Guidelines For Utility Impact Assessment For Local Roads in Developed Areas MME 2012 Cross-Section

MINISTRY OF MUNICIPALITY
AND ENVIRONMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Guidelines for
Utility Impact Assessment for Local Roads in
Developed Areas MME Cross Section 2012
February 2019
Ministry of Municipality and ‫وزارة البـــــلـــــــــــديــة و‬
Environment ‫البيئـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــة‬
Infrastructure Planning Dept. ‫إدارة تخطيط البنية التحتية‬
Table of Contents
DOCUMENT CONTROL ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 DOCUMENT CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION .............................................................................. 3
1.2 PROCEDURES FOR SUBMISSION.......................................................................................... 3
1.3 ACRONYMS AND TERMINOLOGY: ........................................................................................ 3
2.0 PROCEDURE FOR UTILITY ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 3
3.0 ABOVE GROUND FEATURES .......................................................................................... 5
3.1 STREET LIGHTING COLUMNS............................................................................................. 5
3.2 STORMWATER GULLIES .................................................................................................. 7
3.3 TREES .................................................................................................................... 8
3.4 GANTRIES, TRAFFIC LIGHTS, SIGNAGE AND STREET FURNITURE ........................................................ 8
4.0 APPROVAL PROCESS ................................................................................................... 8
4.1 IPD-MME’S INITIAL APPROVAL ........................................................................................ 9
4.2 NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATES FROM UTILITY PROVIDERS ............................................................... 9
4.3 IPD-MME’S PRE-CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL ......................................................................... 9
4.4 IPD-MME’S FINAL APPROVAL.......................................................................................... 9
5.0 DISCLAIMER ............................................................................................................ 10
6.0 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ 10
Document Control
Document No. IPD-MME-UT-LRD-01-R1
Prepared By M. Hamidy
Verify By M. Chebib
Approved By Ibrahim Abbas Hassan
Revision 1 Date
Tel: (+974) 4426 5305 – Fax: (+974) 4426 6242 www.baladiya.gov.qa DOC. NO. IPD-MME-UT-CS14-01-R1
P.O. Box: 22423 Doha – Qatar
1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this document, from the Infrastructure Planning Department of the Ministry of Municipality
and Environment (IPD-MME), document is to provide guidelines for the Utility Corridor allocation to achieve
optimum use of the Right of Way for a Local Road in Developed Areas.
The intended audiences for this document includes, without limitation, government agencies, service providers
and private agencies involved in public services and infrastructure in the State of Qatar.
1.1 Document Control and Distribution

Updates and modifications to this document are controlled by IPD-MME. Users of this document should
check that they have the most current version. Users are encouraged to provide feedback, which will be
reviewed, assessed and possibly included in the next version.
1.2 Procedures for Submission

A written application shall be sent to the Director of Infrastructure Planning Department of the Ministry of
Municipality and Environment. The Applicant shall provide drawings including location plan, site plan,
proposed design, and any other relevant information to comply with MME’s submission requirements in both
electronic (CAD & PDF) and paper version.
1.3 Acronyms and Terminology:

IPD: Infrastructure Planning Department at MME
MME: Ministry of Municipality and Environment
PPD: Public Parks Department
PWA: Public Works Authority
ROW: Right of Way
UPD: Urban Planning Department
2.0 PROCEDURE FOR UTILITY ASSESSMENT

The designers for all Local Roads with respect to the Utility Corridor allocation must undertake the following
steps:
a. Establish the extent of the road project’s impact (which may extend beyond the limits of the
project limit of work).
b. Collect data from all the relevant agencies including their proposed future projects. This data
shall be updated at regular intervals throughout the development of the project.
c. A site investigation and survey (including a Ground Penetration Radar survey) to verify the
position and levels of the agencies’ underground as well as aboveground assets should be
carried out.
d. Develop a Discrepancy Plans identifying all the discrepancies between the agency’s As Built
data against the surveyor’s surveyed data. These plans shall be submitted to the responsible
agency for their information and use. The surveyed data should be considered accurate and used
instead of the agency’s As Built data, wherever applicable.
e. Develop the traffic requirements and finalize the road layout including, but not limited, all the
junction configuration, bus stops, parking bays, taxi ranks, services roads and access points.
f. Identify the road project’s underground structures such as ramps, troughs and tunnels, or surface
assets such as light poles, street signs, traffic signals, barriers, pedestrian railings and
landscaping features including tree planters.
g. Superimpose the proposed road layout plan and hard structures on top of the existing and
proposed utilities identifying and assessing the impact of the proposed road project on the
existing and known proposed utilities.
h. Superimpose the proposed road layout plan and hard structures with MME’s generic (MME’s
2012 Typical Cross Sections) corridor sections layout for that particular ROW width.
i. Carry out an Utility Impact Assessment, where the engineer shall decide for each of the existing
utilities whether to :
i keep the utility in its current location without treatment,
ii protect the utility
iii divert/relocate the utility or adjust its depth to comply with agency’s requirements.
iv excavate and remove the existing utility completely or abandon it in place with appropriate
treatment.
j. A value engineering exercise needs to be carried out. MME supports proposals that keeps
utilities in their existing location as much as possible by adjusting or providing provisions
within the road design such as:
i Road geometry (appropriate grade, alignment, widening on one side, ramp positioning)
ii Highway drainage (alignments and locations of Ditches/Culverts/Inlets/Curbs)
iii Retaining walls (appropriate design selection)
iv Batters/Slopes/Barriers Bridges and abutment arrangements (maintaining corridors)
v Protection above water pipes (AK)
vi Concrete protection above electric cables and other ductwork
vii Departures from standard design specifications
viii Road carriageway or lane width reduction to avoid utilities.
ix Consider signal standard changes
x Increased signal mast arm lengths
xi Signal and sign locations
k. The above considerations should be given in order to minimize the impact on any existing
subsurface utilities, especially with respect to transmission cables or pipes.
l. MME’s 2012 or 2014 typical cross sections, as appropriate, should be used as guideline only
and adjustment must be carried out to reconfigure the corridor allocation to suit the location of
the existing utilities, proposed utilities and the road configuration.
m. In areas of road widening where the existing utilities fall inside the proposed wider carriageway,
the design engineer shall propose engineering solutions that either keep the affected utility in its
current location, or relocate it outside the carriageway in a more desirable location if space is
available. The design engineer should consider the items listed below (as per MME –IPD’s
checklist, item 4) and liaise with the utility agencies in order to determine the most appropriate
engineered solution for their respective assets.
i The material of utility e.g. VC/Asbestos or AC/ DI pipes or Oil Filled vs. XLPE cables
ii The size and purpose of the utility (distribution or transmission)
iii The age and condition of the utility and assessment of any upgrade plans in coordination
with the asset owner
iv The size and frequency of access chambers should be determined
v The schedule for periodic maintenance access (if any) of the asset should be established
vi The proposed location of the utility within the carriageway and the impact on traffic i.e. lane
closures during maintenance, breakage or upgrade should be assessed.
vii The hierarchy comparative cost of relocating utilities, i.e. cost of relocating a smaller
cable/pipe vs. bigger cable/pipe
viii Identification of any Substations, Pump Stations, etc. along the route that will need additional
corridor provision for future expansion
ix Risk assessment in case of emergencies i.e. pressure mains bursting, electrical cable failure
or telecommunication duct damage should be carried out.
n. In the majority of the cases, where road widening schemes or major structural elements are
proposed, the allocated utility corridor widths as per MME’s 2012 or 2014 typical cross-section
will not be achieved, the design engineer should therefore consider the following:
i Corridors should only be provided for existing and known future utilities.
ii The placement of utilities under carriageway with deeper utilities towards the inner lane
of the carriageway. It is preferred to place transmission cables or pipes at these
locations. Generally, the installation of LV cables, telecommunication ducts and small
distribution pipes or any other utilities required for house connections should not be
installed within the carriageway.
iii Further space saving can be achieved (subject to authority approval) if the utilities are
placed in the following manner
 Shared Trenches/Common Trench for compatible utilities e.g. gas and water
 Stacking of Utilities over short stretches e.g. transmission cables & large
diameter pressure mains below distribution cables & smaller diameter pressure
mains
 Telecommunication ducts above pressure mains or transmission cables where
concrete slab is placed between the two for protection
 Easement, instead of acquiring land - utility easement can be created to allow
utilities to traverse at pinch points.
 Rerouting of the utilities within secondary minor roads parallel to main traffic
routes, this option should be especially considered at junctions.
 Consideration should be made for Power Galleries or Utility Tunnels in lieu of
land acquisition and when other options are exhausted and Value Engineering
has identified these as the optimal solution in any given case.
3.0 ABOVE GROUND FEATURES

Currently, MME does not allocate corridors for above ground features. However, following are some
guidelines to be followed for the major above ground features within the ROW.
3.1 Street Lighting Columns

a. Street Lighting is generally placed within the verge and median of the roadway. Its location is
governed by a number of factors which include:
i Lux model
ii Must be placed at a safe distance from the edge of the carriageway
iii The movement of the pedestrian/cyclist shall not be hindered wherever possible
iv Space availability at verges
vExisting and proposed utilities
vi
Road classification and alignment
vii
ROW width
viii
Light pole height
ix
Light pole frequency
xFoundation type and dimensions
xi
The location shall also meet the relevant authorities requirement in regards to its general
maintenance e.g. in case a luminaire needs to be changed.
b. Generally the foundation of light poles should be positioned within allocated corridors defined
in MME’s typical cross section as L + ITS (Street Lighting & Intelligent Traffic System), which
is required for all the streets in Qatar. If lighting poles cannot be located directly on, top its
designated corridor e.g. due to the corridor being inside the carriageway or parking area, light
poles shall be installed in other agencies corridors without an allocation of a special corridor.
Therefore, the encroachment of the lighting pole on another agency’s corridor (entirely or
partially) is acceptable to MME. In such cases the designer is required to follow the below
selection criteria for light pole positioning with (a) being the most preferred.
i On top of gravity foul sewer or stormwater pipes that are allocated in the verges of the
roadway (subject to availability of space).
ii On the electrical distribution, telecommunication, security ducts or similar corridors.
The cables/ducts should be slewed around the base of the pole or taken under the
pole’s base. A typical detail of such arrangement should be produced to demonstrate it
is feasible, constructible and meets the concerned agency’s requirements.
iii On the distribution pressured mains corridors (water, rising main or TSE pipes less
than 200mm diameter). It must be demonstrated that pressure mains can be realigned
around the pole’s base and that the pipe joint deflections are within the manufacture’s
specification and that the adjacent utilities are not impacted.
iv Within the electrical transmission corridor, with existing cables either slewed around
the side of the foundation or below the foundation (subject to the availability of cable
slack). It must be demonstrated that the bending radii of the cables meets Kahramaa
Electricity’s requirements. This is usually applicable in the central median.
v Foundations can be placed on top of pressurized transmission mains (water, TSE or
Foul Sewer rising main). Light pole foundation shall be designed in such a way to
ensure static loading on pipes below does not exceed pipe design criteria.
vi A special street lighting corridor wider than what has been prescribed in MMUP
typical cross-section (L + ST = 0.5m) can be considered if it is shared with stormwater
gullies, trees and other surface appurtenances such as signs, gantries, street furniture
etc…
vii In certain special cases, if the separation of street light poles is less than 15m, a wider
corridor can be considered to allow for the width of the light pole base.
Note: In all the cases designer must carry an in-depth clash analysis to satisfy the viability of the proposed
light pole position. It is recommended in cases where the foundations are proposed on top of the
transmission cable/pipe corridor, that a shallower and wider base be considered to allow the
transmission cables/pipes to traverse under it. In case the foundation is proposed on top of a distribution
corridor, a thinner base should be considered to allow the distribution cables/pipes to be slewed around
it. A nominal diameter ducts/sleeves, extending at least 1 m on either side of the foundation should be
provided, if the cables/pipes are to run below the foundation to permit the future use of the corridor.
3.2 Stormwater Gullies

a. It is desirable to locate Gullies above the gravity stormwater drainage pipes wherever possible.
Where this may not be possible, the design engineer should make allowance for, and specify,
deep corridors for utilities under the gullies (as in the case of transmission pipes/cables). It must
be technically proven however, that the performance of the cables/pipes is not hindered by such
localization, i.e. consideration should be given to electrical de-rating and hydraulic performance
of the pipe. In case of distribution cables/pipes, allowances should be given for slewing and
realigning of these smaller cables/pipes to get around fixtures such as gullies. In both instance
the agency responsible for the corridor will have the right to take out the gully if access is
required to their asset for maintenance, emergency repairs or upgrade purposes. Therefore, an
agreement will be developed between PWA, MME and the relevant agency for such
undertaking. See below for further guidelines.
b. Stormwater Gullies are generally placed along the kerb (either as side entry or top entry) at the
edge of carriageway, service road or edge of the median (where there is super-elevation) and
their location and frequency is primarily governed by the road design, which include the below
factors:
i Road Geometry
ii Road catchment (width of RoW)
iii Cross-fall & Profile of the road
iv Road classification
v Existing and proposed utilities
c. Currently there is no designated corridor in MME’s 2012 typical cross-section for Stormwater
Gullies. However, MME’s 2014 typical cross section (for undeveloped areas) does provide a
location to the Stormwater Gully, that is to be placed on top of the proposed Stormwater
corridor given that the Stormwater pipes are deep and therefore there is available space above
the pipe. Therefore, it is encouraged to locate the stormwater pipes along the kerb-line of the
road, where the surface water can be collected by the Gullies and directed to the conveyance
system below it. In cases where Gullies cannot be placed on top of the stomwater corridor, the
Gullies can be installed in other agencies corridors without been provided a dedicated Gully
corridor. The placement of the Stormwater Gullies on other agency’s corridor (entirely or
partially) is acceptable to MME. In such cases the designer should consider the following;
i When installed in the electrical distribution, telecommunication, security ducts or
similar corridors – the cables/ducts shall be slewed around the Gully. A typical detail
of such arrangement should be produced to demonstrate it is feasible, constructible
and meets the concerned agency’s requirements.
ii When installed in the distribution pressured mains corridors (water, rising main or
TSE pipes with their diameter less than 200mm) – it must be demonstrated that the
pressure mains can be realigned around the Gully and that the pipe joint deflections
are within the manufacture’s specification and that the adjacent utilities are not
impacted.
iii When installed in the electrical transmission corridor – the electrical transmission
cables should be installed below the Gully. It must be demonstrated that the bending
radii of the cables meets Kahramaa Electricity’s requirements and that the clearance
(between the base of the gully and the cable) is in compliant with Kahramaa’s and the
cable manufacture’s specifications.
iv When installed in a pressurized transmission mains corridor (Water, TSE or Foul
Sewer rising main), gullies shall be installed on top of these mains with the static
loading on the pipes below not exceeding the pipe’s design criteria. Also the pipe joint
deflections are within the manufacture’s specifications and that the adjacent utilities
are not impacted.
Note:
 In each of the above four cases, a typical detail of the proposed arrangement must be produced
and should demonstrate that the proposed arrangement is feasible, constructible and meets the
affected agencies’ requirements.
 A wider corridor for street lighting and stormwater gullies are acceptable if it is shared with trees
and other surface appurtenances such as road signs, gantries and street furniture. In addition, the
installation of deep sewers would be permissible in this corridor.
 In all cases the designer must carry an in-depth clashes analysis to ensure that all clashes have
been dealt with.
 A nominal diameter ducts/sleeves, extending at least 1m on either side of the gully should be
provided, if the cables/pipes are to be installed below the gully for the future use.
3.3 Trees
If there are open spaces available on the verges or in the medians, trees can be installed in such places.
However, given that, in the expressway program, the Right of Ways are extremely constricted, the design
engineer is encouraged to utilize tree barriers and should consider placement of such trees above the gravity
sewers where possible. Alternatively, if the landscape design requires the frequency of trees to be at regular
intervals of 10 meters and less, consideration could be given to placing such trees above transmission
pipes/cables with the understanding that these cables/pipes have to be constructed deeper than their usual
depth. Similarly it must be proven that there is no adverse impact on the performance of these utilities. In
addition, an undertaking that in case access is required to the assets, the agency can take out trees and reinstate
them to MME’s Public Parks Department’s specifications. It is important that the landscape design of the road
projects be carried out in conjunction and in coordination with the highway and utilities design and should not
be considered as an “add on” or an afterthought to be accommodated by the utilities designers at a later stage
of the design process.
3.4 Gantries, Traffic Lights, Signage and Street Furniture

Gantries, traffic lights, signage and street furniture are elements of the roadway that do not have any
designated corridors. Therefore; the foundations and pole positions of these elements should be properly
coordinated with the subsurface assets to ensure there are no clashes and that they do not obstruct the
installation of future utilities directly above their foundations or at least minimize such effect.
Note: Encroachment of chambers/manholes, stormwater gullies as well as the foundations for street lighting
poles or other features are likely to extend to adjoining corridors. The design engineer must demonstrate that
these encroachments will not adversely impact the adjoining utilities.
4.0 APPROVAL PROCESS

The approval process involves the MME-IPD, PWA and utility agencies. Overall there are four stages as
indicated in Figure 1.
Project
Initiation/Design -
(by Project
Proponent)
MME Final
MME Initial
Approval (As Built +
Approval
Test Rsults)
MME Pre-
Agency's NOC
Construction
(QDRS)
Approval
Figure 1
4.1 IPD-MME’s Initial Approval

Design of utility corridor distribution shall be prepared by the applicant as per MME’s guidelines, specified in
this document for all utility network, then shall be submitted to MME-IPD for review and initial approval.
4.2 No Objection Certificates from Utility Providers

After obtaining the Initial Approval from MME-IPD, the applicant shall seek NOCs from utility providers,
through the application of QDRS or similar. The project proponent is also required to meet agency’s
conditions. Any disagreement or point of contingency between the project proponent and a utility agency
should be raised to MME for resolution.
4.3 IPD-MME’s Pre-Construction Approval

Prior to the execution of the project the applicant shall submit the below documents to MME-IPD, in addition
if there are any changes in comparison to MME’s initial approval it must be highlighted and documents must
be provided to fully justifying the proposed changes.
a. Written approvals from all the relevant agencies, including Ashghal’s Drainage Department,
Ashghal’s Street Lighting Department, Kahramaa Water, Kahramaa Electricity, Qatar
Petroleum, CRA, QAF, SSD and MoTC.
b. A latest version of AutoCAD drawings of all the drawings.
c. A SHP file of Rainbow drawings.
4.4 IPD-MME’s Final Approval

The final approval will be granted to the applicant when the work is completed and a copy of the “As Built” in
soft and hard copies as well as testing certification from the relevant agencies. The As Built drawing will be
checked against the Pre-Construction approved documents and in case of any discrepancy between the two
submittals, the applicant is required to provide clarification and justification. If accepted by MME-IPD the
final version of the As Built drawings will be incorporated in the GIS system as true document. Accordingly
MME-IPD will issue a final approval which will allow the applicant to request final completion certificate from
the concern Municipality.
5.0 DISCLAIMER
This document is intended to be used only in its entirety. IPD-MME should be contacted if the Applicant
requires additional information or has questions regarding the content or completeness of this document.
Under no circumstances does IPD - MME warrant or certify the requesting agency’s analysis to be free of
errors or deficiencies of any kind. The use of IPD - MME's approval for any work, does not relieve the
requesting agency (or anyone who acts on its behalf) from its responsibilities, nor does it entitle the
requesting agency (or anyone who acts on its behalf) to claim any kind of compensation for damages or
losses during construction or thereafter.
6.0 APPENDICES
Appendix A. MME Utility Investigation Approval Procedure for Road Projects.
Appendix B. MME Project Document Submission.
Appendix C. Signed MOU.
APPENDIX A
MMUP Utility Investigation Approval Procedure for Road Projects
Utility Investigation by Legend:

Owner/Consultant/Client Consultant
Agencies
MMUP
Collect Data
(Existing & Proposed Utilities)
Topography Survey, including Document and Report

Trial Pits & Radio Detection Discrepancies to Authorities
Superimpose Data on
Agency's Responsibility
Proposed Road Layout
to use this Information
New Road Existin g Road
Impact Assessment of
Follow MMUP Latest Proposed Road Layout on .,._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Cross-Section
Utilities
Relocate/Divert Protect and Adjust Levels "Keep As Is"
Yes No
Seek Alternative Recommend Adjust Level

Corridor/Additional Protection Scheme Accordingly
ROW (e.g. Encasing) (i.e. Raising or Lowering)
Recommend
Develop Revised
Relocate/Divert Protection Scheme
Utility Cross-Section
(e.g. !Encasing)
Yes
No
No
~t,..wJt 4,:fc:>::l'J ¼""'½1 I ~.,ljJ

Yes ..,,;,•,-1•, 1 ~•3 ~• t '-1
Final Report to MMUP
Authorised by:
Mohamed Abdah
l'iQil;: Director of Transportation And Infrastructure
1HE PROPOSED FLOWCHART IS ONLY A GUIDE TO ASSESS TI-IE Planning Department
CONSULTANT DEVELOPING A UTILITY INVESTIGATION REPORT.
lHE TOR Of EACH CONlRACT SHOULD BE SlRICTlY FOLLOWED. CheckedDY'
Abdullah Jassim AI-Muraikhi
Section Head
Designed By:
Mujtaba Hamidy & Hassan Qasem
Date: October 2012
Doc No: MMUP/INF/002
APPENDIX B
Ministry of Municipality and Urban Planning
Transportation & Infrastructure Planning Department
Project Documentation Submission:
LOCAL ROAD AND DRAINAGE
1. COVER PAGE
2. GENERAL NOTES
3. LEGENDS AND ABBREVIATIONS
4. CUT AREAS LAYOUT PLAN – IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON EXISTING UTILITY
5. DISCREPANCY DRAWINGS
6. ROAD PAVEMENT LAYOUT PLAN AND DETAILS
7. PROPOSED UTILITY CORRIDOR – COMBINED LAYOUT PLAN
8. CROSS SECTIONS
9. UTILITY CHECKLIST
10.STANDARD CADD LAYERING
NOTES:
• All drawing entities should be by layer.

• CADD CTB (Pen Assignment) to be develop for clarity and to be included in the submission.
• Drawing layout and cross section should be as per approved scale.
• A3 size of drawings in hardcopy to be provided along with the softcopies both PDF and CAD format.
Prepared by: Muhsin Kuhutan

Checked by: Mujtaba Hamidy
Approved by: Hassan Qasem
PROJECT DOCUMENTION SUBMISSION Page 1 of 10

DETAILED DESIGN
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE - SUBDIVISIONS
(PROJECT LOCATION)
':· DATE DESCRIPTION APPR.
~ -
• State of Qatar
Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning
TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CLIENT
PROJECT CODE
PROJECT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
mLE
DESIGNED STAlUS
CHECKED UPDAAPPROVAL
DATE @A1=
SCALE I @A3=
DWG.NO. REV.NO.
PROJECT COVER PAGE
GENERAL NOTES
REV.
DATE DESCRIPTION APPR.
NO.
~ -
• State of Qatar

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CLIENT
PROJECT CODE
PROJECT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
mLE
DESIGNED STAlUS
DATE @A1=
SCALE I @A3=
DWG.NO. REV.NO.
GENERAL NOTES
DRAWING LEGENDS AND ABBREVIATION
REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APPR.

