Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.3.2021.
Revision
Page | 1
-Syntax seeks to describe, investigate and explain universal characteristics of natural languages
as well as their specific features.
-> What’s universal? -Things found in many languages (every language has something subject-
like and something verb-like, all languages express possession in some way)
=syntax deals with how sentences are connected from smaller units into larger ones
-What’s a word?
-phonetic – a single produced entity consisting of more than one written word
-written – a meaningful sequence of letters separated from other words by blank spaces
-compound words – babysitter
-lexical categories:
-open and closed
-notional definition:
- “verbs denote state or action”
-this assumes that the semantics of a word predicts it’s category and hence function
-the meaning of a sentence:
-a combination of both the lexical and grammatical meaning (both lexical words and the
relations between them)
-the function of elements in the sentence is a grammatical/syntactic relation (subjects, objects,
verbs…)
-the organization of units into constituent structure (constituents – NP, VP…)
-general structure of clauses:
-the core (predicate + arguments) + periphery (adjuncts)
Dependency relations
11.3.2021.
-What’s a sentence?
-a string of language with two pauses or blanks (meh)
-the highest-ranking unit of syntax
17.3.2021.
Syntactic and semantic arguments
-the central element of a sentence is a clause, and the central element of a clause is the verb
(heads of the verbs but also the entire clause)
-a verb phrase = singular verb OR verb head and other obligatory elements
-the verb governs the entire sentence (whether or not you need a object or two, a complement
etc.)
-arguments:
-direct argument: not marked by a preposition – direct objects f.e. (John gave a bouquet to
Mary.)
-oblique argument: marked by a preposition (preceded by a preposition) (John gave a bouquet
to Mary.)
-required by the valency:
-f.e. put has a valency of 3 – needs to be accompanied by 3 arguments – argument structure
(the number and the type of arguments associated with a particular verb)
-adjuncts: contribute to the meaning of the entire sentence but are never necessary to
complete the meaning of the predicate
18.3.2021.
-How do we determine the role?
-intuition (we know roles intuitively)
-grammatical criteria
-division of verbs:
events (processes, activities…) vs. states (The baby is heavy. – undetermined,
unclassified – a neutral role)
Page -agent
|7 role:
-What did X do? (What did the baby do?)
wh-cleft (What the baby is doing is chewing the biscuit.)
-putting the imperative-verb: Chew the biscuit! (the supposed subject is the
addressee)
*but: The client is suffering a lot of pain. (experiencer)
The client is annoying the staff. (agent) (experiencers)
-prototypical agents are human beings acting of their own volition, instigating an
action and producing an effect on something (Jim was chopping logs.)
-less typical agents –may be inanimate, do not have volition nor do they initiate
an action (This arch supports the tower.)
-prototypical objects are usually direct objects and undergo a drastic change (The
car was crushed by bob – a patient, but a subject)
Page -markers
|9 for segregatory coordination: neither… nor, both…and, each,
respectively
31.3.2021.
-different types of coordination:
-clauses
-phrases
-heads (old men and women… are the men old and not the women or are all old?
– coordination only if old refers to both men and women)
-modifiers
-coordinated modifiers:
-only segregatory meaning
-old and new furniture (two noun phrases)
-exception: colour adjectives (red, blue and white flag)
-only combinatory meaning:
-a dishonest and lazy worker (one worker, but a lazy and a dishonest worker –
two workers)
-Barbara gave Sue a rose and Ada a carnation (Barbara gave Sue a rose and Ada
gave Sue a carnation OR Barbara gave Sue a rose and Barbara gave Ada a carnat.)
-case marking:
-the subject, in English, typically precedes the verb (SVO) and is in the nominative
Page -case
| 14 may be instantized morphologically in a number of ways within a NP:
-as a bound affixal elements (usually suffix)
-as an adposition or on articles
*adposition is an umbrella term for prepositions and postpositions (equivalent of
the preposition but it comes AFTER the complement)
-Hanakoga Taroo ni han o yotta. (Hanako gave a book to Taroo.) – ga
(nominative), ni (dative) o (accusative)
-by prosodic features (the tone)
-Masai language (Cile pantet, depending on the intonation, means different
things)
-verb agreement:
-the finite verb shows agreement with the subject
-English (number and person), Croatian (number, person and gender)
-position of arguments:
-basic position of subjects in front of verbs or after the operator in interrogative
clauses
-exceptions:
-in clauses without any conjunction (Even had she been alive, we couldn’t have
heard her.)
