[1935] AC 524, 104 LJPC 88, 18 Asp MLC 551, [1935] All ER Rep 86, 79 Sol Jo 320, 153 LT 425
Court: PC
Judgment Date: 12/04/1935
Catchwords & Digest
CONTRACT - DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTUAL PROMISES - DISCHARGE BY RESCISSION FOR
BREACH OF CONTRACT - BY ELECTION TO TREAT CONTRACT AS AT AN END - WHEN RIGHT TO ELECT ARISES - INABILITY TO PERFORM - CAUSED BY PARTY'S OWN WILFUL ACT - CHARTERPARTY — NECESSITY FOR LICENCE TO OPERATE VESSEL — ELECTION TO OPERATE ANOTHER VESSEL Respondents were owners and appellants were charterers of a steam trawler which was fitted with, and could operate as a trawler only with, an otter trawl. By the charterparty the vessel could be used only in the fishing industry. The charterparty was renewed for a year from 25 October 1932. At that date both parties knew that a Canadian statute, which was applicable, made it an offence to leave a Canadian port with intent to fish with a vessel using an otter trawl, except under licence from the Minister. In March 1933, appellants applied to the Minister for licences for five trawlers which they were operating. The Minister intimated that only three licences would be granted, and requested appellants to name the three trawlers in respect of which the three licences should be granted. Appellants named three trawlers, excluding the trawler now in question, and accordingly licences were granted for those three only. Appellants thereupon claimed that they were no longer bound by the charterparty, and to an action claiming the charter hire pleaded that the charterparty had become impossible of performance and their obligations under it ended: Held there had been no frustration of the charterparty, as the absence of a licence was due to the election of appellants, who remained liable for the hire.
Cases referring to this case
Annotations: All CasesCourt: ALL COURTS Sort by: Judgment Date (Latest First) Treatment Case Name Citations Court Date [2019] EWHC 335 (Ch), Canary Wharf (BP4) 183 ConLR 167, [2019] T1 Ltd and other EGLR 17, [2019] CaseSearch Considered companies v ChD 20/02/2019 PLSCS 37, 169 NLJ Entry European Medicines 7831, [2019] All ER (D) Agency 154 (Feb) [1957] 2 QB 401, [1957] 2 All ER 70, Universal Cargo CaseSearch Considered [1957] 2 WLR 713, QBD 12/03/1957 Carriers Corpn v Citati Entry [1957] 1 Lloyd's Rep 174, 101 Sol Jo 320 Constantine (Joseph) [1942] AC 154, [1941] Steamship Line Ltd v 2 All ER 165, 70 Ll L CaseSearch Considered Imperial Smelting Rep 1, 110 LJKB 433, HL 01/05/1941 Entry Corpn Ltd, The 46 Com Cas 258, 165 Kingswood LT 27, 57 TLR 485 Page 2
Cases considered by this case
Annotations: All CasesCourt: ALL COURTS Sort by: Judgment Date (Latest First) Treatment Case Name Citations Court Date Larrinaga & Co Ltd v (1923) 92 LJKB 455, Société Franco- 16 Asp MLC 133, 29 CaseSearch Considered Américaine des Com Cas 1, [1923] All HL 16/03/1923 Entry Phosphates de ER Rep 1, 129 LT 65, Médulla, Paris 39 TLR 316 [1903] 2 KB 740, 72 LJKB 794, 52 WR 246, CaseSearch Considered Krell v Henry CA 11/08/1903 [1900-3] All ER Rep 20, Entry 89 LT 328, 19 TLR 711
National Transport Corp., As Owner of The Tanker, National Defender v. The Tug Abqaiq, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Arabian American Oil Company, Inc., 418 F.2d 1241, 2d Cir. (1969)