Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Everyone knows head and stomach aches, hunger, thirst, lust, disgust spiritedness
and tiredness. Everyone has felt anger welling up in themselves, has been brought
down by grief, has been lifted by joy. Such experiences give man the assurance
that it is she who is experiencing them. But this certainty is obfuscated by the fact
that such events and states often occur in places where man finds parts of his body
or believes them to be. They are transposed into the body, since they occur to the
body. Thus they are removed from their immediate certainty, for man can take a
step back from his body, look at and investigate it, use and style it, while she has
to suffer her hunger, his pain and relief himself.
Through the two words ‘Leib’ (the felt body) and ‘Körper’ (the material body),
it is easy for us Germans to distinguish the felt body from visible (and otherwise
perceptible) material body. Other languages need to resort to cumbersome para-
phrases. It takes the felt body [Leib] to be the epitome of everything that someone
can feel of themselves (as belonging to themselves) in the vicinity (not always
in the bounds) of their material body without drawing on their five senses and
perceptual body scheme, i. e. the habitual image of one’s own body gained through
experience (in particular vision and touch). This epitome of embodiedness I divide
into four types of embodied stirrings: first, there are merely embodied stirrings
https://doi.org/10.1515/yewph-2017/0004
such as fright, fear, pain, anxiety, itches, tickles, disgust, lust, relief, hunger, thirst,
spiritedness, tiredness, animalistic contentment. The second group are the em-
bodied stirrings by means of which emotions take hold of an affectively involved
person in such a manner that they become their own emotions, felt by themselves.
In this sense raging anger as a force that takes hold of one differs from anger as
an embodied stirring by means of which anger imbues someone with expressive
authenticity (flashing eyes, clenched fists, a sharp voice etc.). Such feeling needn’t
exhaust itself in the embodied stirring, but may also contain a personal stance
to the involvement in the form of surrender or resistance. Both groups are forms
of affective involvement. The following two groups I have counted as embodied
stirrings, because both with a view to spatial extension as well as with a view to
dynamism and embodied communication (this will yet be dealt with) they belong
in the same category, even though they do occur without any notable affective
involvement. Third are felt motor skills, both intentional and spontaneous, as in
shivering, twitching, sneezing. Fourth are irreversible embodied directions, party
tied to movement such as breathing out, swallowing, the channels of the embodied
motor scheme, partly without motion, as in a gaze or glance.
It is an error to conceive of these embodied stirrings as felt states of the body.
In so doing one would overlook the difference in the manner of spatial extension.
The body of a human or an animal is constantly extended, limited and divisible
by surfaces, with various positions and distances of its elements. Anything em-
bodied, however, is surfaceless. One cannot feel surfaces in one’s own felt body,
while one can look at and feel one’s own material body. The difference is easily
dor de cabeça
illustrated using the example of a headache. It shares its location with the head, a
three-dimensional mass divisible by sections. A headache is spatially extended
in a different manner, as a diffuse contracting and contracted mass, not clearly
delimited, yet shaped by dynamic accents (pounding, hammering, banging) but
nowhere divisible and thus not decomposable into parts. The space of the felt body
is a surfaceless space just like the space of sound with its spatially manifesting
suggestions of motion, which take hold of dancing and marching felt bodies as
being far and near, as having direction, expansive and pointed shapes, but without
points, distances and surfaces. Spaces of impressive places (festive, stifling or
gently invigorating ones), of the weather, of the unnoticeable background that is
continuously presupposed in small backwards-directed movements, the space of
impacting headwind with a motion without a change of location which one notices
in the direction of its origin as long as one does not re-interpret is as air in motion
and the space of water for a swimmer who struggles to get ahead or who gently
floats are equally surfaceless spaces.
Surfaceless spaces do not have geometrical dimensions, since such are only
accessible in ascending to or descending from a surface. But they do have dynamic
rhythmical: compact in such a manner that tension and swelling stick together
tightly or rhythmical in such a manner that a dominance of tension and a domi-
nance of swelling alternate at short intervals, while it might still be one of the two
competing impulses that gives the entire stirring its character.