-when the sentence is introduced negatively (Never gonna give you up, never
gonna let you down. – Yes, you just got rickrolled.)
-in set phrases (Long live the king!)
14.4.2021.
-behavioral properties
-how grammatical processes behave when they are involved in specific
constructions
-constructions observed:
-imperative constructions:
-the addressee is usually the subject (The dishes need washing*)
-reflexive constructions (reflexivization):
-which argument can be the antecedent of the reflexive pronoun?
-James saw himself, Sam told Miriam about herself, Sam told James about
himself?
-in English, the antecedent may be either the Subject or the Object
-wh-question formation:
-the referent may target a number of grammatical relations
Page | 16
-relative clauses:
-the antecedents of relative pronouns and the complementizers may have various
grammatical roles
-if the head of the NP modigied by the relative cl. Functions as the subject of the
verb in the relative caluse, then the relative pronoun or that are obligatory (I
talked to the person that bought the house.)
*seem, appear, control – control verbs (It seems that she no longer likes you.)
15.4.2021.
Oi are in English either only recipients or beneficiaries
Middle voice – Active in form and passive in meaning (This document won't scan.)
-subject-verb agreement:
-sing./pl. noun requires sing./pl. verb
-clauses take singular verbs
-nominal wh-clauses can take both singular and plural (they resemble NPs)
Page | 17
-pseudo subject (here and there) takes a singular verb
-singular nouns in plural form (mathematics) take a singular verb
-plural nouns in singular form (cattle) take a plural verb
-plural names and titles (Crime and Punishment) take a singular verb
-coordinated subjects (nouns, sentences, pronouns) take the pčural verb
-asyndetic coordination takes the plural verb
-quasi-coordination takes the singular
-coordinated premodifiers take a plural verb (American and Dutch beer are..)
-coordinated postmodifiers require a singular verb (beer from America and the
Netherlands is…)
-coordination of nouns equal in number take the verb whatever the number is
-coordination of nouns different in number take either depending on proximity
-phrases with neither… nor take the plural
-indefinite expressions:
-noncountable – singular (some [milk] is in the fridge)
-plural countable – plural (some [books] are coming today)
-indefinite pronouns and quantifiers – singular (Nobody was…)
-quantity a large number of people have applied/The majority agree
-pronouns and determiner reference – everyone thinks they have…
-concord of:
-notion – the idea of number rather than the gramm. Marker – collective nouns
(government, family, audience, band…)
-proximity – the verb agrees with the noun and pronoun that closely precedes it
(one in ten take… - fractions and correlatives)
-direct objects:
-have few unique syntactic properties but share some properties across languages
-coding property: typically, in the accusative (but not always)
-behavioral properties: they can become the subject of passive sentences
-semantic roles: most often the theme or patient
-English: typically, the first direct argument after the verb (esp. in mono-transitive
verbs)
*passives avoided in constructions with stative verbs - *A puppet was contained
by the box.
21.4.2021.
-verb alternations:
-not a universal property of languages (not in every language)
-constructions in which certain arguments don’t appear in the Od position, but
can, nevertheless, occur
-4 alternations of this kind in English:
-dative alternation
-transfer alternation
-locative alternation
-instrumental alternation
-the dative alternation (shift):
-the most debated one, because it involves two direct arguments
-Dan sent the package to Alan.
-Dan sent Alan the package.
*topicalization – making an element more prominent (sent 1. – the package, sent.
2. – Alan.) (the other element, the less important one, is the motive)
-English has around 30 verbs which allow dative shift
!!!!!
22.4.2021.
-primary object: the indirect object of ditransitive constructions and direct object
of monotransitive constructions
Page | 20
28.4.2021.
