You are on page 1of 3

GROUP 7-

By-
Veditha C Makam-2021JULB01155
Paul Isaac Shelton-2021JULB08002
Sahil Kala- 2021JULB02054
Bollapu Jaganath Reddy- 2021JULB02057
Divyanshi Agarwal-2021JULB07030
T Shanmukha- 2021JULB02009
Case: Alex Sander

Decision Problem:
How Landon can improvise its 360-feedback process to create a high-performance
environment and improving leadership and management skills of Alex

Factors:
 Time constraint
 Small firm
 Relationship management problem
 360 performance review
 First time feedback
 Long term employees not willing to work extra hours
 Unorganized Hierarchy of management

Critical Factors:
 Time constraint
 Relationship management problem
 First time process

SWOT ANALYSIS:
STRENGTH:
 Team leadership qualities will improve drastically
 Efficiency of the employees will improve
 Alex’s potential

WEAKNESS:
 Individual biased feedbacks
 Personal grudges
 No delegation of work efficiently
 Alex’s anger issues
OPPURTUNITY:
 All the employees must go through the feedbacks and implement it in his
management
 All employees career enhancement
THREAT:
 It can reduce employee morale if not implemented properly.
 Multiple negative feedbacks might demotivate employees
 Employee turnover may increase
 Alex’s management behaviour/anger

Constraints:
 The process is not Anonymous
 Employee morale
 Time constraints as employees like Alex feel this is a waste of time

PESTEL
POLITICAL: N/A

ECONOMIC:
25 million has been allocated as an urgent project in Landon and this feedback process will
add pressure to employees and improve their performance

SOCIAL:
This will create image consciousness and degrade employee morale

ENVIRONMENTAL:
All the employees will know their areas of improvement and will be in a better work
environment

TECHNOLOGICAL: N/A

LEGAL: N/A

Alternatives:
1st :
To make the process completely anonymous so that employee morale is not downgraded.

2nd:
Outsource a motivational leader so that employees are motivated and individuals like Alex
will consider what their team expects from him.

Evaluation:

Basis 1st alternative 2nd Alternative

Financial Can be financially achieved May require more finances


as it is an internal process as it involves an external
requirement
Employee Morale Employees will be All employees may not be
comfortable amongst their comfortable with an outsider
team members to discusss their issues
Time constraint Will require minimal time Will require a lot of time

DECISION:
After evaluating both the alternatives the First alternative is the right choice as all
employees will be comfortable working on their downfalls with their own team members
and the process is financially feasible as well. It can also be completed and implemented
with no time constraints.

You might also like