Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3, 1981
J. W . F r o e h l i c h , x R . W . T h o r i n g t o n , Jr., 2
and J. S. O t i s 3
INTRODUCTION
Orchid Is.
Gross Pt.
;child PL
N. 9010'
'<'--Lutz _: o,
..~..j "-......*.
~.o~
( ,. ....... PJateau -
-....- ,.... -
i, :..:
i
.~
%~176
[-.j .... ? _,
9"~ %.o..."
Meters [
dTi
I
6 ' lobo 79~ i w.
Fig. 1. Map of Barro Colorado Island, Panama, showing principal landmarks discussed in the
text (modified from Carpenter, 1965). See Froehlich and Thorington (1982) for outlines of
eensused troop ranges.
the base o f Fairchild Peninsula (Collias and Southwick, 1952). The distri-
bution was much the same in 1959 (Carpenter, 1964). By 1967, howler
troops occurred all the way to the tip of Fairchild Point (Smith, 1977).
Thus, the present distribution o f howler monkeys throughout our study
area is a relatively recent phenomenon, having occurred within the last two
decades.
The howlers of BCI have been censused many times since Carpenter's
(1934) pioneering studies in 1932 and 1933, but it has been difficult to
obtain good demographic data on the population. Only the major popula-
tion fluctuations have been reasonably well documented. In 1932, Carpenter
counted approximately 500 animals. The population was reduced by a
yellow-fever epidemic in 1949 (Collias and Southwick, 1952), but it in-
creased rapidly from approximately 237 in 1951 to an estimated 814 in 1959
210 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
0.6 ml. This enabled us to increase the injection to 60 mg, which reduced
the time between darting and capturing the animal (cf. " d o w n t i m e " o f
Scott et al., 1976).
After the animals had been captured, they were marked individually
in at least four ways. The most successful techniques were freeze-branding
for recognition at a distance and tattooing, ear-notching, and ear-tagging
for absolute identification of recaptured animals. For a branding iron,
we used a heavy curved piece o f brass extracted from the inner workings
o f a toilet. It was attached to a stick, dipped into liquid nitrogen, and ap-
plied to a shaved place on the tail for 25-30 sec. Brand widths of approx-
imately 3 cm seemed optimal. Narrower brands would become overgrown
and difficult to read. The hair usually grew in white and the brand was
then conspicuous for at least 5 years, perhaps for life. Some brands did not
take, for reasons obscure to us. Others gradually disappeared, probably
due to the reinvasion o f the area by melanocytes. Broader bands were
conspicuous, but seemed to cause the animal disproportionately more
trauma for about a week after branding. Freeze-branding caused the skin
to blister, but contrary to Scott et al. (1976), we never observed infection
or dipteran invasion in freeze-brands, although we have frequently seen
both in other wounds on Alouatta. The brands were placed on the tail in
patterns unique to each individual. Intervals between brands of 5, 10, 20,
and 30 cm were readily distinguishable from one another. Axillary tattoo-
ing, and ear-tagging are conventional techniques, and our procedures did
not differ from those described elsewhere (Thorington, 1981).
Collars were relatively unsuccessful for long-term observations o f
BCI howlers. Most leather or synthetic collars disappeared within 1 year.
Loss seemed to result from failure o f the fasteners rather than the material.
Collars fastened with broad-flange pop rivets lasted the longest. Stiff
collars o f other materials (e.g., polyurethane) caused sometimes fatal
abrasion and were exceedingly disliked by the animals. Ball-chain collars
of stainless steel with color-coded beads were most successful, although
even these were lost at a discomforting rate, especially by adult males,
which tend to have a greater neck than head circumference.
