Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Discuss the evolution of information systems in an organization. How can the use of ERP
systems remove information or functional silos in organizations?
- Answer: The evolution of the information systems in the organization started with the use of
basic information systems in the mid- 1950s. The systems like Sales Information System (SIS),
Transaction Process System (TPS), Management Information System (MIS), Office Automation
System (OAS), Decision Support System (DSS) and others were in practice in the organizations.
These are usually called divisions or silos and are not integrated with each other. Thus if the
information is required in other functional area, then the information is collected by re-entering
to each and every particular system. This process was very time consuming and less efficient.
Over the past 50 years there has been significant progress in the Information System with new
specialties and research communities. The progress can be monitored by looking at the use of
cards, electronic calculators back then, coming to the age of e-business and mobile computing.
- The ERP system has capacity to handle large data reducing the data repetition and mistakes in
the data. Depending on market and organizational need the information system that an
organization use get evolves in size per their current need from standard platform. Information
that is required for an organization keeps growing and growing and as their needs and market
positions change, eventually they will find that they need an information system that can better
aid their business practices. And this leads to a large number of information system which
becomes complex and time consuming. There are large number of organizations with thousands
of information system and database because of their business needs and growth in market area.
With increasing demand in market area, at some point they have to decide to implement an ERP
system from a vendor such as SAP, Oracle so that the large number of information system will
have dynamic flow. It prevents and eliminates duplication of work improving the performance in
information flow. When a company implements ERP system, it eliminates the division occurred
in the organization.
3. Among all the ERP components listed in the chapter, which component is most critical in
the implementation process and why?
- Answer- Among the different components of ERP system people factors can be termed as most
critical component in the implementation process. As the organization is run by the people and
the system and the business is also remaining under the employees. Employees at different
levels and management are the users and this directly affects the ERP system. The
implementation directly depends on how much knowledge the employees has about this system
and the level of interest and effort they show on using the system. The decision to implement an
ERP system will be of the employees and also the willingness to change the business practices
using this system. An ERP system will be successful only when the people in the organization are
willing to accept the possibility to change and business reform.
4. Discuss the role of ERP in organizations. Are ERP tools used for business process
reengineering (BPR) or does BPR occur due to ERP implementation?
- Answer- ERP systems integrate all data and processes of an organization into a unified system. A
typical ERP will use multiple components of computer software and hardware to achieve the
integration. A key ingredient of most ERP systems is the use of a unified database to store data
for the various system modules. In an organization it can be viewed as the system to run and
handle all the daily works and data on daily basis with full efficiency and escaping the data
redundancy. An ERP software solution seeks to streamline and integrate operations, processes
and information flows in an enterprise. The role of an ERP in organizations is to integrate
departments and allow them to function as a single infrastructure that serves the needs of each
department. A BPR is the process of a group of activities or tasks that has been coordinated to
achieve a business goal. When an organization implement an ERP system it does brings forth
Business Process Reengineering (BPR).
5. Why is the design and selection of ERP architecture crucial for the implementation
project? What are the long-term implications of selecting a wrong architecture?
- A business organization must start with the correct architecture to meet their needs for a new
ERP system. If they choose a chocolate implementation, but only need a package-driven vanilla
architecture, they may waste large sums of company money and time. Chocolate
implementations can be very time consuming and costly. Also, vanilla implementation
architectures are toted as being the best option from vendors, as they utilize the "best business
practices" across various industries.
6. Discuss the criteria for selecting ERP vendors. Which is the most important criterion and
why?
- Answer- SAP, Oracle, Infor, Microsoft Dynamics are the most popular ERP vendors. Before
selecting the ERP vendors an organization should meet up the criteria that directly affects the
organization and the system. For an organization which don’t have any experience in developing
ERP system it is best to use one. The organization must carefully study the present and future
needs in enterprise management systems and then select the appropriate vendor. Also, proper
examination and reviews of the hardware, network and software infrastructures must be done
so that it would meet up all the requirements for the vendor implementation. Besides, Vendor
specialization is one of the compulsory tasks as it studies whether the vendor of the
organization supports the size of the very huge organizations like Woolworths with more than
200000 employees. An organization should also take a look at the reputation of the vendor so
that it could get knowledge on the previous implementations and use their ERP system.