Transitivity
-the selection of a given verb determines what kind of complements will occur in
a sentence
-Adjuncts are generally not grammatically determined
-valency:
-the verb is the top-most element in the hierarchy
-syntactic: the number of syntactic arguments a verb may take
-semantic: the maximum number of semantic arguments a verb takes
-complex-transitive verbs:
-Od and Co (form: AdjP or NP)
-Ray found her jokes hilarious.
-Max found Bob an amusing companion. – ambiguous (Max found an
amusing companion for Bob)
-Od and Ca
-Sheila put the keys on the table.
Page -some
| 24 verbs have small restrictions and some have very specific (if you use the
verb “flow” you know you need a liquid as the subject [in its literal meaning])
*metaphorical meaning abolishes these restrictions!
-language systems:
-morphosyntactic alignment
-transitive have 2 core arguments (subjects (Si/A*) and object (O))
-intransitive have 1 core argument (subject (Si/S*)
*A – the marking for the subject in transitive constructions to separate them from
subjects in intransitive constructions
-nominative-accusative alignment:
-the subject argument of transitive verbs is treated like the A/S of intransitive
(Objects stand apart) (English, Croatian, Japanese)
-no ergative-absolutive functions/elements ever
-ergative-absolutive alignment:
-the ergative and absolutive case
-the subject of transitive verbs are marked by the ergative case and the subject of
intransitive and the Objects are unmarked (absolutive case) (Basque)
-some do show some elements of the Nominative-accusative alignment
*the only thing to know for the exam is the fact that these two alignments exist
and their differences (how they treat the S/A and how ergative languages treat
the S/O arguments of transitives)
5.5.2021.
Adverbials
-being an Adverbial is neither a function, nor structural type nor lexical categories
(Adverbials can be obligatory (Ca) and non-obligatory (A))
*NEVER write just Adverbial (mention both the function and form)
-characteristics:
-generally mobile (can occur in initial, medial and final position and can generally
be moved around – there are limitations)
-generally optional – may be added or omitted from the sentence without
affecting the acceptability (except the obligatory adverbials – Ca)
-obligatory or optional?
-if they are crucial and cannot be omitted – obligatory and they are adverbial
complements
-if they don’t give crucial information – additional and they are Adjunct (of time,
place etc.)
-ambiguous cases:
-if you leave it out will it be grammatical and if it is left out will the verb have the
-stative verbs:
-can rarely be used in the progressive form and are not used in the imperative
-Romeo knows Julia. *Romeo is knowing Julia. *Know Julia!
-but: I’m seeing my shrink tomorrow. Yondu is being difficult again.
-exclude adverbs such as quickly (*John quickly likes Mary.)
-do not occur in wh-cleft sentences (What Romeo did was know Julia’s parents.)
12.05.2021.
-classification according to Vendler:
-states: desire, want, love, hate, believe, have
-dynamic:
-activities – durative and atelic
-accomplishments – durative and telic (result)
-achievements – punctual and telic (result) - reach
-grammatical aspect:
-in English – the perfect and progressive aspect
Page | 30
-shows a particular situation is:
-non-progressive forms:
-refer to an event as a whole and completed
-in the past typically a single event (Romeo stared at Julia.)
-in the present typically a habitual event (He stands under the balcony.)
-progressive form:
-a single ongoing event (Jane was playing the piano.)
-with telic verbs in progressive we abolish the end-point (She was baking a cake. –
activity; …for hours)
13.5.2021.
- ‘twas a Kahoot quiz, but good exercise:
1. Oz - it’s no place like home. STATE
2. O’Reilly is constantly plotting against someone. ACTIVITY
3. Keller hid a knife under his mattress. ACHIEVEMENT
4. Beecher didn’t push Keller over the fence. ACHIEVMENT
5. Everybody was watching Miss Sally’s Schoolyard. ACTIVITY
Page | 32 Modality
-derived from the Latin word modus which means mode
-mood – grammatical expression of various modalities
-modality – the meanings expressed through these grammatical device
-modality:
-intertwined with tense, aspect, evidentiality, conditionals etc.