NO.
~ -
• State of Qatar

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CLIENT
PROJECT CODE
PROJECT
DESIGN CONSULTANT
mLE
DESIGNED STAlUS
DATE @A1=
SCALE I @A3=
DWG.NO. REV.NO.
LEGENDS & ABBREVIATIONS
$WNLQV-RE1R
)25&217,18$7,215()(5726+((71R 1

300XLPE
569
;/3(3

co
co
'f
i·r;i
',
c,
"
1_.,..j '
$ 53601713 $
ALIGNMENT P8E10
4C300XLPE
B16/8194
53601730
53601729 53601728 53601727 53601726 53601725
.(<3/$1
L = ± 158.0m
Ø300mm PVC W1 % 127(6
&( 7+(/2&$7,2162)$//(;,67,1*$1'352326('
%
ALIGNMENT P8H24 3 %
&( .$+5$0$$6(59,&(6+$9(%((12%7$,1(')520
38%/,&87,/,7<5(&25'65()4&6&/$86(
L = ± 90.0m
Ø300mm PVC W1 2CE 35,2572(;(&87,1*7+(:25.67+(&2175$&725
B16 6+$///,$,6(:,7+7+(6(59,&(6'(3$570(17$1'
/7569 &203/<:,7+$//7+(:25.5(48,5(0(172)7+(
'(3$570(176
&29(5'(37+6)255(/2&$7('6(59,&(66+28/'
%(2%6(59('5()(572.$+5$0$$67$1'$5'6
+
PE 5(/2&$7,2162)$//6(59,&(672,1&/8'(
2X4C300XLPE PE 4C300XLPE $77$&+('$33857(1$1&(6,1&/8',1*9$/9(6
B16/8189 B16/8189
B16/8189 B16/8189 +<'5$1766(59,&(&211(&7,216(7&
7+(6('5$:,1*6$5(127,17(1'('72%(86('
)25($57+:25.6
& $5($62)&876+2:1$5(%$6('21352326(' &
),1,6+685)$&(/(9(/6
'(6,*1(5$6680('7+$7(;,67,1*87,/,7<6(59,&(6
$5(/2&$7('$70,1,0806(59,&(&29(5'(37+6
63(&,),('%<&21&(51('6(59,&($87+25,7<
B34
/65 B34/652 B34/653 7+(,03$&7217+((;,67,1*87,/,7<6(59,&(6
ST 2 4C300XLPE
B34/653
PE 81'(5$5($6,1&87:,7+'(37+6)520P72
4C300XLPE P6+28/'%($66(66('%<&2175$&725$76,7(
*
+
F1 F1 F1 * * $1'(1685(7+$77+(&21&(51('6(59,&(
$87+25,7<5(48,5(0(176$5(0(7
L = ± 43.0m
L = ± 35.0m
Ø100mm PVC W1 4C300XLPE E1 L = ± 72.0m
W1
Ø100mm PVC
)25&217,18$7,215()(5726+((71R
)25&217,18$7,215()(5726+((71R
' /(*(1')255(/2&$7,216 B34/655 '
B34/654 PE
(/(&75,&$/&$%/(6
PE
$3352;/(1*7+2)5(/2&$7('&$%/(
F5 53591079
L = ± 54.0m
E1 53591080
'(6&5,37,212)5(/2&$7,21 /(*(1'
4C300 XLPE
B34/655
2088 53592089 53592090 4C300XLPE
53592091 53591025 72%(&$55,('2876((%(/2: 53592020
53591026 53592019$5($,1&87'(37+ 72P
D
•
7<3(2)&$%/(72%(5(/2&$7('
$5($,1&87'(37+ 72P
127,1&/8'(' ALIGNMENT
ENT P8G8 327$%/(:$7(53,3(6
$3352;/(1*7+2)5(/2&$7('3,3( ~
$5($,1&87'(37+ 72P
$5($,1&87'(37+ 72P
U01 12DEC13 ISSUED FOR REVIEW JFN GRP MJA
,1&2175$&7 L = ± 61.0m
W1 '(6&5,37,212)5(/2&$7,21
F5
•• $5($,1&87'(37+ 72P
5HY 'DWH 5HYLVLRQ'HWDLOV 'UDZQ &KNG $SSG
4C300XLPE
B34/654
Ø100mm PVC
( 72%(&$55,('2876((%(/2: iLol.o.J I J U....:.111 Ll,,,, (
$5($,1&87'(37+ P$1''((3(5 Publ ic Wo rks Authority
6,=($1'0$7(5,$/2)
3,3(72%(5(/2&$7(' (;,67,1*327$%/(:$7(53,3(
53591094
5(/2&$7,217<3(6 53591081 ►---◄
5(/2&$7('327$%/(:$7(53,3(
(;,67,1*.$+5$0$$0(',8092/7$*(
P,O,Box: 22188
Tel. : 00974 44950000
Fax : 00974 44950999
ll§ll&HHb
J_.;,.o~I ~ ,-b.o
09(/(&75,&$/&$%/(
(;,67,1*(/(&75,&$/&$%/(72%('((3(1('72 Qatar Deserves The Best
53591031 53591030 53591029 53591027

0E1 6$7,6)<67$1'$5'&29(5'(37+6'((3(1('
&$%/(72%(,167$//('$/21*35(9,286
$/,*10(17 ~-----
53591134
(;,67,1*.$+5$0$$/2:92/7$*(/9
(/(&75,&$/&$%/(
5(/2&$7('(/(&75,&$/&$%/(
IA
INFRASTRUCTURE A FFAIRS
www.a shghal.gov.qa
53591028 3URMHFW0DQDJHPHQW&RQVXOWDQW
X X X X5(029('3,3(&$%/(53591133
(;,67,1*(/(&75,&$/&$%/(72%('((3(1('72
PARSONS
$/
+
' ((5$
HEE 1
F5
0E2 6$7,6)<67$1'$5'&29(5'(37+6$1',167$//('
$/21*$//2&$7('87,/,7<&255,'25
D
(;,67,1*'8&7
(;,67,1*68%67$7,21
_J).atar
...,,... ;. '-
BRINCKERHOFF
WK)ORRU)DLVDO7RZHU
:HVW%D\
R EN4 (;,67,1*:$7(53,3(72%('((3(1('726$7,6)<
(1 32%R['RKD4DWDU )
AN-

0W1
Local Roads & D rainage
) 13O ALIGNMENT
NT P8G7
P8 67$1'$5'&29(5'(37+6'((3(1('&$%/(72%( 67 ii-i 16 I lid I id ii I 11· Jhl# ii 3URMHFW
/D ST (1 ,167$//('$/21*35(9,286$/,*10(17 0DLQRIILFH

B34/652 T 53591093 53591082
B
4C300 XLPE
34/6 'HVLJQ&RQVXOWDQW
B34/655
36 F5 B34/654
+
% 7 54 (;,67,1*:$7(53,3(72%('((3(1('726$7,6)<

2t---,-----,-----'-----------.-----'----.------~
7 F5 F6 % F4
0W2
&;/3(3
F6 F5~ ~ - l .'---1---------,-------'--..,.------.../F6 67$1'$5'&29(5'(37+6$1',167$//('$/21*

36
%

F3 F4 ST 3X4C300 XLPE
7
F4 3X4C300XLPE PE
* $//2&$7('87,/,7<&255,'25
WS Atkins & Partners Overseas
&;/3(3 6 7 ST &;/3(3B34/65 '5LQJ5RDG 7HOHSKRQH
B34/653 B34/653 B34/653 3 B34/653 &;/3(3 32%R[ )D[
EN4 % % % 'RKD6WDWHRI4DWDU (PDLO RIILFHTDWDU#DWNLQVJOREDOFRP
B34/653 B34/653 B34/653 B34/653 F5
ST F3 F5 3URMHFW1DPH
4C300XLPE 4C300XLPE T F3 PE B34 • •
/084
T
PE
5 • F4 2X4C300XLPE &;/3(3 • *(&'2+$:(67':
CO- CO- B34/654
3
4C3 P 100A 4
3P
C70 150A F1
% 52$'6 ,1)5$6758&785(
5 XL
F3-1 P F3-1 XLPE F4 B31 ,15$:'$7$%$/+((5$1
665 E B28 6659 /279
* B28 9 /105 9 *
/105
3 3 PE 3$&.$*(
53591092 53591083 3URMHFW&RGH
53591135 53591136 00833+3.
53591060 53591923 53591924 53591925
4C300XLPE
53591059
B34/655
4C300XLPE
CC)
53591926 6WDWXV
B31/2799
co
-~,'n &255,'25$33529$/
DETATILED DESIGN APPROVAL
......
~ NT P8
ALIGNMENT P8G2
,,
C\1
ALIGNM
'UDZLQJ7LWOH
&87$5($6
1-1...1 r
.....L
: ' CUT AREAS LAYOUT PLAN
:
,03$&7$66(660(17
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
o, 21(;,67,1*87,/,7,(6
ON EXISTING UTILITY
SHEET 01 OF XX
6+((7RI
4C300XLPE
53591091
B34/0845
+ 53591084 'UDZQ
-1$9,6$
&KHFNHG
*320$172& +
53591150 53591137 'HVLJQHG $SSURYHG
55$<26 0$/6$.,1,
'DWH 6FDOH
-$18$5< RQ$
'UDZLQJ1XPEHU 5HYLVLRQ
0 5 10 15 20 25 m
/,0,72)6+((76
SCALE 1:500
': 3 $7. 8& 8

KEYPLAN
·•·
N
COORDINATE SYSTEM : Cl'TAR NATION GRID
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT: METERS
ORIGIN: 5113' E 200,000 E
24 'D'E 300,000N
PROJECTION: TRANSVERSE MERCA~
SPHEROID: INTERNATIONALHA.YFrnD
s
NOTES:
---·-·-·-· -----4bm -~ - 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS

OTHERWISE STATED.
2. ALL COORDINATES ARE RELATED TO QATAR
NATIONAL GRID.
3. EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION HAS BEEN
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL) RECEIVED FROM RELEVANT AUTHORITIES.
' __ ___!'
L
···- ..~ - LEGEND:

