Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reference Books:
https://taxguru.in/income-tax/relief-case-double-taxation.html
INTRODUCTION
The basic purpose of multinational tax planning is to minimize the firms’
worldwide tax burden. Upon entering the global arena, an investor must
also contend with multiple tax systems and multiple rates of taxation. The
marginal corporate income tax rates for an MNC can vary widely across
countries. Moreover, the definition of taxable corporate income also varies
across different countries depending on what costs are deductible from
revenues in order to arrive at taxable profits.
Government usually set tax rates as a function of domestic political
considerations, but will sometimes treat foreign investors depending on the
extent that they choose to encourage or discourage foreign investment.
MNCs are specifically concerned with corporate income taxes, which are
generally conceived as taxes on return on equity capital.
Primarily, it is necessary to understand the framework for taxing income
based on two factors
Residential status of the entity earning income
same income of a person in more than one country. This results due to
countries following different rules for income taxation
There are two main rules of income taxation (a) source of income rule and
(b) residence rule.
As per source of income rule, the income may be subject to tax in the
country where the source of such income exists (i.e. where the business
establishment is situated or where the asset/property is located) whether
the income earner is a resident in that country or not.
On the other hand, the income earner may be taxed on the basis of his
residential status in that country. For example if a person is resident of a
country, he may have to pay tax on any income earned outside that country
as well.
Further some countries may follow a mixture of the above two rules.
Thus problem of double taxation arises if a person is taxed in respect of
any income on the basis of source of income rule in one country and on the
basis of residence in another country or on the basis of mixture of above
two rules.
If both rules apply simultaneously to a business entity and it were to suffer
tax at both ends, the cost of operating on an international scale would
become prohibitive and would deter the process of globalization. It is from
this point of view that Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA)
becomes very significant.
In India, the liability under the Income-tax Act arises on the basis of the
residential status of the assessee during the previous year. In India the
residential status is the key point for determination of income tax. In case of
Residents their global income (i.e Indian Income as well as Foreign
Income) is taxable in India whereas in case of non-residents only Indian
Income is taxable. So we can say that in India residence rule is applied for
residents whereas source rule is applied for Non-residents. The residential
status of a person is determined based on the provisions of Section 6 of
Income Tax Act 1961.
DOUBLE TAXATION RELIEF
Relief against such hardship can be provided mainly in two ways (a)
Bilateral relief (b) Unilateral relief.
BILATERAL RELIEF
The governments of two countries can enter into agreement to provide
relief against double taxation, worked out on the basis of mutual agreement
between the two concerned sovereign states. This may be called a scheme
of 'bilateral relief' as both concerned powers agree as to the basis of the
relief to be granted by either of them.
Agreement for 'bilateral relief' may be of following two kinds
a) Exemption method – A particular income is taxed in one of the both
countries and exempted in the other country.
Agreement, where two countries agree that income from various specified
sources which are likely to be taxed in both the countries should either be
taxed only in one of them or that each of the two countries should tax only
a particular specified portion of the income so that there is no overlapping.
Such an agreement will result in a complete avoidance of double taxation
of the same income in the two countries. This is known as exemption
method of relief.
b) Tax Credit method- The income is taxed in both the countries as per
the treaty and the country of residence will allow the tax credit / reduction
for the tax charged in the country of source.
The agreement that does not envisage any such scheme of single taxability
but merely provides that, if any item of income is taxed in both the
countries, the assessee should get relief in a particular manner.' Under this
type of agreement, the assessee is liable to have his income taxed in both
the countries but is given a deduction, from the tax payable by him in India,
of a part of the taxes yield by him thereon, usually the lower of the two
taxes paid. This is known as tax credit method of relief.
In practice the former type of agreement also works in the same way as the
latter. Bilateral agreements ensure that either country is to refrain from
taxing the whole or part of the income only if the other country has kept to
its part of the bargain. This can be only proved by producing the
assessment order in that country which will, naturally, take time. Moreover,
even in these agreements, there is a provision that if any item (not being
covered by specific provisions) is chargeable to tax in both countries, each
country should allow abatement to the doubly taxed income. Thus, even in
an avoidance agreement, generally, the income may get taxed in both
places but the assessee is able to get the benefit of the collection of the
appropriate tax being kept in abeyance or by way of relief in the form of
deductions later on proving that he has paid tax thereon in the other
country as well. The relief under either of these types of agreement
depends on an agreement between the countries concerned.
UNILATERAL RELIEF
The above procedure for granting relief will not be sufficient to meet all
cases. No country will be in a position to arrive at such agreement as
envisaged above with all the countries of the world for all time. The
hardship of the taxpayer, however, is a crippling one in all such cases.
Some relief can be provided even in such cases by home country
irrespective of whether the other country concerned has any agreement
with India or has otherwise provided for any relief at all in respect of such
double taxation. This relief is known as unilateral relief.
