Annex 2

Monitoring and Evaluation Tool

Differentiation of Classroom Instruction

SECTION Last Name First Name learners in the 1st

quarter who received
interventions

Ipil-pil ESCALA PRINCE JOMAR ( Reading in English) Yes

Ipil-pil EMNIL JOHN REY (Reading in English) Yes

Ipil-pil OPERAÑ ERHODGE ELIOKISH (Math) Yes

Ipil-pil REALUYO MARKUS JAN LIGHT (Cursive Writing) Yes

Ipil-pil MONTILLA THOSS ALDRIDGE (Reading in English) Yes

Ipil-pil CALINGO KENNETH JAMES (Reading in English) Yes

Ipil-pil CANDELARIO ALDEN JAZZ (Reading in English) Yes

Ipil-pil ANOBA CHARMAINE MATA (Reading in English) Yes

Ipil-pil BETUA ALTHEA (Reading in English) Yes

 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
on Tool

nstruction

Grd/Yr. Level: TWO

failed learners in the
failed learners in the 1st learners who failed learners in the 2nd quarter who learners who
quarter who passed in failed in the 2nd 2nd quarter who passed in the 3rd failed in the third
the 2nd quarter quarter received interventions quarter quarter

None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
List of Teachers
Differentiation of Classroom Instruction

Subject:

Last Name First Name

conducted home
visits or conferences
with parents of all
learners who are at
risk of getting a
failing grade

Agravante Maricel Yes

Otaňes Helenanie Yes
Sollesa Rosiela Yes
Albia Jesusima Yes
Basaňes Emily Yes
Paulino Vilma Yes
Mallorca Jelyn Yes
Antonio Rowena Yes
Adalla Lilibeth Yes
Cumabig Richelle Yes
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
onitoring and Evaluation Tool
List of Teachers
entiation of Classroom Instruction

Grd/Yr. Level:

provided
remedial
instruction to
students who provided remedial
failed in their instruction to students
classes in the who failed in their offered alternative
first quarter, classes in the delivery mode of offered
including those second quarter, instruction as differentiated
conducted home visits or conferences who are at risk including those who intervention to failures assessment as
with parents of all learners who failed in of failing in the are at risk of failing in requiring such intervention to
their subject/s second quarter the third quarter intervention failures

No pupil failed in their subjects Yes

No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
No pupil failed in their subjects Yes
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 42-43)
Leave seat works or collaborative tasks to student groups in a class when on official business or personal leave.
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level: TWO
Last Name First Name MI Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometimes Never
NONE NONE NONE (NONE
100%) (80-99%)
NONE (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 54-55)
Provide substitute teachers when other teachers are on leave for more than a day
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
MI Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometimes Never
NONE (100%)
NONE NONE (80-99%)
NONE (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 58-60)
Conduct remedial reading program
Grd/Yr. Level:
Last Name First Name MI Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometimes Never
Agravante Maricel L. (100%)
YES (80-99%)
YES (79%-below)) (0%)

Otaňes Helenanie M. YES YES

Sollesa Rosiela F. YES YES
Albia Jesusima B. YES YES
Basaňes Emily V. YES YES
Paulino Vilma V. YES YES
Mallorca Jelyn C. YES YES
Antonio Rowena B. YES YES
Adalla Lilibeth R. YES YES
Cumabig Richelle B. YES YES
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool

10 Implementation of reading program—Phil-IRI for intermediate and secondary grades (by grade level)

GRADE TWO
Last Name First Name MI Filipino/English SLOW AVERAGE FAST FRUSTRATION INSTRUCTIONAL INDEPENDENT
ESCALA PRINCE JOMAR M. English /
EMNIL JOHN REY U. English /
OPERAÑ ERHODGE ELIOKISH L. English /
REALUYO MARKUS JAN LIGHT S. English /
MONTILLA THOSS ALDRIDGE G. English /
CALINGO KENNETH JAMES C. English /
CANDELARIO ALDEN JAZZ M. English /
ANOBA CHARMAINE MATA M. English /
BETUA ALTHEA - English /
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 69-71)
Provide substitute teachers when other teachers are on leave for more than a day
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Name of Teachers Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometimes Never
None (100%)
None (80-99%)
None (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:
Annex 2
Monitoring and Evaluation Tool
LIST OF TEACHERS
Policy in Increasing Engaged Time-on-Task from September - November (Nos. 72-73)
Provide substitute teachers when other teachers are on leave for more than a day
Subject: Grd/Yr. Level:
Name MI Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Always Often Sometimes Never
None None (100%)
None (80-99%)
None (79%-below)) (0%)
 TOTAL
PERCENTAGE

PREPARED BY:

CHECKED/REVIEWED BY:

School Head
NOTED BY:

Public Schools District Supervisors