We obtained tooth casts from the anesthetized animals. The molds
were made with dental alginate in specially prepared plastic trays; they
were kept moist until the casts were made with dental stone within a few
hours. These casts were examined under low magnification and each tooth
on the right side of the mouth was given an ordinal score based on the
amount of wear (see Appendix 1). We summed these wear scores for the
distal two premolars and three molars o f the maxilla and mandible to
obtain a combined quantitative assessment o f dental wear for each in-
dividual. Longitudinal data from recaptured animals were used to cali-
brate the total wear scores in terms o f years (see Appendix 2). We used a
212 FroehHch, Thorington, and Otis
RESULTS
Maturation
The body weights of 56 immature and young adult animals are plotted
against estimated age in Fig. 2. These data include all young animals cap-
tured from 1973 to 1977, for whom dental casts were made. Some of these
I
8
7
:/ 9 0
0
0
6
o~ .....
0 0
5
/.
9 o ~
3
///
-- 2
o~
t- 1
Age (Yr) 1 2 3 5 6 7
Mates-- 9 Femates- -- - - o
Fig. 2. Weight maturation in Barro Colorado howlers, with male and female regression curves
superimposed on the raw data
214 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
The age profile of the subadult and adult animals captured in our
study area is shown in Fig. 3. It is based on 75 animals from seven con-
tiguous troops which inhabit Lutz Ravine, Fairchild Peninsula, and Gross
Peninsula. The age profiles in these three geographical regions were
relatively homogeneous (X2 = 4.1, P > 0.25, 3 dr). We have excluded the
animals from Orchid Island, because the age structure of that population
differed significantly from that of the BCI population. We also excluded
small samples from neighboring troops. Our data are standardized to
July 1976, including only animals known to have been alive then. The
figure reflects our sampling biases of avoiding females which were pregnant
or carrying young infants.
The oldest male in this sample is estimated to be 20.5 years of age;
the oldest female was approximately 19 years old. A slightly greater male
Demography of Howler Monkeys 215
F 171 -]
15
I I ....
I':
I.
11 J
F
I
7
J
F
F a I
h
<
54321 1 234.
Fig. 3. Age profile of captured adult and sub-
adult Barro Colorado howlers (N = 75). t~ Number O~C~
longevity is also suggested by the numbers of each sex older than 15 years.
Among the sexually mature animals (females more than 3 years of age,
males more than 4), about one-half are more than I0 years old and one-
fourth are more than 13 years.
The age profile in Fig. 3 is not smooth; there are striking cohort
fluctuations, particularly for males. For example, there are too few animals
between the estimated ages of 7 and 8.5 years. We think these fluctuations
in cohort numbers are real phenomena, not sampling artifacts. They are
tested for significance and discussed below.
Census data from the seven contiguous troops on BCI are shown
in Table I. They represent actual counts, without "Lincoln index" ex-
trapolations from the ratios of marked to unmarked individuals. Again,
a test of homogeneity (X2 --- 1.03, P > 0.9, 4 df) allowed us to pool these
data. Combining the data from Table I and Fig. 3, we approximated the
age profile for the whole population in Fig. 4. qlae separated blocks
represent the census adjustments described above. With 83 adult females
216 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
Table I. Census Data in Percentage from Three Contiguous Geographical Regions on BCI
and from Orchid Islanda
Females Total
Census category Males and J3 J2 J1/I3 I2/I1 sample
Estimate age (years) 5+ 3+ 2 1 0
Geographical area on 13(31
Lutz Ravine 16.7 41.7 16.7 12.5 12.5 48
Fairchild Point 15.3 54.2 4.2 9.7 16.7 72
Gross Point 15.7 48.0 6.9 11.8 17.6 102
Orchid Island 26.9 53.8 0 11.5 7.7 26
aSamples include only animals actually seen; age estimates are discussed in Appendix 2.
and 40 infants less than 1 year of age, this figure suggests an annual re-
productive rate o f 0.48 offspring per adult female per year, which is similar
to the rate o f 0.53 documented for howlers in Costa Rica (cf. Glander,
1980).
20 16 12 8 4 .< 4 8 12 16 20
~ Number O~C~
0 ~
0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
e~
i)
~-~
N ~'~
i o
~o
or,.)
