Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cone-beam computed tomography provides orthodontists with 3-dimensional images of the craniofacial region
and valuable information for diagnosis and treatment planning of craniofacial or dental anomalies. However,
a narrow focus on the skeletal and dental contributions to malocclusion can cause failure to identify skeletal
or soft-tissue pathologies of the craniofacial structures unrelated to the orthodontic concerns. Two cases are
presented that demonstrate skeletal and soft-tissue anomalies identified as incidental findings on cone-beam
computed tomography scans of asymptomatic orthodontics patients. One patient was diagnosed with
craniofacial fibrous dysplasia; the other had an intrahemispheric lipoma. Their cone-beam computed
tomography images are presented, along with a literature review on their pathologies. (Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:888-92)
C
one-beam computed tomography (CBCT) ex-
pands the imaging options for clinicians by
providing volumetric information unobtainable
with standard radiographs. This option is especially
valuable in orthodontics, in which diagnosis is made in
3 planes of space.1 Along with the increased power to
accurately diagnose malocclusion in 3 dimensions,
CBCT imposes on clinicians an obligation to evaluate
the entire imaged volume for pathology.2-4 Thus,
clinicians using CBCT for diagnosis must have a strong
knowledge of normal head and neck anatomy.
Although CBCT is most useful for imaging
skeletal structures, soft tissues are also imaged, albeit
at a lower contrast resolution.5 Orthodontists focused
on diagnosing the skeletal and dental contributions to
malocclusion might fail to recognize abnormalities in
craniofacial structures captured in the CBCT images. Fig 1. Lateral cephalogram of 12-year-old Hispanic girl sug-
To highlight the need to evaluate both the mineralized gesting sphenoid opacification anterior to the sella turcica.
and soft-tissue components of CBCT images, we present
2 cases of incidental findings in the initial CBCT
radiographs taken of orthodontics patients.
a
Postdoctoral fellow, Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Den-
tistry, University of California, Los Angeles.
b
Professor and chair, Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Den-
PATIENT 1: FIBROUS DYSPLASIA
tistry, University of California, Los Angeles. A 12-year-old Hispanic girl came to the orthodontic
c
Assistant professor, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School
of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. clinic at the University of California at Los Angeles for
The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the screening. Her past medical history was significant for
products or companies described in this article. a lymphoma on the left side of the neck at age 3.5 years;
Reprint requests to: Jeanne M. Nervina, University of Michigan School of
Dentistry, 1011 N University Ave, Dentistry 2158, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; it was surgically excised with no recurrence. The clinical ex-
e-mail, jnervina@umich.edu. amination showed a mild overbite and a slight asymmetry
Submitted, January 2012; revised and accepted, March 2012. of the face. The patient was referred to the university's Oral
0889-5406/$36.00
Copyright Ó 2013 by the American Association of Orthodontists. and Maxillofacial Radiology Clinic for panoramic, lateral
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.037 cephalometric, and CBCT examinations.
888
Barghan, Tetradis, and Nervina 889
Fig 2. CBCT images of the patient in Figure 1, confirming the sclerotic changes and defining the extent
to the right lesser wing of the sphenoid and frontal bones (arrows) in A, the axial plane; B, the coronal
plane; and C, the sagittal plane.
Fig 3. Medical computed tomography images of the patient in Figure 1, demonstrating the sclerotic
changes to the right lesser wing of the sphenoid and frontal bones in A, the axial plane; B, the coronal
plane; and C, the sagittal plane. D, There was no reduction in the diameter of the right optic nerve root
foramen or the superior orbital fissure.
The lateral cephalograph was initially seen as normal, dysplastic changes of the roof of the right orbital fossa
although in retrospect sphenoid opacification anterior to and the superior margin of the greater wing of the
the sella turcica could be identified (Fig 1). The CBCT im- sphenoid. There was no reduction in the diameter of
ages showed expansion and loss of cortication and tra- the right optic nerve root foramen or the superior orbital
becular architecture of the right frontal bone that fissure (Fig 3).
extended to the lesser wing of the sphenoid. These MRI scans of the brain and orbits with contrast were
changes, along with the ground-glass or homogeneous carried out to assess the optic nerve canal. There were
sclerotic appearance of this region, were consistent hyperostotic changes to the roof of the right orbit and
with fibrous dysplasia (Fig 2). lesser wing of the sphenoid bone. There was no obvious
The patient was referred for medical computed compromise to the optic nerve as it transited the canal,
tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of and the brain was normal (Fig 4). (Because of the fixed
the brain. Consistent with the CBCT findings, the orthodontic appliances, substantial phase artifacts
medical computed tomography image showed fibrous obscured the tail of the orbital fossa.)
