Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0 Intro/Overview
Jan 9, 2013
www.huawei.com
MRFD-231501 IP-Based Multi-mode Co-Transmission on BS side (eNodeB) E GUL concurrently in same UMPT
MRFD-231806 GSM and LTE Dynamic Power Sharing (LTE) N (GL) LTE Cell edge User Experience
MRFD-231808 GSM and LTE Buffer Zone Optimization (LTE) N (GL) Reduced need for Buffer zones
MRFD-231901 Multi-RAT Carrier Joint Shutdown (eNodeB) N (UL) Removed, lack of commercial interest
Description:
Distance
To offer safety net mechanism when moving out of useful
trigger
single band LTE or High band LTE coverage
Urban: When moving around, L2600 islands may still reach
far (and strong enough) although much weaker than e.g.
neighbouring L1800 or U2100
Example: If average ISD = 500m gap assisted measurements should be
automatically triggered when distance above 2000m (as derived from TA
measurements) Same cell
stronger
Rural: L800 sites on high hills may shoot all the way to towns than A2
with strong U2100 coverage
Benefit:
This will save effort on Neighbour definition and improve user G900
L1800
(drop) performance
ANR normally fixes this, but some UE lack support for GSM Gap L2600 L2600
measurements + if Tilt dictated by eg GSM
Impact:
IRAT case needs IRAT PS mobility feature
Note: R9 terminals needed. 3GPP RIM procedure Support Needed in GSM and UTRAN
Description:
Blind CSFB Optimization in case LTE site density
less than legacy and/or L800
- Blind close to LTE site
- Measurement assisted at LTE cell edge LTE not on all sites
Benefit:
Improve the CSFB end user experience
Impact:
CSFB feature needed and MW/UE support for 3GPP R9
RIM procedure
Description:
MME will map TA LA according to table and perform combined LA/TA
registration
Registered LA forwarded to eNB at CSFB in order to select (if possible) a
target RAT / cell belonging to registered LA in order to avoid subsequent
Roaming Retry and Location Update before Call setup Complete TA LA MSC
Applies also to when multiple PLMNs exist among neighbours TA1 LA1 MSC1
Benefits: TA2 LA1 MSC1
Minimize Risk of Roaming Retry (MTC) or Location Update (MOC)
TA3 LA2 MSC2
Robust CSFB, useful especially when separate LA for 2G/3G
Impact:
CSFB feature needed MSC
SGs
R9 MME Support needed MME
BSC/RNC BSC/RNC
eNB
LA1 TA3
TA1 LA2
eNB
BTS/NB TA2 BTS/NB
BTS/NB eNB
Description:
L2U: Possibility to differentiate between PS and CS
measurements
Example: CS may be instructed to eg. measure Neighbours of only One Freq
whereas PS will consider all neighbours LTE not on all sites
Voice: Possibility to put QCI1 on “Robust” LTE Frequency
Increase 38 SIBs (8 cells) in RRC connection Release
UL Coverage based inter-freq HO
A5/B2 support added
Benefit:
Different IRAT/Freq strategies for CS and PS and potentially
speed up CSFB by enabling only measuring Neighbours of U900 x1 (PS, CSFB)
same Frequency U2100 x3 (PS)
Increase VoLTE Robustness L2600 L2600
Increase Robustness in case on LTE cell edge, in particular
towards U2100
Less Call drops due to UL
Description:
Two A2 events thresholds sent to UE
One to trigger gap measurements
The other to trigger blind (urgent) redirect/HO
Functionality ON/OFF per LTE/3G/2G
Benefit:
Improved Drop call Performance
A2 (normal)
A2 (urgent)
Description: Description:
CS/PS steering with different Multiple UMTS freq. with different
priority traffic load
LTE LTE
UMTS Low
UMTS (data priority) load
Freqency1
UMTS High
GSM (voice priority) Frequency 2 load
Benefits: Benefits:
Fully utilize GSM/UMTS resource Improve CSFB success rate by steering
and improve user experience to light load
Fast CSFB vs Reliable PS Mobility Impact:
Impact: 3GPP R9 RIM load info NW support
L2U CS/PS steering feature needed LTE/3G PS IRAT Mobility feature needed
CSFB feature needed CSFB feature needed
Description:
UEs Interfering on PRACH and PUCCH
IRC applied also on the Control Channels
Benefit:
Increased Robustness for PUCCH with up
to 3 dB Victim cell Interfering cell
Better DL Performance thru better ACK/NAK
on PUCCH
Increased PRACH Robustness
Increased UL capacity
Impact:
IRC feature needed Control Channel IRC vs MRC
PUCCH
LBBPd needed
PUCCH IRC PRACH
• Up to 3 dB gain (2RXD)
PUSCH
PRACH IRC
• Up to 4.5dB gain (2RXD)
PUCCH
Shared EMS
Operator A NMS Operator B NMS
Itf-N Itf-N
Operator B EPC
Operator A EPC
Shared eNodeB
Description: Benefits:
• Dedicated EPC for each operator. • Reduce up to 40% CAPEX and OPEX for
• Dedicated PLMN ID and logo display. operators, and speed up time to market.
