Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Though most evangelical Christians are familiar with the biblical concept of "signs" of
the End, they are less sure about what to make of these "signs," particularly in the light
of the wild and sensational claims that have accompanied the new millennium.
How can Christians distinguish true signs from false ones? Are all these "signs" really
signs? In short, will we ever know with absolute certainty that the return of Jesus is at
hand?
When the disciples asked Jesus (Matt. 24:3) about the "sign" of His coming and the end
of the age, He replied, " 'You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you
are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come " (Matt. 24:6
NIV, emphasis mine). Wars and rumors of wars made great signs of the End in Jewish
apocalyptic, but in Matthew 24 they do not herald the End; they are, instead, part of
1
" 'Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines
and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of birth pains' " (Matt.
24:7, 8, emphasis mine). Wars, famines, and earthquakes do not signal the End but the
beginning! The disciples asked for a sign of the End, Jesus gave them signs of the age.
These "signs" were not intended to stimulate speculation regarding the date of the End;
they were, rather, to remind us of Jesus' words, which encourage us to be watchful and
ready for the End at all times (Matt. 24:42-44).2
peace characterized Palestine in A.D. 31, there were "wars and rumors of wars"
throughout the A.D. 60s. There were famines (Acts 11:28), earthquakes (Laodicea in 60
A.D., Pompeii in 63, Jerusalem in 64, and Rome in 68 ), and heavenly signs. The New
4 5
lifetime (Col. 1:23; Rom. 1:8; 16:26). It is no wonder, then, that the apostles believed
that they were living in the last days (Acts 2:14-21; Heb. 1:2; 1 Peter 1:20; 1 John 2:18).
However, both Jesus and Paul portray the last days as somewhat normal times, in spite
of all the spectacular events. Like before the Flood (Matt. 24:37), people will pursue
9
their normal round of eating and drinking; even weddings will not be postponed (Matt.
24:38). As in the days of Lot, there will be buying and selling (Luke 17:28), which
suggests that the basic economic structure of the world remains. Planting and building
continues (Luke 17:28). Most people seem to have no premonition that the End is upon
them (Matt. 24:39).
In fact, Paul wrote that the terrible destructions associated with the Second Coming
itself (see 2 Thess. 1:5-10) will come when people are proclaiming "peace and safety" (1
Thess. 5:2-3). To many, the last days may seem like a golden age of peace and
prosperity. The troubles, disasters, social disruptions, and persecutions of the end time
will be on the radar screen, but will not seem out of proportion to normal times. The
majority, perhaps the vast majority, will be surprised to see the End come when it does.
But even when information is reasonably solid, it is imperative to look at the evidence
from all sides. Those who emphasize the nearness of the End love to talk about rising
crime statistics, catastrophic earthquakes and floods, wars and rumors of wars,
imminent economic collapse, and declining morality. But credibility is severely damaged
when we ignore solid contrary evidence. For ex ample, many sincere Christians have
been predicting imminent economic collapse since 1982. The irony is that the last
seventeen years have witnessed the greatest economic boom in the history of the human
race.
But what if your information is unquestionably solid, balanced, and carefully verified?
You still have to determine whether it is of any spiritual significance. Just because
events are taking a course that reminds us of a particular prophecy, it doesn't mean that
this particular event is what that prophecy was pointing to. Just because former
American President Bush proclaimed a New World Order, it doesn't prevent a new
world disorder from being just around the corner; and even if this New World Order
came, it doesn't mean it's the eschatological one we've been expecting. We damage the
credibility of all preaching about the End when we use inaccurate information, are
selective in our use of solid evidence, or make exaggerated claims that are inappropriate
to our level of expertise.
In A.D. 95, the author of Revelation considered Jesus' coming to be near (Rev.
1:3; 22:10,12). So, a Western chronological understanding of "nearness" is clearly false
in light of the passage of 2,000 years since the New Testament was written. From an
Eastern perspective, nearness seems to be much more a state of mind than a
chronological datum.
But is there any sense in which the coming of Jesus is chronologically nearer now than it
was in the first century? Of course. Note this comment on the wording in Matthew
24:33,36: "One saying of the Saviour must not be made to destroy another. Though no
man knoweth the day nor the hour of His coming, we are instructed and required to
know when it is near" (emphasis is part of the quote) .For this writer, Ellen White, the
10
coming was near because by her day the time prophecies leading to the time of the End
had been fulfilled.
