Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By-
Veditha C Makam-2021JULB01155
Paul Isaac Shelton-2021JULB08002
Sahil Kala- 2021JULB02054
Bollapu Jaganath Reddy- 2021JULB02057
Divyanshi Agarwal-2021JULB07030
T Shanmukha- 2021JULB02009
Case: Alex Sander
Decision Problem:
How Landon can improvise its 360-feedback process to create a high-performance
environment and improving leadership and management skills of Alex
Factors:
Time constraint
Small firm
Relationship management problem
360 performance review
First time feedback
Long term employees not willing to work extra hours
Unorganized Hierarchy of management
Critical Factors:
Time constraint
Relationship management problem
First time process
SWOT ANALYSIS:
STRENGTH:
Team leadership qualities will improve drastically
Efficiency of the employees will improve
Alex’s potential
WEAKNESS:
Individual biased feedbacks
Personal grudges
No delegation of work efficiently
Alex’s anger issues
OPPURTUNITY:
All the employees must go through the feedbacks and implement it in his
management
All employees career enhancement
THREAT:
It can reduce employee morale if not implemented properly.
Multiple negative feedbacks might demotivate employees
Employee turnover may increase
Alex’s management behaviour/anger
Constraints:
The process is not Anonymous
Employee morale
Time constraints as employees like Alex feel this is a waste of time
PESTEL
POLITICAL: N/A
ECONOMIC:
25 million has been allocated as an urgent project in Landon and this feedback process will
add pressure to employees and improve their performance
SOCIAL:
This will create image consciousness and degrade employee morale
ENVIRONMENTAL:
All the employees will know their areas of improvement and will be in a better work
environment
TECHNOLOGICAL: N/A
LEGAL: N/A
Alternatives:
1st :
To make the process completely anonymous so that employee morale is not downgraded.
2nd:
Outsource a motivational leader so that employees are motivated and individuals like Alex
will consider what their team expects from him.
Evaluation:
DECISION:
After evaluating both the alternatives the First alternative is the right choice as all
employees will be comfortable working on their downfalls with their own team members
and the process is financially feasible as well. It can also be completed and implemented
with no time constraints.