• S1-flex optional. • Higher Capacity and higher Efficiency with
• Maximum 4 operators are supported. (improved as pooled spectrum
of eRAN6.0 from 4 operators to 6 operators)
Benefit:
More Visibility
Impact:
GWCN requires MOCN and S1-flex
Description:
Different operator can configure different cell
reselection priority for GUL
If the IRAT cell priority of the serving cell is
configured, the priority would be sent to UE in
the message of RRC Connection Release.
If SPID is used, the cell priority defined by SPID
will be sent to UE instead
Benefit: GUL carriers priority configuration
Impact:
LTE
UMTS
f2
f3
6
4
MOCN feature needed GSM f4 1
2 LTE f1 0
LTE f2 1
UMTS f3 7
GSM f4 6
Description:
LTE RF (PA) is shutdown at low load or at LTE
preconfigured time 3G
Any ongoing LTE traffic is first handed over to 3G
LTE RF is lighted up at preconfigured time
Benefit:
Energy Saving in low load areas or night time
Impact:
None
LTE
3G
LTE Power
Impact:
LTE Power Power Allowed for
LTE
Need MSR
Need more than 1 GSM TRX per PA
GSM Power
TCH Power
TCH Power
2% Capacity impact:
Since we favour QPSK users we will
Rural, 40% of users on QPSK
introduce interference to the others
GL DPS LTE Power 5% CEU QPSK users Capacity
and reduce Capacity (cf ICIC) OFF 2x20W 0% 0% 0%
We recommend max 2x5W sharing ON 2x22.5W 12% 3% -1%
ON 2x25W 21% 4% -2%
Comparison to GU DPS: ON 2x27.5W 28% 6% -3%
In this feature we share the total
Urban, 50% of users on QPSK (eg indoor)
power to all HSDPA users, and
GL DPS LTE Power 5% CEU QPSK users Capacity
thereby increase capacity some 10% OFF 2x20W 0% 0% 0%
ON 2x22.5W 10% 5% -1%
ON 2x25W 16% 8% -2%
ON 2x27.5W 24% 11% -3%
LTE
Bufferzone area, LTE can only
use a narrow bandwidth
Description:
• In GL buffer zone area, numerous LTE sites can be configured with a Full BW LTE carrier
• eNB automatically detect GSM interference and dynamically schedule LTE RBs based on that
Benefits:
• Capacity increased as more areas can use full LTE Bandwidth
Impact:
• LTE feature PUCCH Flexible Configuration needed
mBSC
GSM
High Traffic
UMTS
Traffic Load
mBSC
Traffic Load Threshold
GSM
Low Traffic
UMTS
Description:
• In GU co-coverage sites, when traffic is low enough, UMTS cells can be shutdown to save
energy. And when the traffic goes higher, UMTS cells can be turned on again to fulfill the
traffic requirements.
