Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hyperostosis cranii
Radiography and scintigraphy compared
To cite this article: H. Jacobsson & M. Haverling (1988) Hyperostosis cranii, Acta Radiologica,
29:2, 223-226, DOI: 10.3109/02841858809174997
HYPEROSTOSIS CRANII
H. JACOBSSON
and M. HAVERLING
223
224 H . JACOBSSON A N D M . HAVERLING
Fig. 1. Lateral view of the skull of a 53-year-old woman with Fig. 2. Lateral view of the skull of a 73-year-old woman with
hyperostosis cranii. a) Radiograph showing moderate frontal le- hyperostosis cranii. a) Radiograph showing very marked fronto-
sions (2+). b) Bone scintigram showing marked frontal activity parietal lesions ( 5 + ) . b) Bone scintigram showing moderate activ-
(4+). ity corresponding to the lesions (2+).
Scintlyraphlc
included at least one frontal and two lateral views. The score
scintigraphic examination was performed as an analogous
registration with a General Electric 400 Maxicamera 2 to 3
hours after the intravenous injection of 500 MBq 9 9 T ~ m -
methylendiphosphonate. The examination included at
least one lateral registration from each side. The time
interval between the two examinations never exceeded
two weeks. The radiographs and the scintigrams were
evaluated independently. The degree of hyperostotic
changes and the radionuclide activity of the lesions were
.
scored according to a semiquantitative scale 1+ to 5+,
+
where 1 represented mild (‘incipient’) changedactivity,
and 5+ very marked changedactivity (Figs 1, 2). By
including only cases with frontal and fronto-parietal hy-
perostosis in the study, a reasonable correspondence be-
tween the areas evaluated by the two modalities could be
ensured.
Fig. 3. Relation between radiographic changes and activity at
Statistical methods. When analysing the relation be- bone scintigraphy in hyperostosis cranii as assessed by a semi-
tween radiographic and scintigraphic score (Fig. 3) rank- quantitative scale. An inverse relation is suggested, but the corre-
correlation was used. When comparing the age of the lation is not statistically significant.
HYPEROSTOSIS CRANII 225
. ..
Radiographic
score
Mean age Standard
deviation
Results
1
5. During the present study it was confirmed that HC
66 106 exhibits a characteristic appearance at bone scintigraphy
4.
that is usually easy to recognize and distinguish from
metastases. HC typically appears as symmetric frontal or
fronto-parietal lesions of variable extent, flaring laterally
3. from and sparing the midline.
. ..
By plotting the scintigraphic score against the radio-
I
2. . . a .
graphic score, as illustrated in Fig. 3, a negative correla-
tion between radiographic and scintigraphic score is sug-
.
50 105
gested but cannot be statistically proven.
1. The radiographic score plotted against the age of the
patient is seen in Fig. 4. There was a significant tendency
L, .
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Age(years)
of more marked hyperostotic changes with increasing age.
The relation between age and scintigraphic activity was
Fig. 4. Relation between age and radiographic changes in hyper- plotted in the same way as illustrated in Fig. 5 This shows
ostosis cranii as assessed by a semiquantitative scale. The small a significant tendency of decreasing activity of the lesions
number of patients scored I + and 5+ are added to the groups of with increasing age.
2+ and 4+ respectively. By separately comparing the three
groups thus obtained, the only significant difference (p<O.Ol) of
age which could be demonstrated was group 1 +2 versus group 3 Discussion
and group 4+5, respectively. Thus, at higher ages the endosteal
Reports on scintigraphy of HC are scarce in the litera-
lesions are more prominent.
ture and series of cases have not been published. Tran-
sient diminution of activity in the frontal areas at brain
scintigraphy in cases of hyperostosis frontalis interna has
Sclntigraphlc Mean age Standard
score deviation been reported (3). Strongly increased accumulation of
bone-seeking tracer in the frontal lesions of hyperostosis
frontalis interna has been described in a single case, on
the basis of which the ‘classical’ scintigraphic findings of
the entity have been defined (9). By the present study it is
confirmed that HC usually can be recognized at bone
scintigraphy. However, the scintigram does not parallel
the radiographic findings. The tendency of an opposite
development of radiographic changes and activity at bone
scintigraphy with increasing age explains the lack of posi-
tive correlation between the two diagnostic techniques. A
negative correlation may exist but could not be proven in
this material. However, since bone scintigraphy reflects
metabolic activity and vascularity rather than radiograph-
4/ 3’0 4b 60 6’0 7’0
Age(years1
ic lucency, this discrepancy between radiographic and
scintigraphic findings is not inconsistent (2).
