You are on page 1of 9

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/3087415

Free-Space Measurement of Complex Permittivity and Complex Permeability


of Magnetic Materials at Microwave Frequencies

Article  in  IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · May 1990


DOI: 10.1109/19.52520 · Source: IEEE Xplore

CITATIONS READS

630 2,972

3 authors:

D.K. Ghodgaonkar Vasundara Varadan


Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology University of Arkansas
83 PUBLICATIONS   1,944 CITATIONS    546 PUBLICATIONS   10,053 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Vijay Varadan
University of Arkansas
932 PUBLICATIONS   15,174 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Breast Cancer detection using microwave imaging View project

Solid Deposition on Metal Surfaces from Heated Fuels and Hydrocarbons View project

All content following this page was uploaded by D.K. Ghodgaonkar on 08 June 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATlON A N D MEASUREMENT. VOL 39. NO 2. APRIL 1990 387

Free-Space Measurement of Complex Permittivity


and Complex Permeability of Magnetic Materials
at Microwave Frequencies
D. K. GHODGAONKAR, V. V . VARADAN, MEMBER,
IEEE, AND V. K. VARADAN, MEMBER,I E E E

Absfract-A free-space measurement system operating in the 8.2-40 A conventional method for E*and p* measurement con-
GHz frequency range is used to measure the reflection and transmis- sists of measuring complex reflection coefficients of short-
sion coefficients, SI, and S,,, of planar samples. The complex electric
permittivity and the magnetic permeability are calculated from the
circuited and open-circuited (quarter-wavelength short-
measured values of SI,and SzI.The measurement system consists of circuited line) samples [6], [7]. Using this method, the
transmit and receive horn lens antennas, a network analyzer, mode measurements are difficult and time consuming to make
transitions, and a computer. Diffraction effects at the edges of the sam- because the open-circuited sample has to be established
ple are minimized by using spot-focusing lens antennas. Errors due to at each measurement frequency. In this paper, we have
multiple reflections between antennas via the surface of the sample are
corrected by using a free-space TRL (thru, reflect, line) calibration
employed a method for determination of E* and p* from
technique. For thin, flexible samples, the sample had to be sandwiched reflection and transmission coefficients of a planar sam-
between two half-wavelength (at mid-band) quartz plates, to eliminate ple. This method is especially suitable for quick, routine,
the effect of sagging. Results are reported in the frequency range of and broad-band measurement o f t * and p* of high-loss
8.6-13.4 GHz for materials such as Teflon, sodium borosilicate glass, materials. For materials with dielectric (or magnetic) loss
and microwave-absorbing materials.
tangent less than 0.1, the loss factor measurements are
found to be inaccurate because of errors in reflection and
I. INTRODUCTION transmission coefficient measurements. The dielectric
constant and loss tangent of low-loss materials can be
F REE-SPACE methods are nondestructive and con-
tactless; hence, they are especially suitable for mea-
surement of the complex electric permittivity ( E * ) and
measured accurately by using another free-space method
which involves reflection coefficient measurement of a
complex magnetic permeability ( p * ) of magnetic mate- metal-backed sample [5].
rials under high-temperature conditions. In the past, free- In this method, the free-space reflection and transmis-
space methods have been used by several investigators for sion coefficients S I ,and S,, of a planar sample are mea-
the measurement of electrical properties of materials [ 11- sured for a normally incident plane wave. The complex
[4]. Recently, a new free-space method was developed for constitutive parameters E* and p* are calculated from the
the accurate determination of the dielectric constant and measured S I I and For thin and flexible samples of
loss tangent of nonmagnetic materials such as Teflon and magnetic materials, the accuracy of measurement of SI I
quartz at microwave frequencies [5] using reflected fields and is poor because of sagging of the sample when
from metal-backed samples. This paper presents an ex- mounted on the sample holder. The sample is, hence,
tension of the free-space method for simultaneous mea- sandwiched between two fused quartz plates which are
surement of t * and p* of magnetic materials at microwave half-wavelength at mid-band. The actual reflection and
frequencies using reflected and transmitted fields. transmission coefficients, S I Iand SZI, of the sample are
The errors in free-space measurements are presumed to calculated from the measured S I Iand SZI of the quartz
be due to diffraction effects at the edges of the sample and plate-sample-quartz plate assembly from a knowledge of
multiple reflections between the horn lens antennas and the complex electric permittivity and thickness of the
the mode transitions. Diffraction effects at the edges of quartz plates. Results are reported in the 8.6-13.4 GHz
the sample are minimized by using spot-focusing horn lens frequency range for Teflon, sodium borosilicate glass,
antennas as transmitters and receivers. In addition, we Eccogel 1365-90 (epoxy resin), and microwave absorb-
have developed a free-space TRL (thru, reflect, line) cal- ing materials.
ibration technique which eliminates errors due to multiple
II. THEORY
reflections.
Fig. 1 shows a planar sample of thickness d placed in
free space. The complex electric permittivity and the
Manuscript received January 17, 1989; revised November 8 , 1989.
The authors are with the Research Center for the Engineering of Elec-
complex magnetic permeability, relative to free space, are
tronic and Acoustic Materials and the Department of Engineering Science defined as
and Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
IEEE Log Number 8933410. = E l - jt” = t ’ (1 - j tan 6,) (1)

