Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sabri Tekin1, Berrin Erok 2, Nu Nu Win3, Elidor Agolli3, Alper Uçak4, Hüseyin Akyol5,
Assiya el Mounjali6, Murat Başaran4
Financiamiento:
Ninguno.
1) Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Bahcesehir
Conflicto de intereses: University, İstanbul, Turkey
Ninguno 2) Department of Radiology, Prof. Dr Cemil Tascıoglu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
3) Department of Radiology, Medicana Bahcelievler Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
4) Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medicana Bahcelievler Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Recibido: 08-01-2021 5) Department of General Surgery, Altınbas University School of Medicine Bahcelievler Medical Park
Corregido: 19-04-2021 Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Aceptado: 21-05-2021 6) Medical student of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, İstanbul, Turkey
walls, peritoneal, retroperitoneal and pelvic cavities vein showed obstruction of iliac veins and the
(Figures 1 and 2). As an incidental finding, an IVC in association with patent venous collaterals.
accessory right infrahepatic vein was also observed (Figure 2)
(Figure 3). Venography from the right femoral
Fig. 1a.
Figure 2.
a, b) IV contrast enhanced portal venous phase
abdominopelvic CT images show pelvic collateral
veins (2a, 2b, thick arrows). Dilated venous
collaterals involving the abdominal walls are
visible (2a, 2b, short arrows). c) Venography from
the right femoral vein show obstruction of the IVC
and iliac veins in association with dilated patent
venous collaterals (c, thin arrow)
Fig. 2a.
Considering the young age of the patient, we transplantation from his father in whom AT
decided to try a new technique; the use of a deficiency was ruled out, was made. Their blood
prosthetic graft with anastomose to the IVC for groups were the same, the panel reactive antibody
a direct venous drainage. The difficulty of the (PRA) and the lymphocytes crossmatch tests were
procedure was explained to the patient and his negative. He shared an haplotype with its donor
family. After meeting with the transplantation regarding the human leucocyte antigen (HLA)
team, the decision to perform living-related kidney compatibility for class I or class II. (Table 1)
Warfarin was discontinued and low-molecular- vascularization was detected on both sides of the
weight heparin (LMWH) was started 48 abdominal wall in the pre-operative imaging, a
hours before the scheduled live-donor kidney long median incision in order not to damage the
transplantation. Since diffuse collateral collateral circulation was performed. A Cattell-
Braasch maneuver (complete mobilization of the distal part of the ureter for anastomosis with the
distal small bowel, right colon, and duodenum) transplanted kidney’s ureter. The right hepatic
was performed to allow identification of the iliac vein was suspended and the accessory hepatic
vessels and IVC. The IVC, bilateral iliac and renal vein draining the segment 6 & 7 was ligated at its
veins were found to be completely occluded and hepatic site. At its cava site, the accessory hepatic
fibrotic. After mobilizing the right lobe of the vein stump was extended downstream into the
liver, it was noted that the retrohepatic IVC was retrohepatic IVC, and a 14 mm PTFE graft was
also thrombosed and fibrotic. Right nephrectomy used to extend the transplant renal vein into the
was performed with the preservation of the recipient’s retrohepatic IVC (Figure 4).
Figure 4: a) Intraoperative image shows the donor kidney (thin black arrow), venous graft with anastomosis
to suprahepatic IVC (thick white arrow) and the arterial graft (short black arrow). The site of renal vein
anastomosis on the graft is shown (thin white arrow). b, c, d) Postoperative CT images show the venous (b,
arrow) and the arterial (c, arrow) grafts. The transplanted kidney with renal vein graft is shown (d, arrow)
Fig. 4a.
Fig. 4b.
Venous drainage was attained to the suprahepatic to the aorta. After reperfusion of the graft, the kidney
IVC. The renal artery of the graft was anastomosed had good coloration. There was palpable pulse in
Table 2. Postoperative labo- Pre-op 1st day post-op 3rd day post-op 5th day post-op
creatinine 8.16 mg/dl 5.36 mg/dl 3.4 mg/dl 1.71 mg/dl
ratory values
urea 90 mg/dl 73 mg/dl 88 mg/dl 73 mg/dl
e-GFR 7.95 mL/min/1.73 m2 12.45 22.945 59.0745
mL/min/1.73 m2 mL/min/1.73 m2 mL/min/1.73 m2
BUN 42 mg/dl 34 mg/dl 41 mg/dl 34 mg/dl
e-GFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; BUN: blood urea nitrogen
opacified blood returning from lower limbs should treatment of hereditary antithrombin deficiency. An
be kept in mind to avoid misdiagnosis of this filling update. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101(5):806-12.