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics June 2013 Vol 143 Issue 6
890 Barghan, Tetradis, and Nervina
Fig 4. MRI images of A, the brain; B and C, the optic nerve of the patient in Figure 1, showing bony
changes but no significant pathology in the brain.
June 2013 Vol 143 Issue 6 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Barghan, Tetradis, and Nervina 891
Fig 6. CBCT examination of the patient in Figure 5, showing a radiolucent lesion in the right anterior
temporal lobe of the brain in A, the axial plane; B, the coronal plane; and C, the sagittal plane.
Fig 7. A, Axial; B, sagittal water-saturated T1-weighted; and C, axial fat-saturated T2-weighted MRI
images of the patient show the lipid-rich lesion in the temporal lobe.
a-stimulating activity polypeptide I (GNAS-1) gene, and Albright patients have the poorest prognosis. In all
is characterized by fibrous replacement of mineralized fibrous dysplasia cases, extensive fibrous replacement re-
bone.8,9 Fibrous dysplasia has a clinical spectrum and duces the long-term prognosis. Treatment involves phar-
can be monostotic or polyostotic; the latter is part of maceutical agents, beginning with mild pain relievers
the McCune-Albright syndrome with or without and bisphosphonates to reduce bone resorption. Nutri-
precocious puberty, or the McCune-Albright syndrome tional supplementation with calcium, vitamin D, and
with other endocrine disorders.10 Bone pain, deformities, phosphorous is also used to promote mineralization. Sur-
and fractures caused by a weakened bone structure are gery to correct the skeletal deformity is also warranted.
common clinical features. If fibrous dysplasia is Fibrous dysplasia accounts for 5% to 7% of all bone
suspected in an orthodontic patient, medical referral is tumors.11 Unlike fibrous dysplasia, intracranial lipomas
required for a definitive diagnosis, which requires are quite rare, with an incidence of less than 0.1%.12
a bone biopsy or genetic screening for the GNAS-1 Most intracranial lipomas are located near the corpus
mutation. The prognosis depends on where in the callosum and are usually asymptomatic, although the
fibrous dysplasia spectrum the patient falls and the patient might have chronic headaches, convulsions,
extent of skeletal involvement. Monostotic patients psychomotor deficits, or cranial nerve dysfunction.12
have the best long-term prognosis, whereas McCune- Surgical removal is rarely indicated since these tumors
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics June 2013 Vol 143 Issue 6
892 Barghan, Tetradis, and Nervina
are usually not lethal and the surgical risks outweigh 5. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust
nontreatment.12 Dent J 2008;53(Supp 1):S11-25.
6. Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C,
These 2 patients demonstrate that both skeletal and
Nair MK, et al. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial
soft-tissue pathologies can be detected with CBCT imag- Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and in-
ing. Clinicians using these images for their patients must terpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral
be alert to any possible lesions throughout the Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:
craniofacial region. This is particularly important in the 561-2.
7. Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial
evaluation of orthodontic patients when large field-of-
area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod
view volumetric scans that image most of the patient's Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:7-14.
skull are used. Incidental findings occur in approxi- 8. Shenker A, Weinstein LS, Sweet DE, Spiegel AM. An activating Gs
mately 25% of CBCT images, and not all of them have alpha mutation is present in fibrous dysplasia of bone in the
associated symptoms.7 As with conventional cephalo- McCune-Albright syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;79:
750-5.
metric and panoramic radiographs,13 CBCT scans should
9. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, Merino MJ, Friedman E,
first be considered skull images and interpreted by Spiegel AM. Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein
a specialist familiar with the anatomy, normal variants, in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med 1991;325:
and anomalies of the craniofacial structures.4,6,14 1688-95.
10. Chapurlat RD, Orcel P. Fibrous dysplasia of bone and McCune-
REFERENCES Albright syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008;22:
55-69.
1. Mah JK, Huang JC, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam 11. DiCaprio MR, Enneking WF. Fibrous dysplasia. Pathophysiology,
computed tomography in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; evaluation, and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:
141(Supp 3):7S-13S. 1848-64.
2. Tetradis S, White SC. A decade of cone beam computed tomogra- 12. Yildiz H, Hakyemez B, Koroglu M, Yesildag A, Baykal B. Intracra-
phy. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38:24-6. nial lipomas: importance of localization. Neuroradiology 2006;
3. Zinman EJ, White SC, Tetradis S. Legal considerations in the use of 48:1-7.
cone beam computer tomography imaging. J Calif Dent Assoc 13. Tetradis S, Kantor ML. Prevalence of skeletal and dental anomalies
2010;38:49-56. and normal variants seen in cephalometric and other radiographs
4. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics. Joint of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;
Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists 116:572-7.
and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. 14. Turpin DL. Befriend your oral and maxillofacial radiologist. Am J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:234-7. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:697.
June 2013 Vol 143 Issue 6 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics