Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The FIAT bogie is a two-axle type with two stage are used. Static stress analysis of two bogie frames, namely the
suspensions. This bogie belongs to the two-axle type, with a FIAT bogie frame and the New CASNUB bogie frame, is
primary suspension and a secondary. The bogie frame is carried out and the cumulative stress in both structures is
composed of two Y-shaped longitudinal beam side members calculated. Reducing the weight of the bogie frame helps to
connected by two tubular steel members. The Y shaped side reduce the force needed to drive the railway vehicle, indirectly
members consist of structural steel, and box sections are created helping to reduce energy consumption during service [1].
by welding. The system has a minimum force of 510 N / mm2. Analysis of finite elements is one of the methods often used for
Bogie is designed to run at average speeds of 160 kmph and has stress analysis. To evaluate the critical regions in the chassis
operating capacity of up to 200 kmph. FIAT bogie uses 4 frame, finite element analysis with necessary boundary
primary vertical, 2 secondary vertical, one lateral secondary, conditions is used. Static analysis was performed to assess the
and 2 dampers with yaw. Figure.1 and 2 represents the Salient area of highest stress [3]. Working with the FE models saves
features of LHB coach and Fiat Bogie respectively. Table 1 time and costs during railway vehicle development processes
represent Design Features of LHB Coaches and FIAT bogies and complex simulations can be easily carried out at all design
[9]. stages [3,4]. The reliability of the individual parts influences the
performance of the entire vehicle significantly. Bending and
loss of an individual part's efficiency will cause the vehicle's
related regions to lose stability. Structures can experience
stability loss in two ways: (a) Bending or buckling of the entire
structure. (b) Part(s) of the structure lacks functionality and
thereby creates a lack of stability for the entire structure.
Therefore, it is important to coordinate deformations between
components and the structure as a whole. That requires that
each component deform at the same rate and thus keep its axis
Fig. 1. LHB Coach
in the same direction [5]. Working with the database model
saves both time and cost throughout the process of virtual
creation. Complex structural dynamics equations have been
developed to estimate the vehicle's ride comfort [6]. In FE
analyses, various static loading cases specified in standards
such as UIC CODE OR 577 and ERRI B12/RP17[1] can be
used to obtain static structural behaviour of railway vehicles,
i.e. stress and strain distribution. [7].
Literature survey reveals that different methodologies were
adopted by researchers across the world in the study of the static
behavior of the rail coach and bogie. In most of the literature,
Finite element analysis is used for the study of railway coach
and bogie as well as to analyses its static response. FE software
has been found vital in performing dynamic analysis and also
Fig. 2. FIAT Bogie finding the critical stresses and deformation of the vehicle under
static and operating conditions.
Table 1
Design Features of LHB Coaches and FIAT Bogies
3. Methodology
S.No. Parameter Value Unit
1 Length over body 23540 mm The main components of the vehicle system such as wheel,
2 Maximum width over body 3240 mm bogie frame, body of the car, and so on are built separately using
3 Maximum axle load Permissible 16 Tonne Solid works 2016 package and then the Parasolid file is
4 Bogie wheel base 2560 mm
5 Width of the bogie frame 2240 mm
imported into Ansys 19.2 work bench software for static
6 Mass of total bogie 6.33 Tonne analysis.
7 Secondary spring mass/bogie 0.94 Tonne
8 Primary spring mass/bogie 2.61 Tonne
A. Geometric modeling of LHB Coach and FIAT Bogie
9 Bogie Length 3534 mm The present study is focused on the static analysis of LHB
10 Bogie Width 3030 mm Coach with FIAT Bogies. The geometric model of the Coach
11 Distance between bogie centres of the coach 14900 mm
with Bogies is modeled in Solid works 2016 Modeling package
is shown in Fig. 3 and 4.
2. Literature Survey
For evaluating the static and dynamic behavior of railway
vehicles, numerical methods and experimental measurements
International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management 350
Volume-3, Issue-3, March-2020
www.ijresm.com | ISSN (Online): 2581-5792
hence the allowable stress for the material is 355 N/mm2. From the bogie bolster the greatest deformation is found. From the
the FE model analysis, stresses induced, deformation in the results, we infer that the coach is in safer limits as the ratio
coach and von mises stress distribution, equivalent strain is as between the material's permissible stress and the average stress
shown in the figure 7, 8 & 9. Maximum von mises stress generated at any point in the entire structure is higher than 1.
induced in the coach is 150 N/mm2. The maximum equivalent
strain in the coach is 1.5 x 10-4 m/m. References
[1] Chodeshwar Korsa, Veera Bhadraiah, Dora Bharadwaj, “Stress Analysis
[2] of Bogie Frame Structure,” Master’s Degree thesis, ISRN: BTH-AMT-
EX--2017/D15--SE. Dept. of Mechanical engineering, Abbrev. Blekinge
Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2017.
[3] Rusu-Casandra Aurelia Liliana, Baciu Florin, Iliescu Nicolae, Atanasiu
Costica, “Stresses in a Bogie Frame of a Rail Carriage,” in 25th DAAAM.,
Romania, 2014.
[4] Archit Tomar, Dheer Singh, “Static analysis, Modal analysis and design
modification in chassis frame to optimize weight by using composite
material,” IJME, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 101-108, Dec-Jan.2016.
[5] Baykasoglu, Sunbuloglu, “Numerical static and dynamic stress analysis
on railway passenger and freight car models,” in International Iron & Steel
Symposium., Türkiye, 2012.
[6] Xue, Schmid, Smith, “Analysis of the structural characteristics of an
intermediate rail vehicle and their effect on vehicle crash performance,”
JRRT, vol. 221, Part F, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, pp. 339-352,
Fig. 7. Equivalent Stress (Von-Mises stress) 2007.
[7] Stribersky, Moser, Rulka, “Structural dynamics and ride comfort of a rail
vehicle system’,” in Proc. Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 33, pp.
541–552, July 2002.
[8] Doğan Onur Arısoy, Oğuzhan Ahan, Kenan Müderrisoğlu, Meral
Bayraktar, “Static and dynamic analysis of railway wagon trailer bogie in
computer environment,” in IWRSE12, Türkiye, 2012.
[9] RCAMTECH. (Indian Railways Centre for Advanced Maintenance
Technology), “Maintenance manual for AC LHB Coaches,” Gwalior,
2013.
[10] IRICEN. (Indian Railway Institute of civil engineering), “Monograph on
Fiat Bogie (LHB Coaches),” Pune, 2016.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, static stress analysis of LHB coach with FIAT
Bogie are presented. From the results of static stress analysis,
we conclude that maximum Von Mises stresses in the ANSYS
model of the LHB coach with FIAT bogie induced are lesser
than the allowable stresses. In the coach Bogie frame the
highest stress and corresponding strains are observed. Within