····.~---~ ... - . . . .
AUTHORITY (KAHRAMAA)
~~~ ELECTRICITY HV/EHV CABLE+

PILOT
- ~ ~ : : : ;_-:·-:_~~.~
-. - - ~ - --111F-- - . . . . .- - - .... - - ELECTRICITY HV CABLE
PROPOSED BY KAHRAMM
- - .... - - ELECTRICITY EHV CABLES

• PROPOSED BY KAHRAMM
~ - ~~~ ELECTRICITY MV CABLE+

PILOT
. - -- - ELECTRICITY MV CABLE
PROPOSED BY KAHRAMM
... ... ... - · - - · - ELECTRICITY LV CABLE
STREET LIGHTING
_r ---"'- GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)

r _ _ .... , _ _ ELECTRICITY HV CABLE
'
'
✓
- .. · - -.. · - ELECTRICITYMVCABLE
I /
---------------- /I
I
..//
' - · - - · - ELECTRICITY LV CABLE
'
UNKNOWN ELECTRICITY CABLE
I -------------------------------- _ _ i_____,__
I I I I
GPR SURVEY (CONCORD) REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION I DWN I APPD
·,.,._i,~•..1":!-'-'-:J'•.J'.iJ
Mlnistry of Municipality & Urban Planning
!
.,. PROJECT:
•
..... LRDP
QN000
NAJMA STREET
.
... .
, . PROJECT CODE:
TITIE:
ELECTRICAL SERVICES
( DISCREPANCY ASSESSMENT DRAWING
i /✓ (Sheet 001 Cont. on END)
'
DESIGNED STATIJS
--------------- _ / _ , _~ ~----
CHECKED APPROVED
DATE SCALE(A1)
1:1000
AUTHORITY & GPR SURVEY DRGNo.
IREV:ION
REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER
KEYPLAN
TS03
--------
~ '~
'
~ y - - ',
I
I
...
NOTES:
N
s
COORDINATE SYSTEM : QA.TAR NATICf,l GRID
ORIGIN: 51 13' E
24 'lJ'E
200,000 E
300,000N
SPHEROID: INTERNATIONALHAYF(R)
I 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS

OTHERWISE STATED.
NATIONAL GRID.
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL) RECEIVED FROM RELEVANT AUTHORITIES.
LEGEND:
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL)
- - - - - - TSE PIPELINE
GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)

TS03 TSE PIPELINE
I
'
I
~~y--
I I I I
GPR SURVEY (CONCORD) REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION I DWN IAPPD
-,~1~1_,i.,!.i.l;,lt;;_hJ
\ \
TS03
----------
\ \_>-' . .· . -····---·tN___ ---
L---------- ~--------------~
PROJECT:
LRDP
QN000
-------- -- ~ - PROJECT CODE:
TITIE:
TSE SERVICES
------- DISCREPANCY ASSESSMENT DRAWING
• I (Sheet 001 Cont. on END)
DESIGNED STATUS
CHECKED APPROVED
DATE SCAI.E(A1)
AUTHORITY & GPR SURVEY 1:2500
DRGNo.
IREV:IDN
KEYPLAN
\ 1,, ! I
!( N
_S_W_4_1 :/ I
\ SW39 " 1 I
' AJ/ ''
,/) ) . \ '~ -
.,,~, I
! i
-------~-,,_____
------------------=;::> .,. ,.,. .,.
~
_7 ZS ',·~J-::rc ~ ~~~:-~~~~~=~~~~--r:________ ------ ___ .]
_________--~
.... c:_______________ _ ----...
D-RI NG ROAD
l-------'[=J'-------=[:=-'----------------------------'[=J'-------=[_J=-7--------------------------LJ_J____________________ _
-------------------========±=======================================t==
•·
N
UNllS OF MEASUREMENT: METEP.S
ORIGIN: 51 13' E 200,000 E
24 'lJ'E 300,000N
PROJECTION: TRANSVERSE MERCATOR
SPHEROID: INTERNATIONALHAYFORD
s
NOTES:
\ 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS
DTHERWISE STATED.
NATIONAL GRID.
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL) 3. EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION HAS BEEN
RECEIVED FROM RELEVANT AUTHORITIES.
! I
- - - - -:'' N
SW39 SW41 Ii
i;
,' II
LEGEND:
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL)
- -- - SURFACE WATER PIPELINE
-------~-,, _______./--'--Fo'-'-~ ------------9 )zs\-~~_,.-::rc--~ _: ;J \_~ __, c __ r:________ _____-_-_- -_-}- - - - - - - - - -- SURFACE WATER RISING MAIN
---------- -=---=/ c:.----,__________ _

,::':__,_,
(_~I I --------------------------------:::>
______________________--_-_::,'• --------------------- ---------------------------- ,
D-RI NG ROAD
... .... ... . GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)
SURFACE WATER PIPELINE
- - - - - - SURVEY BOUNDARY
[J [J [J [J LJ__J ____________________ _
1-----=:____,=----------------------:____,=-------'=---------------------
.
---------\
\
GPR SURVEY (CONCORD) l I I I
REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION I DWN IAPPD
\
-,~1~1..,i.,!.iJ.;,lt;;_Ji_j_,
N Mlnistry of Municipality & Urban Planning
\ SW39
-------~-,, _______./--'--Fo'-'-~ -----------9 '~s\'--~~J--::rc--~ -: ;J \_~ __, c __ r:________ --------_- -_-}- -

----------- -=---- ,/
----:;>
_____-------------------
C.:_1
c...__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __c,
r ---------------------------------::,
------------------ c:__...----,·~=====:
----------- : ;: ;======'._j--'f:~,
t"II" ~
, II" M'
.
~ ------:::,
PROJECT:
D-RING ROAD
f----------------------------------------------------------==========t==============================================t==
l-------'[=J'-------=[:=-'----------------------------'[=J'-------=[_J=-7---------------------------LJ___! ____________________ _
LRDP
QN000
. PROJECT CODE:
TITIE:
SW SERVICES
DISCREPANCY ASSESSMENT DRAWING
(Sheet 001 Cont. on END)
\
---------\ DESIGNED STATUS
\ CHECKED APPROVED
AUTHORITY & GPR SURVEY DATE SCAI.E(A1)

1:1000
DRGNo.
IREV:100
KEYPLAN
(__ -
r , I ----------
1--- - - - - - - " l J__!--------

D-RING ROAD
·•·
N
ORIGIN: 5113' E 200,000 E
24 'D'E 300,000N
s
NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED.
NATIONAL GRID.
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL)
LEGEND:
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL)
POTABLE WATER PIPELINE
TO BE CANCELLED BY KAHRAMAA
ABANDONED POTABLE WATER

r , I ------------
1--- - - - - - - - " l J__!.--------

D-RING ROAD -=-==~ ======I
I I I I
GPR SURVEY (CONCORD) REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION TDWN 1 APPD
L
·,.,._i,~•..1":!-'-'-:J'•.J'.iJ
', I I . Mlnistry of Municipality & Urban Planning
I
,, 'I N
1:
'l/' \ --- - - r _Pw_4_9)- .' 1r \~ ------F1'~.f'=

L~
, - ~ ----- --
~ ~ ~ ~=:=,,=_=_:.,;_=_:::,_,;."' '-..'s-..,~_ •.c::r_
____= 3 ~ ----
=--t:: 't= · ===r--- L-------=s ~ ---~ \__ __ . / L-~ ...___) I\: , ---·-....::--~----------
PROJECT:
- ...,.. (.__ - + ---
LRDP
QN000
''__!.-----
' -------
1-- - - - - - - L J
D-RING ROAD
PROJECT CODE:
TITIE:
POTABLE WATER SERVICES

DESIGNED STATIJS
CHECKED APPROVED
DATE SCALE(A1)
AUTHORITY & GPR SURVEY 1:1000
DRGNo.

t :ION
- - ---r-!- - -- .. : -- - - -- - - -- - 11
i ~
- ,- ,- - - 1 r - - - -1- - -
1 - n-- -- MATCH LINE F-F SEE SHEET 003
-------/........
/' ,/
KEYPLAN
i _::_-: -_: _-: -_: ,--:,:-::-_::_-: -~ -::-_::_1

j I : i I : : : : , ,
,/· /, I
'
,
I
,
!
,
:
,
I
w :
,
I
i i
j
I
I
: :
: ,
::
: ,
1~-----L_i _____ )~-----11
i
I I />/\\t\ ;j
\ '\ .
;\
\ I
I
\\_ -
LJ.
I
---\
u\
I , I
~---~-' I: '1 / j
\·~--/:: ~\~·1·
•,/ \
k-- -~~--- ----~7 - - - - -
___
_/ 1
//
I J_ _____ -,I i, '1 [ /
/'
I '1 I I:
·•·
-----------~ N
N 389500
1
1
: I COORDINATE SYSTEM : Cl'TAR NATION GRID
ORIGIN: 5113' E 200,000 E
,. , I 24 'D'E 300,000N
l ________ J'
.----- --------1,
: i--~--~~--~~J
',
I, I,
1
:
i
,
NOTES:
s
,,
j

1 '1 \ ' ' I ' OTHERWISE STATED.
I, I, : 2. ALL COORDINATES ARE RELATED TD QATAR
I~-----=-----=-----=--:-.\
j
NATIONAL GRID.
\ '1 ' I : 3. EXISTING UTILITY INFDRMATIDN HAS BEEN
_/,', \\ :I RECEIVED FRDM RELEVANT AUTHORITIES.
I, \ I, I I
1
,
_______ , -----=-1
\ \
V
{\
I '
j,=-~7= =- I I::_::-
' '
I;=- : _
' '
THERE IS DISCREPANCY IN THE
ENTIRE DRAWING BETWEEN GPR
LEGEND:
AUTHORITY (□□REDD□)
.__ _____ ,--~~~ ', , \ , I I i I j
SURVEY AND OOREDOO DATA.

t=_____)_[~:~-=\
L ---------------.
1
,
I,
\ \
I, '. _________ ;11
I
'1
i
i
I
:
j
i
I
:
GPR SURVEY
----
ODREDDD DUCT
(CDNC□RD)
O□RED □□ DUCT
I
'----------, , I , I - - • • - - SURVEY BOUNDARY
\ , I I I I I
~ I ~~~=- L _ ~ - - - - - L ~ ·- -
w
W I
::c
~ ~-~:-~--~-~
~h ooo
w
-~-~~~:~~~~~~2~~~~~~-"'~--=~=~=--;_;/;-;t-; i;~~~~~E~~~:,::~~~t~ ~.~~~==2':~J! 1~g:::~~~
~ f----0.RINBROAD---□-□~-----+--~ · ~ - - - - - - -
::c
- - --
-
,~
I
z
I ::::;
::c
iI '
I
L- -----7 I I I I
,----~I'! / I I I _______ \
REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION I DWN I APPD
r- --~ ' 1--'\--------~----T ------\, · 1.,._il~l_14:!-'-'-:Jl•.JljJ

Mlnistry of Municipality & Urba n Planning
r~~l--------:-:~:~:\_-11---------- \1 \
I- ~----T I ' I I
r
-------- ; ,j ', --\,,
I
' '
~---
I ----
--~ I ' I
~==-:I '
I' F~'
'
t
------
,------- ------
. · \L .\ \
PROJECT:
LRDP
l -_ -~
1 /
I /
fc_ _____
' II
\\ -------
___,:_c--------------~-- --
PROJECT CODE:
QN000
--------)
---7i---\-,,,,L-----,y
,__
\---~/ "
,I
/;-------------
/
\\
' \
\ '-
TITIE:
OOREDOO SERVICES
1 :I i: ; ' \\
I L: :
'
I ,' ,/ '
N 388500 '-' I , DESIGNED STATIJS
CHECKED APPROVED
MATCHLINE K-K SEE SHEET 008
DATE SCALE(A1)
PLAN 1:2500
DRGNo.
SCALE 1:2600 IREV:ION
KEYPLAN
\' \'
\ \
\r
\ \ \
FS86 FS86 FS86
·•·
N
\ \ \ COORDINATE SYSTEM : Cl'TAR NATION GRID
ORIGIN: 5113' E 200,000 E
\ 24 'D'E 300,000N
s
\ \
NOTES:
OTHERWISE STATED.
NATIONAL GRID.
-e--- _-e---
---
J--- --
\
--- LEGEND:
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL)
- - - - FOUL SEWER PIPELINE

- - - --- - FOULSEWERRISINGMAIN
FOUL SEWER PIPELINE

I
I
\
I I I I
\' REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION I DWN I APPD
."\
·,.,._i, ~ • . . 1 ":!-'-'-:J' •.;l.jJ
~_\
Mlnistry of Municipality & Urban Planning
'
\
\ PROJECT:
LRDP
\ QN000
\
PROJECT CODE:
TITIE:
FOUL SEWER SERVICES

FS92 (Sheet 001 Cont. on END)
)
. l \ DESIGNED STATIJS
L_____ --~- ~ t - 7"'
-+- - -,-~--¥- ~ --~-
__I_ - .L- -
CHECKED APPROVED
DATE SCALE(A1)
1:1000
AUTHORITY (ASHGHAL) GPR SURVEY (CONCORD) AUTHORITY & GPR SURVEY DRGNo.
IREV:ION
Atkins Job No: 5099998 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET No: 9 N

44
38 39 40 41 42 43
I
~
&
d,
-
~
"v L/ I
SIKKA-37
I?; r--_ 53601713
A A
ALIGNMENT P8E10
I
IV"'J9
Oooa I
r'\ Ir
53601730
I
53601729 53601728 53601727 53601726 53601725

t
50
'\ / KEY PLAN
rr,,"
DETAIL DRAWING No. SD/6/8/114
I ' "" NOTES:
I /
B 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS OTHERWISE B
ALIGNMENT
---fL...._ __JI
_ _P8H24
/ STATED.
2. ALL COORDINATES & LEVELS ARE RELATED TO QATAR
NATIONAL GRID AND QATAR NATIONAL HEIGHT DATUM,
15.00
RESPECTIVELY.
3. REFER TO PAVEMENT SCHEDULES IN SECTION E OF
TENDER DOCUMENTS FOR BLOCK PAVING (BP) AND
· · .· . . . . . . · . . · . . . . . . ·. · .. :, .....,....,, 11 ' 111
. . . . . . ·. .· . . . . · .. . till l \ FULLY FLEXIBLE (FF) PAVEMENT OPTIONS. SUFFIX 'B'
I \
7( l 1
1
I
l
I
I
1
\
l l l
l I
l I 1 l 1 l \ l I
..,-e :
·1
<<
i ·, .
. -: ·. : ·. ~-
· '!<.. ,I
J----J.
..._
/ /-~k---------------------~---;-'"'.""-:-C-:C-:-'."".~-::-::-c-:-:-c-7:-
. . . ...... ......
• •
. . . .
•
. .
•
. . . .
• •
. ..
• •
:.:.:
•
-"
. ~,
• • • • l I \ I
, I I l l l
1 l
'-
I
I \
/.-:
I
l T\ 1
1··\ ·, ;
l l \ 1-. 1 \ I I
l
.l
l 1
l l
1 l l I
l I
1 I
lll;l 7
1
l
l
7 1..,.,1'1
..,. 1
l
I
I
\
I
I
\ Ill l
'(\
1 \ l 1
l l , l \I
l
I
;· l
\
l
l 1 1 l
1 1 '1'1
l
I
I
I
l
1
l
111" -??'1
l l l
l I
I I
I
T l
l
1 l
l l I ~
1.h" 1 I
, -1 l r - ( 0 l
l l I I l \ l
REPRESENTS BUFF, 'C' CHARCOAL & 'R' RED COLOUR.
4. SEE TYPICAL TIE IN DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR PAVEMENT
,. ,.--y, 'i",,1 , 111 1 7 \ l l l ' 1 , 1 , ~ 1 ) 1 ' 1
1
ill 11
11ll.~1l 111
1,111\,1'1r0,11'
1111.
1
1111 1 . , . 1 \ 1 1 1 1 l
,,-,,-1;~1- ,1 · \· •·l l.'ll· l· ·\ \ \ ; 1· 11 ·, ·\;;-;,1,1i-
11. 11\I ill\\ \l l._ 1111 1 -,11ll
,....,,.1//--r\---(11..,.1111'11,1,1.l>---r1ll,,1
1
..,..
I ~111
7 I TIE IN DETAILS.
5. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR OTHER PAVED
AREAS, e.g. FOOTPATH, CYCLE LANE, SIKKA. SPLITTER
~----------------+------------1 ISLAND.
417.001
6. ROAD MARKINGS SHOWN ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
517
LEGEND:
C C
0
Corridor Carriageway Parking Bay
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 BP2-B * j:: :::1
BP2-C
16m
FF3
# .....
....... --1
f . . . . . . . BP2-C
20/24m FF3 r 1•
-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:I BP2-C
w -
32m FF5 [ l ....... IFF5-R

. . . . . . .
400
500
40m FF5
15.00
15.00
64m FF5 [
CORE COMMUNITY ROADS Parking Bay
*# OTHER ROADS & Bus Layby
Corridor Service Road (Collector Roads)
FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET No: 1

D D
40m FF5 I ...............
... I FF5-R
64m FF5 I·.·:.·.·::.·IFF5-R

Bus Layby at BP2-R Roundabout
Local Roads l)?S?S?SJ BP2-C
Overrun Area
SIK-216 SIKKA NUMBER
RAISED JUNCTION
/ CUL DE SAC
/ SPEED TABLE
TURNING HEAD
D01 10SEP13 ISSUED FOR REVIEW JFN RAK ABB

SIKKA-132
V Rev. Date Revision Details Drawn Chkd. Appd.
Ir
350
450
E a......,,Lo.JI J l...iw.:, .ii I L4'>, E
Public Works Aut hority
---~~ - _ ,_,__,__________ I/ P.O.Box: 22 188

Tel. : 00974 44950000 115111i11Hh
NOT INCLUDED Fax: 00974 44950999 ,-...u
J._..o..,1]1 ~
Qatar Deserves The Best
IA www.ashghal.gov.qa
IN CONTRACT ,, INFRASTRUCTURE AFFAIRS
I
-
1-- -
.&
"')
Project Management Consultant :
PARSONS
F " I
I\._
Ir
Jr
~IV"'Js
9900
" I
_f-)atar
...,.. ;. '
Local Roads & Drainage
Fi lb i!SQ-1- I 1 1I 1-hliiiiil
BRINCKERHOFF
5th Floor, Faisal Tower #2
West Bay
PO Box 23103 Doha, Qatar
+974 4495 1601 (Project)
+974 4435 1612 (Main office)
F
I
Design Consultant :
.l.
450
)
'
) l..... )
'\_ / '\_ WS Atkins & Partners Overseas
/
400
D-Ring Road
311.905.,. Telephone +974 44061600
300
-
. -
I- - - -
.,. P O Box 24656 Fax +974 44669587
' 250 Doha - State of Qatar Email: office.qatar@atkinsglobal.com
200 300 I I
Project Name:
/ \ / •• SIKKA-134 ________,,•
( ", ( ) (
•
- - - - - - - -
•
"'-~----~--,~----------I
'\ ( GEC-DOHA WEST-DW015
•••
I
ROADS & INFRASTRUCTURE
I
IN RAWDAT ABAL HEERAN
G G
/
PACKAGE - 3
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Project Code:
MMUP-PH2-PK8
In addition to the hazards/risks normally associated with the types of work
detailed on this drawing, note the following specific residual risks (Reference Status:
shall also be made to the design hazard log).
DETAILED DESIGN
Construction ,, Drawing Title:
PUBLIC ACCESS TO WORKS AREA/TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT HIGHWAYS ROAD PAVEMENT
Maintenance / Cleaning LAYOUT PLAN
PAVEMENT LAYOUT
r
SIKKA-199
PUBLIC ACCESS TO WORKS AREA/TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

SHEET 012
SHEET OFOF
XX 44
Use
250
NONE
350
Decommissioning / Demolition
H Drawn:
J.NAVISA
Checked:
R.AKBAR H
PUBLIC ACCESS TO WORKS AREA/TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
Designed: Approved:
J.TAPIA A.BHAVSAR
Date: Scale:
I SEPTEMBER 2013 1:500 on A1
I
Drawing Number: Revision:
0 5 10 15 20 25 m
LIMIT OF SHEETS DW015 - P03 - ATK - HW - 9302 D01
SCALE 1:500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Atkins Job No: 5099998 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS
FULLY FLEXIBLE FULLY FLEXIBLE
OPTION FF3 OPTION FF5
OTHERWISE STATED.
2. REFER TO PAVEMENT SCHEDULE FOR DETAILS

A A
OF PAVEMENT MATERIALS.
WEARING COURSE WEARING COURSE
50
50
(SC-TYPE 1) (SC-TYPE 1)
TACK COAT TACK COAT
INTERMEDIATE COURSE INTERMEDIATE COURSE
60
60
(IC-TYPE 1) (IC-TYPE 1)
TACK COAT TACK COAT
BASE COURSE
70
BASE COURSE (BC-TYPE 1)
90
(BC-TYPE 1)
TACK COAT
PRIME COAT
BASE COURSE
70
(BC-TYPE 1)
PRIME COAT
GRANULAR SUB-BASE GRANULAR SUB-BASE
240
150
B (CLASS B) B
(CLASS B)
FORMATION LEVEL
FORMATION LEVEL
500 (MINIMUM)
SUBGRADE
500 (MINIMUM)
C C
SUBGRADE
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

detailed on this drawing, note the following specific residual risks (Reference
Construction
D Maintenance / Cleaning D
DETAILS 1 DETAILS 2 Use
SCALE 1:5 SCALE 1:5

BLOCK PAVEMENT
OPTION BP2
CA 05JAN14 CONTRACT ISSUE JFN RAK ABB
l PRECAST CONCRETE PAVING BLOCKS

Rev. Date Revision Details Drawn Chkd. Appd.
80
E 111111111111111 I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II LAYING COURSE
a......,,Lo.JI J L........:.111 L4'>, E
30
Public Works Authorit y
P.O.Box: 22 188
Tel. : 00974 44950000
Fax: 00974 44950999
115111i11Hh
J._...!ul]I ~ ,_u
180
CBM2 ROADBASE Qatar Deserves The Best
INFRASTRUCTURE AFFAIRS
PARSONS
.f-)atar
GRANULAR SUB-BASE
' BRINCKERHOFF
150
F
(CLASS B)
...,.. ;.
West Bay
+974 4495 1601 (Project)
F
+974 4435 1612 (Main office)
Design Consultant :

D-Ring Road Telephone +974 44061600
P O Box 24656 Fax +974 44669587
Doha - State of Qatar Email: office.qatar@atkinsglobal.com
Project Name:
GEC-DOHA WEST-DW015
500 (MINIMUM)
SUBGRADE
G G
Project Code:
MMUP-PH2-PK8
Status:
DETAILED DESIGN APPROVAL
CONTRACT
Drawing Title:
HIGHWAYS
STANDARD DETAIL
PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS
H Drawn:
K.VINOD
Checked:
R.AKBAR H
DETAILS 3 Designed:
J.TAPIA
Approved:
A.BHAVSAR
SCALE 1:5 Date:
JANUARY 2014
Scale:
1:5 on A1
0 50 100 150 200 250 mm
SCALE 1:5 DW015 - P00 - ATK - HW - 7303 CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Atkins Job No: 5099998 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
NOTES:
OTHERWISE STATED.
2. REFER TO QCS 2010 SECTION 6 PART 5
A
CLAUSES 5.9.2.10 AND 5.9.4.1 to 5.9.4.3 A
REGARDING TRANSVERSE JOINTS.
B B
C C
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
OPTION FF3 LONGITUDINAL TIE-IN BETWEEN FF3 AND FF5 OPTION FF5
2000 MIN 2000 MIN 2000 MIN 2000 MIN 2000 MIN
Construction
FF5
D Maintenance / Cleaning D
WEARING COURSE (SC - TYPE 1) WEARING COURSE
60 50
70 60 50
INTERMEDIATE COURSE (IC - TYPE 1) INTERMEDIATE COURSE
Use
BASE COURSE ( BC - TYPE 1) BASE COURSE
90
BASE COURSE
70
GRANULAR SUB-BASE ( CLASS B)
120
150
SUB-BASE
120
GRANULAR SUB-BASE ( CLASS B)
500 (MINIMUM)
500 (MINIMUM)
Rev. Date Revision Details Drawn Chkd. Appd.
SUBGRADE
E SUBGRADE a......,,Lo.JI J L........:.111 L4'>, E
P.O.Box: 22188
Tel. : 00974 44950000
Fax: 00974 44950999
115111i11Hh
J._...!ul]I ~ ,_u
PARSONS
.f-)atar
F
DETAIL 1
SCALE N.T.S ...,.. ;. '
BRINCKERHOFF
West Bay
+974 4495 1601 (Project)
+974 4435 1612 (Main office)
F
Design Consultant :

D-Ring Road Telephone +974 44061600
P O Box 24656 Fax +974 44669587
Doha - State of Qatar Email: office.qatar@atkinsglobal.com
Project Name:
GEC-DOHA WEST-DW015
G G
Project Code:
MMUP-PH2-PK8
Status:
CONTRACT
Drawing Title:
HIGHWAYS
STANDARD DETAIL
PAVEMENT LONGITUDINAL
TIE-IN DETAILS
H Drawn:
K.VINOD
Checked:
R.AKBAR H
Designed: Approved:
J.TAPIA A.BHAVSAR
Date: Scale:
JANUARY 2014 N.T.S
DW015 - P00 - ATK - HW - 7304 CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Atkins Job No: 5099998 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
NOTES:
OTHERWISE STATED.
2. WHERE KERB CONCRETE FOUNDATION LEVEL
A
IS BELOW SUB-BASE LEVEL PLACE 75mm THICK A
CONCRETE BLINDING LAYER BELOW
FOUNDATION.
3. JOINTS BETWEEN KERBS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH
CL OF ROAD OF 4mm EXCEPT AT MOVEMENT JOINTS.
4. AT EVERY 10m INTERVAL A MOVEMENT JOINT
20mm WIDE SHALL BE FORMED THROUGH THE
I ~
CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND BACKING. THE
I I I I
JOINT FILLER SHALL BE BITUMEN IMPREGNATED
CORK BOARD.
-
~
--
....
-B ...
.
'
~
-
--
~
__.r
....
B ........
CARRIAGEWAY
OPTION FF3
10mm CONTINUOUS
PARKING BAY
OPTION BP2-C 5. WHERE THE CROSS FALL OF ROAD SURFACE IS
TOWARDS THE KERB THE SUB-BASE SHOULD BE
CARRIED THROUGH TO EDGE OF THE
EMBANKMENT OR TO THE FILTER DRAIN.
SQUARE TOP PCC KERB 125x205
B -
-
--
I -
-- -- ~
-
--
-
CLASS 1 MORTAR BED 200
4mm JOINT
6. KERB UNIT SHALL BE LAID ON 1:3 CEMENT SAND
MORTAR NOT LESS THAN 10mm THICK AND NOT B
MORE THAN 40mm THICK.
)
- ~
I I I I I l
-- BP2-C
C
- BLOCK PAVING 7. EDGE RESTRAINT IS REQUIRED AT ALL EDGES
BP2-C BP2-B
-
50
~
-
I/ ASPHALT WEARING COURSE
-- -
80
OF BLOCK PAVING, INCLUDING INTERFACE
. '
~
- I _J l BETWEEN BLOCK AND ASPHALT PAVEMENTS.

ASPHALT INTERMEDIATE COURSE
'
60
-- ~
LAYING COURSE
30
- ~
'
l l
- ASPHALT BASE COURSE
105
90
- -- - ~
~
I
CBM2 ROADBASE
'
180
- ~
l ---"'\ r---
~ ---"""---.Jr--- "---.J
90
75
-
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---,
-
--
C - ~
' C
....
240
~
I GRANULAR SUB-BASE 150 125 150
-
◊
GRANULAR SUB-BASE
150
150
-
A ,,,jr A "11111.
~
- -
I
- '
l l
500 (MINIMUM)
500 (MINIMUM)
-
,,,j
- -- SUBGRADE SUBGRADE
◄:
") SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
C
I I
-
I
BP2-C - ~
~ FF3 -- BP2-C I In addition to the hazards/risks normally associated with the types of work
"II -
I
~
' '
--
'
' ' shall also be made to the design hazard log).
LONGITUDINAL CHANNEL BLOCK DETAIL

-
Construction
D
~
A ADJACENT TO ASPHALT CARRIAGEWAY Maintenance / Cleaning D

-
SCALE 1:5
- I ~ Use
~
I I
- I I I I Decommissioning / Demolition
PARKING BAY CARRIAGEWAY PARKING BAY

PLAN VIEW
E 8 1
N.T.S.
Rev. Date Revision Details
a......,,Lo.JI J L..iw.:, .ii I L4'>,

Drawn Chkd. Appd.
P.O.Box: 22 188
Tel. : 00974 44950000
Fax: 00974 44950999
115111i11Hh
J._.o..o]I ~ ,-b..O
IA www.ashghal.gov.q a
CARRIAGEWAY PARKING BAY Project Management Consultant :
OPTION BP2-B OPTION BP2-C CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY
OPTION FF3 OPTION BP2-B PARSONS
.f-)atar
F
10mm CONTINUOUS
CLASS 1 MORTAR BED
200
4mm JOINT
200
4mm JOINT
10mm CONTINUOUS
CLASS 1 MORTAR BED
200
4mm JOINT
...,.. ;. '
BRINCKERHOFF
West Bay
+974 4495 1601 (Project)
+974 4435 1612 (Main office)
F
Design Consultant :
BLOCK PAVING BLOCK PAVING BLOCK PAVING
50
ASPHALT WEARING COURSE
80
80
80
ASPHALT INTERMEDIATE COURSE
'l WS Atkins & Partners Overseas
60
LAYING COURSE LAYING COURSE LAYING COURSE D-Ring Road Telephone +974 44061600
30
30
30
P O Box 24656 Fax +974 44669587
l l Doha - State of Qatar Email: office.qatar@atkinsglobal.com
'
ASPHALT BASE COURSE
105
105
90
Project Name:
~:J---+ CBM2 ROADBASE GEC-DOHA WEST-DW015
180
CBM2 ROADBASE
'
180
180
---, ,--- ---, ,--- CBM2 ROADBASE l ---, ,--- ---, ,---
\..._J \..._J \..._J \..._J ROADS & INFRASTRUCTURE
90
75
75

G l G
240
150 125 150 GRANULAR SUB-BASE 150 125 150
Project Code:
GRANULAR SUB-BASE GRANULAR SUB-BASE GRANULAR SUB-BASE
150
150
150
150
MMUP-PH2-PK8
Status:
CONTRACT
' Drawing Title:

500 (MINIMUM)
500 (MINIMUM)
500 (MINIMUM)
500 (MINIMUM)
SUBGRADE SUBGRADE SUBGRADE SUBGRADE
HIGHWAYS
CHANNEL BLOCK DETAILS
' ' AT PARKING BAYS
CHANNEL BLOCK DETAIL ADJACENT
TO BLOCK PAVED CARRIAGEWAY TRANSVERSE JOINT BETWEEN CHANNEL
B BLOCK AND ASPHALT CARRIAGEWAY
H
SCALE 1:5
C Drawn:
J.NAVISA
Checked:
R.AKBAR H
SCALE 1:5 Designed:

J.TAPIA
Approved:
A.BHAVSAR
Date: Scale:
JANUARY 2014 AS SHOWN
0 50 100 150 200 250 mm
SCALE 1:5
DW015 - P00 - ATK - HW - 7417 CA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Atkins Job No: 5099998 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET No: 83 N

0 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112
fil> ALIGNMENT P8D10
JRC-4
A A
JRC-12
53601850 53601847
JRC-12
KEY PLAN
53601868 53601947
NOTES:
53601891 53601892
JRC-12
JRC-12
B B
53601893 1. FOR UTILITIES LEGENDS,
REFER TO DWG. NO. DW015-P00-ATK-UC-0010.
JRC-4
LEGEND:
••
JRC-12
ELECTRICITY (TRANSMISSION)
JRC-4
ELECTRICITY (DISTRIBUTION)
D ELECTRICITY (LIGHTING + ITS)
D TELECOMMUNICATIONS (QAF)
53601849 D TELECOMMUNICATIONS
•
C C
53601848
SEWERAGE
53601896
53601895 53601894
ALIGNMENT P8D13
D SURFACE WATER
D TREATED SEWERAGE EFFLUENT

JRC-12
' ALIGNMENT P8D9

ALIGNMENT P8D9 D WATER
,---_Ji
I JRC-12
D CHILLED WATER
I
I
I
----- ---- D
D
DOHA SURVEILLANCE SECURITY SYSTEM
GAS

D I 53601398 D
I
I
I
53601869 JRC-4
I 53601946
I
53601851 53601852 53601853 53601854 53601855
I U01 21JUL13 FOR MMUP REVIEW JFN GRP RSI
I Rev. Date

Revision Details Drawn Chkd. Appd.
E E
I
JRC-4
PARSONS
I J:)atar BRINCKERHOFF
,.,,.., ~ '- 5th Floor, Faisal Tower #2
West Bay
-----+----J:
Local Roads & D rainage PO Box 23103 Doha, Qatar
ALIGNMENT P8D7 ASHGIIAl PROGRAMME oe
+974 4435 1601 (main office)
Design Consultant :
I WS Atkins & Partners Overseas

ALIGNMENT P8D3 D-Ring Road
P O Box 24656
Telephone
Fax
+974 44061600
+974 44669587
53601870 53601945 Doha - State of Qatar Email: office.qatar@atkinsglobal.com
Client :
F 53601860 53601859 53601858 53601857 53601856 Public Works Authority F
P.O. Box 22188
Tel.: (0974) 4950000
Fax.: (0974) 4950999
53601397
ALIGNMENT P8H24
IA
J...ru ill ,g :1i, uj .J,.b.6
cp cp Project Name:
I I I GEC-DOHA WEST-DW015
I I I ROADS & INFRASTRUCUTRE
I ~
G G
JRC-14
JRC-12
Project Code:
MMUP-PH2-PK8
Status:
DETAILED
CORRIDORDESIGN APPROVAL
APPROVAL
Drawing Title:
PROPOSED CORRIDOR
UTILITY UTILITY CORRIDOR
COMBINED LAYOUT PLAN
PROPOSED CORRIDOR
(EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY)
RESERVATIONS LAYOUT
SHEET 01
SHEET 74OFOFXX 112
H JRC-14 Drawn:
J.NAVISA
Checked:
G.POMANTOC H
--- -- --- ---- Designed:
R.JAINY
Approved:
R.IVY
JRC-12
Date: Scale:
JULY 2013 1:500 @ A1
0 5 10 15 20 25 m
FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET No: 65 DW015 - P00 - ATK - UC - 2074 U01
SCALE 1:500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
NOTE:
REFER TO DRAWING XXX.XXX.XXX FOR GENERAL NOTES
s s
~I
>-
I~
·>-
u
~I I~
Q_
LEGEND:
§5 I IQ_
--
COLOR CODING
:,,: . =>
:,,:
"" I I""
I 2500 I
SHARED USE PATH 500 500 500 500 1500 2000
SHY ' SHY SHY ' SHY \ BUFFER FOOTPATH ~ ELECTRICAL GALLERY
7542 I I 4500 I 3500 \ I 3 LANES @ 3650 = 10950 I ' 3178 \ I 3 LANES @ 3650 = 10950 1 VARIES I I I 2000 I I 11285
I I I I I I I I I E(ST) STREET LIGHTING
LANDSCAPE SERVICE ROAD BUFFER CARRIAGEWAY MEDIAN CARRIAGEWAY 1
MERGING I CYCLE I LANDSCAPE
LANE TRACK T TELECOMMUNICATION
TELECOMMUNICATION
T(QAF)
QATAR ARMED FORCE (QAF)
SFM SEWERAGE FORCE MAIN
2% •
-
2% 2% TSE TREATED SEWERAGE EFFLUENT
'
--T ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------f-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . ~if61NPGROFILE
- w
SEWERAGE GRAVITY
WATER
• -
-~ r:
--+--
,,. ,,.
,-
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
'I
,,.
,,.
,,.
,..
,,.
,..
,..
,..
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
--
, --+--
cw
G
CHILLED WATER
GAS
=-a
__,_.,__ m"" ,.. ,,.
,,.
' ,,.
,,.
,-
,,.
,..
'
'
''
'' \'\ I
''
'
''
''
,..
,..
,..
,..
,..
,-
,-
,..
,..
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,.
,,. . :
-
,.. --+--
[JJ
SW SURFACE WATER
BUFFER
-
,-
,.. ,.. ,.. ,,. ,,. ,-
,,. ,.. \\ '' ,..

,,. ,,. ,,. ,-+-
ABBREVIATIONS:
,.. ,,. ,-
~ ,,. ,,. ,,.
·.
,.. ' ,.. ,,. ,.. ,..
,.. ,.. ,,. ,,. ,- E(T) ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION
~
,,. E(D) ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION
~ ~
0:-
+
ITT
w
~
~
"'
~
>
I
-.,_
~
0
+ 3'
~ f2 >
I
E(ST)
T
(QAF)
ELECTRICITY STREET LIGHTING
TELEPHONE
QATAR ARMED FORCE (QAF)
+
ITT
+
ITT
ro -< -< > N -< -< >w
ro
u
n
x xw
ro
u
n
u
~
N
xw
D
0
0
ITT
D
;a; x
0
0
N
I
w
N
xw
-
u
n
N
;a;
D
0
0
N
;a;
D
0
0
~
xw
I
xw
PROP. PW
SFM
TSE
s
SEWERAGE FORCE MAIN
TREATED SEWERAGE EFFLUENT
SEWERAGE GRAVITY
w D w 0 D
w WATER
PROP. QTEL PROP. TEL. cw CHILLED WATER
G GAS
SW SURFACE WATER
PROP. SW B BUFFER
PROP. QAF PROP. QAF PROP PROPOSED
EXIST EXISTING
MIN MINIMUM
KV KILO VOLT
0 DD/MMIYY ISSUED FOR APPROVAL xxxx

+0.000 +0.000 REV.
DATE DESCRIPTlON APPR.
••
·-· -··- • •• • NO.
-1.000 -1.000
-2.000 -2.000 State of Qatar-
-3.000 -3.000
-4.000 -4.000
-5.000 -5.000 TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
-6.000 -6.000
T w TSE E(ST) SW G B B G TSE SW E(ST) w T

DESIGN CONSULTANT
DETAILS & LOGO
PROJECT CODE
0.5 2.5 3.0 1.5 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 20 3.0 2.0 2.5 0.5
VARIES VARIES 1.0
xxxxxxxxx
PROJECT
PROPOSED UTILITY CROSS SECTION - 64.3M CONCEPT DESIGN OF
Scale 1 :100
ROADS/INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECT NAME - PACKAGE XX
TITLE
PROPOSED CROSS SECTION

T w G TSE S(FM) cw SW TSE G w T SECTION Z
(SHEET 01 OF XX)
0.5 2.5 4.0 2.0 20 3.0 2.0 3.75 3.1 2.65 3.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 DESIGNED
xxxx STA1\JS
CONCEPT DESIGN
CHECKED TIPD APPROVAL

xxxx
MMUP TYPICAL CROSS SECTION CORRIDOR - 64M DATE
DD.MM.VY
I @A1= 1:150
SCALE @A3= 1:300
Scale 1:100 Prepared by: Muhsin Kuhutan
DWG.NO. REV.NO.
Checked by: Muj1aba Hamidy
Approved by: Hassan Qasem MMUPDRAFT 0.0
~1..,.....tl ~ I.J 4:!~ I o_J'J__,
Mlnlst,y of Municipality & Urban Planning
MMUP U
UTILITY IMPACT AASSESSM MENT CHHECKLIST
LOCA
AL ROADS AND DDRAINAGE PROGR RAM
(For MM
( MUP’s Initial Acce
eptance)
Item
m Descrription Yes Noo Comments
C s
1.0 Data Co ollection
1.1 Data colllected of all the existing and propos ed utilities frrom
utility aggencies? Infformation must be currennt (not olderr than 4
months.) The agenccies are:
a. MMUP
b. Ashghal (Draainage, TSE a and Foul Sew wer)
c. Ashghal – Ro oad Projectss
d. Qatar Petroleum
e. Kahramaa Electricity
f. Kahramaa W Water
g. ictQatar
h. Qtel
i. Vodafone
j. QNBN
k. DSSS
l. Qatar Cool
m. District Cooling – Kahram maa
n. Qatar Arm FForces (QAF)
o. Qatar Rail Company (QR Rail)
p. Others (Specify)

o be requesteed i.e. size, ttype, age,
Attributtes of utilitiess should also
material, class and aany other relevant inform mation such as
voltage,, operating p pressure etc… …
1.2 Coordinated with ad djacent as we ell as Large PProjects?
a. Mega Reserrvoirs
b. IDRIS
c. Metro
d. Q2022
e. QIDMP
f. Local Road & Drainage Program
g. Others

1.3 Coordination with U Utility agenciees regardingg existing andd future
abandon nments as w well possible upgrades wi thin the vicin nity of
the projject corridor?
Conductted topograp phic survey aand geophys ics survey (G
GPR,
1.4
Radio deetection & Trial Pits)?

1.5 Assessed all the disccrepancies beetween the ssurvey and tthe ‘As
Built’ an
nd forwarded d to relevantt agencies?

Version 001 YY:\06 Infrastructuure & Geotechnicc\Utility Checklist\Utility checklist ‐ Local Roads and Drainage Rev. 33.docx

P a g e | 1 Prepared by: mhamidy; February 14
~1..,.....tl ~ I.J 4:!~ I o_J'J__,
MMUP U
LOCA
(For MM
eptance)
Item
C s
2.0 Study off the Roads and Surroun nding Area
2.1 Identifieed the locatio on of the pro oject?
a. Rural
b. Urban
c. Inner Urban n
2.2 Type of Roads
a. Arterial
b. Local Urban Collector
c. Local Urban Access
d. Others (please specify)
2.3 Studied the Land Usse Plan, futurre adjacent ddevelopmentts
(shoppin ng centers, industries, ho ospitals, inst itutions etc… …) and
major uttilities alongg the corridorr e.g. substattion, pump sstations,
water taanks etc.?
3.0 Road Deesign and Layout
3.1 Road an nd layout including all the e Junctions, A Access, Land dscape,
street fuurniture etc. design has b been developped.
3.2 Proposeed Land acqu uisition requiired for roadd design has been
developped?
4.0 Assessmment of each h impacted e existing utilitty
4.1 Impact o of the propo osed road con nfiguration oon the existin ng utility
including;
a. The effect o of the propossed profile haas been asse essed.
b. The effect o of the propossed landscappe (hard & so oft) been
checked.
c. The effect o of surface as well as sub‐ssurface
appurtenances and features e.g. lighht poles, stru uctural
foundationss etc… has be een checked .
4.2 Consideeration of meeasures/chan nges that cann be adopted d to
minimizze the impactt on existing utilities?
a. Geometric (profile and a alignment)
b. Road Drainaage & Curb
c. Slope/Retaining Walls/B Barriers
d. Structure/Bridges/Footing
e. Other design changes fo or maintaininng the existin ng utilities
at their currrent location
please speciify................................... ...............................
4.3 Decision n hierarchy for utility adjustment witth A being the most
preferreed?
A. Keep As Is
B. Protect (to u utility provid ders requirem ments)
C. Relocate

~1..,.....tl ~ I.J 4:!~ I o_J'J__,
MMUP U
LOCA
(For MM
eptance)
Item
C s
D.Install in a d
duct bank sysstem
E.Install in shaared trench
F.Reroute
G.Install in Gallery
H.Land Acquissition, with (i) being the eeasiest to acq quire.
i. Governmment unalloccated
ii. Governmment allocatted
iii. Private Undevelopedd (no structu ures)
iv. Private Developed‐ oold
v. Private Developed‐ nnew
vi. Protecteed Environm ent
v
vii. Protecteed Sensitive ((PEO)
v
viii. Protecteed Heritage
4.4 Consideeration should be given to o the followiing factors w when
adjustin
ng the affecteed existing utilities?
a. The type of utility e.g. VC/Asbestos oor AC/ DICL o or Oil Fill
vs. XLPE
b. The size of tthe utility (distribution orr transmissio on)
c. The Age of tthe utility and assessmennt for potenttial
upgrade.
d. The size and d frequenciess of the cham mbers
e. The frequen ncy of mainte enance
f. The proposeed location o of the utility wwithin the
carriagewayy and the imp pact on trafffic i.e. Lane C
Closures
during main ntenance or b breakage.
g. The hierarch hy cost of relocating utili ties, i.e. costt of
relocating a smaller cable/pipe vs. bbigger cable/pipe
h. Identificatio on of Primaryy Substationss, Pump Stattions etc.
i. Potential rissks in case off breakage
5.0 Conflict Analysis
5.1 Assessmment been caarried out forr the utility cconflicts arisiing from;
a. Road configuration?
b. Between diffferent utilitiies?
c. Major projects e.g. Metrro?
d. Adjacent pro ojects?
6.0 Documeentation & SSubmittals
6.1 The follo
owing docum ments should d be provide d for the fulll length of
the Road project in readable sca ale (not less thhan 1:500 @ A A1 size):
a. Presentation n of change in the road l evels i.e. existing vs.
proposed in n profile and cross‐sectio n.
b. Presentation n of the roadd layout incluuding other p projects
within the corridor e.g. Metro, IDRISS etc.
c. Presentation n of existing and proposeed utilities, w where the

~1..,.....tl ~ I.J 4:!~ I o_J'J__,
MMUP U
LOCA
(For MM
eptance)
Item
C s
utilities show wn to be "prrotected", "aabandoned",
"removed", "kept as is", "relocated"" and proposed new
utilities.
d. Presentation n of Utility Corridor in plaan and crosss‐section.
These corrid dors should b be based on::
i. MM MUP typical cross‐section
ii. o be maintai ned at their current
Exissting utility to
locaation (i.e. "Keeep As Is" or r "Protect")
iii. Plannned future u utilities (provvided by utility
provvider)
iv. Estimation of future utility nneeds consid dering the
senssitivity of corrridor as perr item 2.3.
e. Presentation n of Cross‐se ections show wing MMUP aallocated
utility corriddors, propose ed utility corrridors as weell as the
existing and d proposed utilities.
f. Presentation n of Layout P Plan indicatinng the Land tto be
acquired forr Utility purp poses.
6.2 It is encoouraged to sseparate the "dry" utilitiees from "wett" utilities
in the laayout plans for ease of do ocumentatioon.

Projject Manaagement C
Consultant (PMC) R
Responsible

Revie ew Engineeer ____________ ______________ _ ____________________ ___________
Signaturee Name

Engin neer Approvve _____________ ______________ _ ____________________ ___________
(Proje ect Director)) Signaturee Name


MMUP - UTILITY CORRIDORS STANDARD CAD □ LAYERING
LAYER NAME COLOR TYPE ABBREVIATION
DRY UTILITIES:
QATAR ARMED FORCES 189,248,100 QAF
TELECOMMUNICATION 148,255,148 TEL
DOHA SURVEILLANCE SECURITY SYSTEM 255,255,209 DSSS
INTELLIGENT TRAFFIC SYSTEM 76,199,15 ITS
STREET LIGHTING 255,168,168 ST
STREET LIGHTING + ITS 255,204,204 L+ITS
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION 255,51,51
ELECTRICAL (TRANSMISSION) 255,51,51
WET UTILITIES:
POTABLE WATER 185, 185,254 PW(D)
POTABLE WATER (MAIN) 185, 185,254 PW(T)
GAS PIPELINE 255,255,36 G
CHILLED WATERLINE 199,255,255 cw
TREATED SEWERAGE EFFLUENT 235,96,201
SEWERAGE 128,96,0
SURFACE WATER 214,161,0 SW
GROUND WATER 214,161,0 GW
SEWERAGE FORCE MAIN 255,232, 163 S(FM)
1 MMUP - UTILITY CORRIDORS STANDARD CAD □ LAYERING

APPENDIX C
I
KAHRA~ ;AA
.:;' 0 ~ ....
0
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
D
Between
Public Works Authority (PWA)

D
0 And
Qatar General Electricity & Water Corporation (Kahramaa)
July 2017
Approved by: Date:
PWA President Kahramaa President

I
D
D KAHRAo;AA
:.' 0 A."-
D
D
Table of Contents
D
D 1) MoU between PWA & Kahramaa Electricity {KME)
M oU ................................................................................................................................. Pages 1 through 13
D Appendix (1) - Typical Joint Bay Details within the roadway (KME) ............................................. ....... 11 of 13
Appendix (2) - Protocol of Work for KM Contractors to Work Within PWA projects ....................... 12 of 13
MOU Approval ............................................................................................................ .. ................. .. .. 13 of 13
2) MoU between PWA & Kahramaa Water (KMW)
MoU ........................................................ ................................................................................................................................................ Pages 1 through 15
D Appendix (1) - PWA Commitm ent Letter ... ............................................................................................ 13 of 15
Appendix (2) - Protocol of Work for KM Contractors to Work Within PWA projects ....................... 14 of 15
MOU ApprovaI ................................................................................................... ................................ 15 of 15
I
D KAHRAo ;AA
.:;,I O .-h."""-
0
0
□
MoU between PWA & Kahramaa Electricity (KME)
I
I
II .
□
•
llialllftb
~ JII ~ .......
Oal•t Ofifne TM ltJI
D Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
D Agreement between the following Members of the Utility Coordination Committee (UCC)
D
PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY Infrastructure Affairs Department (PWA)
And
D KAHRAMAA Electricity Network Affairs Department
And witnessed by
Ministry of Municipality and Environment, Infrastructure Planning Department
Ministry of Interior, Traffic Safety and Engineering Administration
Ministry of Municipality and Environment (Environmental Assessment Department EAD)
I Page 1 of 13
I
Ii
•
0 llallllllll
.,_..........., ........
iatlr 0Ht:NU Thi! 1.-st
KAHRAg - ;AA
~· 0 ~~
Contents
Introduction ................................................... ,............................................................................................................................................. 3
Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 3
Parties to the MOU ..................................................................................................................................................... ,........................... 4
□ Objective ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
Agreements Reached at the UCC Meetings held in June 2015: ...................................................................4
Implementation of the Agreement ............................................................................................................. 10
Applicable Laws and Dispute Resolution .................................................................................................... 10
D Commencement Date ................................................................................................................................. 10
MOU Approval ················································•rtt+llltt••················································································ l l
D
Appendix (1)
D Typical Joint Bay Details within the Roadway (KME)
Appendix (2)
I Protocol of Work for KM Contractors Requesting to Work within LR&DP
Page 2 of 13
I
IJ
0 KAHRAo - ;AA
.:;I O .+."'-
:,
D Introduction
Generally, it is evident that the distribution and allocation of the utility corridors for the
D Public Works Authority (PWA) projects, especially for those located within Inner Doha, is
becoming a challenge to the designers. This could be due to various factors such as
D limitation of the available Right of Way (RoW), higher traffic volumes and higher demands
on utility services. The complicated road configuration (e.g. underpasses, tunnels and
□
overpasses) to accommodate the current and projected traffic volumes is further
aggravating this issue.
To address such challenges and to meet the future demands on utilities, the Infrastructure
D Planning Department (IDP) of MME published Road Cross Sections. This was carried out in
consultation with all utility providers, in which the utility corridors were redistributed and
D some other corridors like, GAS, District Cooling, Utility Gallery etc. were added. To facilitate
and guide the implementation of the new road cross section and utility redistributed for
D enhanced corridors, MME has prepared specific requirements and

Implementation Guidelines as well. However, MME acknowledges that large portions if not
issued an
all PWA Projects will deviate from the typical standard corridors primarily due to lack of
available RoW. Therefore, as a result of this constraint, a new set of guidance needs to be
developed to aid the consultant designing these road projects.
Currently MME is in the process of finalizing the Qatar National Master Plan under the
Urban Planning Department (UPD). This Master Plan will be used by all agencies to carry the
I future planning of their utilities. However, in the absence of such strategic land use plan,
the UPD have assigned Interim Land Use Plans as well as RoW to serve the current
development in the country. Therefore, IPD's role is to determine the width of the RoW,
D how the width of the RoW is distributed among each utility provider to ensure all the
necessary utilities have the access to fully service the current development, and provisions
made to serve future development.
IPD's position is that any land required for a project must be fully justified and it is not
preferred to demolish existing buildings or acquire land to meet the prescribed utility
corridor allocation as per MME's Typical Cross-Sections. Although it may achieve the
necessary approvals from the relevant agencies, IPD does not consider such approach to be
best practice and will hesitate to approve schemes that are based on unnecessary land take.
Background
The Government has directed that land acquisition and the demolition of properties are to
be limited and appropriate design solutions must be put in place to ensure compliance.
Page 3 of 13
□ Ii
D llm■lb
..i--.111 6->-""',-.AA
Qatar °"4:tm lhct Sul
KAHRA~
~I O ~""-
;
D MME has directed that in order to limit land acquisition utility corridors should be restricted
to existing and known future services only. Corridors for future unknown services would be
considered when the need arises.
D The Utilities Coordination Committee (UCC) has considered proposals to achieve land
acquisition reductions specifically associated with the allocation of electrical corridors and
D the agreements reached are recorded below.
D Parties to the MOU
D This MOU is between the following parties:
■ Public Works Authority (PWA) represented by the Infrastructure Affairs Department and
D the Assets Affairs Department.
■ Kahramaa Electricity (KME) represented by the Electricity Network Affairs Department.

D
Witnessed and agreed by:
■ Ministry of Municipality and Environment (MME) represented by the Infrastructure

Planning Department (IPD).
Objective
This MOU puts into effect an agreement on the items listed below, reached between PWA
D and KME at the UCC meetings held in June 2015. The MOU is witnessed and agreed by
MME. The contents shall be implemented by PWA, KME and MME.
Agreements Reached at the UCC Meetings held in June 2015 and other
UCC Meetings:
Item 1: Corridor Width Allocation
1.1 Provide for Existing and Known Future cable services only.
1.2 MME shall provide corridors for Unknown Future requirements, at the time
they are confirmed and required.
Item Z: Cables Under The Carriageway
2.1 New or diversions of HV/EHV Cables under the carriageway to be only

considered and reviewed when the PWA design consultant has discounted all
Page4 of13
□ ·-
0 llialllHlb
.i-a.,JJt ~ ~
Q.rur 0'1u1,1t; the 8tll
KAHRAg - ;AA
,::. I O .-h "'-
;
D options to place cables in the verge. The PWA design consultant will be
required to justify to MME and Kahramaa why cables need to be placed under
the carriageway. In order to be accessible at all times, joint link boxes to be
D kept on the verge.
2.2 Subject to 2.1 above new HV/EHV Cables may be placed under the carriageway
D in the following order of priority:
• Service Roads.
D • Slip Roads.
• Collector/Distributor Roads.
D •
•
Hard shoulders.
Slow lanes in multi-lane roads.
• Intersections (to be reviewed by KME on case by case basis).
D 2.3 Existing cables (other than LV/MV cables - refer to item 2.12} can be left under
carriageway provided they are adequately protected against damage.
D Impacted Existing LV/M cables inside the carriageway to be diverted to the
appropriate Corridor.
2.4 Maximum length of HV/EHV cables allowed under carriageways is 500m. Cable
lengths greater than S00m will be considered as special cases and will require
higher management approval.
2.5 PWA accepts to provide unhindered access to KME for emergencies and
I essential maintenance of cables. PWA confirms that KME will be allowed to
excavate in the carriageway for cable fault repair works/emergency cable
maintenance works. KME Contractor shall follow Emergency RO Process and
D shall comply with PWA "Amendment to the Code of Practice and Specification
for Road Openings in Highway, dated December 201411 and with QCS 2014
Specifications for Backfilling and Reinstatement.
2.6 PWA design consultant to consider Traffic Management for accessing cables.
0 2.7 HV/EHV cables can be laid under asphalt-paving; interlocking-paving tiles are
not required.
2.8 KME is to comply with the PWA "Amendment to the Code of Practice and
I Specification for Road Openings in the Highway" dated December 2014. (Refer
to Appendix 2 for protocol of works).
2.9 PWA is to implement an inspection regime during construction to ensure that

D the backfilling sections of the Code of Practice (refer to item 2.8) are fully
complied with.
Pages of 13
I
KAHRAo ;AA :
J.-o.Jl~ ,-11.1 .:;.I Q ..._,~
Ott11r DcMMI Th. 81!',t
D 2.10 For projects KME works falling under PWA Construction Projects, KME is to
follow the attached protocol of work {refer to Appendix 2). PWA Protocol of
Works is not applicable for KahraMaa Emergency Works.
D Kahramaa contractors carrying out the Reinstatement works may not be PWA
approved contractors. However, KME Contractor shall comply with PWA
D "Amendment to the Code of Practice and Specification for Road Openings in
Highway, dated December 2014" and QCS 2014 Specifications for Backfilling
and Reinstatement.
D
2.11 Oil filled HV/EHV cables that need to be relocated shall be upgraded to XLPE
type Cable from substation to substation.
2.12 Existing LV/MV cables in the main or service roads, before or after PWA new
road layout, will be left under the carriageway in order to avoid the high cost of
relocating these utilities to their respective corridors. However, a corridor
should be provided in the verge (out of the carriageway) to accommodate the
known future electrical networks.
In case there are no corridors available outside the carriageway for the future
i electrical networks due to the congestion of existing utilities, PWA has to
submit a land acquisition request to accommodate the future networks (in
specific for the Expressways). In case there is no available land to be acquired
or rejected by MME-IPO, a letter confirming the same has to be received from
MME-IPD and presented to KM.
In addition, the following conditions should be considered:
• PWA shall allow KAHRAMAA to carry future works in the carriageway for
connections, operations and maintenance, and any other emergency works
wherever required.
• PWA shall protect the existing utilities during construction phase of PWA
projects as per KAHRAMAA's specifications.
I • PWA shall bear the cost of reinstatement upon completion of the

maintenance/emergency works by KAHRAMAA if it was found out that the
cable fault is due to PWA's design or method of implementation while
providing the required concrete protection.
2.13 Only shallow planting will be allowed inside the electrical corridor above the
cable. Only after assessing other options, such shallow planting over the cable
route maybe allowed.
MV/LV cable routes having shallow planting, unhindered access to be provided

to KME for emergency and essential maintenance and special arrangements for
cables under shallow planting will be agreed on case by case to maintain access
Page 6 of 13
I
D lliilllllb
~JI! .;......... ......
()fitu °'1tt'NI Theo I UI
2.14 Existing LV/MV cables, underneath Parking bays, Pedestrian Path, Cycle Path,
Verge (or others), falling in other utilities' corridors will be kept in place in
order to avoid the high cost of their relocations to their respective corridors.
However, a corridor should be provided in the verge (out of the carriageway) to
accommodate the future electrical networks. Please refer to clause2.13 above
for requirements in case no corridors are available.
I Item 3: Cable Joint Bays under the Carriageway
3.1 It is permissible to place HV/EHV cable joint bays under the carriageway subject
to clause 2.1 above and the following conditions:
• Link boxes shall be placed under the verge and must be accessible at all
times.
• PWA accepts to provide unhindered access to KME for emergency and
essential Proactive & Corrective maintenance of EHV/HV joint Bays.
• PWA design consultant to prepare outline traffic management scheme for
accessing cables joint boxes.
• PWA and KME accept the cable joint box detail attached as Appendix 1.
I Item 4: Reduced Spacing of Cables
4.1 KME to permit reduced optimized cable spacing based on calculations prepared
by the PWA design consultant or their specialized sub-consultant subject to the
following conditions:
PWA design consultant to discuss and agree with KME the following:
• Design Criteria and Method of calculation.

• Allowable parameters.
I • Allowable thermal resistivity for specialized backfill.
• Absolute minimum spacing.
• Maintain Cable Current carrying capacity specified by KM.
Item 5: Splitting of corridors and/or Intermittent Structures within

Electrical Corridors
5.1 It is acceptable to allow splitting of corridors and/or intermittent structures

such as street lighting poles and foundations, trees and road gullies to be
constructed within the electrical corridors. Wherever possible, splitting of
electrical corridors or re-routing around obstacles is accepted when it benefits
I Page 7 of 13
I
Ii
KAHRAo - ;AA
11&1mb
.i--,..JII~~ ,:;I g Ao."-
Q11H Clecl'M lhl lNt
the project and relocation of utilities is minimized. PWA design consultants to

set parameters on how the structures to be constructed and electrical cables
protected from these structures and at the same time provide easy access.
D 5.2 For splitting of corridors it is critical to ensure that widths allocated due to
splitting is usable by KME, and should be assessed on case-by-case basis, for
0 the benefit of the State.
D Item 6: Vertical Stacking/ Duct Banks (Sing le User/Authority)
6.1 Vertical stacking and duct banks are agreed in principle for a single
User/Authority only, based on calculations prepared by the PWA design
consultant and subject to the following:
D Design Consultants to discuss and agree with KME:
0 •
•
Design criteria and the method of calculation.
Acceptable rating values, depending on the application and actual
forecasted load.
• Chamber spacing to be proposed by the PWA Design Consultant based on
pulling calculations and other criteria.
6.2 Vertical Stacking to be proposed only If other options are not feasible.
6.3 Duct banks option will be discouraged by KME.
6.4 After conditions in 6.1 are fulfilled, if the proposed vertical stacking design is
approved by KME, KM HSE approval to be mandatory in view of safety
operations and Maintenance Personal.
6.5 Civil Defense approval (if required) to be obtained for all underground
structures and Substation after KME and KM HSE approvals.
Item 7: Rerouting of cables
7.1 Where there is a limitation of availability of electrical corridor, re-routing of

electrical cables to an adjacent relatively minor road is acceptable.
Item 8: Kahramaa Cable tunnel
8.1 The use of cable tunnels is permitted after all other options have been studied.
Page8 of 13
I
• ..
d-i
&lllllb KAHRAo-;AA
D J....,,,,,l l ~,......_.
Qour _ T h l _
.:;. I O • ""-
0 8.2 Cable Tunnel design guidance to be agreed within one month of the date of
this agreement. The time for design review may vary and will be on a case-by-
case basis.
D 8.3 Cable Tunnels will be handed over to KME for operation and maintenance.
D Item 9: Allocation of Land for Substations
□ 9.1 The area of land to be allocated for substations is to be based on the actual
current design requirement and confirmed known future needs.
9.2 MME guideline documents "Electrical Distribution - Guidance for Location

(Version 2 - July 2014)" is to be followed for sizing the areas required for the
D substations.
□ Item 10: Street Li9htin9
10.1 For Street Lighting Feeder Pillar (SLFP) that allocated more than 500m away
from Substation, it is PWA responsibility to maintain the Voltage Drop from
Substation to SLFP within 3%. In addition, it is PWA responsibility to maintain
the Voltage Drop from Substation to the last Street Lighting Poles, of each
circuit within, 5%.
10.2 PWA will undertake the responsibility to maintain the Voltage Drop for the
Street Lighting Assets within the approved range.
I
I Page 9 of 13
I
KAHRAo - ;AA ...
D llliilliHII ,:;I Q ih.-"'-
D Implementation of the Agreement
This MOU shall be implemented by:

D ■ PMC's and Consultants/Contractors appointed by the PWA.
■ Engineers and Technical staff appointed by Kahramaa Electricity to review and
0 ■
approve PWA design and drawing submissions.
Engineers and Technical staff appointed by MME to review and approve PWA
design and drawing submissions.
D
Changes to the Agreement
Changes or deviations to this MOU shall not be permitted without agreement by the UCC.
D
Applicable Laws and Dispute Resolution
Qatari Law shall govern this MOU. In the case of a dispute, the parties should seek to
resolve it amicably within a 14-day period. In the event that a resolution is not reached then
they should submit a joint report to the parties' Top Management for resolution within 7
days of receipt of the report.
Commencement Date
This MOU shall be effective from the date it is agreed and signed by the parties and shall not
have a retrospective effect unless mutually agreed by the parties. This MOU shall remain In
force until such time that the parties agree to terminate.
Page 10of 13
7
NOTES:
Appendix (1): TYPICAL JOINT BAY DETAILS WITHIN THE ROADWAY (KME)
POSITION OF COVER SLAB TO BE SURVEYED BY
THE CONTRACTOR FOR INSTATEMENT OF THE
SURFACE MARKER AND SHALL BE INCLUDED ON
THE AS BUILT DRAWINGS
THIS SKETCH REFLECT THE ALLOCATION OF

ELECTRICAL JOINT BAY DETAIL UNDER THE
ROAD CARRIAGEWAY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE
KAHRAMAA RELEVANT TYPICAL DETAIL
UTILITY SURFACE MARKER SURROUNDING THE CHAMBER
FOR CABLE INSTALLATION DETAILS, REFER TO
SEE DETAIL-1 KAHRAMAA TYPICAL STANDARD DETAIL FOR
JOINT BAY
*
-~~={~ ~ -~=rnm~~M~ PANELS TO BE DESIGNED FOR TRAFFIC LOADING
BY THE CONSULTANT
l'J-----REINFORCED CONCRETE CHAMBER

TO BE DESIGNED FOR TRAFFIC
LOADING BY THE CONSULTANT
i
TYPICAL JOINT BAY DETAILS WITHIN
I THE ROADWAY (KME)
I SCALE: NTS
'* IN CASE WHERE THE THICKNESS OF ROAD TOP

SUB BASE IS LESS THEN 500mm, THE DEFICIT OF
HOT POURED COMPOUND SHALL BE
OXIDISED GRADE BITUMEN TO
BS PS EN 13304 GRADE S84/40 OR S85/25
0
Rev.
APRIL 15
Date
ISSUED FOR INFROMATION
.i.......tala:JI JL.a:. .J.dll i.......1.uJ,

Pt.b!ic Works Author~
Revision Details
,:
dn··
Chkd. Appd.
THIS THICKNESS ON TOP OF THE CHAMBER IS

ll§lllitlHb
IA
TO MADE UP BY ROAD BASE ALSO. INFRASTRUCTU RE AfFAIFl:S Q.atar Oemves The 8e!>t
Project Code:
EXPRESSWAY PROGRAMME
10mm I I- Drawing Title:
TYPICAL ELECTRICAL HV
I JOINT BAY DETAILS WITHIN
I DETAIL - 1 THE ROADWAY (KME)
I Date:
APRIL 2015
Drawing Number:
EXW-GENL-0000- PM - KBR -DG-80001-001

Scale:
NTS
Revision:
0
1,1.i;;;;;;;;;==========================;;;;;;;;;!:=================================..!..;;;;;;;!I
L _J
Appendix (2)- Protocol of Work for KM contractors Requesting to work Within PWA Proj ects•• Rev.OS July 2017
PWA Contractor KM Contractor GEC PMC PWA KM NOTES

----, Kahramaa (KM)
Receive Scheme from KM ,
PlaMing Department Programme Management Consultant (PMC)
_J __ Utilities Coordination Committee (UCC)

Geneyal Engineering Consultant (GEC)
~ Prepare Necessary ~ Days mean Working Days
~- - ----<,-- - - - ~------
I I
-----~-----
I
-+--...; DOC\lmentatlonandSubmlt
,,quest to start - J Request for Information (RFI)
_t: _ T l
rI
'f' L
7~ - ~-- - -- -- ---- - --,1- - --,II - At!':!;" I~-~ --- - ---I

(notea) _
Assess-:. Rea,ved
1:::n
Assess::. Rec
A
,:::,,,,
el.: ~- - 7
I -A
r::: the Received Assessthe Received L~~ .-J
•*This Protocol only applies when there are PWA
l[qy J lDly lOay 2Days _j Contractors and Consultants on site.
1
P,epare aod Submit
r documents (note b) and in
I I
I
I
Prepa re a nd Submit
documents
1
I Aco i,ted I -
Fo,wanl D<><uments 0 ,
Ooss Sections/
I -+---l>!I Forwanl do<uments to the
j]
In case there are no PWA contractors and Consultants, KM
is responsible to ensure that KM contractors comply with
QCS requirements in relation to Excavation, managing
excavated material, backfilling operations and full site
! coordlnationwlthGEC ~- - - - -- - - - -- - - - - --, (note b) , I Profiles and Plans

Setout t- relevant KM Contractor
clearance and to PWA O&M requirements for reinstatement
.,Amendment to the Code of Practice and Specification for
j
1
1Day J 1Day 20.ys

1
Road Openings in the Highway" dated December 2014 or its
~ [ 1 Day J ,j
following updates. Moreover, KMW has to ensure that
testing of backfilling elements shall be in accordance to
Rejected
[oav ~ appropriate Qatari Standards in Place.
a) Minor Schemes application is directly submitted to QPRO

KM Contractor is to
superimpose received
I
I
[ 2 oavs)
2.0, Major Schemes are to be submitted as per QDRS
Requirements. In exceptional cases start of works can be
lnformationon theirprotm .,
to develop the net"eSSary
Information for coordination
,
Il--+--------- - --+-- - - -- - - - - -- +-- -- - - -- - - - -1-------' requested via official letter to PWA. All initial applications
submitted is to clearly identify (CAD Format):
• Li mits of Work
i 10.,121 • Li ne Diagram of th e Section of works to be constructed
II Prepare and Submit

documents
Applications submitted through QPRO 2.0 will go to PWA
first and assigned to Prt!tC/GEC/PWA Contractor as needed
(note c)
I 7Days
I Applications submitted through QDRS will go to all auto
assigned parties PWA/PMC/GEC
r -
b) Once the application is received by the PWA and/or its
IL Support GEC in on site

coordination with KM
Contractor
1-C- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Review/Coordinate
SYbmitted Documents
(note d)
,
+ - -----, ----- ------,- --- - ------,
delegated Consultants, the information is superimposed on
the impacted project and the following information is
provided
I 2oay + + :t -
l
• Assessment and Conditions Form (includes condit ions to
Rejected Support In Escalalion and I I' Support In Escal.ltlon and I be abided by KM contractor and all relevant points of
ssue resolution through 8i•
weekfy meeting and UCC I Issue resolution through UCC
r :pport In Escalation and
Issue resolution
•
contact)
For PWA Projects In Concept Design KM is to Follow
Instruction t o Contractor
under the appropri d e
20ays 2 Days I [20.,. j Cross-sections provided by KM Plann ing
Accepted
Contract Clause if needed • For PWA Projects that is past Concept Design Applicant
I (nott' t')
- i I
to follow PWA Cross-sections (approved and stamped by
KM planning department)
I fi ecelve Site/ Conduct Joint I • Roads Profi les and Setout plans By PWA (CAO Format)
I JolntSitt'Su rvey
(nott'e) ]- -- - -
I Site Survey for Existing
Condition
(notee)
.
j
•
•
Projects Safety plan for projects in Construction for
Infrastructure Schemes
The PWA to inform KM Construction of changes in
10ay
projects stages/priorit ies
t l c) Once the information is received from PWA, KM is
Prepare and Submit
documents
{note e)
i Review Submitted
D<><uments
----------------------------~¥
Review Submitted
Documents
designate the relevant contractor to prepare the following
and coordinate with the GEC/Contractor for approval and
~ 2 Days (note e) {note el site handover
Rejected • In Un-Graded areas KM is to Coordinate directly w ith
t 2 Days
•
PWA for the best way fo rward
In Graded Areas KM Co ntractor to Submit Shop drawings
in accordance to the received PWA Cross sections, Road
rl Start Construction In l Accepted profiles and Setout plans (cables/pipes to be reflected in

the right corridor and at the right level)
C
.2 accord.lnce tothe QCS i+-- +------'------11------------+- -- - - - -------1------.J • Safety plan in accordance to QCS standards for projects
I
~
stand(!e~pface
'ii
8 1 I
- 1- - § !~
7. I
•
in construction for Infrastructure Schemes
General Method statement for Reinstatement/
Backfilling
• Proposed Detailed Schedule of Works (PG format)
I Safety Implementation/ I
-
• Excavated Material Management Plan
: I r;::~~• :
r 1
-- Contlnl.K>U5 Coordination/
• Back fill Material Approva l Requests (includ in g source
~ ~
l
agreement)
Monltartng / Damage
~------- r ------------ r ------------1 • Testing of Back fi lling Elements shall be in accordance to
I Cable/p;pe , .,.,. and Thin! I :I

(note f)
, + + I .i appropriate Qatari Standards in Place
I .
ff
I Part Survey
I I I
Support In Escalation and 1 1• d) The GEC/Contractor is to coordinate the following
l
I (noteij Issue resokrtion through Bi- 1 Support In Escal.ltion and I Su pport in Escalation and
1 weekly meeting and UCC 1 IIssue resolution through UCC Wue resolution • Review and comment on submitta l for All Projects
I t 2oavs J 20,vs --1 20.,, ._ • Set up Kick off meeting for Projects in construction
inviting all necessary parties
and Submit Method I

• Review and agree received Safety plan and General
fPrepare
Statement for Backfill above
Method statement for Reinstatement/ Backfilling in
IKM sul'T'OUndlng and bedding r- ~ Re\llew Submitted accordance to the PWA requirements for projects in
D<><uments construction
~20ays (note~ j
• Agree and finalize Proposed Schedu le and Site handover
for Areas of KM Works
Rejected • The GEC is to escalate necessary issues/concerns ea rly to
the PMC/PWA as needed
• After finalization of all the above and submittal ls
Accepted
accepted the GEC is to Handover the Site to KM
t Backfin / Reinstate in \
I =.=•.:t::.:-" 1 4---1------' Contractor
e) The PWA or PWA Delegated Engineer to direct the PWA
l
Contractor under the appropriate contract clause providing
the following information: KM Contractors Name, Contact
Details, Scope of Work and Duration
The KM Contractor is to follow the following upon receiving

Joint Inspection
{note h)
L_ Joint Inspection the site
(note h)
• Conduct a Joi nt Survey with PWA Contactor
J • Prepare and Subm it an Existing Site Condition Report,
which should incl ude images and narrative, highlfghting
any issues or issues to be foreseen that might prevent
the contractor from return the site to its existing
condit ion
• The PWA or PWA De legated Engineer is to Sign-off on
Existing Site Condition Report upon confirmation
f) The KM Contractor is to follow

• To comply w it h QCS requirements in relation to HSE,
Excavation, managing excavated material, bac kfilling
operations and fu ll site clearance or
• Lay Cab les/Pipes in according to the Approved Shop
Completed Drawings (approved levels and location)
• Confirmation of cables/pipes locat ion by Third Party
Survey
• All reports to be Submitted to GEC/Contractor on Site
• Report any Property damages to KM, t he PWA, t he PWA
Delegated Engineer, Property Ow ner and PWA
Cont ractor. The Proposed remedial action w ill be subj ect
to review and approval by t he Property ow ner and t he
PWA Delegated Engineer before Im plantation
• Provide full documentation related t o t he rem edial
action in accorda nce to QCS requirem ents fo r archiving
w ith Fi nal Dossier
gJThe KM Contractor to prepare a method statement for

backfilling / reinstatement specific to the area being
complete ensuring
• To comply w it h QCS requirements in relation to HSE,
Excavation, managing excavated material, backfil li ng
operations and full site clearance or
• PWA O&M requirements for reinstatement
• Confir ming t hat all materials used in backfilling and sub-
base for works above KM bedding and surrounding to be
in li ne with Qatari Specification and standards
• Surplus excavated materials to be taken off site by KM
Abdullah Ali A AI-Theyab

. . ,_ ".J\l...:..
FahL eM" a Contractor
h) Upon the Completion of KM Works and for Final Approval

• Conduct a Joint Inspection with PWA Contactor
UCC l l'llfElectricity Represe ~tative

I UCC KM Water Representa!
•
•
Provide a Confirmation to PWA in relation to all Works
which have been put out of view at time of inspection
The KM Contractor to prepare a Comp letion of Works
Report
• The PW A or PWA De legated Engineer w ill co~firm ,a-;c
sign th at t he W or ks '1 ave bee; undertaken to ' ,is
comµ•ete satisfacf ;:;. (rei:.,state~~t )
I
D
lllilllllli
D dltllll
~ ~...,..
o,u, l)nMlft lilt, tc,,
D MOU Approval
Q force upon its signing by the parties below.
Date:
D
>
D
D PWA President Kahramaa President
:::::::--:-.,
'-.j '
'
c::,..---4"\:------,;->-
.·
\
Abdullah All A AI-Theyab
UCC Chairman / Assistant of PWA President UCC Kahramaa Electricity Representative
Witnessed by:
I Ibrahim Abbas
I UCC Kahramaa Water Representative UCC MME Representative
I
Youssef Ibrahim AI-Homr
I UCC MOI Representative UCC MME-EAD Representative
Page 13 of 13
D
D
11-
-b
~ Jll ~ .......
Q_ o....,..n,...,,.
0
D
0
D
D
MoU between PWA & Kahramaa Water (KMW)
I
I
I
□
0 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
□ Agreement between the following Members of the Utility Coordination Committee (UCC)
Public Works Authority Infrastructure Affairs Department (PWA)
□ And
D
- KAHRAMAA-Water Network Affairs ( KMW)
D
And witnessed by
Ministry of Municipality and Environment, Infrastructure Planning Department
Ministry of Interior, Traffic Safety and Engineering Administration
Ministry of Municipality and Environment (Environmental Assessment Department (EAD))
I
I
I
I
I Page 1 of 1S
D
D
D Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................3
Background ............................................................................................................................................. 4
0 Parties to the MOU ......... ........... ............ ................................................................................................. 4
Objective .................................................................................................................................................4
□ Agreements between PWA and KMW: ..................... .............................................................................. 5

Implementation of the Agreement .......................................................................................................12
D Changes to t he Agreement ................................................................................................................... 12
Applicable Laws and Dispute Resolution .............................................................................................. 12
D Commencement Date ........................................................................................................................... 12

Appendix (1) .......................................................................................................................................... 13
D PWA Commit ment Letter ...................................................................................................................... 13

Appendix (2} .......................................................................................................................................... 14
MOU Approval ...................................................................................................................................... 15
Appendix (1)
PWA commitment
Appendix (2)
Protocol of Work for KM Contractors Requesting to Work within LR&DP
I
I Page Zof 15
I
I
D
II
0 ---
J.,UJI - ......
0,1o1, OncMs Tht t n·,
D Introduction
Generally, it is evident that the distribution and allocation of the utility corridors for the
D Public Works Authority (PWA) projects, especially for those located within Inner Doha, is
becoming a challenge to the designers. This could be due to various factors such as
limitation of the available Right of Way (RoW), higher traffic volumes and higher demands
D on utility services . The complicated road configuration (e.g. underpasses, tunnels and
overpasses) to accommodate the current and projected traffic volumes is further
aggravating this issue.
To address such challenges and to meet the future demands on utilities, the Infrastructure
D Planning Department (IDP) of MME published Road Cross Sections. This was carried out in
consultation with all utility providers, in which the utility corridors were redistributed and
some other corridors like, GAS, District Cooling, Utility Gallery etc. were added. To facilitate
0 and guide the implementation of the new road cross section and utility redistributed for
enhanced corridors, MME has prepared specific requirements and issued an
Implementation Guidelines as well. However, MME acknowledges that large portions if not
all PWA projects will deviate from the typical standard corridors primarily due to lack of
available RoW. Therefore as a result of this constraint, a new set of guidance needs to be
developed to aid the consultant designing these road projects.
Currently MME is in the process of finalizing the Qatar National Master Plan under the
Urban Planning Department (UPD). This Master Plan will be used by all agencies to carry the
future planning of their utilities. However, in the absence of such strategic land use plan,
the UPD have assigned Interim Land Use plans as well as Rows to service the current
development in the country. Therefore one of IPO's roles is to determine the widths of the
RoW and also how the width of the RoW is distributed among each utility provider to ensure
all the necessary utilities have the access to fully service t he current development and also
provisions made to service future development.
IPD's position is that any land required for a project must be fully justified and it is not
preferred to demolish existing bulldings or acquire land to meet the prescribed utility
corridor allocation as per MME's Typical Cross-Sections. Although it may achieve the
necessary approvals from the relevant agencies, IPD does not consider such approach to be
best practice and will hesitate to approve schemes that are based on unnecessary land take.
Page3of 15
I
I
0
D
□
Background
0 The Government has directed that land acquisition and the demolition of properties are to
be limited and appropriate design solutions must be put in place to ensure compliance.
I MME has directed that in order to limit land acquisition utility corridors should be restricted
t o existing and known future services only. Corridors for future unknown services would be
considered when the need arises.
The Utilities Coordination Committee (UCC) has considered proposals to achieve land
acquisition reductions specifically associated with the allocation of Water corridors and the
agreements reached are recorded below,
Parties to the MOU
This MOU is between the following parties:
■ Public Works Authority (PWA) represented by the Infrastructure Affairs Department
■ KMW Water (KMW) represented by the Water Network Affairs -Directorate
And witnessed and agreed by
■ Ministry of Municipality and Environment (MME) represented by the Infrastructure

Planning Department (IPD)
Objective
This MOU puts into effect an agreement on the items listed below, reached between PWA
and KMW. The MOU is witnessed and agreed by MME. The contents shall be implemented
by PWA, KMW and MME.
Page 4of 15
I
I
*
-·
J-u• ~
Ii
;.-IM
QrLar DIM:rm. ~e It'll
0 Agreements between PWA and KMW:
ltem.01 Submittals
1.01 The Utility Cross Sections design drawings, Detailed Design drawings for all
PWA projects related to KMW should be submitted through QDRS System for
review and approval by KMW.
i. Shop drawings , As built drawings should be submitted via official
letter to Water project Department , regarding Material approval
shall be submitted to WP ( material specification section)
□ ii. Once approved through QDRS application, PWA and/or its delegated
consultant shall submit hard copy officially for stamp.
1.02 KMW is required to provide comments on new revision and/or approval of

PWA submissions according to the following timeframe. PWA submittals are:
1.02.1 Utility Cross Sections design drawings (10 working days).
1.02.2 Detail Design drawings (20 working days).
1.02.3 Shop Drawings (10 working days).
1.02 .4 PWA Design Consultant may submit Shop Drawings as part of Detail
Design submission according to KMW requirements (20 working
days).
1.03 Revalidation of KMW existing/proposed Networks is required after one year

from the date of affixed approval on the drawings
1.04 Referring to clause 1.03 above and for renewing of RO request:

1.04.1 For PWA add itional requirements, revalidation of KMW
existing/proposed Networks is required