0018-9456/90/0400-0387$0 1.OO 0 1990 IEEE


388 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION A N D MEASUREMENT. VOL. 39. NO. 2. APRIL 1990

In (9) the plus or minus sign is chosen such that 1 r I <


1. Using (6), the complex propagation constant y can be
written as

Y = [log, (1/7-)1/d. (11)


From ( 5 ) and (8)

i + r
J$ = (F)
Fig. 1 . Schematic diagram of planar sample. From (7) and (12), we obtain

p* = p' - j p " = p'(1 -jtan6,). (2)


It is assumed that the planar sample is of infinite extent
laterally so that diffraction effects at the edges can be ne-
glected. A linearly polarized, uniform plane wave of fre-
quency w is normally incident on the sample. The reflec- Since the parameter T in (11) is a complex number,
tion and transmission coefficients SI and Sz1are measured there are multiple values for y. If T i s defined as
in free space for the normally incident plane wave. By
applying boundary conditions at the air-sample interfaces T = (Tlej' (15)
in Fig. 1, it can be shown that the S I 1and SZIparameters
are related to the parameters and T by the foilowing then y is given by
equations [8] :

(3)
wheren = 0, + I , + 2 , * * .
The real part of y is unique and single valued, but the
(4) imaginary part of y has multiple values. So (13) and (14)
will give multiple values of E* and p * . The phase constant
where J?, the reflection coefficient of the air-sample in- is defined as
terface, and T a r e given by
0 = (27r/A,) = imaginary part ( y ) (17)
where A, is the wavelength in the sample material. From
(16) and (17), (d/A,) can be obtained as
T = e-?'. (6) 9
d/A,,, = n - -
In ( 5 ) and (6), Z, and y are the normalized characteristic 27r
impedance and propagation constants of the sample. They
are related to p* and E* by the following relationships: For n = 0 and -27r < 4 < 0, (d/A,) is between 0
and 1. If the sample thickness d is chosen such that it is
y = yo+ (7) less than A,, then (9)-( 14) will give a unique value of E*
and p* which corresponds to n = 0. For d > A, ambi-
r- guity in p" and E* can be resolved by making measure-
z,,= $1 - ments on two different thicknesses of the sample.
In the case of thin, flexible samples of magnetic mate-
where yo = (j27r/Ao) represents the propagation con- rials, the accuracy of free-space measurements of s,I and
stant of free space, and is the free-space wavelength. SZ1 is poor because of sagging of the sample when
From ( 3 ) and (4), and T can be written as mounted on the sample holder. So, the sample is sand-
wiched between two fused-quartz plates which are half-
r =K _+ J K -~ 1 (9) wavelength at mid-band. The parameters S l l aand of
where the quartz plate-sample-quartz plate assembly are mea-
sured in free space. Because the complex permittivity and
thickness of the quartz plates are known, S I Iand S2, of
the sample can be calculated from S l l aand of the
assembly. The Appendix gives the derivation for the
transformation of SII, and S,,, to SI, and S2, of the sam-
ple.
GHODGAONKAR EI U / . : F R E E - S P A C E M E A S U R E M E N T OF C O M P L E X P E R M I T T I V I T Y A N D C O M P L E X P E R M E A B I L I T Y

111. MEASUREMENT
SYSTEM
A schematic diagram of the measurement setup is given
in Fig. 2. The transmit and receive antennas are spot-fo- HP 7440A
cusing horn lens antennas which are mounted on a large
aluminum table ( 1.83 m x 1.83 m). The spot-focusing
[I Phmr

horn lens antenna consists of two equal plano-convex di-


electric lenses mounted back to back in a conical horn
antenna. The ratio of focal distance to diameter of the lens
( F I D ) is unity and D is approximately 30.5 cm. The alu-
minum table has provisions for configuring antennas for
monostatic and bistatic measurements (35 to 65 O off nor- O