,r
o
Demography of Howler Monkeys 219
IOO0 I
l
900 I
I
800 I
I
?O0 I
I
600 I
500
~--~ ~oo
80
300
,'," 200
..,=
.20 IO0
Age 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Holes - - ; Females -- --
1000
-.g
o
\
~o
C
v_
o
o
o
o
1C
r,
u1
Age 2 /. 6 8 10 12 1/, 16 18 20 22
Hales - - = Females - - - -
Fig. 6. Male and female survival curves in Barro Colorado howlers, plotted
on a log scale.
220 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
(1 female:2.5 males). The binomial probability is 0.04 that the older sample
was drawn f r o m a population with a sex ratio o f two females to one male,
which tends to support our suggestion that adult males m a y outlive females.
100 0
90
80
70
0
~e0 0
0
0 0
50
o 0
u
u) l.O
(p
o
~:30 o
"6
| 20 0 Fig. 7. Age distribution of captured subadult
O
and adult male howlers within troops. See
Troop 13 2 7 14 3 5 Table AI for yearly age equivalences.
Population Growth
The stable population model used in the above analysis does not
necessarily imply a static population, but rather one in which the growth
rate is constant, in balance with natality and mortality (Cox, 1976). In
fact, our model implies an annual growth rate of slightly over 1.5~ for
the howler population of BCI. We derived this figure by combining the
life expectancy of 11.3 years for 4-year-old females with an annual birth
rate of 0.48 to produce a lifetime average female productivity of 6.42,
adding the first born at age 4 years. If half of these infants are females
with a survival rate to age 4 years of 0.37, then 1.19 females are recruited
by each adult female during her reproductive years. From these figures,
a female recruitment rate of 0.017 adult per year can be used as an estimated
growth rate for the population as a whole. A similar analysis for males
recruited at age 5 years gives an almost identical estimate (0.016) for every
three adult females.
The 1976 age profile of howler monkeys on BCI contrasted with
that on nearby Orchid Island, as shown in Fig. 8 (X~ = 26, P < 0.001, 2 df).
Orchid is a small island (16 ha) where the population appears to be severely
food-limited (Froehlich et al., 1981). With 50% of the population over 13
years, the age profile suggests that infant survival and the recruitment of
juveniles into the adult population had been extremely low during the
preceding decade. If this age profile is typical of carrying capacity in
Demography of Howler Monkeys 223
C
18
16
E 1/.
12
10
8
6
4
2
II I
Fig. 8. Age profile of captured and censused howlers on Orchid
Island. Each square represents one individual. ~" ~ ' <dd'
DISCUSSION
Maturation
Our data show that howler monkeys grow rapidly, in contrast with
other large monkeys, such as macaques (Dittus, 1977; Tanner, 1962) and
spider monkeys (Eisenberg, 1976). This result is corroborated by our own
and other longitudinal observations of Alouatta, as described in Appendix
2; but they disagree with the maturation estimates of Malinow (1968) and
Carpenter (1965).
In the work of Malinow (1968) several investigators reported that
Alouatta caraya both matures later and dies earlier than we suggest for
A. palliata. In the basic study, Rosenthal (1968) used the dental strontium-
90 content to estimate age, relative to the known period of radioactive
fallout in Argentina. However, his results lead to several inconsistencies
in the companion reports. Moreover, they are in disagreement with Shoe-
maker's (1979) data from a captive colony of A. caraya. Pope's (1968)
ordinal data on tooth wear are similar to ours, except that she calibrated
them according to the strontium-90 scale. We find suspiciously low cor-
relations between her relative adult ages and the absolute ages estimated
by strontium-90 content (r = 0.24 for males, 0.37 for females). When we
224 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
Longevity
In the adult age profile (Fig. 3), there are significant fluctuations
in cohort sizes. We do not believe that there are variations of this magni-
tude in the annual birth rates. Rather, there is suggestive evidence for
variations in juvenile mortality, dependent upon extreme oscillations in
environmental factors. Foster (1973) noted a chain of events in 1970, when
extremely heavy rains during the early dry season affected flower pollina-
tion adversely, leading to a failure of the wet-season fruit crop and causing
a high mammalian mortality. We hypothesize that young juvenile howlers
were severely stressed by these events, with a high mortality of the newly
weaned, 1-year-old animals resulting in the underrepresentation of the 7-
year cohort in 1976. We believe that animals with an inadequate toxin
tolerance would be most affected by this fruit collapse; they could not
cope with a nearly total leaf diet in the latter part of the wet season, when
food is normally most scarce (Carpenter, 1934).