• The procedure is controlled by switching time and traffic threshold of operator‟s strategy
Benefits:
• As estimation, 5% energy saved for a typical GU co-coverage network
Description:
• Two component carriers (CC) can be aggregated
to support wider transmission bandwidth for
downlink, either contiguous or non-contiguous
• Maximum 40MHz carrier combination supported:
2.6G+2.6G, 2.6G+1.8G, 2.6G+800M,
1.8G+800M, 800M+900M, 700M+AWS
• Backward compatibility, each CC appears as a
Rel-8 serving cell to Rel-8 UEs
Benefits:
• Improved spectrum flexibility
• CA with carriers in different frequency bands
• Better end user experience via wider bandwidth
• UE CAT6 (DL 300 / UL 50Mbps @ 2x2 MIMO)
• Fast load balance between the two LTE carriers
Intra-band CA non-continuous
Better Experience in Cell Edge
Carrier 1 Band 1 Carrier 2
Assign more RB
for cell edge UE Carrier 1
Carrier 2 Band 2
edge center
Inter-band CA
Mbps
CA
Freq1
Freq2
LBBPd1+LBBPd1
2x LBBPd1/2 can support 20M+20M CA for 3 sectors with 240 CA users
LBBPd1+LBBPc
LBBPd1/2+LBBPc can support 20M+20M CA for 3 sectors with 180 CA users
LBBPd3
LBBPd3 can support 20M+20M CA for 3 sectors with 240 CA users
PCC
22 RB
Scenario:1 SCC
PCC SCC
11+11=22 RB
Non-CA UE
normal load 22 RB
CA UE
Non-CA UE
100 / 4=24~25 RB
Scenario:2
100 / 2=50 RB
PCC heavy load
SCC light load 100 / 2=50 RB
100 / 2=50 RB
Scenario:3
PCC Light load 100 / 2=50 RB
SCC Heavy load
100 / 4=24~25 RB
PCC
(100/5) = 20 RB
Scenario:1 SCC
PCC SCC
20 + 20 = 40 RB
Non-CA UE
normal load (100/5) = 20 RB
CA UE
Non-CA UE
100 / 5 = 20 RB
Scenario:2
PCC heavy load
20 + 50 = 70 RB
SCC light load 100 / 2 = 50 RB
100 / 2=50 RB
Scenario:3
PCC Light load 20 + 50 = 70 RB
SCC Heavy load
100 / 5 = 20 RB
Sub-frames
Coverage of ABS
Coverage of non-ABS
Time Almost Blank Sub-frame ( ABS)
Synchronized
Sub-frames
Description:
• Macro only transmits CRS, PCFICH, PHICH and
SI related info on ABS sub-frames to reduce
interference to Micros.
• Micro schedules the interfered (cell-edge )UEs in Distance
sub-frames aligned with Macro‟s ABS. Benefits:
• Some R10 UE is required for best performance • Up to +40% cell edge performance gain
• Macro and micro cells to be time-synchronized. • No capacity loss
Benefit: Micro
Increase Capacity with small cell layer when Protected Subframe
not possible to expand Macro layer
Impact:
Need some penetration (~5%) of UE supporting
R10 eICIC in Small Cells
Time Sync between Macro and Micro Cell
Only supported by Micro Equal Power
Right Hotspot location not to close to Macro Range Expansion
Simulation assumptions:
System simulation ISD500m
Random micro deployment (4 small cells per
macro)
25 uniformly distributed UEs per macro
Full buffer
Simulation results:
For (RE9dB + 1/5ABS) vs (RE0dB + no ABS)
+2% Capacity (103 vs 101 Mbps)
+32% Median throughput (2.4 vs 1.6 Mbps)
+46% CEU throughput (0.57 vs 0.32 Mbps)
Result
Close to 300Mbps over the air with
commercial eNB HW in commercial NW
Test UE
1x LBBPd1
290+
Mbps
Downlink Uplink
CoMP CoMP UL intra-site
CoMP has no
dependency
Features with UE and
Backhaul
Intra-eNB Inter-eNB
CoMP CoMP Homogeneous network with inter-site CoMP
Cloud BB
Benefits:
Inter-site
Interference from other transmission CoMP bases
points is utilized to improve on Cloud BB
transmission Architecture
Improve Cell Edge User SNR defined in
R11
Reduce inter-cell-interference
CoMP CoMP
CoMP CoMP Off
On Off On
CoMP Verified in
Orchard Road,
CBD of Singapore
UL 2Rx CoMP Cell Middle Cell Edge
eRAN3.0 Throughput
(Intra-Site, 2cells JP) Throughput (Mbps) (Mbps)
CoMP On 12 4.5
Single User CoMP Off 6.5 2
CoMP Gain 84.6% 125%
Carrier Aggregation
3GPP R12/R13 and later Ver.
290Mbps DL Throughput
Yota live NW Oct 10,
2012
LTE-B/C
3GPP R10/R11
UL Intra-eNB CoMP CoMP CoMP
2.25x Edge Throughput in On Off
LTE-A Singapore in May 2012
3GPP
R8/R9
LTE
DL 4x4 MIMO
250Mbps Field
Throughput in Germany
LTE-A is the Next Generation of LTE, in 2012 Q1