mal). A specially fabricated sample holder is placed at


the common focal plane for holding planar samples and
is mounted on a micrometer-driven carriage. It can hold
samples of cross section 17.8 cm x 17.8 cm, 15.2 cm x
15.2 cm, and 10.2 cm X 10.2 cm, respectively. The
transmit and receive antennas are mounted on a carriage
and the distance between them can be changed with an
accuracy of u.OU1 in. At 10 GHz, the 3-dB beamwidth in
Fig. 2 . Schematic diagram of measurement setup
the H and E planes of the spot-focusing antennas were
4.37 cm and 3.2 cm, respectively. The 10-dB beamwidths
in the H and E planes of the spot-focusing antennas are the mode transitions via the surface of the sample. We
7.85 cm and 5.49 cm at 10 GHz. These values are cal- have implemented two-port TRL calibration techniques
culated from the radiation patterns of the antennas mea- along with time-domain gating so as to remove the effects
sured at the focus by the manufacturer. For other fre- of multiple reflections.
quencies, the beamwidth will change in proportion to the In a coaxial transmission medium, the open, short,
wavelength in free space. From Musil and Zacek [9], the matched termination, and through standards are used for
depth of focus can be calculated for the case of D = 30.5 two-port calibration of S parameters. Recently, i t was
cm and F = 30.5 cm. The depth of focus is 8.4 wave- shown that the TRL calibration technique is superior to
lengths (25.2 c m ) at 10 GHz. The calculated values of traditional open, short, matched termination calibration
the depth of focus vary from 8.4 to 10 wavelengths in the technique for a coaxial line [ 101. At microwave frequen-
frequency range 8-14 GHz. These values are close to an cies, the TRL calibration can produce the highest quality
approximate value of 10 wavelengths given by the man- calibration available (effective directivity and source
ufacturer of the horn lens antennas. Because of the spot impedance match up to 60 dB) [ l 11. It is a particularly
focusing of the lens antennas, diffraction effects at the attractive method for measurement in noncoaxial media
edges of the sample are negligible if the minimum trans- (such as stripline and microstripline) because calibration
verse dimension of the sample is greater than three times standards can be realized easily and accurately. TRL cal-
the E-plane 3-dB beamwidth of the antenna at its focus. ibration was implemented in free space by establishing
This condition has been verified experimentally. TRL standards in the free-space medium [5]. The two ref-
The spot-focusing antennas are connected to the two erence planes for port 1 and port 2 are located at the focal
planes of the transmit and receive antenna, respectively.
ports of an S-parameter test set by using circular-to-rect-
angular waveguide adapters, rectangular waveguide to A through standard is configured by keeping the distance
coaxial line adapters, and precision coaxial cables. By between the two antennas equal to twice the focal dis-
using adapters for different bands, the spot-focusing an- tance. The reject standards for port 1 and port 2 are ob-
tennas can be used from 14 to 40 GHz. Another pair of tained by placing a metal plate at the focal planes of the
spot-focusing horn lens antennas are required for coveringtransmit and receive antenna, respectively. The line stan-
the 8.2- 14 GHz frequency range. S-parameter measure- dard is achieved by separating the focal planes of the
ments in free space were performed with a Hewlett-Pack- transmit and receive antennas by a distance equal to a
ard 8510B Network Analyzer system consisting of a syn- quarter of the free-space wavelength at the center of the
thesized sweeper and an S-parameter test set. An HP9836 band. The TRL calibration kit of HP85 10B is modified by
computer was used for automation, data acquisition, defining TRL standards regarding wave impedance and
printing, and plotting. A computer program based on (9)- electrical delay. The error model used for TRL calibration
(14) was implemented on an HP9836 computer for cal- includes error terms for directivity, isolation, source
culation of E* and p* of the samples. impedance match, load impedance match, transmission
frequency response, and reflection frequency response.
IV. FREE-SPACE MEASUREMENT OF S PARAMETERS The description of the error model is given by Williams

For normally incident plane waves, the error in free- [ 111. This error model has 12 error coefficients which are
space measurement of S parameters is due to multiple re- evaluated from measured data for the TRL standards. In
flections between the spot-focusing horn lens antennas and addition to error coefficients, the calibration program cal-
390 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ()
N INSTRUMENTATION A N D M E A S U R E M E N T . VOL. 39. NO 2. APRIL iwn