Furthermore, an organization should be aware of the licensing and upgrading policies of vendors
maintaining the efficient customer service and support with affordable cost. Among these
criteria, longevity can be considered as most important one as several upgrades and adaptations
must be done to cope with the growing technologies and inventions in this fast-growing
technical era. For example, SAP is being marketed for more than 30 years with several upgrades
and adaptations to latest disruptive technologies like web, mobile platform, cloud computing,
software as service. With new inventions in technologies, it is the system that must be upgraded
with new add-ons and features that facilitates the organization and customers without
disturbing the daily basis tasks and transactions.
7. From the examples provided in the chapter on ERP success and failure stories, what are
the critical factors of success and failures?
- For success, it is critical that all management is on board with the plan to implement an ERP
system. Their attitudes towards the system and willingness to be a part the developmental
stages will decide its success. Choosing the correct architecture and moving forward with it is
also important. The failure stories have two things in common: they did not have everyone on
the same page, nor did they stick to the implementation plan.
8. What are the critical steps of the ERP project cycle? Discuss the critical success factors.
- The first critical step is to identify a project manager and subsequent teams. Then, to find a
vendor that can deliver solutions identified by the project manager and upper management is
the next step. Other important steps include establishing a project timeframe, deciding if
consultants are necessary, and most importantly performing adequate ERP testing. Finally, after
going live, it is essential to work closely with the consultants to solve any problems that may
arise during implementation. Keeping these steps in mind will aid in a successful project
implementation.
Case Questions:
1. What do you think of RR’s ERP implementation project? Did they select the right
implementation strategy?
- Yes, they selected the correct implementation strategy for upgrading their legacy systems into
enterprise system. In vanilla implementation, the working practices of RR have to be adopted
with functionality of SAP with mapping their current functions to its processes. This, of course,
will reduce the cost and time of modifications of SAP.
- Previously, RR gave contract to Electronic Data Services (EDS) for all of its IT function because of
which there were inaccurate data and was difficult to maintain. Later ERP implementation from
RR was undertaken by out sourced company EDS and hired expert ERP consultants for better
implementation of SAP. All the business processes needed to be mapped to SAP processes
according to their current function. After ERP implementation, they started deploying their
employees with better knowledge in business area and expertise in RR functional area so that
they can give input to SAP implementation team about the business requirements for better
mapping of SAP. As per RR requirement, the SAP team needed to provide new business process.
Even though RR implemented vanilla implementation of SAP, the technical team had to
overcome to avoid the duplication of data which was RR’s major concern because the reports
generated from SAP had to be precise. Because of ERP implementation selection it helped the
business to adopt new functionality and there was a phase roll out in RR business. They started
giving employee a training to use the new ERP system by adopting training strategy
2. Discuss the critical success factors of RR’s implementation strategy and the role of SMEs in
the project.
- The credit for success of RR’s implementation strategy goes to all the team and experts. They
outsourced EDS Company for ER implementation and hired expert ERP consultants from SAP
too. The implement process was divided into small process and team also form to complete the
specific task assigned. SMEs (subject matter experts) and staff with vital knowledge of cross
functional business relationships and experiences of the old legacy system were deployed. OBU
(operations business unit) responsible for implementing work changes and training were
working together with the project team.
- The project was implemented in one business area at time with two stages: wave one and wave
two. After successful result of wave one, they completed the wave two stage so that the error
and problem could be minimized with great efficiency. They use Phased roll out procedure to
adapt business with new functionality. They trained individuals stepwise along with meetings
and presentation illustrating the benefits to the company with the new systems. They focused
the implementation in cultural, business and technical aspects. In this way, the implantation was
succeeded.
- SMEs has played critical role in the project by using cross functional business relationship and
experience of the old legacy system so that the modification of system goes flawlessly without
skipping any important data.
3. What advice can you give to RR’s technical team on their approach of migrating legacy
system with the SAP software?
- The advice that can be given to RR’s technical team is that while migrating the data, they can
use alternate quick method so that the daily operation is not affected much. Also, they need to
verify the migration of data and cleaned of the data over the certain period so that no garbage
duplicate data is not created. Besides, the team in the project should be expert in every field
according to the division of team member. It should also be known if the time taken to finish the
implementation can be covert. The technical team should also look if it is possible to reduce
time while doing any sort of work. They should make ensure that the data is cleaned that there
is no any error or inaccurate data. They should also avoid any duplication of data which was the
major concern of RR. The technical team should look after all the system so that there won’t be
any technical challenge after migrating from legacy system to the SAP software.