-modality is an assessment of potentiality – the judgment of a speaker about how
possible or real it is for a situation to happen or not happen – epistemic modality
(subjective assessment how likely or unlikely something is to happen – subjective
modality) and deontic modality (the speaker’s attitude towards the realization of
a desired or expected event – objective modality)
-epistemic modality: (Greek episteme – knowledge)
-expresses doubts, certainties, guesses
-certain – probable – possible – unlikely – impossible
-Jane must be right about this. – Jane should be right about this. – Jane may be
right about this. – Jane might be right about this. – Jane can’t be right about this.
*may – stronger possible event than might
-meanings expressed in epistemic modality and which devices are used:
-modal verbs:
-grammatical devices:
-auxiliaries (may, might, can, could, etc.)
-epistemic moods (subjunctive)
-affixes or particles – not used in English in Croatian
-lexical devices:
-adverbs (perhaps, possibly, maybe, surely, certainly, etc.)
-through a certain intonation pattern (sarcasm – He must be a genius. – I highly
doubt he is)
Page | 36
20.5.2021.
Voice
-active and passive voice
-why use differnet voices – to highlight different things and to make other things
less important – differnet organisation of information
-short passive and long passive (with the agent in the form of a PP)
-be passive and get passive:
-get passive:
-dynamic
-be passive:
-static
-participial adjectives: look like a passive but are actually adjectives; to
differentiate
-we are delighted to see, you should be excited – participial adjectives
Oi are in English either only recipients or beneficiaries
Middle voice – Active in form and passive in meaning (This document won't scan.)
-break:
-The silence was broken by the victim’s screams. – we have an agent (by…) – The
victim’s screams broke the silence
-This wooden fence is always broken. – Cs
Page | 37
-shave: different form for the participial adjective (shaved, shaven)
-common uses of the passive voice:
-academic prose: to make it as neutral as possible, to eliminate yourself as the
person who writes and make it about the actual fact (When insulin is
administered…)
-news: the fact that something happened (Smith was accused and prosecuted.)
-the middle voice:
-The book osld 50 000 copies. – somebody sold 50k copies, the book didn’t do
that itself
-This room seats 60 people.
-The potatoes are cooking.
-Soup that eats like a meal.
-syntactically active and lexically passive
-the subject cannot wholy be categorized as agent or patient cause it has
elements of both (The casserole cooked in the oven.)
-passival:
-until the 19th century (The house is building – The house is being built.)
-The clothes are soaking – they are actually being soaked.
*other voices in different languages:
-the circumstantial voice – promotes an oblique argument to the role of the
subject: the former subject becomes an oblique argument
-the applicative voice – promotes an oblique argument to the core object
argument
Page | 38
Pro-forms and ellipsis
26.5.2021.
-pro-forms:
-refer back to an expression without repeating (language economy)
-pronouns, auxiliary verbs, the pronoun “one”
-pronouns:
-instead of noun phrases
-referential meaning: determined by grammar and linguistical/situational context
– deixis – words whose meaning you distinguish based on the context (wihtout
the context we cannot determine what the pronoun refers to)
-without proper reference they are ambiguous in emaning:
-Annie told her friend that she had to leave. (Annie, her friend or someone third
has to leave?)
-anaphoric or cataphoric reference:
-anaphoric: refers back to an antecedent (This restaurant has excellent wines, you
should try them.)
-cataphoric: refers forward to an antecedent (When he caught the thief, he read
him his rights.)
-cataphoric reference:
-Before he joined the Navy, Garry made peace with his family.
-She admitted that the reporters had interviewed Janet. – not cataphoric
-you can only have cataphoric reference if the pronoun is in the class of a lower
rank – subordinate/dependent clause for example
-pronominals do not have to refer to NPs:
-if they do they cannot have the antecedent within the same NP or clause –
antecedent are always in a different clause
Page -reflexive
| 39 pronouns cannot be used to refer directly to someone outside of the
sentence – they always take their antecedents form the same clause
-Jason can feel proud of him. Vs. Jason can feel proud of himself.
-auxiliary verbs:
-replacement of the entire VP – do, so, other auxiliaries, be and modal verbs
-Who took the picture? I did.
-She might cry but I don’t think she will.