A similar nutritional explanation may apply to the relative paucity
or total absence of some male cohorts in the 1976 age profile. The reduction
228 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
of the 8- to 9-year cohort may have occurred when it was 2-3 years old
during the 1970 bottleneck. Reviewing the BCI rainfall records, we found
that 1963 was the only other year in the last 20 with comparably heavy
dry-season rainfall. This might explain the absence of 15- to 16-year-old
males in 1976, who would have been 2-3 years in 1963. We hypothesize that
young males may be more vulnerable to food shortages because they have
greater maternal independence and lower social status than their female
age-mates. It is also probable that aggressive ostracism by adult males
increases during bad years and possibly extends to the prepubertal males,
even though the latter mimic females in their genitalia.
The correlation between rainfall cycles and male cohort sizes is not
perfect; for example, there is no recognizable environmental event to ex-
plain the deficit of 13-year males in 1976. However, the hypothesized link
between rainfall and juvenile mortality is adequate to explain most signifi-
cant deviations between the observed age profile and that modeled for a
stable population. Furthermore, for males there is another reasonable
hypothesis to explain cohort fluctuations, i.e., there could be annual dif-
ferences in adult recruitment rates. This is not an alternative hypothesis,
because we might expect compensatory recruitment following years of
high juvenile mortality. The age profile of 5- to 6-year animals in 1976
suggests such an effect.
Moreover, the age distribution of males within troops (Fig. 7) suggests
that two or three males of closely similar ages may enter a troop at the
same time. Since stable all-male bands have never been reported in Alouatta,
we envision this event as the recruitment of a coalition of males, probably
derived from the same natal troops. Thus, we hypothesize that these males
are at least moderately related, with mutually supporting bonds developed
during juvenile play. Similar "kin selection" or "reciprocal altruism"
arguments have been advanced by Bertram (1976) for lions, Bygott (1979)
for chimps, Kurland (1977) for macaques, and Ligon (1978) for green
woodhoopoes.
Although these social and environmental factors disturb the age
profile away from the expectations of a stable population model, we still
view the latter as a useful heuristic device for evaluating the viability (c.f.
Heltne et al., 1976) and growth characteristics of a population for conser-
vation management decisions. Moreover, in a long-lived animal with no
distinct birth season (Caughley, 1966), stability may be approximated
by averaging the negative disruptions with positive factors (Deevey, 1947).
The relatively high survival rates of the cohorts following the 1970 fruit
failure may be an example of such balancing.
Demography of Howler Monkeys 229
The same wear scales were used twice--once for the deciduous teeth
and the other for the permanent. Since the first and second permanent
molars erupt before the deciduous molars are replaced, we were able to
score some individuals for dental wear on both scales. The two scales were
also highly correlated (r = 0.94). Thus, we were able to estimate all sub-
adult ages by aligning the scales as follows:
232 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
~g
-E
0
d 0
~g
I I I~
e-,
! , i
g
! u i I
I I !
o
r,.)
s
.<
[ I t 1 I t I '~
o~
[..,
234 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
Bygott, J. D. (1979). Agonistic behavior, dominance, and social structure in wild chimpanzees
of the Gombe National Park. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.), The
Great Apes, Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, pp. 405-427.
