Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professional Emphasis
The importance of historical context and criticism from the authors’ perspective.
The purpose of this essay is to compare two pieces of literature written in different
literary periods. These will be realism with “The adventures of Huckleberry Finn” by Mark
Twain to postmodernism with the poem” America” by Allen Ginsberg. Based on both historical
contexts, it will be analyzed and compare how society behaved back in that time and see how
both authors had criticized it during the period when these were written. Knowing the
background of each piece of literature regarding two whole different periods and movements
makes us realize the contrast between them. Topics such as historical background, authors’
In the poem, America reflects a post-war society that intends to ridicule and condemn its
excessive idea of a perfect reality during the war. America satirically addresses the behavior of
Americans with obscene language, rejecting such diplomatic and unrealistic approaches. While
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain took on a more serious character as Twain
focused on the institution of slavery in the South since it was a brutal institution involving black
America is mostly a political work, written in free verse, it was published right after
World War ll and the beginnings of the Cold War. The poem consists of various accusations
against the war, the political unrest in the United States, its government, and its citizens.
The fifties were for a great part of the American people times of comfort and improving
living standards. Nevertheless, they were times of social chaos and confusion even if it cannot be
seen at first sight. Americans were beginning to live better than they had done in the previous
decades, especially after the hardships following the Great Depression and the Second World
War. (A Countercultural Vision of America, page 5) Having a better employment rate permitting
the economy to grow and, the government implementing new reforms such as improving their
living state and access to education as well as healthcare for war veterans and their citizens, this
with the purpose of making Americans rely on their country. All this new improvement brought
to people a new vision of life and the era of communism beginning immediately made
Americans more optimistic allowing them to be perceived as the laborious, the successful, the
The poem begins with the author stating his disappointment in the country and
introducing his poor financial and mental condition: “America I’ve given you all and now I’m
nothing. America two dollars and twenty-seven cents January 17, 1956.I can’t stand my own
mind”. (Berkeley,1956). He disapproves of the human and nuclear warfare present in America at
3
the time of war. He questions America when it can offer him justice, tolerance, freedom, and
acceptance as it has made the world believe about it or changes its perspective of itself. In this
poem, America is personified and is addressed by the speaker as if it were human, being Allen
the interlocutor desperately asking with rhetorical questions and accusing with bitterness and
cynicism the attempting and responsibility of the contribution of the United States in the Cold
War: “America you don’t really want to go to war. America it’s them bad Russians. /Them
Russians them Russians and them Chinamen. And them Russians. / The Russia wants to eat us
alive.” There is another question at the very beginning of the first paragraph: “America ¿When
The analysis of the questions can go in many directions since it can be interpreted by the
reader from Allen asking America to be pacific, to end wars. Or on the other hand, it asks
America to be like an angel, spirituality speaking it can also be taken as a religious symbol or a
symbol of peace and purity and it needs to become pure and merciful, thus angelic. Ginsberg’s
questions make the audience that even if is satirical and laughable, its impact is to concern the
readers back in the time by allowing them to realize the seriousness of the issues that this poem
discusses such as America, politics, war, humanity, and ethics. This conversation based on
making rhetorical questions expecting an answer turns into an indirect warning to the United
States -America- by line 16 for viewing itself as that sort of ideal world. Meanwhile, he tries to
reconcile with America, suggesting it to look for “some other way to settle this argument”
instead of using military power denouncing the use of brutality and violence as a way to settle
things to calm the chaos, something he deeply disagreed with. In the lines that follow, from his
accusation of the government, the poet redirects his perspective towards people, their nature, and
4
possibly the justice system of America post World War (Alb, Miz. "America by Allen
Ginsberg"). From "I am addressing you"- line 38- America uses an angry tone, in which the
author reflects his anger and disappointment towards his country, which usually sells the idea
that it is a free land and the home of the American dream. But it is not; Ginsberg wants to
unmask this romantic and forgery narrative through America’s discrimination; which is pretty
much slavery, bloodshed, death, and poverty caused by confusion and hatred, bigotry, and pride.