-the pronoun one:
-replaces entire constituents, but also only parts of constituents (intermediate
constituents)
-I liked the green scarf but she liked the red one.
-I liked the red scarf, but Lisa liked that one.
-ellipsis:
-the omission of elements which are recoverable from the linguistic context of the
situation
-used to avoid repetition
-She was exhausted and ___ went to sleep.
-the precondition is verbatim recoverability: the omitted words must be precisely
recoverable
-positions of ellipsis:
-clause initial: He squeezed her hand and ___ saw no reaction.
-clause medial. Bob and Bill both jumped out. Bob ___ to help the injured, Bill
____ to stop the traffic.
-clause final: Elise appears to be fond of ice cream but I don’t think she is ____.
-types of ellipsis:
-textual ellipsis: the missing word can be found in the near text – textual
Negation
27.5.2021.
-negative clauses are marked as such by the presence if a very specific negative
element on the verb in some form
-it is expressed either through using the negative particle not on a finite verb or
by using negative infinite verbs
-it has to always be expressed explicitly by using specific markers
-Jules did not go to Amsterdam.
-Jules saw nobody there.
-the scope of negation:
-what are the things negation covers, the part of the sentence negation applies to
semantically (July has no job. – no job is the scope of negation)
-regarding to the scope, negation can be either sentence/clause negation or
constituent negation
-multiple negation:
-DN languages – two or more negations cancel each other out and resolve in
Page | 42 4.6.2021.
-negative polarity items – use of the pronoun any
-do support introduced in negatives and interrogatives
-Jespersen’s Cycle or negative cycle:
-two negations in different clauses make a positive (I can’t say she’s not pretty.)
-sentence negation and constituent negation makes an affirmative meaning
(Paula is not unattractive.)
-an even number of clausal negation make an affirmative meaning (I don’t think
he isn’t trying.)
-an odd number of clausal negations make an negative meaning (Jack doesn’t
believe that Mo didn’t say that Jane wasn’t pretty.)
-other types of negation:
-transferred negation: a feature of informal style with verbs of opinion or
perception (believe, imagine, seem…)
-I believe we haven’t met. I don’t believe we’ve met.
-pleonastic (expletive) negation
-negative elements in the scope of inherently negative verbs (before, unless
clauses, verbs of fearing)
-English uses it rarely!
-I miss not seeing your around (I miss seeing…)ž
Page | 43 Subordination
.one of the two major verbs to link clauses, sentences or elements
-hierarchy
-complex sentences – one main clause and one or more subordinate clauses
-may function not only on a clause element but also as a constituent of a phrase
(Liz served the food that they had ordered. – still a simple sentences)
-marked by: subordinating conjunctions, wh-items, the complementizer that,
subject-auxiliary inversion in declaratives or the absence of a finite verb
-may come in the form of a finite clause, nonfinite clause or verbless clause
-4 major categories:
-nominal, relative, adverbial and comparative
-nominal: resemble NPs
-relative – modifiers of NPs except for nominal relative and sentential relative
clauses
-adverbial – function mainly as adjuncts
-comparative – resemble adjectives and adverbs in modifying functions
-nominal clauses:
-that-clauses
-wh-interrogative
-yes-no interrogative
-nominal relative
-nominal -ing
-nominal to infinitive
-nominal bare infinitive
-nominal that clauses:
-similar to relative clauses but they function as NP’s instead of postomodifiers
.I knew that he was wrong.
-The assumption is that things will improve
-cannot be Co and prep. Compl-
Oi are in English either only recipients or beneficiaries
Middle voice – Active in form and passive in meaning (This document won't scan.)
-nominal wh-interrogative clauses:
-often called indirect questions: do not have the subject-auxiliary inversion
-How the book will sell depends on the author.
-Bob was asking what happened.
Page | 44
-nominal yes-no interrogative clauses:
-indirect questions, with no subject-auxiliary inversion: introduced by whether or
if
-I wonder whether he took out the trash or not.
4.6.2021.