Systems integration raises several ethical issues for management. Integrated systems open up
new ways of sharing information, but it also brings the possibility of some employees exploiting
this information for their personal advantage as well as illegal access of information that they
can easily do from their desks. To avoid the unethical use of information, management needs to
develop a policy on ethical usage of information as well as user proper security software and
hardware to prevent, track, and monitor information access and usage.
Case Questions:
1. What are some of the system integration challenges faced by UPS?
- They originally dealt with an overwhelming number of customer service calls, which led to a
time and cost-consuming process to manually locate package statuses, so their challenge was to
put the power into the customers hands and provide them the information they need faster.
- They also needed to bridge the gap between physical products/services and access to electronic
information. UPS made a lot of errors in their original process, such as sending packages to the
wrong addresses, loading boxes on the wrong trucks, and picking the wrong boxes just because
many UPS products look very similar. With their multiple separate systems requiring redundant
processes to utilize the data, UPS was challenged with performing a complete BPR.
2. Discuss the systems integration solutions at UPS. How does it help UPS integrate new
technologies?
- They added a new variety of services integrated with core transportation functions in order to
better serve the customers. They purchased two different ERP modules from Oracle for both HR
and financials, which saved a lot of money for goods and services purchased. They built a
rigorous UPS logistics network on well-defined technological standards, which makes it easy to
now add new applications that fit into the IT infrastructure. In turn, this also prevents unwanted
data from being stored. This helped UPS tremendously because the process became a lot more
customer-focused and technology-reliant, which is essential in today’s world. Now, instead of
the common shipment errors, UPS has a much lower fault tolerance and can provide better
services to customers related to package shipping and tracking.
3. Discuss the advantages of systems integration for UPS customers.
- From a customer standpoint, systems integration makes a huge difference. Customers can easily
track the shipment of their packages and have a better estimate of when they can expect the
arrival. The tracking system is easily accessed from the UPS website or by software provided by
UPS. If the customer accidentally enters an incorrect zip code, an error message will prohibit the
process from continuing, thus reducing the likelihood of an error in shipment. Additionally, the
system integration provides “smart data” which is able to identify things such as rural addresses
that may be hard to get to or out of the way, allowing UPS to better estimate the amount of
time it will take to deliver the package. Lastly, the auto-fill fields allow easy ordering for frequent
receivers. This ultimately puts the power into the customer’s hands, which improves customer
satisfaction and, as a result, company profits.
Case Questions:
1. What were the key goals in the Army using an ERP system?
- Common view of the rapidly changing operational environment
- Eliminate boundaries between One Army and One Enterprise
- Synchronize transformation between Institutional and Operational Army
- Optimize the Army at the enterprise level
- Rapidly affect combat operations by anticipating change and providing decisive and
dominant combat capability where and when required
- Transform the Army from end-to-end
2. What were the key implementation considerations that were addressed as part of the
planning process, especially related to using an integrated ERP and transforming the
culture?
- Sponsorship/Leadership–Successful ERP systems require dedicated and engaged
leadership. The Army has a unique situation where leaders rotate, and an ERP
implementation can span over multiple sponsors.
- Stakeholder Alignment –The Army’s previous structure did not require each area to
work together. There needed to be tradeoffs in each of the areas to have the best
overall solution for the organization, so there needed to be decisions made at a higher
level than the area that are implementing the tradeoffs.
- Cost –Transformation Management (TM) is a key element to the success of the
implementation. It must be communicated and accepted by the leadership in advance.
Often times when there are cuts to the budget it is the first thing to be cut.
- Project Lifecycle –TM needs to be part of the project from the beginning and is key to
the overall success of the project.
- Culture –As with any organization that has a long-term history, change will be a
challenge. Leadership must take an active role within the Army to support the change.
- Communication –The Army has many areas in which communication is key to success,
both internal and external to their organization. A good communication plan must be
put into place.
3. How was the change management process incorporated into the implementation?
- The Army used blueprinting, which is a comprehensive set of pilots to test proposed
changes and ensure that the proposed changes will work as advertised. Additionally,
the Army evaluated customization of the software versus changing the process on a
regular basis.