minimize stress arising in many scores of situations.
Some companies manage to overcome resistance to change through negotiation and rewards.
They offer employees concrete incentives to ensure their cooperation. Other companies resort
to manipulation, or using subtle tactics such as giving a resistance leader a prominent position
in the change effort. A final option is coercion, which involves punishing people who resist or
using force to ensure their cooperation. Although this method can be useful when speed is of
the essence, it can have lingering negative effects on the company. Of course, no method is
appropriate to every situation, and a number of different methods may be combined as needed.
Managing change effectively requires moving the organization from its current state to a future
desired state at minimal cost to the organization. Key steps in that process are:
1. Understanding the current state of the organization. This involves identifying problems
the company faces, assigning a level of importance to each one, and assessing the kinds
of changes needed to solve the problems.
2. Competently envisioning and laying out the desired future state of the organization.
This involves picturing the ideal situation for the company after the change is
implemented, conveying this vision clearly to everyone involved in the change effort,
and designing a means of transition to the new state. An important part of the transition
should be maintaining some sort of stability; some things—such as the company's
overall mission or key personnel—should remain constant in the midst of turmoil to
help reduce people's anxiety.
3. Implementing the change in an orderly manner. This involves managing the transition
effectively. It might be helpful to draw up a plan, allocate resources, and appoint a key
person to take charge of the change process. The company's leaders should try to
generate enthusiasm for the change by sharing their goals and vision and acting as role
models. In some cases, it may be useful to try for small victories first in order to pave
the way for later successes.
C. Exercises
I. A management consultant is making a presentation about BPR. Choose the best word
to fill each gap from the alternatives given below.
First of all, what is BPR? Business process (1)…….. is a way of restructuring a company's
business processes. This means completely (2) ……........ the processes, rather than trying to
improve things incrementally. It is essential that this redesign is (3) …….……- going back to
the (4) board to ask basic questions about what each process is intended to achieve - and it
should also be (5)……….... , completely ignoring how things were done before. In addition, it
is important that the redesign is (6)…………… - any changes made should be very large and
very sudden.
One outcome of this restructuring can be (7) …………….. Staff may be concerned that the
removal of management (8) .................will lead to job (9) ........................
II. Match the terms (1-8) with the collect definitions (a-h).
Issue Example
III. Change is often met with resistance. Change agents therefore have to negotiate with
those who would prefer to resist the changes. Complete the headings for the five stages of
negotiation with words from the box.
agreement concessions or compromise information
persuasion planning preparation relationship building
Stage I
Planning and ____________________________
Before face-to-face meetings, the foundations have to be ready. Collect information. Decide
on a strategy. Set objectives.
Stage II
____________________________ between negotiating parties
This stage is about developing trust between the parties.
Stage III
____________________________ exchange
Learn about the needs and demands of the other side.
Stage IV
____________________________ attempts
Attempts to modify the position of the other side. Negotiation is about increasing the influence
of your side.
Stage V
____________________________ and ____________________________
In this stage both sides make changes in their original position. If this happens, both sides leave
the negotiation with some satisfaction.
TERMS
• Departmentalization culture
1. “All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes
decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and
responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done.” To what extent
do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above? Support your views with reasons
and/or specific examples drawn from your own work or school experiences, your
observations, or your reading.
2. Organizations should be structured in a clear hierarchy in which the people at each level,
from top to bottom, are held accountable for completing a particular component of the work.
Any other organizational structure goes against human nature and will ultimately prove
fruitless.” Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed
above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience,
observations, or reading.
3. ‘Telecommuting' refers to workers doing their jobs from home for part of each week and
communicating with their office using computer technology. Telecommuting is growing in
many countries and is expected to be common for most office workers in the coming
decades. How do you think society will be affected by the growth of telecommuting?
4. “Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary
grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A ‘flat’
organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among
employees.” Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above.
Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations,
or reading