Carpenter, C. R. (1934). A field study of the behavior and social relations of howling monkeys
(,41ouatta palliata). Comp. Psychol. Monogr. 10: 1-168.
Carpenter, C. R. (1964). Natural Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, Pennsylvania State Uni-
versity Press, University Park.
Carpenter, C. R. (1965). The howlers of Barro Colorado Island. In DeVore, I. (ed.), Primate
Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 250-291.
Case, T. J. (1978). On the evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in
the terrestrial vertebrates. Quart. Rev. Biol. 53: 243-282.
Caughley, G. (1966). Mortality patterns in mammals. Ecology 47: 906-918.
Chapman, F. M. (1929). My Tropical Air Castle, D. Appleton, New York.
Chapman, F. M. (1938). Life in an Air Castle, D. Appleton, New York.
Chivers, D. J. (1969). On the dally behavior and spacing of howling monkey groups. Folia
Primatol. 10: 48-102.
Collias, N., and Southwick, C. (1952). A field study of population density and social organiza-
tion in howling monkeys. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 96: 143-156.
Cox, P. R. (1976). Demography, 5th ed., Cambridge University Press, London.
Croat, T. B. (1978). Flora of Barro Colorado Island, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto,
Calif.
Oeevey, E. S., Jr. (1947) Life tables for natural populations of animals. Quart. Rev. Biol.
22:283-314.
Dittus, W. P. J. (1975). Population dynamics of the toque monkey, Macaca sinica. In Tuttle,
R. H. (ed.), Socioecology and Psychology of Primates, Mouton, The Hague, pp.
125-151.
Dittus, W. P. J. (1977). The social regulation of population density and age-sex distribution in
the toque monkey. Behavior 63: 281-322.
Eisenberg, J. F. (1976). Communication mechanisms and social integration in the black
spider monkey, Ateles fusciceps robastus, and related species. Smithson. Contr. Zool.
213: 1-108.
Eisenberg, J. F., Muckenhirn, N. A., and Rudran, R. (1972). The relationship between
ecology and social structure in primates. Science 176: 863-874.
Foster, R. B. (1973). Seasonality of Fruit Production and Seed Fall in a Tropical Forest
Ecosystem in Panama, Doctoral thesis, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
Froehlich, J. W., and Thorington, R. W., Jr. (1982). The genetic structure and socio-ecology
of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) on Barro Colorado Island. In Leigh, E. G.,
Jr., and Rand, A. S. (eds.), Ecology of a Neotropical Forest: Seasonal Rhythms and
Long-Term Changes, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C. (in press).
Froehlich, J. W., Thorington, R. W., Jr., and Otis, J. S. (1981). Food limitation in a small
island population of mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata). (in preparation).
Gavan, J. A., and Swindler, D. R. (1966). Growth rates and phylogeny in primates. Am. J.
Phys. Anthropol. 24: 181-190.
Glander, K. E. (1975a). Habitat and Resource Utilization: An Ecological View of Social
Organization in Mantled Howling Monkeys, Doctoral thesis, University of Chicago,
Chicago.
Glander, K. E. (1975b). Habitat description and resource utilization: A preliminary report
on mantled howling monkey ecology. In Tuttle, R. H. (ed.), Socioecology and Psy-
chology of Primates, Mouton, The Hague, pp. 35-57.
Glander, K. E. (1977). Poison in a monkey's garden of Eden. Nat. Hist. 86: 34-41.
Glander, K. E. (1980). Reproduction and population growth in free-ranging mantled howling
monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 53: 25-36.
Heltne, P. G., Turner, D. C., and Scott, N. J., Jr. (1976). Comparison of census data on
,41ouattapalliata from Costa Rica and Panama. In Thorington, R. W., Jr. and Heltne,
P. G. (eds.), Neotropical Primates: Field Studies and Conservation, Natl. Acad. Sci.
Washington, D.C., pp. 10-19.
236 Froehlich, Thorington, and Otis