I now demarcate the scope of expansion and contraction in the dimension of
embodied contracted- or expandedness with prominent examples of embodied
stirrings.
Fear and pain are closely related as conflicts of tension and swelling with a
dominance of tension. They are expansive impulses which are resisted by over-
powering inhibition, I speak of a stifled impulse “Away!”. Fear is less entangled
than pain. It consists in a search of a way out of oppression in an embodiedly
contracting manner. Here the impulse “Away!” is successful in that the fear gets
going and takes the oppression along, for instance, in panicked flight but no less
so in simulating being dead: one is paralysed and, while one doesn’t want to leave
one’s relative location, but one’s absolute one by undercutting the entire situation
with the absolute location at its center by means of switching off or coming loose.
Something similar is impossible in the case of pain. Its expansive impulse can only
be released symbolically, in a cry that instead of the person suffering escapes into
expandedness, and in rearing-up which immediately collapses. In fear one can
become absorbed as in rage or enthusiasm, but not in pain; it confronts. For pain
is both a state of one’s own which one wants to escape as well as an imposing
enemy with which one has to deal. The Janus-faced nature of pain is mirrored in the
oppositionality of the associated, partly contracting and party expanding gestures:
screaming, moaning and rearing up are attempts to escape into expandedness,
clenching one’s fists and one’s jaw and lips, on the other hand, are contracting
attitudes with a view to defending against the pain in close combat. Both are not
compatible: one cannot escape one’s opponent by approaching them. The form
of binding of tension and swelling is rhythmical in the case of fear and compact
in the case of pain. For this reason, someone in fear pants: swelling sets in in
breathing, is broken by inhibiting tension and sets in again. No one pants in pain.
The oppression by pain as an enemy is too massive for the elastic oscillations of
the rhythm.
As conflicts of tension and swelling in the vital drive, fear and pain are ag-
onizing. They thus differ from fright which is otherwise similar in virtue of its
dominance of contraction over expansion. But in fright this dominance is so
strong that the vital drive, as a bond of contraction and expansion in privative
contraction tends towards contractedness. In fright one becomes motionless, not
in fear or pain. Fright is embarrassing or annoying as an interruption of the vital
drive which has to be re-connected, not as the friction between opposing tenden-
cies.
etc. for all movable body parts. A confusion could have nasty consequences. This
order encompasses a point of reference relative to which something is right or
left, higher or lower etc. From this point of reference all movable body parts can
easily be found and activated in their place, but it is impossible to find this point
of reference by mere inversion of this direction from the limbs. For the perceptual
body scheme, however, it is absolutely no problem to invert the connection from
head to foot into that of foot to head.
I will be satisfied to merely cast a brief glance at the second dimension of
embodied dynamism, i. e. that of protopathic and epicritical tendency. I have
adopted the terms from the English neurologist Henry Head. The tendency towards
what is muffled, blurred and reaching out diffusely is protopathic, whereas the
tendency towards what is pointed and sharp is epicritical. The felt body, as a surge
of islands of embodied space, and the vital drive in its basic directionless form
are protopathic, whereas the higher forms of vitality, receptivity and fastening
of the drive require epicritical tendencies for their selectivity. In the case of pain,
dull intestinal pain is protopathic, whereas a sharp toothache is epicritical. The
mild lust of gentle sensations of touch is more protopathic, whereas the stinging
sensation sending shivers down one’s spine in a thrilling experience of horror is
rather epicritical. Hunger is protopathic contractedness, the feeling of an addled
head after a few drinks too; epicritical expansion, on the other hand, encourages
a cheerful and fresh start into the day with a light springy step. Although the
protopathic tendency is more inclined towards expansion and the epicritical more
towards contraction, there are consequently opposed pairings. So both dimensions
need to be distinguished.