1.04.2 Revalidation of design approvals from KMW is not required for the RO
renewal in case there are no changes from the approved drawings
and no change in the scope of work and same project boundary
1.05 For KMW additional requirements during design submissions and/ or

revalidation (items 1.01, 1.02, & 1.03) or during renewal of RO (item 1.04):
KMW should request PWA to add the additional requirements and
shall provide budget for these requirements.
KMW shall provide conditional approval for the submission while the
additional requirements are in the process of being agreed between
PWAandKMW.
Page 5 of 15
I
I
I
KAHRA~
::.' C, ,.._..._
D In parallel, PWA will study these requirements and provide cost

estimate to KMW for formal approval prior to implementation.
ltem.02 Water Corridor Allocation
2.01 PWA Design Consultant has to follow MME Typical Utility Cross Sections as
Guidelines for the location and width of Water corridor. where appropriate.
In cases where the MME Typical Cross Sections cannot be applied due to, (1)
road corridor width restrictions, (2) additional land cannot be acquired as
D confirmed by official MME writing , and/or (3) any other justified reason,
then refer to item 03 below.
D 2.02 Referring to clause 2. 01 above, PWA Design Consultant to undertake an

assessment:
- To accommodate the existing and proposed Water Pipes within the
i allocated Water corridors

- To properly locate the related existing and proposed chambers along the
vicinity of the allocated Water corridors, while considering constructability
and accessibility of the proposed chambers (possibility of splitting corridors
as per item 07).
2.03 New Allocated water corridors should be outside the carriageway, and free
from any interfaces with others services w here possible.
ltem.03 Water Pipelines and its appurtenances under Carriageway
3.01 Existing Water Pipes Under the Main and Service Carriageways
(a) Existing Water pipes in the main or service roads, before or after PWA
new road layout, will be left under the carriageway in order to avoid the
high cost of relocating these utilities to their respective corridors.
However, a corridor should be provided in the verge (out of the
carriageway) to accommodate the known future Water networks free for
any interfaces with other services as an optimum solution.
However, existing pipes constructed since 25 years or above or in poor

condition should be relocated outside carriageway within Ashghal
project.
(b) In case t here are no corridors available outside the carriageway for the
known future Water networks due to the congestion of existing utilities,
Page 6of 15
D
D PWA has to submit a land acquisition request to accommodate the future
networks outside carriageway. In case there is no available land to be
acquired or rejected by MME-IPD, a letter confirming the same has to be
□
received from MME-IPO and presented to KM.
In addition, the following conditions should be considered:
i. With reference to point 3.01 (b) above, and In case water corridors
are available only under the carriageway:
- KMW shall study the pos.sibility to find another route for the
future network to avoid placing the network under carriageway.
- In case another route is not available, PWA shall allow KMW to
0 carry out future works in the carriageway for connections,
operations, maintenance and pipes laying, and any other
emergency works wherever required.
ii. PWA shall protect the existing utilities during construction phase of
PWA projects as per KM W's specifications.
iii. KMW shall carry out (Phase 1) of the Reinstatement for the works
mentioned above in points (i), and according to PWA specifications
and KMW shall bear the associated cost (refer to Item. 05 Backfilling
and Reinstatement below).
iv. PWA shall carry out (Phase 2) of the Reinstatement for the works
mentioned above in points (i) and (ii), and PWA shall bear the
associated cost unless it was found that the repair or maintenance
works are due to defect from manufacturer(s) already approved by
KMW and/or by KMW's Contractors (refer to Item. 05 Backfilling and
Reinstatement below}.
v. The aforementioned provisions and requirements shall not apply to

Strategic Waterlines and its appurtenances (chambers, fittings ... ) ,
which will cause significant damage to the State of Qatar if any
defects found therein; KMW will review on a case-by-case basis.
(c) Valve Chambers should be located outside the carriageway, unless

restrictions prevented allocating chambers outside the carriageways.
(d) To minimize costs and avoid delays during design and construction
phases, KMW will accept retaining/constructing valve chambers under
carriageways similar to the water pipelines.
Page 7 of 15
I
D
D ~ -J.-.M-1,-,,..
QA.Ir Oae:,W' The ' " '
D 3.02 Existing Water pipes, underneath Parking bays, Pedestrian Path. Cycle Path,
Verge, (or others) whether surfaces are paved with asphalt or not
D Existing Water pipes underneath Parking bays, Pedestrian Path, Cycle Path,
Verge,(or others), whether surfaces are paved with asphalt or not, falling
within other utilities' corridors or other utilities falling within the water
corridor will be kept in place in order to avoid the high cost of their
relocations to their respective corridors. However, a corridor should be
provided in the verge (out of the carriageway) to accommodate the future
known water networks. Please refer to clause 3.01 (b) above for the
conditions in case no corridors are available. Items (i) to (vi) of 3.01 above shall
remain applicable for item 3.02
D ltem.04 PWA Undertaking for KM W to carry out works under the

Carriageway
4.01 To avoid any potential conflicts when submitting Road Opening (RO) requests
by KMW via QPRO, or any misunderstanding during future excavations to
connect, operate, maintain or construct underground water lines located
under carriageways, car parking lanes, pedestrian walkways, and asphalt-
paved cycle paths (or others), the PWA hereby undertake as follows:
4.01.1 To communicate this MOU to all relevant entities regarding RO

requests, mainly: Roads Operation and Maintenance Department,
Ashghal staff reviewing ROs via QPRO, Ministry of Interior's General
Traffic Department, MME's Infrastructure Planning Department, and
any other entity involved in road opening procedures which are
supervised by PWA.
4.01.2 All future submitted drawings should contain an individual item in
general note referring to this MOU and its application on site .
4.02. Pipelines beneath carriageway should be designed while- taking into account
future temporary road diversion to maintain these pipelines.
4.03 Transmission Water Pipelines may be placed under carriageway In the

following order of priority :
• Service Roads.
• Slip Roads.
I •
•
Collector/Distributor Roads.
Hard Shoulders.
• Slow lanes in Multi-lane Roads.
I Page 8of15
I
I
I·
D
D
□
4.04 In case there is no available space within Water corridor in the verge/parking
bays, keeping Distribution Water Pipelines under the carriageway will require
satisfying the steps, rules and instructions reflected in item 3.01 (b).
a For common interest, KMW might request PWA to provide advance service
connections to vacant plots for distribution pipelines left under carriageway.
4.05 KMW is to comply with the PWA "Amendment to the Code of Practice and
Specification for Road Openings - December 2014 version"; refer to
Appendix 1.
4.06 PWA is to implement an inspection regime during construction to ensure that

the backfilling sections of the Code of Practice (refer to Item. 4 Backfilling and
Reinstatement below) are fully complied with.
4.07 PWA to nominate a Focal Point (Person/Section/Department) to be

responsible for coordination purposes with KMW for notification cases of
pipelines leakages or any maintenance works on the KMW Assets
accommodated/retained under carriageway.
4.08 Any confined/congested location where KMW does not have any provision
for dewatering; KMW shall seek PWA approval to proceed with the
dewatering in PWA Drainage/Storm Water Manholes available in the nearby
KMW maintenance location, if any. PWA will support the application in case
the capacity of PWA's relevant manholes at the time of the request can
accommodate additional dewatering by KMW. If it's not possible to
accommodate KMW dewatering request, KMW shall find another dewatering
solution.
4.09 PWA Design Consultant to consider Traffic Management as part of Detail

Design for accessing Pipelines.
ltem.05 Backfilling and Reinstatement
I 5.01 Phase-1 Reinstatement: KMW Is to comply with the PWA "Amendment to the
Code of Practice and Specification for Road Openings in the Highway" dated
I December 2014. (Refer to clause 5.03 below). The Public Works Authority
shall bear the cost and execution of Phase-2 Reinstatement of road ( main and
service), and parking lanes/bays paved in asphalt, when KMW undertake
future or emergency work (R04) to connect, operate or repair the potential
damage to existing KMW water pipelines under the asphalt roads. For the
only exception on this point refer to clause 3.01 (iv).
I Page 9 of 15
I
I
I
□
D J.....JD,j...>w> ,-,,..
Od,.lr DrM:r;,n ?he l e1t
KAHRA~
=-' 0
AA
--
D KMW will undertake the reinstatement works on the Verge (outside the
carriageways), including cycle lanes and sidewalks (paved in asphalt or
D others), and parking lanes/bays with Interlock because there is no phase 1

and phase 2 requirements outside of the carriageway. KMW will assess the
associated implementation cost of these reinstatement works and in case of
D high costs, a new agreement can be arranged with PWA and the MoU can be
amended accordingly. In any case, KMW is to comply with the PWA
"Amendment to the Code of Practice and Specification for Road Openings in
the Highway" dated December 2014. (Refer to Appendix 2 for protocol of
works and to clause 5.03 below).
D 5.02 PWA is to implement an inspection regime during construction to ensure that

the backfilling sections of the Code of Practice (refer to clause 5.01 above)
are fully compiled with.
0 5.03 PWA will relax their Code of Practice (refer to clause 5.01 above) for trench
reinstatements such that only Phase-1 reinstatement shall be carried out by
i] KMW. Where such relaxation is permitted the temporary asphalt's wearing
course shall be replaced with a 50mm permanent wearing course benched
300mm wider than the underlying base course. PWA shall carry out phase-2
reinstatement.
Meanwhile, PWA will assess the cost, resources, and logistics required to
undertake the Reinstatement works by PWA within the pilot projects agreed
between PWA & KM. In case a new agreement is reached between KM &
PWA, based on the outcome of these pilot projects, the MoU can be
amended accordingly
5.04 For KMW works that fall within PWA projects under construction PWA, KMW
are to follow the attached protocol of work {refer to Appendix 2).
5.05 PWA Protocol of Works is not applicable for KMW Emergency Works; KM
Contractor shall comply with PWA "Amendment to the Code of Practice and
Specification for Road Openings in Highway, dated December 2014" and QCS
2014 Specifications for Backfilling and Reinstatement.
5.06 KMW contractors carrying out the Reinstatement works may not be PWA
approved contractors.
Page 10of15
I
D .....
dfialli
J.-,lJl~ ,-h.6
-0..\ltDnftWI TM •en
0 ltem.06 Reduced Spacing between Water Utility and PWA Wet Utilities
(Drainage/Sewerage)
6.01 Minimum Horizontal Spacing (edge to edge) between Water pipelines and
D PWA Wet Utility pipelines (FS; Sewerage; TSE) shall be 3m if the MME Typical
Utility Cross Sect ions Guidelines allows it.
0 6.02 In case that MME typical utility cross sections guidelines and/or the modified
utility cross sections by PWA consultant (to accommodate both existing and
known future network) does not allow the requested spacing as per item
6.01, this clearance could be revised downward w ithout providing concrete
encasement protection. This clearance shall not be less than 1 m
6.03 In case where the proposed minimum horizontal spacing is less than 1 m,
PWA shall provide concrete encasement protection around its utilities along
the part parallel to t he water pipes.
6 .04 Minimum vertical free spacing between water pipeline and wet utilities pipelines
(FS; Sewerage; TSE) shall be 0.5 m. In case where the proposed vertical free spacing
is less than 0.5 m, KMW will review such proposal on a case by case basis.
ltem.07 Splitting of Corridors and/or Intermittent Structures within

Water Corridors and Overlapping Corridors
7.01 It is acceptable to allow splitting of corridors in case that the consultant

proposal is duly justified and already accepted by KMW to split upon written
approval.
7.02 For splitting of corridors it is critical to ensure that widths allocated due to
splitting is usable by KMW, and should be assessed on case-by-case basis, for
the benefit of the State.
I 7.03 The staking of water corridors with other corridors is not allowed.
7.04 Encroachment of PWA intermittent structures such as street lighting

I foundations, road gullies etc... to the water corridor is allowed and will be
assessed on a case-by-case basis. PWA will bear t he cost for diversion and/or
relocation of these structures by KMW on site to enable access to maintain
I KMW network, if required.
I Page 11 of 1S
I
I
0 .1r.:=-=a•
-=-=al
D
Implementation of the Agreement
D This MOU shall be implemented by:
1. PMC's and Consultants/Contractors appointed by the PWA.
2. Consultants/Contractors appointed by KMW.
3. Engineers, Technical Staff and Consultants appointed by KMW Water to review and
approve PWA design and drawing submissions.
D 4. Engineers and Technical staff appointed by MME to review and approve PWA design
and drawing submissions.

D
Changes to the Agreement
Changes or deviations to this MOU shall not be permitted without consensus agreement by
the ucc.
Applicable Laws and Dispute Resolution
This MOU shall be governed by Qatari law. In the case of a dispute the parties should seek
to resolve it amicably within a 14 day perlod. In the event that a resolution is not reached
then they should submit a joint report within 7 days to the parties top management for
resolution within another 7 days of receipt of the report.
Commencement Date
I This MOU shall be effective from the date it is agreed and signed by the parties and shall not
have a retrospective effect unless mutually agreed by the parties. This MOU shall remain in
I force until such time that the parties agree t o terminate or modified, via consensus basis.
I
I Page 12 of 15
I
‫‪II‬‬ ‫=‪,‬‬
‫""‪••Ii‬‬ ‫‪I‬‬
‫<‬
‫‪Appendix (1) -KAHRAMAA/ASHGHAL COMMITMENT LETTER‬‬ ‫‪R nliHftll‬‬

‫~‪KAHRA‬‬ ‫‪AA‬‬ ‫‪J..-...a...i,.IJ l ~_,_____b.i,‬‬
‫‪Qatar Deserves The Best‬‬
‫‪.:;,I‬‬ ‫‪O‬‬ ‫‪lh..""-‬‬
‫الصيغة النهائية للتعهد بين أشغال وكهرماء طبقا لما تم األتفاق عليه خالل اجنماع اللجنة التنسيقية للخدمات والمرافق رقم (‪ )138‬بتاريخ ‪14/6/2017‬‬
‫السيد المهندس ‪ /‬محمد ثاني المعاضيد المحترم‬

‫مـدير إدارة تخطيط شبكات المياه‬
‫المؤسسة العامة القطرية للكهرباء والماء ( كهرماء)‬

‫ص‪،‬ب ‪41 :‬‬
‫هاتف ‪4484 5988/ 5989 :‬‬
‫فاكس ‪4484 5496 :‬‬
‫الـدوحـة ‪ ،‬قـــطــر‬
‫المـشروع ‪ :‬مشاريع أشغال للطرق السريعة وتطوير الطرق المحلية والصرف الصحي‬
‫المــوضوع‪ :‬تع ّهد هيئة األشغال العامة‬
‫باإلشارة إلى الموضوع أعاله وفي إطار مراجعتكم لمخططات التصميمات المفصلة لشبكات المياه ‪ ،‬فإننا نحيطكم علما بما يلي ‪:‬‬
‫نظرا لكون الدراسات التفصيلية لمخططات الطرق والبنية التحتية وخطوط الخدمات قد أفضت إلى ضرورة م ّد‪ /‬استبقاء أجزاء من خطوط المياه القائمة‪ /‬المقترحة وغرف المحابس ذات الصلة تحت ‪ )1‬مسارات الطرق األسفلتية ‪Carriageway‬‬
‫(الرئيسية والخدمية) أو ‪ )2‬تحت حارات مواقف مواقف السيارات وممرات المشاة ومسارات الدراجات الهوائية المعبدة باألسفلت (أو غيرها) وذلك نسبة للتكلفة المرتفعة لنقل الخدمات القائمة إلى المسار الخدمي الخاص بها أو لشدة اكتظاظ شبكات‬
‫المرافق والخدمات تحت األرض وعدم توفر المساحة الكافية بمخططات مسارات الخدمات النموذجية المعتمدة من طرف وزارة البلدية والبيئة‪ ،‬فقد تم االتفاق بين أشغال وكهرماء في اجتماع اللجنة التنسيقية للخدمات والمرافق العامة رقم ‪ 123‬بتاريخ‬
‫‪ 15/02/2017‬على التالي‪:‬‬
‫أوالً‪ :‬الخدمات القائمة فى مسار الطرق األسفلتية (‪ )Carriageway‬الرئيسية والخدمية‪:‬‬

‫‌أ‪ .‬في حالة وجود الخدمات القائمة (شبكات المياه) تحت مسار الطرق األسفلتية (‪ )Carriageway‬الرئيسية والخدمية قبل أو بعد التصميم الجديد للطريق من قبل أشغال‪ :‬سيتم اإلبقاء على الخدمات فى مواقعها تحت الطرق األسفلتية الرئيسية والخدمية‬
‫وذلك نظراً للتكلفة المرتفعة لنقلها إلى المسار الخدمي الخاص بها‪ ،‬على أن تتم دراسة كل حالة حسب وضع شبكة المياه المقترح استبقاؤها من طرف استشاري الهيئة ومع التأكيد على ضرورة توفير مسار خارج الطرق الرئيسية األسفلتية لشبكات‬
‫كهرماء المستقبلية خالى من الخدمات األخرى كحل أساسي وفى حالة تعذر وجود ممر خال يتم الموافقة على وجود خدمات أخرى على النحو الموضح فى النقطة (ب)‬
‫ب‪ .‬فى حالة عدم توفر مسارات خارج الطرق األسفلتية لشبكات المياه المستقبلية نتيجة لشدة اكتظاظ شبكات المرافق‪ ،‬يتعين على أشغال تقديم طلب لالستمالكات لتوفير تلك المسارات‪ .‬وفى حال تعذر االستمالك‪ ،‬يتم تقديم كتاب من قبل إدارة تخطيط‬ ‫‌‬
‫البنية التحتية بوزارة البلدية والبيئة بما يفيد بذلك (مرفق طيه كتاب وزارة البلدية والبيئة ذو الصلة )‪.‬‬
‫مع األخذ في االعتبار اإلشتراطات التالية‪:‬‬

‫‪ .1‬بالنظر إلى النقطة (ب) وفي حالة توفر مسارات لخطوط المياه حصريا ً تحت الطريق األسفلتي‪ ،‬فإن لكهرماء الحق في استخدام المسارات لتمديد شبكات مياه جديدة أو أي استخدامات مرتبطة بالشبكة‪.‬‬
‫‪ .2‬إمكانية الصيانة والسماح لكهرماء بالقيام بأعمال الحفر المستقبلية بالطريق لتمديد وربط أو تشغيل أو إصالح األعطاب المحتملة أو الطارئة متى تطلب األمر‪.‬‬
‫‪ .3‬قيام أشغال بحماية الخدمات القائمة حسب مواصفات المؤسسة العامة القطرية للكهرباء والماء خالل مرحلة تنفيذ البنية التحتية‪.‬‬
‫‪ .4‬تتحمّل كهرماء إعادة األعمال المذكورة في النقطتين (‪ )1‬و(‪ )2‬أعاله والمتعلقة بـ ( ‪ )phase 1‬إلى وضعها األصلي حسب مواصفات أشغال عند االنتهاء من األعمال المذكورة سابقا ً وتتحمّل التكاليف المتر ّتبة عن ذلك‪.‬‬
‫‪ .5‬تتحمّل أشغال إعادة األعمال المذكورة في النقطتين (‪ )1‬و(‪ )2‬أعاله والمتعلقة بـ ( ‪ )phase 2‬إلى وضعها األصلي ويستثنى من ذلك حاالت الخلل الناتجة عن عيب تصنيعي في المواد التي ت ّم اعتمادها من قبل كهرماء أو المقاول المعيّن من طرفها‬
‫لم ّد األنابيب‪.‬‬
‫‪ .6‬أما في حالة خطوط المياه الرئيسية التي ستتسبب في ضرر كبير على الدولة في حالة وجود أي عطل فيها ‪ ،‬تدرس كل حالة وتقدر بقدرها‪.‬‬
‫ثانيا ً‪ :‬الخدمات القائمة تحت مواقف السيارات وممرات المشاة ومسارات الدراجات الهوائية المعبدة باألسفلت (أو غيرها) وفى غير ممراتها المقترحة ضمن التصميم الجديد‪:‬‬
‫تم االتفاق على إبقاء الخدمات القائمة فى مواقعها نظرا للتكلفة المرتفعة لنقلها إلى المسار الخدمي الخاص بها مع األخذ في اإلعتبار اإلشتراطات المذكورة أعاله من النقطة ‪ 1‬إلى ‪.5‬‬
‫لتجنب أي تعارضات عند طلبات فتح الطريق المقدمة من طرف كهرماء بنظام "‪ " QPRO‬أو أي سوء فهم أثناء أشغال الحفر المستقبلية لربط أو تشغيل أو صيانة خطوط المياه المطمورة تحت مسار الطريق األسفلتي او تحت حارات مواقف السيارات‬
‫ومسالك المشاة ومسارات الدراجات الهوائية المعبدة باألسفلت ( أو غيرها)‪ ،‬تتعهد هيئة األشغال العامة أيضا بما يلي‪:‬‬
‫‪ .1‬تعميم هذا االلتزام على جميع األطراف المعنية بالموافقات على طلبات فتح الطريق والمتمثلة أساسا في إدارة تشغيل وصيانة الطرق‪ ،‬موظفي أشغال مراجعي طلبات فتح الطريق بنظام "‪ ، " QPRO‬اإلدارة العامة للمرور بوزارة الداخلية‪ ،‬إدارة البنية‬
‫التحتية بوزارة البلدية والبيئة وأي جهات أخرى معنية لها عالقة بإجراءات فتح الطرق والتي تشرف عليها أشغال‪.‬‬
‫‪ .2‬إضافة مالحظة عامة بكل مخططات المشاريع في مختلف المراحل ( التصميمات التفصيلية والرسومات التنفيذية ورسومات حسب التنفيذ ) تنص على السماح لكهرماء بالقيام بأعمال الحفر المستقبلية لربط أو تشغيل أو صيانة خطوط المياه المطمورة‬
‫تحت مسار الطريق األسفلتي او تحت حارات مواقف السيارات ومسالك المشاة ومسارات الدراجات الهوائية المعبدة باألسفلت ( أو غيرها) متى طلبت كهرماء ذلك ( مع ذكر مرجع التعهد وتاريخ صدوره)‪.‬‬
‫وستقوم كهرماء بتنفيذ وتحمل تكلفة إعادة األعمال إلى وضعها األصلى‪ ،‬حيث ال يوجد (‪ )Phase 1‬و(‪ )Phase 2‬بمسارات الدراجات الهوائية ومسالك المشاة وحارات مواقف المركبات المعبدة باألسفلت‪ .‬و تم اإلتفاق على أن تقوم كهرماء (شؤون المياه)‬
‫بتجربة ذلك لفترة زمنية ودراسة التكلفة المالية المترتبة على تلك األعمال ورفعها إلى اللجنة التنسيقية للخدمات والمرافق العامة فى حالة الحاجة لذلك‪.‬‬
‫‪ - .3‬بالنسبة للمسافات األفقية والرأسية بين خطوط المياه و خدمات أشغال (‪ )FS, SW & TSE‬ونظرا لحساسية الموضوع في حاالت نفس المستوى حيث أ ّنه يتعلّق بحماية الصحة العامة‪ ،‬يجب أن توفر أشغال مسافة أفقية ال تق ّل عن ثالثة أمتار (‪ 3‬م) إذا‬
‫كانت المقاطع العرضية النموذجية للخدمات الصادرة من وزارة البلدية والبيئة تسمح بذلك‪ ،‬مع مراعاة التالى‪:‬‬
‫• في حالة ما إذا كانت المسافة األفقية المتاحة تقل عن ‪3‬م‪ ،‬يتم السماح بتوفير مساحة أفقية أقل من ‪ 3‬م طبقا لمقترح أشغال بعد دراسته على حدة وتقديره بقدره‪.‬‬
‫• في حالة ما إذا كانت المسافة األفقية المتاحة تقل عن ‪1‬م‪ ،‬يجب أن توفر هيئة األشغال حماية خرسانية لخدماتها على طول الجزء الموازي لخطوط المياه نفس المستوى‬
‫• يجب أن توفر أشغال مسافة عمودية عند تقاطع الخدمات مع خطوط المياه ال تق ّل عن نصف متر (‪ 0.5‬م) و في حالة ما إذا كانت المسافة العمودية المتاحة تقل عن ذلك يت ّم دراسة ك ّل اقتراح مقدم من طرف أشغال بهذا الخصوص على حدة و يق ّدر‬
‫بقدره‪.‬‬
‫في حال وجود أي استفسارات‪ ،‬يرجى اإلتصال بالمهندس ‪ ( /‬ذكر جهة التنسيق والخطة الوظيفية) على الهانف ( ذكر الرقم) أو عبر البريد اإللكتروني ( ذكر العنوان)‬
‫وتـفضــلوا بـقبـول فـائق اإلحــترام ‪،،،‬‬
‫إسم وصفة المُو ّقع‬

‫ممثل أشغال والمخول من طرفها إلصدار التعهد )‬
‫المرفقات‪:‬‬
‫نسخة من كتاب وزارة البلدية والبيئة ذو الصلة‬
Appendix (2) - Protocol of Work for KM contractors Requesting to work Wit hin PWA Proj ects•• Rev.OS July 2017
PWA Contractor KM Contractor GEC PM C PWA KM NOTES

( Receive Sct.eme from KM\
Kahramaa (KM)
\ Pla nning Department } Programme Management Consultant (PMC)
' -i Utilities Coordination Committee (UCC)
~ =-J
General Engineering Consultant (GEC)
Prepare Necessary 7 Days mean Working Days
r-- - - --1r--- - - --,- - - - --+-------,------+ ---tI Documentation and Submit I Request for Information (RFI)
i i i
_fL-"------- ------ --~ As,~!~:"- ~- -i A,,°!:~=f- fL_ -~ A,,°!:~!!"F™ +-~-----J

r Assess the Received
I Applicatlon
(oote b)
[ oavo j ..This Protocol only applies when there are PWA
l Contractors and Consultants on site.
·1
lDay lDay _ lDay 2Days l _
In case there are no PWA contractors and Consultants, KM
Is responsible to ensure that KM contractors comply with
QCS requirements in relation to Excavation, managing
r Prepare and Su~ it
I~- - --------------~r Prepare and Submit excavated material, backfflling operations and full site
rL Profi
= les,dand
= Sc!tout
u=;/ F~~ndt <K
><Mu~u_~~ej
l documents (note b) and In
"' lOay
coordination with GEC
10..,
documents
(note b)
Review Submitted
"'""""'""
Aco Dted
l .zo.,.,,
Plans
' - --f---1>1
r- n:n:-.-.. 1,.v 111,1....,""
clearance and to PWA O&M requirements for reinstatement
"Amendment to the Code of Practice and Specification for
Road Openings in the Highway" dated December 2014 or its
I ' following updates. Moreover, KMW has to ensure that
testing of backfilling elements shall be in accordance to
Rejected
appropriate Qatari Standards in Place.
a) Minor Schemes application is directly submitted to QPRO
[ .:.~::o;:i:. Ir----t- -- - -------+-----------+----- - - - - -- ----,e--------' ''

2.0, Major Schemes are to be submitted as per QDRS
Day~ Requirements. In exceptional cases start of works can be
infonnation on thelrproject:j'"
• requested via official letter to PWA. All initial applications
to d evelop the Mt'eSSa,Y
submitted is to clearly identify (CAD Format):
Information for coordination
• Li mits of Work
i i•~-,,J • Li ne Diagram of the Section of works to be constructed
I Prepare and Submit I Applications submitted through QPRO 2.0 will go to PWA
I
I
_10.ys
doMMnts
{note<) rj----1-------,i
'
first and assigned to PMC/GEC/PWA Contractor as needed
Applications submitted through QDRS will go to all auto

assigned parties PWA/PMC/GEC
~
b) Once the application is received by the PWA and/or its

Support GEC in on srt:e 'Re-riew/Coordir'late delegated Consultants, the information is superimposed on
1
coordination with KM
Contractor
- - ______ , - - - - - - 1- +, Submitted Documents
(note d)
- - - -- - r ----- - - - - --r -- - -- -- - --- 1 the impacted project and the following information is
provided
2Day
l
- ~----~ -- + + + -- • Assessment and Conditions Form (includes condit ions to
Rejected l Support In Escalation and
j r Support In Esaolotlon and J
be abided by KM contractor and all relevant points of
! instruction to Contract; -
J Issue resolution t hrough Bi-
t weekly~eting and UCC
I Support in Escalation and
Issue resolution through ucc lssueresotlltion
•
contact)
For PWA Projects In Concept Design KM is to Fo llow
! "under the appropriate 1lDays 2Days 12oays ~ - Cross-sections provided by KM Planning
Contract:;::;needed ,.- ~-;-- - - - - - - , - - - - - - - + - - -
•'-'°~Pt_e_d~ • For PWA Projects that is past Concept Design Applicant
L
Rec@ive Site/ Conduct Joint
•
to follow PWA Cross,..sections (approved and stamped by
KM planning department)
Roads Profiles and Setout plans By PWA (CAD Fo rmat)
Site Survey • Projects Safety plan for projects in Construction for
Joint
(note e) ~-- __
1
SiteSu~d::~stlng
Infrastructure Schemes
~ lDay (note e) j • The PWA to inform KM Construction of changes in
t ,..,.,,,__ _
projects stages/priorit ies
c) Once the information is received from PWA, KM is

Prepare and Submit
designate the relevant contractor to prepare the following
1·
Revfew Subm~~~ ' , Review Submitted

r-
I' Days
docvments
{note e)
..------._J1
r---+-+ ' Documents
{note e)
)--~--- - - -- - ---- -- ------- - - -- -~ Documents
(notee)
and coordinate with the GEC/Contractor for approval and
site handover
----f~-- - - -1- - - - ---'r~--- - -+---------- -+------------+-- - - ---l

Rejected
I
zoa-i)
•
•
In Un-Graded areas KM is to Coord inate directly with
PWA for the best way fo rward
In Graded Areas KM Contractor to Submit Shop drawings
in accordance to the received PWA Cross sections, Road
Aa:epted profiles and Setout plans (cables/pipes to be reflected in
Sta rt Construction in
,: the right corridor and at the right level)
0 accordance to the QC:S
• Safety plan in accordance to QCS standards for projects
tl j stMtd(:!e~place [ lDoy ] in construction for Infrastructure Schemes
2
~ l • General Method statement for Reinstatement/
8
II I
:
I
lo.,>s]
Safety lmple..,.tatlon /
T;=:~
j: II
•
•
Backfilling
Proposed Detailed Schedule of Works (PG format)
Excavated Material Management Plan
• Back fill Material Approval Requests (includ ing source
I! Conti nuous Coordination/
1
Continuous Coordination/
~ ~
M ortitcriri&/ O:irnage agreement)
Monitorln& / Damage
.- -- reportll'lg +- - ----- - - r - - - - - - - - - - - -r- - - - - - - - - - - - , Testing of Back filling Elements shall be in accordance to
I reportlnc
(nou,f)
:I Cable/Pipe Laying and Third J :
(note f)
+ + +
I)
appropriate Qatari Standards in Place
I
Part su,..,
II Support m Escalation and
I •ndj d) The GEC/Contractor is to coordinate the following
I
I l
(note~
Prepare and Submit Method

1
I
Issue resolution through Bl
weekly meeting and UCC
lDays
Support In ES<alation and~
ilssue resolutlon th rough UCC
2DaysL
Support In Esa>lation
2Days L
Issue resolutio n •
•
•
Review and comment on subm ittal for All Projects
Set up Kick off meeting for Projects in construction
invit ing all necessary parties
Review and agree received Safety plan and General
Statemfflt for BackOff above,

KM surroundk,g and bedding !
L _. I-->-·· Revfew Submitted
Method statement for Reinstatement/ Backfi lli ng in
accordance to the PWA requ irements for projects in
Docvments construction
rzoays {not; I)
• Agree and finalize Proposed Schedu le and Site handover
for Areas of KM Works
Rejected • The GEC is to escalate necessary issues/ concerns ea rly to
[20.,,] th·e PMC/PWA as needed
• After fi nalizat ion of all t he above and submitta l is
rI Bad:flH/ Rtfnstate in L A«epted
accepted t he GEC is to Handover t he Site to KM
I acc:::t!t:::c' 1
- -+-- - - - ~
Co ntractor
e) The PWA or PWA Delegated Engineer to direct the PWA
l
Contractor under the appropriate contract clause providing
the following information: KM Contractors Name, Contact
Details, Scope of Work and Duration
Joint lnsJ)Ktion
(note h)
L_
_j
- ~-~T-
, - Jointlnspectlon
1 Prepare and Submit

J
I
!
The KM Contractor is to follow the following upon receiving
the site
•
•
Conduct a Joint Survey with PWA Contactor
Prepare and Submit an Existing Site Condition Report,
which should include images and na rrative, hlghlighting
any issues or issues to be foreseen that might prevent
the contractor from return the site to its existing
condit ion
Revtew Submrtted • The PWA or PWA De legated Engineer is to Sign~off on
I Completion of Worts Report I_ -----✓-· Documents
t":-Days
l., ..------!
(note h) --._ (note h)
Existing Site Cond ition Report upon confirmation
f
I
Rejected f) The KM Contractor is to follow
i
?Days • To comply with QCS requireme nts in relation to HSE,
Excavation, ma naging excavated material, backfilling
A<<epted operations and full site cl earance or
• Lay Cables/Pipes in according to the Approved Shop
co..,,,.... ) Drawings (approved levels and location)
• Confirmation of cabl es/pipes location by Th ird Party
Survey
• All reports to be Submitted to GEC/Contractor on Site
• Report any Property damages to KM, the PWA, the PWA
Delegated Engineer, Property Owner and PWA
Contractor. The Proposed remedial action will be subject
to review and approval by the Property owner and the
PWA Delegated Engineer before Implantation
• Provide full documentation related to the remedial
action in accordance to QCS requirements for archiving
with Final Dossier
g) The KM Contractor to prepare a method statement for

backfilling / reinstatement specific to the area being
complete ensuring
• To comply with QCS requirements in relation to HSE,
Excavation, managing excavated materia l, backfilling
operations and fu ll site clearance or
• PWA O&M requirements for reinstatement
• Confirming that all materials used in backfi lling and sub-
base for works above KM bedd ing and surrou nding to be
in line w ith Qatari Specification and standards
• Su rplus excavated mat erials t o be t aken off site by KM
--
l _,
__[
l
Contractor
~ ~ dAITamimi ...:.._bdullah All A AI-T~ yab
• I\ \ ~ /at
,4/~ II h) Upon the Completion of KM Works and for Final Approval
~-
,_
UCC Assistant Chairman I l UCC K~ Electricity R~ resentative II r L
UCC KM Water Representative
_,
t' •
•
•
Conduct a Joint Inspection w ith PWA Contactor
Provide a Confirmation to PWA in relation to all Works
which have been put out of view at t ime of inspection
The KM Contractor to prepare a Completion of Works
1r.======r
d1..-=====• •
Report
The PWAor PWA De legated Engineer w ill co nfi rm and
sign that the Works have been underta ken to his
ll§lllillHb comp lete satisfaction (reinstatement)
J.....,,.aJJl.;....,.i..u~
I
0
--·
--- J
D "'-""""6-"-',-,,.,,
QW rOult~ 'Tile tt11
0 MOU Approval
rce upon its signing by the parties below.
Signed by: Date:
□ PWA President Kahramaa President

D
Approved by:
D
i
dullah Hamad Al Attiyah Fahad Yousef Tolefat
UCC Chairman/ Assistant of PWA President UCC Kahramaa Water Representative
D Witnessed by:
•
Abdulla Ali A AI-Theyab Ibrahim Abbas
UCC Kahramaa Electricity Representative UCC MME Representative
___
(__
._~_ - ::::>
Youssef Ibrahim AI-Homr
UCC MOI Representative UCC MME-EAD Representative
Page 15 of15
.. ,.
• ..
Ministry ofMunicipality & Urban Planning

Urban Planning & Development Sector
~··
Typical road Cross-sections and utility corridors
January 2012
Co-nsideration For Utility Detail Design
1. The utility relocations that have been proposed are in line with the authority's (Kahramaa Water, Kahramaa 12. The proposed typical cross sections covers most of the road types as per the Transportation Master Plan of Qatar
Electricity, ictQatar etc) general requirements and the necessary corridor has been allocated to satisfy these {TMPQ) and shall be directly applied to all new roads and to all roads within new subdivisions. All utility services under
relocations. However, further investigation at the detail design and at construction stage of the project must new roads shall be laid before any asphalt works are carried out. Coordination between Ashgahl and all relevant
be carried out to minimize the proposed relocations. MMUP strongly recommends that priority must be given stakeholders are required during detail design stages and prior to the implementation.
for maintaining the existing utility in their current location.
13. For future improvements, that include maintenance, redesign of existing roads, relocation of any existing utilities, or
etc... ; the new cross sections detailing the utility corridors shall be compared against. Prior to any improvements a
2. Doha Street Surveillance System (DSSS) manhole shall be placed every 250m or as per the designed requirements.
written request shall be submitted to the concerned utility provider and MMUP for approval. The cost associated with
Reference should be made to DSSS-s documentations
the improvements shall be the borne by the concerned authority.
3. All telecommunication cables including fiber optic cables, shall be accommodated within the designated
14. The concept of a utility gallery was introduced for the 64m and 86m R.O.W and at major intersections dimensions and.
telecommunication corridors. The corridors are marked with the letter 'T' on the cross section,. The cables shall be
Other details of the utility galleries are to be further studied. The galleries shall meet the utility demands and site
accommodated in a duct bank. The distribution of the ducts among telecommunication providers as well as all technical
Specific condition, including (but not limited) to gallery ventilation, lighting, utility allocation, emergency considerations
details will be provided by ict QATAR. An independent corridor of 0.5m located at both sides of the roads is reserved for
(eg. fire, pipe bust etc), operation maintenance.
Qatar Armed Force (QAF). This corridor is assigned to OAF use only.
15. The concept of utility gallery should be used if all other options were found unfeasible and it shall be restricted to a short
4. The identified standard Rights Of Way (R.O.W) (as per policy plan) were used for the allocation of the utility corridors.
distance i.e. 100m to 500m. However, for sections longer than 500m, a special case study shall be prepared and
Ideally; most of utility services are accommodated within the given R.O.W outside the carriageways. In some cases the
submitted by the relevant stakeholder (applicant) to MMUP for approval.
Width of corridors assigned for a specific utility cannot cater for all of the required utility services, Therefore some utility
may corridors have to be located under the carriageways. Service providers shall provide an accepted technical
16. Intelligent transportation system (ITS) service were added to the proposed cross sections. These cables of ITS service
solution for the alignment and construction methods. These cases shall be submitted to MMUP for consideration,
are to be laid in ducts within the electrical lighting (E) corridor in all types of road cross sections. Most of these cables
coordination with other stakenolders and approval is also required. •
will be located un'"der the road verge or under the footpaths on both sides of the road. The dimension of the duct bank
will be approx. 1m In width and about 0.6m in depth, and shall consist of two rows of 100mm diameter spare ducts. Its
5. Based on discussion with the technical team of Ashgahl (PWA), Drainage, Sewerage and Treated Sewerage Effluent
chambers shall be placed every 100m or as per the designed requirements and at intersections. Manhole and cross
(TSE) Corridors were grouped together to account for maximum flexibility in assigning the required width to the specific
road ducts shall be placed every 500m and at Intersections.
corridor. Sewer and drainage corridors are located under the carriageway. These services are normally laid deep under
the road surface (micro tunnel) and most will not generally impact traffic, provided that proper construction methods are
17. Doha street surveillance system (DSSS) manhole shall be placed every 250m or as per the designed requirements.
adopted.
Reference should be made to DSSS-s documentations
6. Positive Drainage System, using pipes and culverts shall be constructed where possible under carriageways. Where
