Page 1 of 3

Since the first FTA was signed in 1994, free trade agreements have led to a number
of benefits for both parties involved in the agreement. These agreements flourished
in the course of time, such that at the moment there are many such agreements, for
example NAFTA (The North American Free Trade Agreement), ASEAN (The
Association of Southeast Asian Nations), EFTA (the European Free Trade
Association), SAFTA (the South Asian Free Trade Area), the Pacific Alliance.
Morever, there are also many bilateral agreements between countries, such as
between the EU and Canada, the EU and Japan and the EU and Korea, as well as
many free trade areas.

NAFTA, for example ensures the most favoured nation status to all the co-signers,
the elimination of many tariffs, the obligation of a certificate of origin, ensures
procedures to resolve trade disputes, respects patents, trademarks and copyrights
and makes easy travel possible for all business travellers.

These attributes understandably led to many positive changes, among which the
following: trade has tripled between Canada, Mexico and the USA, an increase of
economic output, a growing number of jobs, the creation of new job positions, a
decrease in prices, support with government spending, as well as a foreign direct
investment which tripled.

On the other side, the application of the NAFTA prerogatives also led to a number
of unfortunate happenings: while the creation of jobs was hailed both in the USA
as well as in the other countries in the agreement (approx 5.4 million jobs were
suppported in the USA whereas the trade with other countries supported 17.7
million jobs), this was unfortunately counterbalanced by job losses (according to
the 2011 report of the Economic Policy Institute, approx 700,000 jobs were lost).
The industries which were affected were those belonging to the second industrial
sector, for instance the manufacturing, automotive, textile, computer and electrical
appliance industries.

Morever, the job migration also meant suppressed wages for USA workers. The
companies developed a scheme to prevent workers from joining unions. These
companies threatened with moving their headquarters (and consquently their
labour force) into Mexico if the employees took drastic measures such as
organizing themselves into unions. Faced with this obstacle in joining unions to
 Page 2 of 3

fight for their interests, the employees could not argue for better wages or for other
benefits.

While it did lead to the creation of jobs, at that point, NAFTA also led to Mexican
farmers being out of work. It achieved this by allowing farm products subsidized
by the US government into Mexico, at lower prices than the existing Mexican farm
products. As a result, the Mexican products could not compete with the USA
products in terms of price. As many as 1.3 million farmers were out of business,
according to the Economic Policy Institute.

The working conditions did not undergo any substantial improvement since the
NAFTA, as many low-cost factories continued to function in Mexico. These are
called maquiladoras in Spanish and are usually located near the Mexican border.
Their aim is to produce goods at a lower cost which will afterwards be exported in
the USA, hence they also benefit from carrying business with the USA, on the
basis on NAFTA.1

NAFTA was replaced in September 2018 with the United States–Mexico–Canada

Agreement (USMCA), and entered into force in July 2020. It aims to ensure
improved rules of origin for products, to modernize and improve agricultural trade
in North America, to support trade opportunities, to protect US intellectual
property and covers new domains: Digital Trade, Anticorruption, and Good
Regulatory Practices as well as bringing support to small and medium-sized
enterprises.2

Nevertheless, it is not the only free trade agreement which harbors many
advantages as well as galling disadvantages.

The balance of advantages and disadvantages does not look any better in the case
of ASEAN, as a look at the effects in the Philippines shows us.

ASEAN comprises a total of about 630 million people3, not just from China and
India, but also from neighboring Asian countries, such as Singapore, the

1
Article on Investopedia
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/maquiladora.asp#:~:text=A%20maquiladora%20is%20a%20low,
U.S.%2C%20including%20certain%20tax%20advantages.
2
https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/united-states-mexico-canada-agreement
3
https://asean.org/storage/2017/01/Investing-in-ASEAN-2017-.pdf
 Page 3 of 3

Philippines, Indonesia, Myanmar, Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia

and Laos. This makes it the fifth largest economy in the world, but also renders this
union its unique challenges and concerns. The ASEAN has no single currency, like
most countries in Europe, but it does fight to address common concerns. It boasts
of examples of cooperation, such as in the fight against pollution, human
trafficking and illegal wildfire trade.

The ASEAN commits itself to the following positive developments: easier and
cheaper travel options, as in the visa-free entry countries such as Cambodia,
Indonesia and Malaysia, plans to improve transportation, cheaper goods and
services, taxes being either lowered or eliminated, better employment
opportunities, especially in the IT industry (since it is the fastest growing domain,
with about 700 million digital consumers), better education (support for students,
scholarship programmes). Some countries, such as the Philippines may be said to
be better prepared for globalization.4

ASEAN provides stability for all the members of the agreement, from many points
of view, but its members are not quite ready for Western-style democracy. Such
matters might take more time as opposed to other aspects, concerning
transportation, education, employment and so on.

Besides the challenges it faces, ASEAN is also not without its weaknesses, such as
corruption, unequal social strata due to disparities in economic development,
environmental degradation and political issues.5

Sources:

https://www.thebalance.com/nafta-pros-and-cons-3970481

4
https://www.eastvantage.com/insights/asean-global-necessity
5
https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/05/10/weaknesses-asean-
way.html#:~:text=As%20a%20regional%20grouping%2C%20ASEAN,purely%20emulating%20the%20
Western%20approach.