From the embodied [leiblich] dynamism of the individual felt body I now turn
to embodied communication by means of which embodied dynamism more or
less extends beyond the felt body of an individual. From the word go, embodied
dynamism is communicative, for the vital drive intertwines the two opposed im-
pulses of contraction and expansion in a kind of dialogue. This dialogue becomes
a conflict among partners in pain which, as an imposing enemy stifles the expan-
sively swelling impulse “Away!” and confronts it. Pain is not only an intruder into
the felt body, but also its own state; merely intruding opponents which, like pain,
are only felt in one’s own body but aren’t noticeable as external objects such as the
wind and an overpowering sense of gravity if one falls and only catches oneself
at the last minute. Pain, wind and overpowering gravity like a voice or various
other things, are half-things which differ from common things in two respects: they
come, go and return without it making sense to ask where they have been in the
meantime and they take effect immediately without distinction between cause and
[Einwirkung]. This immediacy gives them an imposing quality by means of which
they squeeze into the vital drive. Thus results a joint drive, as between partners
compact vital drive which is weak if slack and strong if forceful. This embodied
dynamism is equally felt by the person walking as well as it is perceived by others
in suggestions of motion and synesthetic character by others.
Suggestions of motion imbue gestures with gestural meaning by means of
which, for instance, a blink of the eye becomes a gesture of request, of seduction,
of submission or of irony, pointing at a bystander a kind of dagger that stabs them;
just slightly tilting one’s head backwards, by its suggestion of motion, becomes
a prominent gesture of pride. Rhythm is the suggestion of motion of sequence
as such, possibly loaded with further, for instance, tonal suggestors of motion
and synesthetic character; for this reason poems that “get under your skin”, i. e.
ones which grasp the listener in an embodied manner, take verse form (often also
rhyming) rather that of less rhythmical prose. The rhythm survives translation from
the optical to the acoustic and to the embodied medium without loss. A domain of
suggestions of motion and synesthetic character in which they can unfold partic-
ularly well is the acoustic medium, in particular music together with rhythmical
sounds such as calls, clapping, drumming. For this reason this medium has such
a strong effect on the integration of solidary incorporation in singing, dancing,
marching and mass ecstasy. Synthetic character may, for instance, be gentle, soft,
hard. Spring air can be just as gentle as the sound of a voice, protopathic with
little tension and a little more swelling. “Hard”[Hart] sounds hard, “soft” [“weich”]
sounds soft without there being an obvious reason for transfer from the tactile to
the acoustic domain. What overlaps here is rather the epicritical or protopathic
tendency of embodied dynamism. Synesthetic character of taste or olfactory quali-
ties carry constellations of embodied dynamism which may determine peoples’
composure, likes and dislikes, even their life forms and can take effect, for instance,
in choosing from a menu: soft, sweet, fatty is protopathic and low in tension, bit-
ter, grainy and coarse are epicritical with heightened tension. Mozart’s music is
epicritical and marked by tension and privative expansion which is mediated by
embodied direction, just as in a springy step. In terms of its synesthetic character it
corresponds to the color yellow and the vowel “i”, whereas Beethoven’s music with
its protopathic swelling is related rather to the color red. Suggestions of motion
and synesthetic character also determine the character of a city, as I have shown
in my book Atmosphären.
So far, I have dealt with embodied communication as incorporation. Finally,
I cast a brief concluding glance at another form the channel of which is not the
vital drive but the privative expansion of the felt body. Here we are dealing with
excorporation. It is a dream state in which the contractedness of the felt body is
subjected to shapeless expandedness so that there is no more clear object refer-
ence but a sinking into something. This sunkenness becomes productive if after
dedifferentiation of the details of the circumstances by connection with one-sided
incorporation leads to encounters with pure forms (such as sound, light, scent,
warmth), to the naked presentation of elementary impressions which are only
briefly touched upon in the complexity of day-to-day commerce but get lost.