culates the propagation constant of the line standard and between calibration and measurement. Because of resid-
the reflection coefficient of the reflect standard [ 101. By ual errors, the magnitude errors in SII and S 2 , are less than
performing the TRL calibration using the free-space cal- +0.055 dB and k0.035 dB, respectively, and the error
ibration standards, two-port free-space calibration is ob- in phase of S I ,and S,, is less than 0.5".
tained. The second kind of error has to do with small changes
The free-space calibration can be verified for plane in the reference planes (as defined by through or reflect
wave propagation by measuring S2, for free-space delays standard) between calibration and measurement due to
of different lengths. We have observed a linear phase vari- small changes in the positions of plates holding the sam-
ation and negligible amplitude change with increasing ple. Because of the good design of the sample holder (e.g.,
length of delay line (for lengths up to 3.81 c m ) . Thus good mechanical rigidity of plates holding the sample, ab-
the electromagnetic fields in the neighborhood of the sence of any inclination effects of the sample), phase er-
common focal plane are those of a plane wave. rors due to changes in the reference plane are less than 2"
For measuring SI, and SzIof a planar sample, the ref- for SII and S2,.
erence planes corresponding to the transmit and receive The combined effects of the sample holder and the re-
antenna were located at the front and back face of the sidual postcalibration errors were studied for the metal
sample, respectively. Because of residual post-calibration plate (five remounts of the metal plate) and the through
errors such as source impedance mismatch and load standard (five replicate measurements). It was found that
impedance mismatch, a ripple was observed in the mea- the magnitude and phase errors in SI are less than +0.055
sured S I ,and S2, data. Time-domain gating was used to dB and + 2 " , respectively. For Szl, the amplitude and
remove the effects of residual mismatches. For imple- phase errors are less than k0.035 dB and + 2 " , respec-
mentation of time-domain gating, frequency-domain data tively.
are obtained for SI and S2,. After taking the inverse Fou- Plane waves produced by spot-focusing antennas in the
rier transform of the frequency-domain data, the time-do- depth of focus region are not uniform because the ampli-
main S I , and S,, response is obtained. Then, gating is tude distribution of the waves is Gaussian [ 131. For the
applied over the time-domain response which includes the derivation of E * and p* according to (13) and (14), it is
main reflection (or transmission) response and multiple assumed that a uniform plane wave is incident on the sam-
reflections within the sample. The Fourier transform of ple. Because of the TRL calibration technique and time-
the gated time-domain response gives the frequency-do- domain gating of S I Iand S,, data, the plane waves in the
main response with time-domain gating. Time-domain depth of focus region simulate a uniform plane wave, and
gating is applied such that the gated frequency-domain the errors due to the nonuniform nature of the plane waves
response is an approximate average of the ungated re- are negligible. This was verified by measuring dielectric
sponse. The gating feature of the HP8510B network ana- constants and loss tangents of several materials (e.g., Tef-
lyzer is used for implementation of time-domain gating in lon and fused quartz) from reflection coefficient measure-
free-space S-parameter measurements. Additional infor- ment of the metal-backed sample [5]. The accuracy of di-
mation on time-domain gating is given by Rytting [ 121. electric constant and loss tangent measurements was better
than + 2 % and +20 x respectively.
From computer simulation using (1)-(8), errors in E ' ,
CONSIDERATIONS
V. ACCURACY
tan 6,, p ' , and tan 6, were calculated at 10 GHz for Tef-
After free-space TRL calibration and time-domain gat- lon, sodium borosilicate glass, FGM-40, and AN-73. It
ing of the S-parameter response, the measurement errors is assumed that the errors in the magnitude and phase of
in S I , and Szl are mainly due to two kinds of errors. SI, are k0.055 dB and f2",respectively, while the er-
The first kind comprises the residual postcalibration er- rors in the magnitude and phase of SzI are +0.035 dB and
rors resulting from imperfections in the calibration stan- f2",respectively. Table I lists errors at 10 GHz for dif-
dards, the instrumentation, and the coaxial cables con- ferent materials. For low-loss dielectric samples (e.g.,
necting the spot-focusing antennas to the test ports of the Teflon and glass), the maximum error in the dielectric loss
S-parameter test set. Because of the high quality of the tangent is around k0.06. Because the actual loss tangents
HP85 10B network analyzer, the instrumentation errors of Teflon and glass are less than k0.06, the dielectric loss
(e.g., frequency instability, power variation of micro- tangent cannot be measured accurately. For high-dielec-
wave signals) are negligible. In TRL calibration, the only tric-loss samples such as AN-73, the dielectric loss tan-
error caused by the calibration standards is due to the wave gent can be measured accurately. Similarly, for high-
impedance of the line standard (if it is different from the magnetic-loss tangent materials such as FGM-40, the
wave impedance in free space) [ 101. This impedance error magnetic loss tangent can be measured accurately. From
will cause normalization of reflection and transmission Table I, it is observed that the dielectric constant can be
coefficients to the impedance of the line standard. The measured with an accuracy of better than + 4 % .
residual source and load mismatch errors due to imper- Our observations regarding inaccuracies in E " for low-
fections in the calibration standards are minimized by loss materials are in good agreement with similar obser-
time-domain gating. Errors due to coaxial cables are min- vation made by others in stripline and waveguide media.
imized by ensuring a stable configuration of these cables In a stripline medium, the method described in Section I1
G H O D G A O N K A R er U/.: FREE-SPACE MEASUREMENT O F COMPLEX PERMITTIVITY AND COMPLEX PERMEABILITY 391

