Professional Documents
Culture Documents
found in inscriptional data. Through the author’s skillful use of these data,
each of the book’s chapters illuminates a different aspect of early medieval
Indian history. Thus the book provides a powerful counterweight to the
many studies of this age that have relied too heavily on contemporary
literary works, especially Brahamanical texts that tend to be normative in
nature. In passing, Chattopadhyaya urges his archaeologist colleagues to
follow his lead and turn their attention to the early medieval period, for he
feels that many of his hypotheses could be confirmed by archaeological
data.
Another major contribution of this volume is its attempt to rethink the
way in which historians periodise Indian history. Periodisation forms a
crucial part of the historian’s task, since the chronological periods into
which we divide the past reflects-if not dictates-how we think about the
past. For this reason, Chattopadhyaya wishes to do away entirely with the
old tripartite ’ancient-medieval-modern’ scheme of periodisation (itself a
gloss for the still older ’Hindu-Muslim-British’ scheme) and replace it with
a scheme whose earlier phases consist of proto-historic, early historic, and
local cults to become identified with sacred centers, when kings acted as
agents of enshrined divinities, and when states expanded by building upon
pre-existing agrarian units (pp. 197-209). The sort of dynamic, socio-
political processes revealed by Chattopadhyaya’s epigraphic research also
refutes the static models of India’s premodern past propounded by a range
of Euro-American scholars, both Orientalist and post-Orientalist, who
have viewed the seventh to thirteenth centuries in terms of a ’dark period’
(Digby), of a ’traditional polity’ (Moore, Richards, Eisenstadt), of ’ritual
kingship’ (Inden), or of ’segmentary states’ (Stein, Fox, Heesterman)
(pp. 184, 186, 187, 202).
Finally, Chattopadhyaya’s use of epigraphical data enables him to con-
tribute to the much-debated thesis of Indian feudalism, which many his-
torians have argued was in full flower during the period of the author’s own
specialised study. The very existence of this phenomenon, he observes,
rests on the assumption that, between the seventh and thirteenth centuries,
India experienced a decline in trade and urban life. But inscriptional
evidence cited by the author shows that large and thriving cities flourished
all over north India at this time, a point that seems to be reinforced by
archaeological evidence. In the end, Chattopadhyaya concludes that the
notion of Indian ’feudalism’, as an analytical term, is quite useless. Having
become in effect a synonym for political fragmentation, he notes, the
feudalism thesis ’has in fact been shuttled back and forth in Indian history
to suit any period in which no &dquo;unitary empire&dquo; could be located on the
political horizon’ (p. 189).
This is an important volume that is full of fresh insights; it should be read
by all students of premodern Indian history.
Richard M. Eaton
University of Arizona