Seventh-day Adventist students of Daniel and Revelation know that while the "last days"
truly began in New Testament times, the time of the End is a much more recent
phenomenon. With the passing of the great time prophecies of Daniel and Revelation,
11
we now live in the time of the End. So these are not just ordinary times. The year 2000
is much closer to the End than the year 1000 was. From the Bible's prophetic outlook we
know that since 1798 and 1844 this world's history is writing its final chapter. Though
we cannot know with certainty that this is the final generation we certainly know that
things can wind up very soon.
Though current events should not be used to encourage date setting, we are certainly
living in times like those the Bible associates with the End. Knowledge is increasing with
breathtaking rapidity (Dan. 12:4). The Internet and satellite broadcasting make it
possible for the whole world to hear the gospel quickly (Matt. 24:14). Unprecedentedly
far-reaching divisions among nations are rife; weapons of mass destruction, not heard of
just a few years ago, are in increasingly unstable hands. Rebellion, profanity,
perversions, and violence seem to have an omnipresence and potency unparalleled in
human history (2 Tim. 3:1-5).
The question for us is, How do we accurately, and responsibly, interpret them?
1. An excellent summary of the early Jewish perspective on signs can be found in D. S. Russell, The Method and
Menage of Jewish Apocalyptic (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1964), 271-276. The Jewish under standing of
signs, which the disciples of Jesus would have shared, was based on the Day of Yahweh passages in the Old
Testament. It was felt that the near approach of the End would be marked by wars, wickedness, earthquakes,
famines, and heavenly portents, among other things. Jesus is not inventing the concept of signs, He is
moderating their impact on the disciples.
2. Jesus does seem to give a measurable sign of the nearness of the End in Matthew 24:14. The End will come
when the gospel has been preached to the whole world. Yes, the gospel must be preached to the world before
the Lord comes, but it is not the kind of sign you can base a calculation on. After all, Paul had the impression
that this sign had been fulfilled already in his day (Col. 1:23). The only sign that meets the disciples' intention is
the " 'sign of the Son of man' " in Matthew 24:30. But this appears to be the literal glory that surrounds Jesus
Himself at His coming. Those who wait for this sign will be too late. Jesus' response to His disciples is
disappointing to me in a way. It would seem easier for us if He would have given us all the details about the
End, and the events leading up to it; then we could line them all up, see exactly where we are, and know when
we have to get ready. But apparently that
wasn't Jesus' purpose. Apparently that wouldn't have been the best thing for us. What then was His purpose in
this chapter? He gives us that in Matthew 24:42." 'Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day
your Lord will come' " (emphasis mine).
4. On ancient earthquakes see A. Hermann, "Erdbeben," in Reallexikon fuer Antike und Christentum, edited by
Theodor Klauser, vol. 5 (Stuttgart: Anton Heirsemann, 1962), 1070-1113.Note especially the list of first-century
earthquakes on page
1104. It is reported that the quake in Jerusalem damaged the newly finished temple, just before the Roman
sieges began in A.D. 66: G. A. Turner, "Earthquake," The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, revised
edition, edited by Geoffrey Bromiley (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1982), 2:4, 5.
5. See the account that Ellen White drew from Josephus in The Great Controversy, 1911 ed. (Nampa, Idaho:
Pacific Press Pub. Assn., 1950), 29.
6. Note evidence for heretical movements within the church of the first century in 1 and 2 Corinthians,
Galatians, Colossians, 2 Peter, 1 and 2 John, Jude, and Revelation 2, 3 (note 2:20 especially).
7. A careful examination of this text, of course, would include it among those mentioned earlier that indicate the
"last days" as a present reality in New Testament times. Paul instructs his readers to "have nothing to do" with
people already acting in this way. The "sign" of apostasy and social unrest has been with us from the beginning
of the Christian era.
8. For an analysis of current events in the light of the New Testament picture of the end time see Jon
Paulien, The Millennium Bug, (Nampa, Idaho: Pacific Press Pub. Assn., 1999), 9-43 and What the Bible Says
About the End-Time (Hagerstown, Md.: Review and Herald Pub. Assn., 1994), 139- 159. Samuele Bacchiocchi is
offering an ongoing analysis of end-time signs at the following listserv: sbacchiocchi@qtm.net.
9. Roy Adams, "The Final Days Normalcy," Adventist Review, April 21, 1994, 4.
11. Seventh-day Adventists understand the time of the End to have begun at the time of the relatively-recent
events surrounding the French Revolution. For a scholarly study of the distinction between the last days and
the time of the End, see Gerhard Pfandl, The Time of the End in the Book of Daniel (Berrien Springs, Mich:
Adventist Theological Society Publications, 1992).