TABLE I changes from 8.6 to 13.4 GHz, the electrical thickness of


ERROR
ANALYSIS
FOR t * A N D p* MEASUREMEN.IS A T 10 GHZ
the quartz plates varies from 0.37 to 0.57 wavelengths.
Percentm Errorin Percentemr Errorin Because the thickness and complex permittivity of the
Sample in E' fiin 6, in p' tan 8,
quartz plates are known very accurately, negligible errors
Teflon' 2.9 0.025 4.5 0.033
Soda-Borosilicate 2.6 0.052 2.0 0.043 are introduced due to the departure of the quartz plate
Glassb
Comine 7750 thickness from half-wavelength. This was verified exper-
FGM-W- 3.1 0.048 9.9 0.11 imentally by measuring a Teflon sample with and without
AN73d 1.5 0.015 2.0 0.01
quartz plates. It was found that the dielectric constant of
a. E ' = 2.08 and tan 6 = 3.7 x 10 ' from 1151. the Teflon sample was within *2% when the measure-
b. e' = 4.38 and tan 6 = 54 X 10 from [ I S ] .
c . e' = 25.2. tan 6, = 0.048. p ' = 1.54 and tan 6, = I . 3 7 . from our measurements
ments were done with and without quartz plates.
d. e' = I , IO. tan 6, = 0.71. p ' = 2.03 and tan 6, = 0.2560, from our measurements The uncertainties in S I 1measurements using the net-
work analyzer are low for high values of SII [ 161. Because
has been implemented by Barry 1141 in the frequency of a quarter-wave transformer effect, 1 S I II is maximum
range 0.5-5 GHz. The measurement accuracy of E ' , E " , when d = (2n + l)h,/4 ( n = 0, 1, 2, * ). So, the
p ' , and p" was better than +5% excluding E " and p" less uncertainties in I Sl1I can be minimized if the thickness
than 0.05 for the stripline method. In a waveguide me- of the sample is equal to an odd multiple of a quarter-
dium, the dielectric properties of Teflon and nylon were wavelength. For unique values of E* and p * , it is required
measured in the frequency range 8.2-12.4 GHz by mea- that 0 < d < A,,,; hence, it is desirable that the sample
suring SI1and S2, of waveguide samples 181. It was con- thickness be close to A,,/4 or 3Ar,/4. All samples used in
cluded that the loss factor E " of low-loss materials cannot our experiment have thicknesses of less than one wave-
be measured accurately if the loss tangent is less than 0.1. length. Except for the AN-73 sample (which is available
This method was also implemented in a free-space setup in standard thickness only), the thickness of all other sam-
for the measurement of dielectric and magnetic properties ples was close to A,,/4 over the 8-14 GHz frequency
at 56 and 94 GHz [2]. The author concluded that the range. The cross section of all samples was 15.2 cm X
method described in Section I1 is good only for low-loss 15.2 cm.
materials. It should be pointed out that it is an erroneous
conclusion which is not supported by our measurements VII. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS A N D DISCUSSION

in free space and the measurements of others in stripline The values of E* and p* for Teflon, sodium borosilicate
and waveguide media. glass, and FGM-40 were obtained first for assessing the
accuracy of the free-space method. The thicknesses of the
VI. PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING E* A N D p* Teflon, glass, and FGM-40 samples were 0.333 cm, 0.386
After performing the free-space calibration using the cm, and 0.102 cm, respectively. Tables I1 and 111 give the
TRL, the planar sample was mounted on the sample holder complex permittivity and the complex permeability of Tef-
for S I Iand S2, measurements. The frequency range for lon and sodium borosilicate glass. At 10 GHz, the com-
S-parameter measurement was 8- 14 GHz. Because errors plex permittivity of Teflon and soda-borosilicate glass
due to time-domain gating are large at the band edges [ 121, (Corning 7750) given by Von Hippel [6] are 2.08-
E* and p* were calculated only in the frequency range j0.00076 and 4.38-jO.0237, respectively. The values of
8.6-13.4 GHz. Since maximum accuracy and repeatabil- E ' agree fairly well with those given by Von Hippel, but
ity are required for SII and S2, measurements, a step sweep a large discrepancy is observed in the E " values. This is
mode with 801 frequency points and averaging of 128 due to measurement errors in SII and S 2 ,. Here, it should
sweeps is used. be emphasized that the dielectric data reported by Von
For thin and flexible samples of microwave materials, Hippel were measured by the short-circuited-line method
such as FGM-40, AN-73, and Eccogel 1365-90 (all man- or the resonant-cavity method, which are known to be very
ufactured by Emerson and Cuming, Inc., Canton, MA), accurate for E ' and E " measurements. In this method, the
the sample was sandwiched between two fused-quartz inaccuracy in E " for low-loss materials is due to simulta-
plates. The complex relative permittivity of fused quartz neous determinations of E* and p * , which results in higher
is assumed as 3.78-jO.0006 [15]. The fused-quartz plates sensitivity to measurement errors. Thus for low-loss ma-
are 6.604 mm in thickness. These plates are half-wave- terials, E " cannot be measured accurately. Table IV lists
length at 11.674 GHz. Using the formulation given in the the measured E* and p* of the FGM-40 sample. FGM-40
Appendix, S I Iand SZIof the sample can be calculated is a thin flexible microwave absorber. It has an average
from the measured S l l aand of the quartz plate-sam- reflectivity of less than - 10 dB (with respect to a metal
ple-quartz plate assembly. In the case of hard materials plate) in the frequency range 4-10 GHz. FGM-40 was
(Teflon, sodium borosilicate glass, etc.), it is not neces- chosen as a reference magnetic material because its di-
sary to use quartz plates because sagging is negligible electric and magnetic properties have been reported by
when the sample is mounted on the sample holder. How- Joseph 1171 in the 9-18 GHz frequency range and by
ever,for all samples used in this paper, including Teflon Westphal [ 181 in the 0.005-3 GHz frequency range. Ta-
and glass, measurements were done in the quartz plate- ble V gives E* and p* values reported by Joseph [17] in
sample-quartz plate configuration. As the frequency the frequency range 10-13 GHz. The data were obtained
392 IEEE T R A N S A C T I O N S O N I N S T R U M E N T A T I O N A N D M E A S U R E M E N T , VOL 39. N O . 2. A P R I L 1990

