Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- http://casacabrones.tumblr.com/post/3890587291/discussing-nuclear-energy-with-a-heavy-
heart-japan-earth
- http://www.new.ans.org/
- http://www.world-nuclear.org/
- http://www-ns.iaea.org/committees/insag.asp
- http://library.thinkquest.org/17940/texts/fission_power/fission_power.html
Positive:
- Reliable, unlike wind or solar which are based on weather and other volatile variables.
Negative:
- Nuclear energy produces nuclear waste, which can stay radioactive for many thousands
of years.
- High risks are involved in nuclear reactions such as earthquakes or even human
accidents.
- Uranium is a paucity.
- It is expensive and time consuming to build a nuclear reactor
- Health problems are common in power plant workers and Uranium miners
My conclusion is simple; nuclear energy is an absolute waste. More than the benefits,
nuclear energy has a myriad of malevolence involved. By trying to protect the
environment the waste can actually damage the environment beyond repair. Not only is
it harmful to the environment but humans are also negatively affected because the
miners and workers are often inflicted with untreatable forms of cancer. Furthermore,
nuclear energy costs too much for its benefits. It’s true that risks are a necessity but, is it
worth risking all of humanity? Accidents happen all the time and one nuclear accident
can kill millions of innocent lives. This “virtue” can actually be a vice in disguise!