Fig. 5. Relation between age and scintigraphic activity of the
endosteal lesions in hyperostosis cranii as assessed by a semi-
The semiquantitative scoring system used is based on
quantitative scale. The small number of patients scored 5+ are subjective criteria, but if applied by the same interpreter
added to the group of 4 + . By separately comparing the four they should be useful measures for evaluation. Similar
groups thus obtained, the only significant difference (p<O.Ol) of quantitation systems have been used by other investiga-
age which could be demonstrated was group 4+5 versus group 1, tors for mapping the radiographic extent of HC (6, 7). The
group 2 and group 3, respectively. Thus, at higher ages the
scintigraphic activity is lower. age variations between most groups of Figs 4 and 5 were
small due to a large variation within the groups, presum-
ably caused by a considerable interindividual variation of
the rate of development of the changes and of the age at
the onset of the process. The natural history of HC is
different radiographic and scintigraphic score groups (Figs unknown. In earlier reports HC was claimed to be a
4, 5) one-way analysis of variance followed by a multi- progressive condition which increases with age (1 1). Lat-
comparison procedure was carried out. The distribution er, it has been claimed not to be an age phenomenon,
of age within groups was checked for assumptions re- reaching a maximum at 40 to 60 years, and then rapidly
quired for the use of analysis of variance. diminishing (5). It has also been concluded that HC is a
15-888082
226 n. JACOBSSON AND M . HAVERLING
process of irregular course; once started it may progress slowly, tending towards a stabilization in the process with
but it can also be stabilized or show regression (6). These increasing age.
studies were based on large series of single radiographic
Requesf for reprints: Dr Hans Jacobsson, Department of Diag
examinations of women of different age. Thus, an appar- nostic Radiology, Karolinska Sjukhuset, P. 0. Box 60500, S-
ent decrease with increasing age could be due to the 10401 Stockholm. Sweden.
affected individuals not reaching old age owing to patho-
logic processes associated with HC ( 5 ) . Since the present
cases have been selected for HC from a larger material, REFERENCES
they do not allow conclusions concerning prevalence fig- 1. DIHLMANN W.: Computerized tomography in typical hyper-
ures at different ages. However, the tendency of more ostosis cranii (THC). Europ. J. Radiol. 1 (1982), 2.
pronounced radiographic changes with increasing age sup- 2. GALASKO C. S. B.: Mechanism of uptake of bone imaging
ports the view of HC being a progressive condition that isotopes by skeletal metastases. Clin. Nucl. Med. 5 (1980),
565.
does not undergo regression at higher ages. This is also 3 . HAHNF. J. Y.,STINEE. J., SCHAPIRO R. L. and CHRISTIE 1.
consistent with the decreasing scintigraphic activity with H.: Scintigraphic findings in hyperostosis frontalis interna.
increasing age, since bone resorption and bone remodel- Radiology 122 (1977), 409.
ling would give rise to increased activity at bone scintigra- 4. LEIBERB. und OLBRICH G.: Die klinischen Syndrome. Sixth
edition, p 706. Urban und Schwarzenberg, Miinchen, Wien,
phy (2, 10). Baltimore,l981.
Since the cases investigated were all part of a larger 5 . LENGYEL E. and HORVATH F.: Gerontological aspects of hy-
series of patients with mammary carcinoma, the present perostosis frontalis interna. Aktuel. Gerontol. 8 (1978). 113.
material obviously represents a selection, even though 6. MARLETJ. J. C.: Development of cranial hyperostosis. A
cases with suspected metastases of the skull were ex- radiological approach to a process. Radiol. Clin. Biol. 43
(1974), 473.
cluded. Consequently, as a matter of principle, conclu- 7. MOORES.: Hyperostosis cranii. Charles C. Thomas, Spring
sions should be restricted to this group of patients. How- field 1955.
ever, considering the fact that the present cases exhibited 8. MORGAGNI G. B.: Adversario anatomica, Animadversio 74.
a radiographic appearance identical with that of HC in Padova 1719. (Quoted by 4.)
general, and this being a frequent condition, our findings 9. NOVETSKY G. J . and BERLINL.: Bone scintigraphy in hyperos-
tosis frontalis interna. Clin. Nucl. Med. 7 (1982). 265.
permit us to formulate a working hypothesis for future 10. PRAKASHV . , KAMELN. J . , LIN M. S. and KRISSJ. P.:
testing on a population without potential systemic bone Increased skeletal localization of w"Tc-diphosphonate in
affection. paralyzed limbs. Clin. Nucl. Med. 1 (1976), 48.
Thus, it is proposed that HC starts in younger or middle 11. SALMIA,, VOUTILAINEN A., HOLSTIL. R. and UNNBRUS
C.-E.: Hyperostosis cranii in a normal population. Amer.
aged women, and that in earlier phases of the develop- J. Roentgenol. 87 (1962), 1032.
ment the osseous turnover is high. Successively, the 12. WILINDER J.: Hyperostosis frontalis interna and mental mor-
metabolic activity decreases while the deposits grow very bidity. Brit. J. Psychiat. 131 (1977), 155.