18. All telecommunication cables, including fiber optic cables, will be accommodated within the designated
Positive Drainage System are not feasible, retention areas should be set aside to retain surface water runoff until the
telecommunication corridors. On the cross section, the corridors are marked with the letter "T". The cables will be
water has soaked into the ground; these areas are known as infiltration basins. Public parks can be also used as
accommodated in a duct bank. The distribution of the ducts among telecommunication providers as well as all technical
infiltration basins or Emergency Flood Areas.
details will be provided by ict QATAR. An independent corridor of 0.5m located at both sides of the roads is reserved for
Qatar armed force (QAF). This corridor is assigned to QAF use only.
7. Soakaway are not recommended. They should only be used as a last. Soakaway shall be appropriately designed
taking into consideration all other utilities.
19. The identified standard rights of way (R.O.W) (as per policy plan) were used for the allocation of the utility corridors.
Ideally; most of utility services are accommodated within the given R.O.W outside the carriageways. In some cases the
8. All the future proposals for each utility provider shall be designed and aligned within their designated corridor/s.
Width of corridors assigned for a specific utility cannot cater for all of the required utility services, Therefore some utility
Exceptions will be considered in special cases where the designated utility corridor width does not fulfill a specific
corridors have to be located under the carriageways, such cases are limited. Service providers shall provide an
technical need, thus requiring additional corridor width. In such cases coordination shall be carried out with adjoining
accepted technical solution for the alignment and construction methods. These cases shall be submitted to MMUP for
utility provider and their approval shall be sought. Also a request shall be submitted to MMUP for consideration and
consideration, coordination with other stakeholders and approval.
approval. This procedure shall follow the MMUP's flow chart for "Utility Impact Assessment"
20. Based on discussion with the technical team of Ashgahl (PWA), drainage, sewerage and treated sewerage effluent
9. The proposed cross-sections have been derived based on consultation with all the relevant stakeholders; however it is
{TSE) Corridors were grouped together to account for maximum flexibility in assigning the required width to the specific
MMUP's understanding that not all the designated corridors will be utilized by the assigned services authorities.
corridor. Sewer and drainage corridors are located under the carriageway. These services will normally be laid deep
Therefore, upon coordination and mutual agreement between utility authorities, further refinement / modification of the
under the road surface {micro tunnel) and mostly will not be affected by the traffic loads.. ,_ .. . •• .••• .
cross-sections can be undertaken to ensure optimum and most cost effective utilization of the ROW is achieved I.P''~•~•,:Y-••hJ
provided that proper construction methods are adopted. -flt' .,,,,...,,.,,,i.:i,,....-.,,~
10. Connection points: The points connecting new utility services, aligned as per new proposed cross sections, and the
:W.:: )l~of~-,p.l,~ a:l"INO ll.crug
l'tl,.,.!'b:,tf lr~:S.stoo
existing utility services laid as per Qatar Highway Design Manual (QHDM). For each individual utility services, the -- - - ---
connection points shall be studied and a technical solution to be develop and agreed upon.
11. Manuals: after acceptance and adoption of the new proposal, the road cross section shall replace the existing sections
in all used manuals in the state of Qatar. The technical team will review and amend accordingly all related sections in all
applicable technical manuals.
21. Positive drainage system, using pipes and culverts shall be constructed where possible under carriageways. Where 35. Manuals: after acceptance and adoption of the new proposal, the road cross section shall replace the existing sections
, Positive drainage system are not feasible, retention areas should be set aside to store surface water runoff until the in all used manuals in the state of Qatar. The technical team will review and amend accordingly all related sections in all
water has soaked into the ground; these areas are known as infiltration basins, Special land shall be designated as applicable technical manuals.
Infiltration basins. Public parks can be also used as infiltration basins or emergency flood areas.
22. Soakaway are not recommended. They should only be used as a last option to positive drainage system or retention
areas (infiltration basins).Soakaway shall be appropriately designed taking into consideration all other utilities. This
design shall be approved by PWA and MMUP.
23. For existing roads where the available R.O.W is insufficient to fulfill the utility requirements and the acquisition of
additional land is not possible, then a utility gallery concept can be used to accommodate the utility services.
24. Most of the utility services can be accommodated inside the utility gallery; however utilities such as sewer and drainage
that depends on gravity are excluded from the utility gallery.
25. Different options for utility galleries were provided. Agreement in principles of adopting utility galleries among all
stakeholders was reached. However, all stakeholders are kindly requested to add any specific requirement which they
may require.
26. All utility services within the R.O.W must be constructed, or appropriate and sufficient ducts and manholes/ chambers
be placed and accepted by MMUP and the relevant utility providers prior to the commencement of roads/ carriageways
construction. The appointed consultant/contractor for design and construction of the infrastructure projects shall
produce a utility execution p lan during the concept and detail design of the project. This plan shall be approved from all
utility Providers, PWA and MMUP and they shall strictly adhere to it.
27. Utility services that are dependent on gravity such as drainage and sewer shall be designed in close coordination with
the site grading and road level plans.
28. As a standard construction practice all deep services, such as sewer and drainage, shall be constructed prior to
shallower services.
29. Details and method of execution procedures of each utility service shall be followed as per procedures set forth in
relevant design and construction manuals in the state of Qatar.
30. Each utility provider is obligated to design and align their services within the designated utility corridor I corridors.
Exceptions will be considered in special cases where the designated utility corridor width does not fulfill a specific
technical need, thus requiring additional corridor width. In such cases coordination shall be carried out with adjoining
utility provider and their approval shall be sought. Also a request shall be submitted to MMUP for consideration and
approval.
31. The proposed cross-sections have been derived based on consultation with all relevant stakeholders; however it is
MMUP's understanding that not all the designated corridors will be utilized by the assigned services authorities.
Therefore, upon coordination and mutual agreement between utility authorities, further refinement I modification of the
cross-sections can be undertaken to ensure optimum and most cost effective utilization of the row is achieved.
32. Connection points: The points connecting new utility services, aligned as per new proposed cross sections, and the
existing utility services executed as per Qatar highway design manual (QHDM). For each individual utility services, the
connection points shall be studied and a technical solution to be found and agreed upon.
33. Marker system: It is strongly recommended to use an electronic marker system for each individual utility which will
enable field personnel to uniquely identify underground facilities in the field to correlate to plant maps or in the absence
of maps. Such a system will reduce the amount of time and excavation required to locate and access specific Mohamed Abdah
underground facilities.
34. Detail design of the utility gallery: The gallery options shall be studied further. Technical limitation and safety issues
shall be considered. Specific gallery cross section for specific situation to be prepared. The technical team to discuss
-
' -' "'
~~Mai,
Hassan Oasem MOOamed Ehdris1
Mohab M Zaki
Khal1fa Buhaztaa ~
(}1 • V
each individual case and responsibility of each stakeholder to be determined and agreed upon. Maintenance of the
n... Jan uarv 2012 · •
utility gallery's civil structures shall be the responsibility of the PWA
.., , CS·02
2of 2
llll-iiitt4•:J•t◄•iitJ•&fi#i■c•1it:i1111111Wi1••8i1,•1lii•1;il1iYd;~=Ml1:J•fi.i•#tl
NOTES:
1_ ';;-.;.~~~~=t:: ltl MILLII.IE:TERs UNLESS
ALL VERil CAL OIME NSIONS GIVEN ARE tJ.lt-l IMUPJI FRoM
2
- GROUND/SURFACE IN MILLIMETERS.
AU. HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR IJTIUTV

3- RESERVATIONS AA£1N METERS.
CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN AA!! ONLY TO BE USED AS

4- GUIDELINES AND MAV BE SUBJECT TO MODI FICA110NS
FOR INDI\I\DUAL PROJECTS As REQUIRED \MTH
1 2_M CORRIDOR
_____ - -----'- ENGINEERS AFf'FtOVAL
10M CORRIDOR ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
- ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ~
ROAD CORRIDOREDGE ROAD CORRIDOR E OGE 5. =;:i;-;o:~il:~R~~~:;r~/~~~:~~~~~
South 2000 3650 r- 2500 1850 North South
West I--
S-H_AR
_ E_
4000
D....:U:..::S;;
E::...P-A_T_H~-t-- C
-A
3650
_R_R_,clA
~G~EW
1 2500
- 'A_Y_ -l---=
pA
.:,R:ocK
::,.:IN
'--cG
1850
~ 4-,Fc'.;O,C:::O'=T,---
North
East
TO IMPI.EMENltNG THESE CROSS SECTIONS.
West CYCLE CARRIAGEWAY PARKING FOOT

PATH
East BAY PATH
FOR THE lJTIUTtES PLACED UNOER n-iE GARRIAGl:;VIIA,Y
G. n-tElR ACCESS POINTS MUST BE P\..ACEO AT 11-tECENTRE..
LANE BAY
I
I
OF "THE RO/lO I.NIE.
~
~
I
~ 1/~% - 1
2%
t:
2% PGL 2% 2%
, '
I 600 mm MIN) ELECTRICITY (TRANSMISSION)
600mm MIN) 900mmMIN) Road /Gro nd 900mm MIN)
Road I Grou d Surface ELECTRICITY (DISTRIBUTION)
Surface
E ELECTRICITY
(L+ITS) (SlnHtl Lighting~ lnlolligent Traffic Sy.tom)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(Qatar ArrMd force,)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
•
0
0
0 0
0 <'I
~ SEWERAGE
SURFACE WATER
2900
..
TREATED SE\NERAGE EFFLUENT)
WATER
cw cw CN CHILLEO WATER
DSSS DOHA SURVEILLANCE

LOCAL URBAN ACCESS -12m CORRIDOR SECURITY SYSTEM
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS-10m CORRIDOR
(RESIDENTIAL) ONE WAY SYSTEM GAS GAS
(RESIDENTIAL), ONE WAY SYSTEM
Water
1. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP TO
12M CORRIDOR
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
~- , _ROAD CORRIDOR EOGE
FINISHED GROUND LEVEL~900mm.
South 2500 3000 r- 3000 2200 1300 North 2. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF
SERVICE CONNECTION/SERVICE DUCTS
West CYCLE LANE CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY PARKING FOOT East TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL~600mm
BAY PATH (SERVICE CONNECTIONS WILL CROSS
OTHER UTILITY RESERVES.
Electricity
~ 2%
~
L r PGL ~ ~ 3. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF CABLE
_.rr==, 9 Lv•60011m, Hr-eoomm & EH>r-1100mm
□
'
I
600mm MIN) l v=600 Hv=800 & Ehv=1100
MMUP TYPICAL
Road / Ground
Surlace
900mm MIN) CROSS SECTION
WITH TYPICAL
UTILITY CORRIDOR
.,,.,...,..,,...,...•........,,,~....
. _ , > ~ l ~ ! J il,!~liJ\jJ
0
g
N
Atillillly ofM1111wpaliiy a: UrbiA

Uiban PWllling & Dmlopmcr,r S«ror
Hassan Qage-m, McharMCI E,drisi

MahabM Za.l<I
cw ; .~at,--:~ }
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS -12m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL),
°"''" CS-U-10/12.()()2~J'~-·- , 019
Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning I Urban Planning ~ Development Sector /Hassan Qasem
NOTES:
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION & UTILITY ALLOCATION FOR NEW URBAN ROADS AU. DIMENSIONS AAE IN MILLII.IElERS UNLESS
\, OlliERIMSE STAlEl.
ALL VERTICAL 011'-IENSLONS GIVBJ ARE MINIMUM FROM

2. GROU/11D/SURFACE. IN M!lUMETERS
ALI. HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS S""1M>J Faff UTILITY

3. RESERVATIONS MEIN METERS
CROSS SECTIONS SHQlAoN ARE ONLY TO BE USEC NS

4- GU.CELJNESANO MAV eE. SUBJECT TO MOOIFICATlONS
FOO INOIVIDUAL PRoJECTS AS REQUIRE□ Vla1TH
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
COORDINATION AAD AGRl:EMEN't IS REOUI RED lMTH THI:
North South North
South S MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL MD URBAN Pl.ANl\llNG PRIOR
TO iMf'tEMENTlNG THESE CROSS SECTIONS
West CORRIDOR WIOTH
East West _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _..;.
CO -=-R
'--"R
-'-'l"'-
DO =R
-'--'--'
Wl.;-CD___
TH.:......._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ E_a_s_t--1 FOR IBE I.IllUll Es PLACEO UNCER THE C/\RRIAGEWAV
6 THEIR ACCESS POINTS MUST BE Pl.ACED AT 1l<E CENTRE.
I
OF THE ROAD LANE
2500 2500 3000 3000 2500 2500 3300 550 3650 3650 2500 50 3300
SHARED USE PARKING CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY PARKING SHARED USE SHARED USE CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY PARKING a: SHARED USE LEGEND:
PATI-l BAY BAY PATH PATH BAY LU
LL.
PATH
u. COLOR COOING
. ia I I =
•
:::)
al
2%
• ELECTRICITY (TRANSMISSION)
800-1000mm(MIN) 600mm(MIN) E ELECTRICITY

Lv=600, Hv=800 & EHV=1100(MIN) 6QQ.gQOmm(MIN) Lv=600, Hv=800 & EHv=:1100(MIN) (LJ!!§) (Street Ug~'"1g + lnlel igenl Traffic System)
1600mm(MIN) Lv=:600, Hv=800 & EHv=1100(MIN)
Road / Ground Road I Groundsoomm(MIN) 800·1000mm(MIN) 1600mm(MIN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Surface 1200-1600mm(MIN.) 1200(MIN) Surface ~~- 1200·1600mm(MIN.) iZOO(MIN) (Qatar Amlao F<>ra•J
r'- r~~:,"
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
• SE\IVERAGE
r:11 SURFACE WATER
r·;:~;
GAS r:11
1.2 1.5
4000
i;> 1h1, 1.50
TREATED SEINERAGE EFFLUENT)
WATER
f}N CHILLED WATER
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS-16m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL) LOCAL URBAN ACCESS - 20m CORRIDOR (INDUSTRIAL) DSS8 DOHA SURVEILLANCE
1YPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1:100) SECURITY SYSTEM
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1:100)
GAS GAS
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE

ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
South North South North
West East
West CORRIDOR WIDTH East CORRIDOR WIDTH
- Water
3500 ,700 2500 3300 1- 3300 2500 700 3500 FINISHED GROUND LEVEL:900mm.
3000 1500 2500 3000 3000
I
f AlH
PARKING SHARED USE
i
SHARED USE PARKING CARRIAGEWAY 1 CARRIAGEWAY a::
:fA:i
SHARED USE BUFFER PARKING CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY BAY w 2. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF
LL.
PATH SAY SERVICE CONNECTION/SERVICE DUCTS
-
BAV LL.
~i ;;u·til f3 ~
::) TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL:liOIJmm
al
(SERVICE CONNECTIONS INILL CROSS
!!l I\ ,1 1 Q= e:i Electricity
600-900mm(MIN) ' 3. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF CABLE

Lv=600mm, Hv-<600mm & EHv=1100mm
Lv=600, Hv=:800 & EHv=110D(MIN) Lv=600, Hv::800 & EHv=1100(MIN)
600-900mm(MIN) 1 600·900mm(MIN)
800-1000mm(MIN) 1600mm(MI )
Road f Ground 600mm(MIN) 800-1000mm(MIN) 1600mm(MIN)
Road / Ground 600mm(MIN) 1200(MIN) 1200(MIN)
Surface 1200·160 mm(MIN.) Surface 1200·1600mm(MIN.) MMUP TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
WITH TYPICAL
SW UTILITY CORRIDOR
~~ ~1.,-ll~IJ<,!~li.)l,ij
{~ ..,,_,,.,..s.,,,,~,tlW
4600
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS - 20m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL)

1YPICAL CROSS SECTION {SCALE 1:100) TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
Ministry of Municipality~ Urban Planning I Urban Planning & Development Sector /Hassan Qasem
NOTES:
1. AU. DIMENSIONS MEIN M!LUMETERS UNLESS
OlliERIMSE STATED.
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE South North ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
2 ALL VEffllCAL 01 MENSIONS G 1\/EN Al'E MINIMUM FROM
East
,:~'.{ ___ iap;a isl~

West GROUND/SURFACE IN tJl!LllMETERS.
:lOOO _ _3::::000c:::..._ __,_ ~ 25c,:.00 2&00~=.......- ~ ~

=--,..-i- ,..-;. 4000~- - 3 All HORJZOOTAL (> MENSIONS SliOl'.N FOO UTIUTY
4000 2500 2500
CARRIAGEWAY - CARRIAGEWAY PARl<JNG LANDSCAPE SHARED USE RESERVATIONS ARE IN METERS.
SHARED USE LANDSCAPE PARKING
BAY PATI, 4 CROSS SEGll ONS SHO\NN ARE ONI...Y 7'0 BE USED >S
GUIDEJ.JNES ANO MAY SE SUBJECiTO MODIFICATIONS
FOR INDMDUAI. PROJECTS AS REQUIRED lMTH
El'IGI NEER'S l'PPfl.OVAL
5. COORDINATION AND AGREl;tJIENT IS REQUIRED VYITl-i lME

.;; ~ ~
(
5 M1NI STRY OF MUNICWAL MO URBN-1 PI.N,IN•NG PfflaA
TO IMPLEMENTING Tt-tESE CROSS SECTIONS
Lv=600, Hv=800 & EHv=1100(MIN) 12<J0.1600mm(MIN,) 1200(MIN)
600mm(MIN) ~ 1000mm(MIN) 1200-1600mm(MIN,) Lv=600, Hv=800 & EHv=11OO(MI NJ

600mm(MIN)
ELECTRICITY {TRANSMISSION)
E ELECTRICITY
(l+ITS) (Sln>el Ll',ll\Ung -t- lntelligen I Traffic SyslemJ
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
2.3 (Qatar Anne<! Fora•)
I 5000
I TELECOMMUNICATIONS
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS AND MINOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 24m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE

_ _ _ _ __
South
West
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,,_
CO,.. RRIDOR WIDTH
3850 3650
CARRIAGEWAY
2500
PARKING
North
East
2000
FOOTPATH
(SCALE 1:100)
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE

• SEW'ERAGE
SURFACE WATER
TREATED SEWERAGE EFFLUENT)
..
CARRIAGEWAY
BAY .. WATER
p
(;:w CHILLED WATER
Lv=600, Hv=800 & EHv=1100(MIN) 120D-1600mm(MIN.) 1200(MIN) osss DOHA SURVEILLANCE

SECURITY SYSTEM
600mm(MIN) 800-1 OOOmm(MIN) 120D-1600mm(MIN.) L,,-,600, Hv=SOO & El,v;1100(MIN)

GAS GAS
600-SOOmm(MIN)
·1~!•, •1
·_
:
'
.. .
'· .. -~~-~
•
_-_.- ,_.-
.
__
\. ..i·,!
.1
'i
I'
1.
--_(_--_·
..-; , . , .
,- - ~·
•
., -.~_r.._,,■-•.
.;
•:f~
,
,...
•I
~-'.J
. .,.:,,
-I -
11111
.
~.l~_r.~.·1
-·1
I
~
.
'
·
'
~---
P"
e'
r
l····•,
·
~
.
.,
C• •
I i. -.- >' ,,.,.,I"

~- :· ·
_
'- ··
._
: ·
Water
FINISHED GROUND LEVEL=900mm.
· \~-; ,...{;1 ·· -;., 1.0 2.3

~-.._:.~,
i , .I"
-
F•,
11!!11Jtl.bu..a..
2. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF
-~~~ '-
TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL~
(SERVICE CONNECTIONS WILL CROSS
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS ANO MINOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 24m CORRIDOR (INDUSTRIAL) OTHER UTILITY RESERVES.
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1;100) Electricity

CORRIDOR 'MDTH 3, MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF CABLE
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE South North ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE LV"600mm, Hv=aoomm & EHv=1100mm
East
West
2350 3300 3300 2350
FOOTPATH CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY FOOTPATI,
MMUP TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
WITH TYPICAL
Lv=600, Hv=SOO & EHva-11 OO(MIN) 1200-1600mm(MIN.) 1200(MIN)
UTILITY CORRIDOR
600mm(MIN) B00-1000mm(MIN) 1200-1600mm(MIN.) Lv=600, Hv=SOO& EH-F1100(MIN) ~~ ,_.;!;-IIJ,.~}&;.,:,IIJ 1,j.>J.ifliJ!i,
Road I Ground 600-000mm(MIN) (!ff, i,i,...i1~ ~ ~ ~ 4 t u . . l
Surface
AliBlluyofMtmi<ipality& l!iwl
Urbrn Pbnning& Oe-..lopmrntSmnr
GAS
Hc1111sar, Qasell\ Maliamed Elidri.sl

MohabM.Zal<i
Khail~a Buhazzaa
--- J~~ ·/J/J:J

1.0 2.3
LOCAL URBAN ACCESS AND MINOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 24m CORRIDOR (COMMERCIAL) ....,,...
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1:100) CS-U-24-002 3 ol9
Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning / Urban Planning & Developm§int Sector /Hassan Qasem
NOTES:
1 AU 0lt.le./Sl0NS ARE IN flJILllMETERS UNI.ESS
CORRIDORWO!H
OTHERMSE STA.TED
South North
West East
ROAD CORRIOOfl ED~
i ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE 2 ALL \/ERTICAL DIMEN~ONS GIVEN ARE MINIMUM FROM
J
GROUND/SURFACE lN MLU.I METERS
ALL HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS SHOI/IN FoR Ull UTY

""'
l!OtFER RESERVAllONS ME IN METERS
4 CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY TO 1!E USED As

GUl CELJNES AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO MOOIFICATl CNS
FOR INDIVIOUAL F'ROJECTS NJ REQUIRBJ \MTtt
ENGINEER'S PS'PROVAL
6
5 COORDINATION ANO AGREEM S'/T IS REQUIRED \ldTH THE
BOO·tOOOmm~.\IN) MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL ANO URBAN Pl.ANNING PRIOR
TO IMPlEMENTJNG THESE GROSS Sl;CTlONS
MINOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 32m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL)
TYPlCAL CROSS EEcTION {SGALI: 1:100)
E ELECTRIC1TY
CORRJDOR WO™ {L+ITS) (Strff1 Lighting + lntelligen!Traffie Syolem)
South North
ROAD CORR OOR EOGE West Ea&t ROAD C<lRflJ DOR EDGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
•-
{Qaler i\nned For<:eJ)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
SEWERAGE
flN SURFACE WATER
••
1200-1600mm(MIN)
12D0~1EiCIOmrn(MIN,)
.. .. TREATEO SEWERAGE EFFLUENT)
j__ __J!!!!_
- ~91.~;~-~- - · · ,>, '"
_j
'..• !lL'.C,.'.; L'.~~
(!)JI
DSSS
WATER
CHILLED WATER
DOHA SURVEILLANCE
SECURITY SYSTEM
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 32m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1.100) GAS GAS
CCRRiOORWOIH
South North
ROAO CORRIDOR EDGE W8st East ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
Water
FINISHED GROUND LE'/EL,.900mm,

SERVlCE CONNECTION/SERVlCE DUCTS
TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL~GOO-nm
(SERVlCE CONNECTIONS WILL CROSS
Electricity
3. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF CABLE
Lv=600mm. Hv=OOOmm & EHr-1100mm
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 32m CORRIDOR (INDUSTRIAL) MMUP TYPICAL

TYPICAL CROSs SEcnON (SCALE 1.100)
CC..,DOR 'MOTH
CROSS SECTION
ROAD COAAIOOR EDGE
South
West
North
East
WITH TYPICAL
ROAD CORRID!lR EDGE
UTILITY CORRIDOR
~
AlicimyofMuniciptlfty&UdwiPl
.; Urb3n Planninga: Da·dopmm s,uw
Maliamoo Abdoh
Olree1« «Trataipol'tdon h!dlnfrffluetJr• Plannlng Oep:mner,t
Hasaa11 Qasam, Mol'laroed Eltdrisl
Kha!la /4.
Moh•b M. Zaki
/J?J J
Ja.1uary2012 /// P ....,...
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 32m CORRIDOR (COMMERCIAL) """"' CS-U-32-002
Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning/ Urban Planning & Development Sector /Hassan Qasem TYPICAL CllOSS SECTION (SCALE 1:100) 4019
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION & UTILITY ALLOCATION FOR NEW URBAN ROADS NOTES:
1 AI.L ClMENSI ONS ARE IN Ml LLI MEIERS UNLESS
OTHEFMISE STATED.
CORRIDOR \MOTH ~ ALL VEITTlCAL OIMENSlONS GIVEN AAE MINIMUM FROM

GROUNOISURFACE IN MILUME'T'ERS
\ North AO CORRIDOR EDGE
ROAD CORRIDOR ED East 3 AI.L HOfilZONTAI. OIMENSlONS SHO\MJ FOR LITIUTT
REseRVATIONS ARE IN METEAS
4 CROSS SECTIONS SH~ ARE ONLYlO BE USED AS

3650 3000 GUI OEUNES AND MAY BE SUR.JECT TO MOOIFICATImas
3650
FOOTPATH FOR INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS AS REQUIRED 'IMTH
FOOTPATH CARR EWAY ENGINEEffS Mffli1IIAL
5. COORDINATION AND AGREEMENT IS REQUtREO 'IMTli Tl1E

M1NISTRY OF fJIUNICI PAL ANO URBAN ~t>IING PRIOR
PGL TO I MPL9.!eNTING THESE CROSS l!i e:cnoNs,
2%
Lv:600, Hv=SOO & EHv=1100(MINJ 1200-1600mm(MIN.) Lv-=600, Hv=SOO & EHv:1100(MIN)

600--BOOmm MIN)
800-1000mm(MINJ 600mm(MINJ
1600(MIN) ELECTRICITY (TRANSMISSION)
ELECTRICITY (DlSTRIBUTION)
~ 4000
- I
3.2 ,(16 3.1
I 5500 I
E ELECTRICITY
(l.+ITS) (SINlot Llgiting.,. lntoligent Traffic Systom)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(Q•!a• Armo~ Force•)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
•
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 40m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL)
SEV';ERAGE
CORRIDOR \MOTH
South North ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
SURFACE WATER
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE West East
3500 ;»I)!) 1500 1500 1500 3650 3850 3500
SHARED USE PATtt SERV1CE ROAD MEOIAN CARRI EWAY SERVICE ROAD SHARE O USE PATH
WATER
cw CHILLED WATER

SECURITY SYSTEM
Lv:600, Hv=800 & EHv=1100(MIN) 1200-1600mm(MIN)
800-1OOOmm(MI ~) GAS GAS

1600(MIN)
., Water
3.2 3.1 FINISHED GROUND LEVEL:900mm.
4000 5500
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR - 40m CORRIDOR WITH SERVICE ROAD IF REQUIRED (RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL) TO FINISHED GROUND lEVEL=600mm
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1:100) (SERVICE CONNECTIONS WILL CROSS
Elec1r1city
CORRI DOR \MOTH 3. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF CABLE
Lv=600nrn, Hv=800mm & EH\r-'1100mm
South North ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE West East 1--- - -- -- -
3500
SHARED USE ?ATH
3500
SERVI CE ROAD
1500
ME DIAN
3650 1500
ME DIAN
3500
SERVI CE ROAD
3500
SHARED USE PATH
MMUP TYPICAL
CARRI EWAY
CROSS SECTION
2% WITH TYPICAL
2%
UTILITY CORRI DOR
Lv=600, Hv=600 & EHv=1100(MIN) 1200·1600mm(MIN )
Lv:600, Hv:800 & EHv--1100(MIN)
600-900mm MIN) ..,;t,-11 ~ I J ~~I •~\jJ
800-1000mm(MIN) 600mm (MIN) ~1..,.-11 .1:!'.J••:.lt, ~ · e,u.J
1600(MIN)
Minls1frofMunicipality& Ud,,nPl..ni.
Urhm Plan,,~& Drn!Dpmm S(cror
T T
~ cw Moliamed Abdah
rl!du d T~adon AnCI lnfrmruct\lro P l ~ De~,.
a.1 Has5MI Q.asem. Moh.imed Eliciisi

3.2 Moliob M. Zaki
5500
Khoiro &hazzao /JM (
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR WtTH SERVICE ROAD - 40m CORRIDOR (INDUSTRIAL)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE1:100) JM~20!1? •///~
o., ,~. CS.U-40-002
5of 9
Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning/ Urban Planning & Development Sector IHassanQasem
~
- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- = = =- - - ...1..'.::========~====-
CI.II Roi, fell! ll-.g\'ta!<I\MM1JPOAT"81.SEWlell,__Ul' STANDARD C R O S S ~ - . d w g
1 /\I.I. rnMENSI ONS ARE IN ~~LLIM!al"ERS UNLESS
Oll<ERV\IISE STATED.
2 All VERTIC/11. DIMENSIONS GIVEN ARE MINIMUM FROM

GROUNDl'SURFACE IN Ml LUMETERS
l A1.L HORIZONT/11. Oll~SIONS SHOIIIIN FOR. UTILITY

RESERVATIONS ARE IN METERS
4 CROSS SECTIONS SHO'M,1 NE ON..V TO SE USED /AS

ourcELINES AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO MODIFlcA1lONS
FOR. INDIVIDUAi. PROJECTS AS REQUIRED Will<
ENGINEER'S APPROVAL
5 COOROINATION AND AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED VVlTH TtlE

CORRIDOR 'MOTH MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AND URBAN R..ANNING PRIOR
TO IIIIR.EMENTl NG THESE CROSS SECTIONS.
South North
West East
ROAD CORRIOOR EDGE LEGEND:
3650 3850
3650 2500 3400 MEDIAN 3650 3650 3500 MEDIAN COLOR CODING
SHARED USE PATI, PARKING SERVICE ROAD VARIES- --F+----===~ CA
_R_R_I -t--
EW- AY___:=:.......--f~ ~ - = ~- -'i
3500 3650
CARR 81/AY
3650
VARIES
3400
SERVICE ROAD
2500
PARKING
BAY
I, 3650
SHARED USE PATH
"t ~tE~LS '

p
A.,t ~t I C
•
E
{!,,+ITS)
ELECTRICITY
\Slnlot Ligh~ng ~ lntelliganl Traffic System)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
••
Lv:600, Hv:800 & EHv=1100(MIN) (Qatar Armlld fc:ircaaJ
1200-1600mm(MIN,) Lv=600, Hv=eoo & EHV"1100(MIN)
600-900mm(MIN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS
800-1000mm(MIN)
SEWERAGE
• SURFACE WATER
3.M
VARIES
3.G
VARIES
•• (M
WATER
CHILLED WATER
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR WITH SERVICE ROAD - 50m CORRIDOR (COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL) DOHA SURVEILLANCE
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DSSS
(SCALE 1:100) SECURITY SYSTEM
GAS GAS
CORRIDOR \MOTH
South North
~ ,.....,.,.,_... f'""'"'"' ~
West East
Water
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
3850 3650 1. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP TO
MEDIAN
3850
SHARED USE PATH I 2500
PARKING
3400
SERVICE ROAD VARIES
3650 3500 3500 3850
CARRI 8NAY
3850 MEDIAN
VARIES SERVICE ROAD PARKING
BAY
SHARED USE PATH
2.
FINISHED GROUND LEVEL=OOOmm.
MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF
t ~iAt3 ~B ."f
SERVICE CONNECTIONISERV1CE DUCTS
6
jy. A~ S,1I~ 1"' TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL=600mm
(SERVICE CONNECTIONS VVILL CROSS
Electricity
Lv=600mm, Hv=800mm & EH-r-11 OOrnm
Lv=600, Hv=BO0 & EHv=11 00(MINJ 1 20 Lv=600, Hv:800 & EHv=11 00{MI N)
600-900~ IN)
eoomm(MINJ
~-~--::;::::::::::::::::::i..._ _______~-~~-~-_ _ 0-
_ •7 7- - -s-oo
_._1o_oo
_m_m
_<~M-1N
f-J- ~ - - - - -
MMUP TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
WITH TYPICAL
3.2
3.85
VARIES
3.G
VARIES UTILITY CORRI DOR
~
5500
MinisttyofMnnkipality& Ur.
MAJOR URBAN COLLECTOR WITH SERVICE ROAD - 50m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL) ~n l'bnning& D<.tlof"""'t S«t OI
MohamodAbdah
OirQelor Qf Tll!l~PQrt.l;ltion Im lfflrostuetul4 PliiMing O.~rrt
Hassan Qssem, Mohamad E:liQ-isi
M<Jlieb Id Z.ki
o.,r1r CS-U-50-002 Bof9

Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning/ Urban Planning & Deyelopm'?nl Sector /Hassan Oasem
~ llol: Pc\11 D - . g - . O IIATA!IASE\IAC!1111E'1,1!fJP8TAlilAROCAOSSSECOONS\Slandald~
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION & UTILITY ALLOCATION FOR NEW RURAL ROADS -NOTES:
- ---
1 .All OIME'NSliOf'IIS AAE IN M ILLIMETERS UNLESS
OTHERIMSE STAlcD
~ AU 1/ERTicAL OIME.NSIONS GIVEN AAE MINIMUM FROM

GROUND/SURFACE IN f.ttLLIMETERS
J l<LL HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS SHO\/\JN FOR UTILITY
RESERVATIONS />FE IN METERS
4 CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ARE ONLY TO BE USED AS

GUIDELINES A'ID MAY BE: SUBJECT TO r,KlOIFICA,lloNS
FOR IOOMCUAL PROJECTS As REQUIRED wrrn
ENGINEER'S M'f'Rrnl>I..
5. COORDINATION /',NO AGREEMENTIS REOUIREO IMTH THE

MINISTRY OF MUNICtPAL AND URBAN PLANNING PRIOR
TO IMPLB,.IENnNG THESE CROSS SEC110NS
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
ROAD CORRIOOR EOOE North
East
South
West
LEGEND:
COLOR CODING
E ELECTRICITY
{!,-+ITS) (StrMI Lighting + lntlllligenl Traffic Sy.lorn)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
\Qat.ar Armed force•)
15700
15700 • TELECOMMUNICATIONS
2500 woo
2000 2SOO ~ 1lllltCYCI! LR I:
• SEWERAGE
FORSSlOPE tJI
=-- ~ SURFACE WATER
('~AAA>·
..
•
L...ioo. 11..aoo & EHv=1100(MIN)
•
WATER
~ CHILLED WATER

SECURITY SYSTEM
5J5 1.1
GAS GAS
RURAL ARTERIAL - 64 M CORRIDOR PROPOSED
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION NTS
S(FM) SEWERAGE FORCE WJN
ROAD CORRIDOR EllGE Wat.er

ROAll CORRIDOR EDGE
North 1. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP TO
South East FINISHED GROUND LEVEL-..OOO!nm.
West 4()000
11~
200ll SER\IICE CONNECTION/SERVICE DUCTS
TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL=600mm
(SERVICE CONNECTlONS WILL CROSS
2000
2000 Elactricity
Lv=600mm, Hv=800mm & EH>P1100mm
L,-600, Hv:800 & EH¥=1100(MIN)

600·900rrcn!MN)
1200-16(10mrn(MIN )
MMUP TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
-~~---■,
a.--------------- --~ ,-, - -i.·_· - ..-'.
cw
WITH TYPICAL
0. " JIL .__ '..·:= _ ._} UTILITY CORRIDOR
~.:. .. ' -: - -- Jt _ -,; , - . . J us
,...t,,,_Jl~IJ ~..YU.Ju,
.,..,..,,....,.._.,,.......,,tlW
RURAL ARTERIAL - 40 M CORRIDOR PROPOSED
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION ~ MlniJtr,ofMnnicip.illty& Urlm
lhban Pbnni!g et Dadopmrnt Scaor
MohamedAbd..tl
Olr«tor (If TrampOl'te'llon Md lnt~1rud\JIO Planning O e ~
Hasun Qa:1e:m1 Mohamed Ell~si
-_..,,
Moh•b M. Z,11<1
Kl1al1!a 8uhau&a
Je,,ua,y20~ •
""'"·
CS-R-40/64--002
""''" 7 019
Ministry
CA!lllot ~
of M_l,!nicipalily Urban Planning/ !)rban Planning & Oeve!opment..;_:..; Sector
P:lt1Drddng-AUPDATABASEIAAC!il\lfWMUP8TANDARIICROSSSECTIONSIS'Mdanl.........tlondwg /Hassan
_:..;______....:.,:______Qasem
_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _L .:-:::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::~:::::::::::::::__.
------------ -- -- -- - - -~=----=--
1 H.L OlM9'Sl0NS AAE IN Milli METERS UNLESS
OTHERVV'ISE STATED
2 ALL VERTI CAI. 01 MENSIONS mVEN AAE MINIMUM FROM

GROUND/SURFACE 1N I.ILU METERS,
3 AU. H<JRJZONTAI. OlMENSIONS Si'f()\/\jN FOR VTIUlY

RESERVATIONS NIE IN MElffiS
4. CROSS SEC110NS SHOIMJ ARE ON..Y TO BE USED AS

GUIOEUNES AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO t.fODtF1CATIONS
FOR lr-,IDMOUAL PROJEC'TS A9 REQUIRED VVITH
ENGINEER'S lff'FIDVAL
5 COORllfNATION NID AGREEMENT IS RECIVIRED WITH THE

MINISTRY OF MUN ICI PAl ANO UflBAN ~ N G PRIOR
TO IMPLEMENTING THESE CROSS SECTlONS..
ROAD CORRIDOR EoGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
South North LEGEND:

West East
CORRICOR 'MOTH COLOR CODING
• ELECTRICITY (DISTRIBUTION)
4000 2000 1200 2800 2800 1200 3050
SERVICE ROAD
I: ELECTRICITY
(l.~ (S1teol Ligl>U"g + ln,.mg•n1 Traffic System)
PGl
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
••
(Qatar MTlOd forcos)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Lv-800, Hv-8-00 & EHva1100(MIN) Lll"OOII. H,-,800 &EH,...1100{MIN)
1200-1600mm(MIN.) S00-1000mm(MIN)
SEWERAGE
••
1200(MIN)
SURFACE WATER
-
..
2.Q 3.15 2.65 WATER
URBAN ARTERIAL- 64m CORRIDOR ( COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL) ~ CHILLED WATER

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1: 200)
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE DOHA SURVEILLANCE
osss SECURITY SYSTEM
South North
West East
GAS GAS
S(FM) SEWERAGE FORCE MAIN
2000 3500 3850 4000 4000 3850 3850 3500 4000 ◄551l
Water
MEDIN'l MEDWI CMRw;EWAY CARRPAGEWAY CARRtAG~AY BUFFER SER"1CEROAIJ BLIFFER 5HAR£ USE PAfH
SHARE USE PATH 8\.IFFE/1 SERVIC~ ROM> BUFFER CARRIAGEWAY CARRIAGEWAY ~ARRIAGEWAY 1. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP TO
FINISHED GROUND t.EVEL:900mm.

TO FINISHED GROUND LEVEL:4l00mm
(SERVICE CONNECTIONS WLL CROSS
OTHER UTILITY RESERVES,
Electricity
Lv:eoomm, Hv:600mm & Ettr-1100Tim
LV"SOO, H.-IIOO & EH'r'1100(MIN) L,,..;ocJ, Hv-800 lo EH,..1100(MIN) LV"'SOO, Hv-800 & EHV" 1100\MIN)
800-lOOOmm(MIN)
MMUP TYPICAL
11.W.O.
CROSS SECTION
I.Ji
WITH TYPICAL
UTILITY CORRIDOR
URBAN ARTERIAL • 64m CORRIDOR (RESIDENTIAL}
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION (SCAl.E 1;200)
~ y,,1,-Jl~IJ:l,!.1¥1iJ!}J
,....,..,,_,...,,.,.,,.........,,tlW
Minin'l' afMimi<ipdity& Udm
lJtbin Fhiini11&:Dc-.dopmcmSea111
Moliomod Abdah
airt<:1.0f Of Trahe~ hid [nhD&tn.dw"e Plann11g [)epertm,tflt
liauan QBHHT\ Moliamad Elim"fsj

M"l!_ab M, Zaki
Kllallfa Buhazzaa
~
_.,
Januo,y201/ 1 1
o., ,,. CS-U-64-003

8of9
Ministry of Munlci_pality_& Urban Planning I Urban Planning & Development Sector /Hassan Oasem
- - - - -
t. ALL DIMENSIONS NIE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED
2 All VERTICAL OIMENSIONS GIVEN ARE MINlMUM FFtOM

GROUNDl'SURFAC~ IN MILLIMETERS.
3. ALL ~oRIZONTAl. OIMENSIONS SHOWN FOO UTILITY

ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE RESERVATIONS N>£1N METERS
ROAO CORRIDOR EDGE
North 4 CROSS SECTIONS SHOr./Yfll ARE ONLY TO l:if:. USED AS
South East GU10ELINES mo MAY BE SUBJECT TO MCJOll'lCAno,.js
West CORRIDOR 'WIDTH
FOR INOI\/IOVAL PROJEcTS As REOlJI RED WITH
ENGi NEER'S 1'Pl'ROIIAL
l I
5. COOROINAllON AND AG REEMENT lS REQUIRED lNITt-1 TH:
MINISTRY CF MIUNICI PAL ANO URBAN PUJINHG flf'idaR.
TO IMl'l.EMe<TING ntESE CROSS SECTIONS.
•~
•ooo isoo 1,00
'"""'
CAARIAOEWA~
SERVICE: Ro.AO I PARKING
BAY
UF ER
I~ ~~~~ J i!,
LEGEND:
COLOR CODING
• ELECTRICITY {TRANSMISSION)
• ELECTRICITY (DISTRIBUTION)
ELECTRICITY
(SlrHt Ughling • lnlellgent Traffic Sy•tom)
Roacl /Gmund
--
Si.Jrtace TELECOMMUNICATIONS
(Qatar Armed Fo"""')
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
.,.,.
E
SEWERAGE
10,15 15.35
2.0
--
1W SURFACE WATER
64m CORRIDOR TREATED SEWERAGE EFFLUENT)

lYPICAL CROSS SECTION [SCALE 1 2"0)
.. .. WATER
(SPECIAL CASE 1)* (NJ CHILLED WATER

SECURITY SYSTEM
GAS GAS
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
Nor1h
South East
West CORRIDOR 'WIDTH
S(FM) SEV,,:::RAGE FORCE MAIN
Water
3000 3050 3850 3600 3650 SOOD 2000 '4000 2600 1500 3000 1. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP TO
W<OSOl'E CYCLE SERVICE. R ~ PARK.I Kl 1JFFE.R FOOiPAlli
ANISHED GROUND LEVEL=900mm.
• •
W<DOCN'E CARRIAGEWA AARIJ,,;.!l'/AY
~~~ j
TRACK
!,
ltlttitll'll8 {P~ §i ~ r--"~ >
i @ i!,
(SERVICE CONNECTIONS \MLL CROSS
Electricity
Old I G«Jllnd
Surfaai >
i Lv=60Dmm. H>P800mm & EHv=1100mrn
MMUP TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
10.15 t!LJS
2.0
WITH TYPICAL
64m CORRIDOR UTILITY CORRIDOR
TYF' ICAL CROSS SECTION (SCALE 1 200)
~
0
8
-.:-
(SPECIAL CASE 2)* Mohom>dAbdah