TABLE I1 TABLE VI
DIELECTRIC AND M A G N E T I C PROPERTIES OF TEFLON DIELECTRIC OF ECCOGEL
PROPERTIES
~ N MAGNETIC
D 1365-90

Frequency E* P* Frequency E* P*
(GW a
E' E" P' P,' (GH7) E' e" PS P"
8.6 1.99 0.05 1.00 4.03 8.6 2.69 4.03 1.01 0.06
9.0 2.00 0.05 0.99 4.03 9.0 2.67 0.00 1.01 0.03
9.5 2.00 0.05 0.99 4.04 9.5 2.65 n.w
. .. 1.03 0.03
10.0 2.00 0.06 0.99 4.04 10.0 2.62 0.03 1.01 4.oi
10.5 2.00 0.06 1.00 4.04 10.5 2.59 0.03 1.01 4.02
11.0 1.99 0.06 1.00 4.04 11.0 2.58 0.05 1.01 4.03
11.5 1.99 0.07 1.00 4.04 11.5 2.59 0.06 1.01 4.02
12.0 1.98 0.07 1.00 4.04 12.0 2.61 0.09 1.01 4.02
12.5 1.98 0.07 1.00 4.04 12.5 2.64 0.09 0.99 4.01
13.0 1.98 0.08 1.00 4.04 13.0 2.71 0.09 0.98 4.01
13.4 1.98 0.08 0.99 4.04 13.4 2.76 0.06 0.97 0.00

TABLE I11 TABLE VI1


DIELECTRIC
AND MAGNETIC
PROPERTIES O F SODIUM BOROSILICATE GLAS AND MAGNETIC
DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES
OF AN-73

Frequency e* P* Frequency E* P*
(GW (GW
E' E" P' P '* E' e" P' P',
8.6 4.38 0.07 1 .oo 0.00 8.6 0.97 1.04 2.07 0.07
9.0 4.37 0.08 1.01 0.00 9.0 1.02 0.95 2.12 0.20
9.5 4.36 0.09 1.02 0.00 9.5 1.06 0.86 2.1 1 0.37
10.0 4.36 0.10 1.02 0.00 10.0 1.10 0.78 2.03 0.52
10.5 4.36 0.1 1 1.02 4.01 10.5 1.14 0.72 1.93 0.62
11.0 4.36 0.13 1.02 4.01 11.0 1.19 0.67 1.78 0.70
11.5 4.38 0.14 1.01 4.02 11.5 1.24 0.63 1.65 0.72
12.0 4.41 0.15 1.oo 4.02 12.0 1.29 0.62 1.54 0.70
12.5 4.46 0.15 0.99 -0.02 12.5 1.34 0.61 1.46 0.65
13.0 4.55 0.14 0.97 -0.03 13.0 1.38 0.61 1.40 0.58
13.4 4.63 0.1 1 0.96 4.03 13.4 1.41 0.61 1.36 0.54