Under Section 91, the Indian government can relieve an individual from
double taxation irrespective of whether there is a DTAA between India and
the other country concerned. Unilateral relief may be offered to a tax payer
if:
(1) The person or company has been a resident of India in the previous year.
(2) The same income must be accrued to and received by the tax payer
outside India in the previous year.
(3) The income should have been taxed in India and in another country with
which there is no tax treaty.
(4) The person or company has paid tax under the laws of the foreign
country in question.
the country of residence of the owner can also tax the same income unless
the tax treaty between the countries expressly provides for exclusion of the
property income from being taxed in the country of residence of the
assessee. Relief can however be claimed and given in terms of tax treaty
on providing- proof of payment or at least proof of assessment.
Relief cannot be granted unless the income which has been taxed in one of
the contracting countries has also suffered tax in the other contracting
country. Proof has to be provided of the income having suffered double
taxation. If there is no tax treaty with the country levying double taxation
then relief can be granted unilaterally under section91.
(c) transfer or issue of any security or foreign security by any branch, office
or agency in India of a person resident outside India;
(d) any borrowing or lending in foreign exchange in whatever form or by
whatever name called
(e) any borrowing or lending in rupees in whatever form or by whatever
name called between a person resident in India and a person resident
outside India;
(f) deposits between persons resident in India and persons resident outside
India
(g) export, import or holding of currency or currency notes;
(h) transfer of immovable property outside India, other than a lease not
exceeding five year by a person resident in India;
(i) acquisition or transfer of immovable property in India, other than a lease
not exceeding five years, by a person resident outside India;
(j) giving of a guarantee or surety in respect of any debt obligation or other
liability incurred
1. by a person resident in India and owed to a person resident outside
India; or
2. by a person resident outside India.
A person resident in India may hold, own, transfer or invest in foreign
currency security or any immovable property situated outside India if such
currency, security or property was acquired, held or owned by such person
when he was resident outside India or inherited from a person who was
resident outside India.
A person resident outside India may hold, own, transfer or invest in Indian
currency or any immovable property situated in India if such currency,
security or property was held or owned by such person when he was
resident in India or inherited from a person resident in India.
The Reserve Bank may prohibit, restrict, or regulate establishment in India
of a branch office or other place of business by a person resident outside
India, for carrying on any activity relating to such branch, office or other
place of business.
The Reserve Bank shall not impose any restriction on the drawl of foreign
exchange payments due on account of amortization of loans or for
depreciation of direct investment in the ordinary course of business.
thousand rupees for every day after the first day during which the
contravention continues. This provision is in total contrast to the respective
provision in the erstwhile (former) FERA which provided for imprisonment
and no limit on fine. Under FEMA, a person will be liable to civil
imprisonment only if he does not pay the fine within 90 days from the date
of notice and that too after formalities show cause notice and personal
hearing. If he does not respond to the notice, there can be a warrant of
arrest.
COMPARISON CHART
BASIS FOR FERA FEMA
COMPARISON
Meaning An act promulgated, to FEMA an act initiated to
regulate payments and facilitate external trade
foreign exchange in India, and payments and to
is FERA. promote orderly
management of the forex
market in the country.
Enactment Old New
Number of 81 49
sections
Introduced when Foreign exchange Foreign exchange position
reserves were low. was satisfactory.
Approach Rigid Flexible
towards forex
transactions
Basis for Citizenship More than 6 months stay
determining in India
residential status
Violation Criminal offence Civil offence
Punishment for Imprisonment Fine or imprisonment (if
contravention fine not paid in the
stipulated time)
Question Bank:
1) Write a note on Foreign exchange management Act (FEMA) 1999.
OR
2) Write note on provisions of FAMA in India. Compare in brief between
FARA and FEMA.
OR
3) Describe the FEMA which has replaced FERA illustrating the major
changes it has brought in.
4) What are the provisions of double taxation relief in India? Explain
methods of giving relief from double taxation.
OR
Explain provisions of section 90 and 91 of Income Tax Act regarding
relief from double taxation. Explain methods of giving relief from
double taxation.
5) Write note on Method of Giving relief from Double Taxation.
6) Write a note on: Double taxation Avoidance agreement.
7) What is double taxation? How/In what ways relief against it can be
provided?
OR
8) What you mean by double taxation and double taxation relief?
Explain bilateral relief and unilateral relief
DISCLAIMER
THIS STUDY MATERIAL HAS BEEN COMPILED BY DR MITTAL THAKKAR TO
SUPPLEMENT THE STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING & LEARNING
WITHIN THE CLASS ROOM. STUDENTS ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO USE OTHER
SOURCES LIKE LIBRARY & REFERENCE BOOKS; MOREOVER THEY SHOULD
CONSULT THE SUBJECT TEACHER FOR THE SOLUTION OF THEIR PROBLEMS
IN ORDER TO ENHANCE THEIR SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE.