Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bai Bao EC-1998
Bai Bao EC-1998
Abstract
Both flow injection methodology and square-wave voltammetry were developed and evaluated for determining codeine in human plasma and
pharmaceutical formulations using a Nafion/ruthenium oxide pyrochlore chemically modified electrode. Combining the electrocatalytic function of
the ruthenium-oxide pyrochlore with charge-exclusion and the preconcentration features of Nafion perform well in codeine detection. Compared to
a bare glassy carbon electrode, the chemically modified electrode exhibits a shift of the oxidation potential in cathodic direction and a marked
enhancement of the current response. A linear calibration plot is obtained over the 0–32 mM range in 0.05 M HClO4 solution with a detection limit
(3j) of 10 nM in the square-wave voltammetric method. While, in flow-injection analysis, a linear calibration plot is obtained over the 0.5–40 mM
range with a detection limit of 0.86 ng. Quantitative analysis was performed by the standard addition method for codeine content in human plasma
and a commercially available drug.
Keywords: Codeine, Flow injection analysis, Human plasma, Square-wave voltammetry, Chemically modified electrode
Electroanalysis 1998, 10, No. 8 q WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim, 1998 1040-0397/98/0807-0536 $ 17.50þ.50/0
Determination of Codeine in Human Plasma and Drug Formulation 537
Fig. 1. SW voltammograms for 10 mM codeine in 0.05 M HClO4 solution at the CME as indicated in our previous studies, so that the effect
a bare GCE (a), the Nafion/GCE (b), and the Nafion/ruthenium oxide of the concentration of HClO4 on the voltammetric oxidation of
pyrochlore CME (c). SWV amplitude: 50 mV; SW frequency: 15 Hz; step
codeine was first studied. The results obtained are shown in
height: 4 mV.
Figure 2. As can be seen, the current response starts to increase
rapidly in more acidic environment and the optimal condition was
3. Results and Discussion found to be around 0.05 M HClO4. The above supporting electrolyte
was thus used in the subsequent caffeine detection work. Note
that the optimum concentration of HClO4 supporting electrolyte
3.1. Voltammetric Behavior is the same as that used in the detection of caffeine at the CME [11].
Apparently, the same catalytic mechanism of the ruthenium
Figure 1 demonstrates the catalytic function of the Nafion/
oxide pyrochlore is operated in both cases.
ruthenium oxide pyrochlore CME in the determination of codeine
The effects of preconcentration potential and preconcentration
by SWV. On scanning from þ0.6 V toward a positive potential at
time on the SW response for codeine were studied next and the
a bare GCE, only a much smaller anodic peak around þ1.2 V was
results obtained are shown in Figures 3A and B, respectively. As
observed for 10 mM codeine (Fig. 1, curve a). A clear increase in
anodic peak was observed when a Nafion-coated GCE was used
(Fig. 1, curve b). The increase in codeine response for the Nafion-
coated GCE is an indication of the ion-exchange process between
Nafion and codeine. Whereas, a large increase in the peak current
at þ1.07 V was observed when the CME was used (Fig. 1, curve c).
The enhancement in current response and the shift in oxidation
potential are clear evidences of the catalytic effect of the CME
toward codeine oxidation.
Further investigation was made to the transport characteristics
of codeine at the CME. The linear scan voltammetric current
response obtained at the CME was found to be linearly proportional
to the square root of the scan rate, which illustrated that the process
was diffusion-controlled. Further evidence for the nonadsorptive
behavior of codeine was demonstrated by the following experiment.
When the CME was switched to a medium containing only
supporting electrolyte after being used in measuring a codeine
solution, no voltammetric peak signal was observed at all. Note
that, since the process is diffusion-controlled, the response time
for the CME is very fast. All the measurements can be done
immediately after the CME is immersed into the test samples.
Fig. 6. Typical SWV and FIA responses for the determination of codeine in human plasma with increasing codeine concentrations of 10 mM to 50 mM at 10 mM
intervals (A) and commercially available drug with increasing codeine concentrations of 10 mM to 50 mM at 10 mM intervals (B) and 5 mM to 25 mM at 5 mM
intervals (C).
0.86 ng). The repeatability of the response of the CME to codeine Y ¼ 1:47 þ 0:51X and Y ¼ 3:64 þ 0:12X with correlation coeffi-
was determined by ten replicate injections of 20 mL of codeine cients of 0.999 and 0.998 were observed with SWV (Fig. 6B) and
and the relative standard deviations were 2.86 % and 2.53 % for FIA (Fig. 6C), respectively. The signals were confirmed as being
5 mM and 50 mM codeine, respectively. Again, the electrode due to codeine by enhancement of the peak when standard codeine
renewal gives a good reproducible surface. solution was added to the sample solutions. The recovery was found
to be 99 % for both cases.
5. Acknowledgement [2] E.J. Cone, W. D. Darwin, W.F. Buchwald, J. Chromatogr. 1983, 275, 307.
[3] J.W.A. Findlay, R.F. Butz, R.M. Welch, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1977, 22,
439.
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the [4] K.R. Bedford, P.C. White, J. Chromatogr. 1985, 347, 398.
[5] Z.R. Chen, F. Bochner, A. Somogyi, J. Chromatogr. 1989, 491, 367.
National Science Council of the Republic of China under Grant [6] C.P.W.G.M. Verwey-Van Wissen, P.M. Koopman-Kimenai, T.B. Vree,
NSC 87-2113-M-005-021. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 570, 309.
[7] E.M. Elnemma, M.A. Hamada, Mikrochim. Acta 1997, 126, 147.
[8] J.-M. Zen, C.-B. Wang, J. Electroanal. Chem. 1994, 368, 251.
6. References [9] J.-M. Zen, J.-S. Tang, Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 208.
[10] J.-M. Zen, J.-S. Tang, Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 1892.
[11] J.-M. Zen, Y.-S. Ting, Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 342, 175.
[1] R.A. Zweidinger, F.M. Weinberg, R.W. Handy, J. Pharm. Sci. 1976, 65, 427. [12] J.-M. Zen, I.-L. Chen, Electroanalysis 1997, 9, 537.