You are on page 1of 5

Autumn Willshaw

February 12, 2020

HRM320: Human Resources Information System

Week 2 Assignment: A Case Study

Case Study Questions

CalleetaCO (The Calleeta Corporation) is a company that has ranked in leader of radio

frequency identification (RFID) manufacturing. This has made the company highly successful in

which the organization invested a large amount of money into hiring and retaining the very best

employees. Over an eight-year span, the company has developed several key business issues

leaving Jan, the CEO, in a jam and John, the vice president of HR, left with the important job of

implementing a few changes so they meet the board’s demands. Even with the development of

business issues, CalleetaCO still has the opportunity of achieving sustainable competitive

advantage. The CEO now must find a way to justify her choice of talent approach, which can be

done through different business measure techniques.

For CalleetaCO, they are facing some pretty common business issues. The key issues are

concerning high costs and slow Return on Investments (ROI). The high costs were mainly

coming from the above-market compensation and benefits plans that were offered to employees

in return for continuous and improved innovation (Kavanagh, Thite, & Johnson, 07/2011, Ch. 10,

p. 330, para. 2). The company’s success made it possible for them to extend their business

globally opening jobs for many in Mexico and Vietnam which has sparked an activists-led

protest for working conditions related issues. On the lighter side, U.S. employees have expressed

the inability to contact HR representatives when visiting foreign facilities. In addition, Jan has

been contacted by HRO firms regarding servicing the HR needs of the foreign locations.

This study source was downloaded by 100000807771540 from CourseHero.com on 01-24-2022 10:30:28 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/57975134/HRM320-Willshaw-Week2-Assignment1docx/
Obviously, CalleetaCO had acquired issues in business that could turn ugly depending on

which HR approach they choose to implement when time comes to manage the issues. Yet, even

with such business issues, the HR department has contributed to the company’s success by

implementing the practice of hiring the best, paying them the best, and providing them with the

best but expensive benefit programs which yielded the best candidates for the positions held

within the company that created innovative products the market demanded. Thanks to the

practices developed by the HR’s vice president, the company was able to achieve their strategic

goal to ultimately become “the global leader in RFID products” by “challenging the top

providers in its industry” (para. 2). Though the company has achieved success in one area they

are unfortunately not making board members happy because of the lack to produce numbers. Jan

proposed a growth would come from going global, yet the current ROI’s suggest otherwise.

Now, not just Jan, but John Nosmas are left with a heavy burden on their shoulders and

they have just two weeks to make big changes which will make the owners happy and keep

business operating. One recommendation to John would be to conduct a basic job analysis to

help with identifying the appropriate knowledge, skills, and abilities for each job (p. 327, para.

2). Then HR can develop a HR administration module in which the information from the analysis

will be entered. A second recommendation would be to revise current processes used by the HR

department which includes improving the current HR approach being used. The third

recommendation I suggest would be to evaluate the current compensation and benefits plan for

the inessential needs that can be eliminated to aid in lowering the employee’s costs that had

become a high expense the board was unwilling to continue providing for. The last

recommendation, probably the most important one would be to create a work environment that

resembles the U.S. facility in the facilities oversea by imitating the processes used in the U.S.

This study source was downloaded by 100000807771540 from CourseHero.com on 01-24-2022 10:30:28 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/57975134/HRM320-Willshaw-Week2-Assignment1docx/
John will need to make changes that will “slow employee expense growth, control the

activist stakeholder groups, and ultimately improve earnings” (p. 331, para. 1-2). By conducting

a job analysis, John will be able to visually locate unnecessary positions currently employed, he

can develop a structured plan of administration to include foreign affairs, and he can eliminate

costly expenditures that will not result in unhappy employees. Changes like eliminating some of

the unnecessary and unused benefits such as the onsite spa and fitness centers and onsite pet

boarding will help achieve a sustainable competitive advantage because these are benefits where

money is being wasted away and probably not used by anyone so why not get rid of it. To create

a competitive advantage an organization must have elements that cannot be imitated, benefit

plans can easily be copied. If I were in Johns shoes, I would focus on investing in human capital

by employing knowledgeable and smart candidates that cannot be cloned and work on creating

relationships with their customers that leave an impression that cannot be erased.

There exist measurements for HR professionals to use to support their choice of talent

approach that will offer senior management four perspectives explaining how the implementation

of a chosen approach has contributed to a sustainable competitive advantage for the organization.

A balanced scorecard is just that, a business tool for measuring HR approaches and techniques so

that HR professionals can sophisticatedly keep track of strategic activity. It is a link that connects

performance measures to financial, customers, internal business, and innovation and learning

perspectives (Kaplan & Norton, 1992, para. 5-9). Jan can use this tool to explain her chosen

approach and visualize how her performance measures in the areas most important to board

members. She will be able to show top management leaders how customers view the business,

exactly what activity the company is superior in, and if they will be able to continuously improve

and create value that contributes to the organization’s strategic goals.

This study source was downloaded by 100000807771540 from CourseHero.com on 01-24-2022 10:30:28 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/57975134/HRM320-Willshaw-Week2-Assignment1docx/
The following is a balanced scorecard sample Jan could hypothetically use in her presentation to

the board:

(ECI'S Balanced Business Scorecard, 1992)

This study source was downloaded by 100000807771540 from CourseHero.com on 01-24-2022 10:30:28 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/57975134/HRM320-Willshaw-Week2-Assignment1docx/
References
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992, Jan-Feb). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive

Performance. Retrieved February 17, 2020, from Harvard Business Review:

https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2

Kavanagh, M. J., Thite, M., & Johnson, R. D. (07/2011). Human Resource Information Systems:

Basics, Appications, and Future Directions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California, United

States: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved Febraury 14, 2020, from

vbk://9781483332710

This study source was downloaded by 100000807771540 from CourseHero.com on 01-24-2022 10:30:28 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/57975134/HRM320-Willshaw-Week2-Assignment1docx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like