You are on page 1of 1

A clean energy transition plan for India

It also demonstrates a commitment to climate change mitigation by optimising resources with indigenous technology
installed generation capacity of their usage. In addition, the Nu- cient TPPs with obsolete technolo-
382 GW (as of March 2021). Coal, clear Power Corporation of India gy in the total TPP generation ca-
therefore, plays a vital role in In- Limited (NPCIL) is also construct- pacity will reduce from the FY
dia’s ongoing efforts to achieve ing 11 nuclear power plants with a 2018-19 level of 46% to 4%. Conse-
Sustainable Development Goal 7, total generation capacity of 8,700 quently, total CO2 emissions from
which is “to ensure access to affor- MW that will supply 24x7 power the power sector will go down by
A.V. Krishnan & R. Srikanth dable, reliable, sustainable and without any CO2 emissions. 57 Mt even as coal-fired electricity
modern energy for all”. generation is projected to increase
Capacity increase by 21% to 1,234 BU in 2029-30.

GETTY IMAGES
E
nergy security warrants the Renewable energy With the implementation of our
uninterrupted supply of While variable renewable energy transition plan, the total installed Estimated benefits
energy at affordable prices. (VRE) sources (primarily, wind capacity of TPPs operated by utili- Since HELE TPPs minimise emis-
India faces the twin challenges of and solar) account for 24.7% of the ties will increase from the current sions of particulate matter (PM),
meeting the aspirations of its 1.3 total installed generation capacity, unaffordable to industries that level of 209 GW (as of September SO2, and NO2, our transition plan
billion population even as it safe- as of March 2021, they contributed need low-cost 24x7 power to com- 2021) to 220 GW by FY 2029-30 offers operational, economic, and
guards its energy security and con- 10.7% of the electricity generated pete in the global market. even after retiring 211 inefficient environmental benefits including
tributes to global efforts to miti- by utilities during FY 2020-21. Ho- and obsolete TPPs that are more avoidance of sustenance Capex
gate climate change. Thanks to the wever, the ramp-up of VRE gener- Contours of a plan than 25 years old and need major and FGD costs in the 211 obsolete
Electricity Act of 2003, the in- ation capacity without commen- We have developed a time-bound sustenance capital expenditures TPPs to be retired besides savings
stalled coal-fired thermal power surate growth in electricity transition plan for India’s power (Capex) for life extension, moder- in specific coal consumption and
plant (TPP) generation capacity in demand has resulted in lower util- sector involving the progressive nisation, and retrofit of flue gas de- water requirement leading to re-
India more than doubled from 94 isation of TPPs whose fixed costs retirement of 36 GW of installed sulphurisation plants (FGDs). The ductions in electricity tariffs and
GW to 192 GW between March 2011 must be paid by the distribution generation capacity in 211 TPPs combined thermal (220 GW) and PM pollution.
and 2017. This sharp increase in companies (DISCOMs) and passed (unit size 210 MW and below) nuclear (15 GW) capacity of 235 This plan prioritises the installa-
the installed capacity has enabled through to the final consumer. based on key performance param- GW can meet the baseload re- tion of high-efficiency electrostatic
the government to increase per The rapid growth of VRE sourc- eters such as efficiency, specific quirement (80% of peak demand) precipitators that can remove
capita electricity consumption by es in India has been largely aided coal consumption, technological during the evening peak in FY 99.97% of the PM pollution with-
37% while reducing peak demand by policy measures as well as fi- obsolescence, and age. The result- 2029-30 without expensive bat- out extensive shutdowns or hiking
deficit from 9.8% (2010-11) to 1.6% nancial incentives whose cost is ing shortfall in baseload electricity tery storage, while the optimal tariffs unlike expensive, imported
(2016-17). However, India has a borne by the consumer. The cur- generation can be made up by in- utilisation of existing and under- FGDs. The implementation of this
long way to go in providing elec- rent level of VRE in the national creasing the utilisation of existing construction HELE TPPs with fas- plan will enable India to safeguard
tricity security to its people since power grid is increasing the cost of High-Efficiency-Low-Emission ter-ramping capabilities and lower its energy security and ensure effi-
its per capita electricity consump- power procurement for DISCOMs, (HELE) TPPs that are currently un- technical minimums also facili- cient grid operations with lower
tion is still only a third of the global leading to tariff increases for elec- der-utilised to accommodate VRE tates VRE integration. water consumption, PM pollution,
average. tricity consumers. Specifically, the and commissioning the 47 govern- As per our transition plan, In- and CO2 emissions. Ultimately, this
Forum of Regulators has estimated ment-owned TPPs (total capacity dia’s power generation from TPPs plan demonstrates India’s com-
Thermal plants are the core the total additional burden of grid of 31.6 GW) that are at an advanced is expected to reduce from the FY mitment to climate change mitiga-
Coal is the only fuel that India has integration of VRE sources in- stage of construction in which 2020-21 level of 71% to 57% of the tion by optimising the use of our
in abundance and the geopolitics cludes ₹1.11 of balancing cost and ₹1,77,742 crore have already been total electrical energy (2,172 BU) land, coal, water, and financial re-
of India’s neighborhood do not ₹1.02 of stranded capacity cost, to- invested by government utilities. projected to be generated by utili- sources with indigenous
permit ready access to piped natu- talling ₹2.13 per unit. Therefore, These TPPs have already signed ties during FY 2029-30. Further, technology.
ral gas. TPPs contributed 71% of India must implement a plan to in- power purchase agreements with the share of HELE TPPs in the total
the 1,382 billion units (BU) of elec- crease energy efficiency and re- the respective DISCOMs; and TPP generation capacity will in- A.V. Krishnan and R. Srikanth are Visiting
tricity generated by utilities in In- duce the emissions of carbon diox- thanks to the two-part tariff policy, crease from the FY 2018-19 level of Professor and Professor, respectively, at
dia during FY 2020-21 though they ide (CO2) and airborne pollutants their fixed costs must be borne by 25% to 44% in FY 2029-30. More the National Institute of Advanced
accounted for only 55% of the total from TPPs without making power power consumers irrespective of importantly, the share of ineffi- Studies, Bengaluru

You might also like