TABLE IV measured as 2.72 and 0.067 at 13 GHz. Again, E ' values


A N D MAGNETIC
DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES
OF FGM-40
are in agreement between the two free-space methods, but
E " values are in disagreement because our method is in-
accurate for tan 6, < 0.1. It should be noted that Teflon,
8.6 25.44 0.90 1.62 2.30 sodium borosilicate glass, and Eccogel 1365-90 are non-
9.0
9.5
25.38
25.15
0.95
0.97
1.56
1.60
2.32
2.24
magnetic materials and the expected values of p' and p"
10.0 25.16 1.16 1.55 2.12 are 1 and 0, respectively. The deviation of p' and p" from
10.5 25.25 1.24 1.46 2.06
11.0 25.44 1.59 1.40 1.94 expected values is due to measurement errors. Table VI1
11.5 25.75 1.77 1.32 1.89
12.0 26.28 1.95 1.26 1 80
~ ~~
lists the measured complex permittivity and complex
12.5 26.99 i .93 1.20 1.71 permeability data for an AN-73 sample. It is a microwave
13.0 27.88 2.13 1.17 1.64
13.4 28.59 2.13 1.13 1.59 absorber with a reflectivity reduction of -20 dB for fre-
quencies above 7.5 GHz. AN-73 consists of three layers
of carbon-filled Urethane foam with a total thickness of
TABLE V
COMPLEX PERMITTIVITY AND C O M P L E X PERMEABILITY OF FGM-40 GIVEN IN
0.9 cm. Because of its three different layers of lossy di-
~171 electric material, the measured E* and p* are the effective
complex permittivity and effective complex permeability
Frequency E' P*
(GW of the AN-73 sample.
E' E" P' P,*
10 28.0 0.67 1.32 2.0 VIII. CONCLUSIONS
11 27.3 0.0 1.17 2.0
12 27.3 0.67 1.OO 2.0 The free-space technique described in this paper gives
13 27.0 0.0 0.66 2.0
accurate values of E* and p* for lossy magnetic materials
in the microwave frequency range. Because this method
by a time-domain measurement system. There is good is nondestructive and contactless, it can be used for broad-
agreement in the E' and p" values given in Tables IV and band measurement of E* and p* under high-temperature
V. The poor agreement in p' may be due to the limited conditions. The free-space TRL calibration technique is
accuracy of the time-domain system. The quantity E " can- used to eliminate errors due to multiple reflections be-
not be measured accurately by our method (error of tween horn lens antennas. In the case of thin and flexible
f0.048 in tan 6, from Table I) or by the time-domain samples, intolerable errors are introduced in measured SII
method used by Joseph [17]. and S,, values due to sagging of the sample when mounted
Table VI gives E* and p* data for Eccogel 1365-90 (an on the sample holder. By sandwiching the sample be-
epoxy resin) for a sample of 0.305 cm thickness. The tween two quartz plates (which are half-wavelength at
sample was cured at 140°C for 20 min. Using another mid-band), errors due to the sagging of the sample are
free-space method [5], E ' and E" of Eccogel 1365-90 were minimized.
GHODGAONKAR er U/ : FREE-SPACE M E A S U R E M E N T OF COMPLEX PERMITTIVITY A N D COMPLEX PERMEABILITY 393

In the frequency range 8 . 6 - 1 3 . 4 GHz, E* and p* values Quartz P l a t e s


are measured for Teflon, sodium borosilicate glass, Ec-
cogel 1365-90, FGM-40, and AN-73. Good agreement is
obtained between measured and published values for Tef-
lon, sodium borosilicate glass, and FGM-40.
s*lb
APPENDIX
CALCULATION OF S PARAMETERS OF THE SAMPLE FROM
THE MEASURED S PARAMETERS OF THE QUARTZ
PLATE-SAMPLE-QUARTZ PLATEASSEMBLY
Fig. 3 shows a schematic diagram of the quartz plate-
sample-quartz plate assembly. The scattering parameters
SIIrrand of the assembly are measured by using the
free-space measurement system. Because of symmetry of Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of quartz plate-sample-quartz plate assembly.
the assembly and the reciprocal nature of the sample ma-
terial, = SI and SI2, = S210. The ABCD matrix [A"]
of the assembly is given by [19] For layered samples (e.g., AN-73), the quartz plate-
sample-quartz plate assembly has Sllr, # S22u. In this
case, ( A l ) should be modified according to the equations
given in [ 191.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions
of Dr. C. L. Croskey of Electrical Engineering and W . J.
('41 1 Burkhard of Electronic Design Services in the design and
If E: and dy are the complex permittivity and thickness fabrication of the free-space microwave measurement
of the fused quartz plate, the ABCD matrix for the quartz setup. The authors would like to thank the reviewers and
plate is given by [20] the editor for helpful suggestions and comments.

