Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Specified Content
● The League of Nations:
○ Strengths and weaknesses in its structure and organisation: work of the
League’s agencies/humanitarian work
○ Successes and failures in peacekeeping during the 1920s
○ The impact of the world depression on the work of the League after 1929
○ The failures of the League in the 1930s, including Manchuria and Abyssinia
BACKGROUND
An international peace-keeping organization is desired → Wilson’s lofty vision for the league
(14 points) → a plan is drawn up to be included in TOV → Wilson faces resistance in the
States and the US never joins
Why didn’t the US ultimately join the League of Nations? What stood in the way?
- Needed the approval of Congress (like a parliament)
- Growing political opposition (Democrats in power for 8 troubled years, defeated in
1920 election)
Make sure you can explain how/why other countries relied on US involvement in the league
and concerns over their failure to join.
NOTES
Also part of this vision: open relations between nations, i.e. no secret deals, + just and
equitable relations, i.e. big, powerful countries don’t bully more vulnerable ones
By the end of this unit you should be able to judge the extent to which the League achieved
these aims. You can take notes in a table like this as you study:
Discourage aggression
Encourage cooperation
Disarmament
Improve living/working
conditions
Structure of the LON
Alland Islands
(Sweden v. Finland)
1921
Upper Silesia
(Germany v. Poland)
1921
Corfu
(Italy v. Greece)
1923
Mosul
(Turkey vs. Iraq/UK)
1924
Bulgaria
(Greece v. Bulgaria)
1925
* Note: you don’t have to be familiar with all of these conflicts, but you must be able to
describe at least one “success” and one “failure,” including explaining why the LON was or
was not successful