defect as a thrombus. In equivocal cases, increasing 6) Hallett JW, Jr., Mills JL, Earnshaw JJ, Reekers JA,
the delay after contrast material injection to 70- Rooke TW. Comprehensive vascular and endovascular
90 seconds allows more uniform enhancement of surgery [e-Book]. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2009.
the entire IVC. Admixture artifact can also result 7) Hertig A, Rondeau E. Role of the coagulation/
from a contrast material injection rate faster than 3 fibrinolysis system in fibrin-associated glomerular
mL/sec or retrograde flow of contrast material into injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(4):844-53. doi:
the IVC due to right heart failure.(14-15) 10.1097/01.asn.0000115400.52705.83.
8) Eneriz-Wiemer M, Sarwal M, Donovan D, Costaglio
CONCLUSION C, Concepción W, Salvatierra O Jr. Successful
The presence of IVC occlusion should not prevent a renal transplantation in high-risk small children
patient from having a kidney transplant and other with a completely thrombosed inferior vena cava.
alternatives should be searched. Careful assessment Transplantation. 2006;82(9):1148-52. doi: 10.1097/01.
of appropriate options for venous drainage helps tp.0000236644.76359.47.
to define an approach that will allow long-term 9) Cauley RP, Potanos K, Fullington N, Lillehei C, Vakili
function of the renal graft. If any thrombotic K, Kim HB. Reno-portal anastomosis as an approach
complications are detected preoperatively, every to pediatric kidney transplantation in the setting of
effort should be made to plan the transplant inferior vena cava thrombosis. Pediatr Transplant.
either with a high IVC anastomosis or orthotopic 2013;17(3):e88-92. doi: 10.1111/petr.12059.
placement of the renal graft. In our patient, we 10) Schrader J, Köstering H, Scheler F. Bedeutung
used a synthetic PTFE vascular graft interposition von Antithrombin III bei Nierenerkrankungen
for venous drainage. It is very important for such [Significance of antithrombin III in kidney diseases].
a synthetic vein graft to remain patent for a long Behring Inst Mitt. 1986;(79):216-30.
time. Therefore, an effective anticoagulation 11) Christiansen CF, Schmidt M, Lamberg AL, Horváth-
with INR monitoring and repeated radiological Puhó E, Baron JA, Jespersen B, et al. Kidney disease
evaluation for graft patency will provide long term and risk of venous thromboembolism: a nationwide
functioning kidney transplant. population-based case-control study. J Thromb
Haemost. 2014;12(9):1449-54. doi: 10.1111/jth.12652.
12) Szymczak M, Kaliciński P, Rubik J, Broniszczak
BIBLIOGRAPHY D, Kowalewski G, Stefanowicz M, et al. Kidney
1) Rosendaal FR. Venous thrombosis: a multicausal transplantation in children with thrombosed inferior
disease. Lancet. 1999;353(9159):1167-73. doi: 10.1016/ caval vein - atypical vascular anastomoses. Ann
s0140-6736(98)10266-0. Transplant. 2019;24:25-9. doi: 10.12659/AOT.912657.
2) De Stefano V, Finazzi G, Mannucci PM. Inherited 13) Aguirrezabalaga J, Novas S, Veiga F, Chantada V,
thrombophilia: pathogenesis, clinical syndromes, Rey I, Gonzalez M, et al. Renal transplantation with
and management. Blood. 1996;87(9):3531-44. doi: venous drainage through the superior mesenteric
10.1182/blood.V87.9.3531.bloodjournal8793531. vein in cases of thrombosis of the inferior vena
3) Lipe B, Ornstein DL. Deficiencies of natural cava. Transplantation. 2002;74(3):413-5. doi:
anticoagulants, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. 10.1097/00007890-200208150-00022.
Circulation. 2011;124(14):e365-8. doi: 10.1161/ 14) Kandpal H, Sharma R, Gamangatti S, Srivastava
CIRCULATIONAHA.111.044412. DN, Vashisht S. Imaging the inferior vena cava: a road
4) Lane DA, Mannucci PM, Bauer KA, Bertina less traveled. Radiographics. 2008;28(3):669-89. doi:
RM, Bochkov NP, Boulyjenkov V, et al. Inherited 10.1148/rg.283075101.
thrombophilia: Part 1. Thromb Haemost. 15) Sheth S, Fishman EK. Imaging of the inferior vena cava
1996;76(5):651-62. with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(5):1243-
5) Rodgers GM. Role of antithrombin concentrate in 51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2133.