Oicect<lr i:;,l'T~portaioo hld I n t ~ • • Plillnng ~
Ha! un Qi!lsem. Moh amad Eliai.si
10000 10000 Moltsb M Zaki
........,,,
* GALLERY DIMENSIONS AND ARRANGEMENTS OF PIPES TO BE ADJUSTED AS REQUIRED n., •~· CS-U-64-003 il ol9
Ministry of Municipality & Urban Planning I Urban Planning & Development Secto r /Hassan Oasem
.,. .
NOTES:
SPEC!AL CASE: 64m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION@ INTERSECTION t . AI.L.D1t.lENSIONSAAEIN MILLIMETRES UNLESS
OTIHS<l'\IISE STATED
2 ALL VERTICAL DIMENSIONS GIVEN ARE MCNIMutd FROM

GROUNOISURF'AGE IN MllUMEm:ES
ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE EXISITING ROAD:

ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
FOR FUTIJRE IMPROVEMENTS, THAT INClUOE MN~ ,
South North REDESIGN OF EJQSTI NG ROAOS, RE!.OCATION OF NfY
R L C/L R/L East EJQ SITING UTILll1 ES, 00 ETC.. ; THE NEW CROSS SECTIONS
West ~4000 ow DETAfUNG THE UTIU"N COMOORS SHAL.l. SE COMPARED
AGAINST l=!RlOR. TO AJN IMPROVEMENTS A \I\IRiTIEN
REQUEST SHALL BE SUBIAITTEO TO THE CONcrnNED unuTV
f'RO\IIOER /IND MMUP FOR APPR<JIIAI. THE COST
2000 ASSOCIATED \MTIH TIHE lf,IPROIIEMElfTS IMU. llE BIJROEN OF
2000
THE CONCERNED AU'IHORlTY.
n oo Cycle
'200
Cy<l•
TAllt:k
Sld8Willlk Ttai;IC 1200
ftince Fent:
l5D LEGEND:
Shy
••
COLOR COOING
,o.sa 4
3 Lane Cen'iageway Me Ian
A ELECTRICln' (DISTRIBUTION)
EC
C
UC
..,
1200
UC
FC m~ki1
ELECTRICITY
(Slreat Lightrig + lntallig■nt Traffic S)'s~m)
(RW) TELECOMMUNICATIONS
ca-
••
(Q~!ar Armed Force,)
{RW TELECOMMUNICATIONS
8Q0-101)(1 rmi(MIN> 1BCD(MINJ