The poem ends with Ginsberg putting his "queer shoulder to the wheel", stating with resignation
meaning the poem needs to bring changes to the social situation. Despite his desire to see
changes in society, he has not revealed how he would accomplish it. ( Alb, Miz. "America by
Allen Ginsberg").
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain was a pillar of American literature.
This book had previously been censored in the United States because the themes had been
condemned in a very crude and realistic manner, which offended American southern society.
Topics such as racism, slavery, superstitions, and southern morals are some of the central themes
of the novel within the southern society of the United States, in the period before the Civil War.
In the early 1800s, the Mississippi River served as the primary trade route for the western section
of the United States. During the 1820s there was an agreement called The Missouri
Compromised, that allowed Missouri to be pronounced as a slave state. Some other states began
to establish their laws regarding slavery and quickly split into two groups: “free states,” which
5
comprised the northern half of the country, and “slave states,” which made up the southern half
(Gale,2006). For the African-Americans, the Mississippi River alternated between liberator and
oppressor, building up an identity that was at times deplored, celebrated, despised, and be
terrified of. The river ran south from Canada through “free states” such as Iowa before flowing
through the “slave states” of the South like Missouri, where The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
takes place. Slavery is one of the key elements in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. The
novel takes place in Missouri in the 1830s or 1840s, at a time when Missouri was considered a
slave state. Although the book claims to be about Huck's “adventures,” the story is driven by
Jim's attempt to achieve freedom and safety for himself, and ultimately for his wife and children.
it is Huck's perspective on Jim's struggle that allows the author to address the topic of slavery
uniquely. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, blacks are subject to dehumanizing treatment
from nearly every white character in the book. This is not incompatible with the narration set in
the pre–Civil War South, where blacks were often witnessed as property above all else. Indeed,
one of Huck's primary inner conflicts deals with his “wicked” impulses to treat Jim as more than
One notable example of degradation over black people occurs in Chapter 32 when Huck
shows up at the Phelps residence pretending to be Tom Sawyer. Huck, speaking to Aunt Sally,
invents a mechanical problem that held up the boat he supposedly traveled on:
“It warn't the grounding—that didn't keep us back but a little. We blowed a
cylinder-head.”
Mark Twain appears to be satirizing the apathy with which white people at that time
frequently dismissed black people's personhood. Twain communicates how natural, and even
morally correct, racism would have seemed to characters like Huck. Twain knew the popularity
of racism, as he grew up in a slave-owning family, and held racist beliefs as a young man. By the
end of the 19th century, Twain wrote essays on the harmfulness of this conformity within social
mores, which allowed him to demonstrate the dehumanizing and humiliating effect of slavery in
the time these had happened. In the same way, he was able to show the human and desperate
CONCLUSION
Both pieces of literature are great examples of social inequality and the dominance of
power, which are part of the historical context that was lived when these authors were alive and
could narrate what happened back then. Although Mark Twain's crude approach may have
described a more humorous perspective, it could mark the reality that was lived during the Civil
War and the normalization of slavery and racism, which today is still in constant social disputes
in different states located in the South. On the other hand, America is a poem that was written
7
after World War II, postmodernism awakened in writers like Allen those desires to expose the
fallacies and corrupt, erroneous, and absurd behaviors of the United States in its citizens. That
said, it can be concluded that knowing the historical context of a literary piece is very important
since to know the writer's point of view it is necessary to look beyond his life, like the events that
occurred around him and the impact within the culture. This gives readers an impulse to want to
References
www.sparknotes.com/lit/huckfinn/context/literary/mark-twain-and-american-reali
sm.
http://studymoose.com/the-poem-america-by-allen-ginsberg-essay
8
www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/49305/america-56d22b41f119f.
Geneson, Paul, and Allen Ginsberg. “A Conversation with Allen Ginsberg.” Chicago
Review, vol. 27, no. 1, 1975, pp. 27–35. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25303265. Accessed 28
May 2021.
Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, 1984, pp. 43–46. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41641252. Accessed 28
May 2021.
Why the Ending Works.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 81, no. 1/2, 1998, pp.
Pinar Madrid, Valentín David. A Countercultural Vision of America: Allen Ginsberg and
tauja.ujaen.es/bitstream/10953.1/1998/1/PINAR_~1.PDF.