REFERENCES
[ I ] R. M . Redhetfer. "The measurement of dielectric constants," in
Techniques of Microwai.e Mea~surenients.C. G . Montgomery, Ed..
(A21 vol. 2. New York: Dover. 1966, pp. 591-657.
where y q is the propagation constant in quartz, which is [2] P. K. Kadaba. "Simultaneous measurement of complex permittivity
and permeability in the millimeter region by a frequency-domain tech-
defined as nique." IEEE Truns. Instrum. Meas., vol. IM-33, pp. 336-340, 1984.
[3] A. L. Cullen, "A new free-wave method for ferrite measurements at
Yy = . i ( 2 a q ) / b . ('43) millimeter wavelengths." Radio Sci., vol. 22, pp. 1168-1 170, 1987.
[4] 1. C. Joseph. R. J . Jost. and E. L. Utt. "Multiple angle of incidence
In (A3), ho represents the free-space wavelength and Zq measurement technique for the permittivity and permeability of lossy
is the normalized characteristic impedance of quartz, materials at millimeter wavelengths," in IEEE AP-S Inr. Swnp. D i g . .
which is related to the complex permittivity by the follow- 1987. pp. 640-643.
ing relationship: (51 D. K. Ghodgaonkar. V. V. Varadan, and V. K . Varadan. "A free-
space method for measurement of dielectric constants and loss tan-
gents at microwave frequencies," IEEE Trans. Instrum. M e a s . , vol.
zy = ( l / @ ) . ('44) 38, pp. 789-793, 1989.
If the ABCD matrix of the sample is denoted by [A']], [6] A. R. Von Hippel. Dielectric Materials and Applications. New
York: Wiley. 1954, pp. 134-135, 310-332.
then the relationship between [ A " ] and [ A ' ] is given by [7] M. B. Amin and J. R. James, "Techniques for utilization of hexag-
the following matrix equation: onal ferrites in radar absorbers, Part I , Broadband planar coatings,"
Radio Elecrron. E n g . , vol. 51, pp. 209-218, 1981.
[A"] = . [ A A ]. [ A ~ I
[ ~ 9 1 (A51 [8] Hewlett-Packard Product Note 85 10-3, "Measuring dielectric con-
stant with the HP 8510 Network Analyzer," 5954-1535. Aug. I .
or 1985.
[9J J . Musil a n d , F . Zacek, Microwave Measurenients of Complex Per-
[AS] = . [A"] * [Ay]-! ('46) mirtivity b?;Free-Spuce Methods and Their Applications. New York:
The parameters S I Iand S2, of the sample can be ob- Elsevier, 1986, p. 52.
101 D. Rytting, "Advances in microwave error correction techniques,"
tained by using the following expressions [ 191: Hewlett-Packard. RF and MW Symp., 5954-8378. June 1, 1987.

SI1 = [ A5
A'
+ B S - C5 - D'
+ B' + Cs+ D ' 1 (A71
I I ] J. Williams. "Accuracy enhancement fundamentals for vector net-
work analyzers." Microtvave J . , vol. 32, pp. 99-1 14, 1989.
121 D. Rytting, "Let time domain response provide additional insight into
network behavior." Hewlett-Packard, RF and MW Symp., 5952-
r 3 1 6660. Mar. 1985.
131 D. R. Gagnon. D. J. White. G . E. Everett, and D. J . Banks, "Tech-
niques for microwave dielectric measurements," Final Rep. NWC TP
394 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION A N D MEASUREMENT. VOL 39. NO. 1. APRIL 1990

6643, Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA. pp. 39-50, 1986. [ 171 J . C. Joseph. “Multiple angle of incidence measurement technique
[ 141 W . Barry, “A broad-band. automated, stripline technique for simul- for the permittivity and permeability of lossy materials at millimeter
taneous measurement of complex permittivity and permeability,” wavelengths.‘‘ M.S. thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology,
IEEE Trans. Microwave T h e o y Tech., vol. MTT-34, pp. 80-84, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, O H , pp. 56-60, 1986.
1986. [I81 W. B. Westphal, “Dielectric constant and loss data,” Tech. Rep.
1151 G. Y. Chin and E. A. Mechtly. “Properties of materials.” in Ref- AFML-74-250, Part 111. Air Force Materials Lab., Air Force Sya-
erence Datu f o r Engineering: Radio, Electronics, Computer, Cot17- tems, 1977.
munications, E . C . Jorden. Ed. Indianapolis, IN: Howard W . Sam, 1191 T . S . Saad. R. C . Hansen, and G. J . Wheeler. Microvlwve Engineers’
1985, pp. 4-20, 4-21. Handbook. vol. 1 . Dedham, MA: Artech House, 1971, p. 179. 4.
[ 161 B. Donecker, “Determining the measurement accuracy o f t h e HP8510 [20] G . Matthaei, L. Young, and E. M . T. Jones, Microwaw Filters,
microwave network analyzer.” Hewlett-Packard RF and MW Symp.. Itnprdarice-McrtchiriRNerbvorks. and Coupling Structures. Dedham,
Oct. 1984. MA: Artech House, 1980. p. 28.

View publication stats

You might also like