BCQmmjMIN)
-• SEWERAGE
SURFACE WATER
GAS
S(FM)
4,35 !.16 2.1111 • ~
DSSS
WATER
CHILLED WATER
DOHA SURVEILLANCE
SECURITY SYSTEM
GAS GAS
10000 SE'M:RAGE FORCE MAIN

10000
Underpass Section - 64m Corridor OPTION 1 S(FM)
SCALE NTS
ROAD CORIRJDOR EOGE ROAD CORRIDOR EDGE
South North
RL C/L R/L East Waler
West ~4000 ...2:tf_
FINISHED GROUND LEVEL=OOOmm.
2000 2000
,oaoo c,... zzoo 2. MINIMUM COVER FROM TOP OF
Cyda
Trod< 3YMCffllcl
_· ~gswa
~ y_ _ _ __ _ 1200 T'°'" s-..1k SERVICE CONNECTION/SERVICE DUCTS
Fence f&nc ..,

350
(SERVICE CONNECTIONS 'MLL CROSS
Electricity
"
2400
Shauldcr
•
M ·,
LV"'600rnm, Hv=SOOrnm & EHv=1100mm
EC 1200
Shy
1200
Shy
MMUP TYPICAL
CROSS SECTION
(RW)
9- 3
WITH TYPICAL
(R'N
UTILITY CORRIDOR
~t,.,..11~\f:l.,!~liJUJ
~i.,...ll.71jSa:11J~ljtl.W
L ~ . Hv-800 & EHIF'110D(MIN)

eoo IMl{MINJ
Lv-6()0, Hv-800 & EH.,.1100(MINJ
121JQ-160Dmm(MIN ) 800•lOOOrnm(MIN)
800-1000 rnm(MIN) 121JM8D0mm(MIN} l200(MIN)
S{FM)
2.0 00 Al 1.0 2.4 2.0 1.75
Underpass Section - 64m Corridor OPTION 2

SCALE NTS

Guidelines For Utility Impact Assessment For Local Roads in Developed Areas MME 2012 Cross-Section

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Guidelines For Utility Impact Assessment For Local Roads in Developed Areas MME 2012 Cross-Section

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MINISTRY OF MUNICIPALITY

1.1 Document Control and Distribution

1.2 Procedures for Submission

1.3 Acronyms and Terminology:

2.0 PROCEDURE FOR UTILITY ASSESSMENT

3.0 ABOVE GROUND FEATURES

3.1 Street Lighting Columns

3.2 Stormwater Gullies

3.4 Gantries, Traffic Lights, Signage and Street Furniture

4.0 APPROVAL PROCESS

4.1 IPD-MME’s Initial Approval

4.2 No Objection Certificates from Utility Providers

4.3 IPD-MME’s Pre-Construction Approval

4.4 IPD-MME’s Final Approval

Utility Investigation by Legend:

Topography Survey, including Document and Report

New Road Existin g Road

Relocate/Divert Protect and Adjust Levels "Keep As Is"

Seek Alternative Recommend Adjust Level

~t,..wJt 4,:fc:>::l'J ¼""'½1 I ~.,ljJ

Final Report to MMUP

Project Documentation Submission:

LOCAL ROAD AND DRAINAGE

• All drawing entities should be by layer.

Prepared by: Muhsin Kuhutan

PROJECT DOCUMENTION SUBMISSION Page 1 of 10

TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE

TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APPR.

TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE

53591031 53591030 53591029 53591027

 /D ST (1 ,167$//('$/21*35(9,286$/,*10(17  0DLQRIILFH

 % 7 54 (;,67,1*:$7(53,3(72%('((3(1('726$7,6)<

 F6  F5~ ~ - l .'---1---------,-------'--..,.------.../F6  67$1'$5'&29(5'(37+6$1',167$//('$/21*

---·-·-·-· -----4bm -~ - 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS

···- ..~ - LEGEND:

~~~ ELECTRICITY HV/EHV CABLE+

- - .... - - ELECTRICITY EHV CABLES

~ - ~~~ ELECTRICITY MV CABLE+

... ... ... - · - - · - ELECTRICITY LV CABLE

_r ---"'- GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)

i /✓ (Sheet 001 Cont. on END)

I 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS

GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)

-------- -- ~ - PROJECT CODE:

---------- -=---=/ c:.----,__________ _

-------~-,, _______./--'--Fo'-'-~ -----------9 '~s\'--~~J--::rc--~ -: ;J \_~ __, c __ r:________ --------_- -_-}- -

AUTHORITY & GPR SURVEY DATE SCAI.E(A1)

1--- - - - - - - " l J__!--------

GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)

1--- - - - - - - - " l J__!.--------

'l/' \ --- - - r _Pw_4_9)- .' 1r \~ ------F1'~.f'=

POTABLE WATER SERVICES

REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER

i _::_-: -_: _-: -_: ,--:,:-::-_::_-: -~ -::-_::_1

k-- -~~--- ----~7 - - - - -

1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS

SURVEY AND OOREDOO DATA.

r- --~ ' 1--'\--------~----T ------\, · 1.,._il~l_14:!-'-'-:Jl•.JljJ

N 388500 '-' I , DESIGNED STATIJS

- - - - FOUL SEWER PIPELINE

GPR SURVEY (CONCORD)

FOUL SEWER PIPELINE

/D ST (1 ,167$//('$/2135(9,286$/,10(17 0DLQRIILFH

% 7 54 (;,67,1*:$7(53,3(72%('((3(1('726$7,6)<

F6 F5~ ~ - l .'---1---------,-------'--..,.------.../F6 67$1'$5'&29(5'(37+6$1',167$//('$/21*

-------~-,, _______./--'--Fo'-'-~ -----------9 '~s\'--~~J--::rc--~ -: ;J \_~ , c r:________ --------_- -_-}- -

---~~ - _ ,_,,________ I/ P.O.Box: 22 188