-nominal relative clauses:
-are NOMINAL clauses
-normally can be paraphrased by a simple NP that contains a postmodifying
relative clause
-Macy’s is where I buy my clothes. – Macy’s is the place where I buy my clothes.
-nominal ing clause:
-Watching TV keeps them out of trouble.
-verbal nouns vs. -ing clauses
-verbal noun – add a modifier or determiner in front of the noun (I warned him
against careless driving.)
-ing clause – adding adverbs (I warned him against driving carelessly.)
-nominal to-infinitive clause:
-To be neutral is out of the question.
-The best thing is to say what you mean.
-nominal bare infinitive clause:
-rare
-Maw the lawn was what I did today.
-The best thing to do now is write her a letter.
-They made her pay for the damage.
Page | 45
Relative clauses
9.6.2021.
-generally modifiers to nouns
-introduced by relative pronouns and the complementizer that
-show inanimate and inanimate distinction (who, which – that)
-refer back to an antecedent
-restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses:
-difference in intonation and punctuation (non-restrictive have slight pauses in
intonation, restrictive don’t – spoken as one unit) (non-restrictive relative-clauses
will be divided with commas, restrictive won’t)
-meaning: restrictive clauses restrict or rather specify the meaning (the guy who
stood by the pool was drunk – as opposed to other guys) and non-restrictive
clauses add more information (the guys, who stood by the pool, was drunk – the
guy was drunk and btw he was at the pool)
-restrictive clauses can take both that and which, non-restrictive clauses can only
be introduced by wh-pronouns
Adverbial clauses
-conditional clauses:
-if clauses – adjuncts
-open condition, hypothetical condition and third condition (was in the past and was possible, but didn’t
happen)
Information processing
10.6.2021.
-information structure – obavijesna struktura
-the communicative organization of the text (or sentences combined to produce a text) – how to
present what you want to say (psychologically determined)
-we can highlight an aspect of our utterance that is communicatively effective – dynamism – variation in
communicative value between different parts of the utterance
-information unit – the unit highlighted, the one item being highlighted )but other units carry info too)
-the principle of end-focus – linear presentation from low to high information values
-we always start with the known info and then get to the new one
-given information – theme or topic; something that the receiver of the message has knowledge about
-usually in initial position in the sentence and unstressed – the subject and the theme often coincide
-new information – rheme or comment; the essential piece of new info that is carried by the sentence,
it is the focus of the message
-new info can be the entire clause or the last element of the clause (end-focus):
-We’re going to the races.
A: What’s on today?
B: We’re going to the races – everything here is new info
-every clause usually has one point of focus – marked by intonation (dynamic prominence)
-end-focus is unmarked – the chief prominence is on the last phrase
-theme and focus can also be marked – move the element carrying the focus from its usual position at
the end to somewhere else (different intonation
-Fronting:
-placing in initial position a clause element which is usually found after the verb
-An unusual way of speaking Yoda has.
-Subject-operator inversion:
-fronting with so, neither or nor – Luke didn’t see C-3PO and neither did Leia.
-negatives (neither, never, not only, hardly, no sooner, seldom) – Hardly hat the engine started when all
hell broke out.
-expressions with so, only and such – Such was the battle that they lost all of the sips.
-subordinate clauses of condition and concession (formal) – Should you change your mind, please let me
know.
-cleft sentences:
-the one that is cleft is made most prominent
-it + be … that/who
-It is silk worms that most of the silk in Britain comes from.
-pseudo-cleft sentences:
-What you need most is a good rest.
Page -What
| 51 I’m doing is teaching them to dance.
-begin with “W” words and have the SVCs valency
-postponement:
-putting the element at or near the end of the clause rather than its default place (the major factor is
weight)
-They brought an extraordinarily lavish lunch with them. – They brought with them an extraordinarily
lavish lunch.
-sometimes you postpone only one part of the constituent – discontinuous NP – A droid walked in
whom I never saw before.
-extraposition:
-taking something out of its usual position. it can be either fronted or postponed – always ends in
fronting or postponement
-the extraposition of a clausal subject or a clausal object
-dummy it
-either postponing subjects or fronting objects
-It is a pleasure to have you here for dinner.
-It was on the news that prices went up.